Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Experimental Brain Research 3/2012

01-10-2012 | Research Article

Dual-task practice enhances motor learning: a preliminary investigation

Authors: Hui-Ting Goh, Katherine J. Sullivan, James Gordon, Gabriele Wulf, Carolee J. Winstein

Published in: Experimental Brain Research | Issue 3/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Practicing a motor task under dual-task conditions can be beneficial to motor learning when the secondary task is difficult (Roche et al. in Percept Psychophys 69(4):513–522, 2007) or when it engages similar processes as the primary motor task (Hemond et al. in J Neurosci 30(2):650–654, 2010). The purpose of this pilot study was to determine which factor, difficulty level or engaged processes, of a secondary task is more critical in determining dual-task benefit. Participants practiced a discrete arm task in conjunction with an audio-vocal reaction time (RT) task. We presented two different RT tasks that differed in difficulty, simple versus choice (i.e., more difficult), at two different arm task phases that differed in engaged processes, preparation versus execution, resulting in four dual-task conditions. A simple RT task is thought to predominantly engage motor execution processes, therefore would engage similar processes as the arm movement task when it is presented during the execution phase, while a choice RT task is thought to engage planning processes and therefore would engage similar processes too when it is presented during the preparation phase. Enhanced motor learning was found in those who engaged similar process as the primary task during dual-tasking (i.e., choice RT presented during preparation and simple RT presented during execution). Moreover, those who showed enhanced learning also demonstrated high dual-task cost (poor RT task performance) during practice, indicating that both tasks were taxing the same resource pool possibly due to engaging similar cognitive processes. To further test the relation between dual-task cost and enhanced learning, we delayed the presentation timing of the choice RT task during the preparation phase and the simple RT task during the execution phase in two control experiments. Dual-task cost was reduced in these delayed timing conditions, and the enhanced learning effect was attenuated. Together, our preliminary findings suggest that it is the similarity hypothesis and not the difficulty hypothesis that mediates the enhanced motor learning under dual-task conditions.
Literature
go back to reference Adcock RA, Constable RT, Gore JC, Goldman-Rakic PS (2000) Functional neuroanatomy of executive processes involved in dual-task performance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97(7):3567–3572PubMedCrossRef Adcock RA, Constable RT, Gore JC, Goldman-Rakic PS (2000) Functional neuroanatomy of executive processes involved in dual-task performance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97(7):3567–3572PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Cahill L, McGaugh JL, Weinberg NM (2001) The neurobiology of learning and memory: some reminders to remember. Trends Neurosci 24(10):578–581PubMedCrossRef Cahill L, McGaugh JL, Weinberg NM (2001) The neurobiology of learning and memory: some reminders to remember. Trends Neurosci 24(10):578–581PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Cross ES, Schmitt PJ, Grafton ST (2007) Neural substrates of contextual interference during motor learning support a model of active preparation. J Cogn Neurosci 19(11):1854–1871PubMedCrossRef Cross ES, Schmitt PJ, Grafton ST (2007) Neural substrates of contextual interference during motor learning support a model of active preparation. J Cogn Neurosci 19(11):1854–1871PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Fleury M, Bard C, Audiffren M, Teasdale N, Blouin J (1994) The attentional cost of amplitude and directional requirements when pointing to targets. Q J Exp Psychol 47A(2):481–495 Fleury M, Bard C, Audiffren M, Teasdale N, Blouin J (1994) The attentional cost of amplitude and directional requirements when pointing to targets. Q J Exp Psychol 47A(2):481–495
go back to reference Guadagnoli MA, Lee TD (2004) Challenge point: a framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. J Mot Behav 36(2):212–224PubMedCrossRef Guadagnoli MA, Lee TD (2004) Challenge point: a framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. J Mot Behav 36(2):212–224PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hemond C, Brown RM, Robertson EM (2010) A distraction can impair or enhance motor performance. J Neurosci 30(2):650–654PubMedCrossRef Hemond C, Brown RM, Robertson EM (2010) A distraction can impair or enhance motor performance. J Neurosci 30(2):650–654PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hiraga CY, Garry MI, Carson RG, Summers JJ (2009) Dual-task interference: attentional and neurophysiological influences. Behav Brain Res 205(1):10–18PubMedCrossRef Hiraga CY, Garry MI, Carson RG, Summers JJ (2009) Dual-task interference: attentional and neurophysiological influences. Behav Brain Res 205(1):10–18PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kantak S, Winstein CJ (2012) Learning-performance distinction and memory processes for motor skills: a focused review and perspective. Behav Brain Res 228:219–231PubMedCrossRef Kantak S, Winstein CJ (2012) Learning-performance distinction and memory processes for motor skills: a focused review and perspective. Behav Brain Res 228:219–231PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Klapp ST (1996) Reaction time analysis of central motor control. In: Zelaznik HN (ed) Advances in motor learning and control. Human Kinetics, Champaign, pp 13–35 Klapp ST (1996) Reaction time analysis of central motor control. In: Zelaznik HN (ed) Advances in motor learning and control. Human Kinetics, Champaign, pp 13–35
go back to reference Klingberg T (1998) Concurrent performance of two working memory tasks: potential mechanisms of interference. Cereb Cortex 8(7):593–601PubMedCrossRef Klingberg T (1998) Concurrent performance of two working memory tasks: potential mechanisms of interference. Cereb Cortex 8(7):593–601PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Klingberg T, Roland PE (1997) Interference between two concurrent tasks is associated with activation of overlapping fields in the cortex. Cogn Brain Res 6(1):1–8CrossRef Klingberg T, Roland PE (1997) Interference between two concurrent tasks is associated with activation of overlapping fields in the cortex. Cogn Brain Res 6(1):1–8CrossRef
go back to reference Lang N, Siebner HR, Ernst D, Nitsche MA, Paulus W, Lemon RN, Rothwell JC (2004) Preconditioning with transcranial direct current stimulation sensitizes the motor cortex to rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation and controls the direction of after-effects. Biol Psychiatry 56(9):634–639. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.07.017 PubMedCrossRef Lang N, Siebner HR, Ernst D, Nitsche MA, Paulus W, Lemon RN, Rothwell JC (2004) Preconditioning with transcranial direct current stimulation sensitizes the motor cortex to rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation and controls the direction of after-effects. Biol Psychiatry 56(9):634–639. doi:10.​1016/​j.​biopsych.​2004.​07.​017 PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Lee TD, Swinnen SP, Serrien DJ (1994) Cognitive effort and motor learning. Quest 46:328–344CrossRef Lee TD, Swinnen SP, Serrien DJ (1994) Cognitive effort and motor learning. Quest 46:328–344CrossRef
go back to reference Li Y, Wright DL (2000) An assessment of the attention demands during random—and blocked-practice schedules. Q J Exp Psychol A 53(2):591–606PubMed Li Y, Wright DL (2000) An assessment of the attention demands during random—and blocked-practice schedules. Q J Exp Psychol A 53(2):591–606PubMed
go back to reference Miller JO, Low K (2001) Motor processes in simple, go/no-go, and choice reaction time tasks: a psychophysiological analysis. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27(2):266–289PubMedCrossRef Miller JO, Low K (2001) Motor processes in simple, go/no-go, and choice reaction time tasks: a psychophysiological analysis. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27(2):266–289PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Mirabella G, Pani P, Ferraina S (2008) Context influences on the preparation and execution of reaching movements. Cogn Neuropsychol 25(7–8):996–1010CrossRef Mirabella G, Pani P, Ferraina S (2008) Context influences on the preparation and execution of reaching movements. Cogn Neuropsychol 25(7–8):996–1010CrossRef
go back to reference Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113PubMedCrossRef Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Olivier I, Rival C, Bard C, Fleury M (2003) Aged-related differences in the attentional cost of pointing movements. Neurosci Lett 338(2):169–173PubMedCrossRef Olivier I, Rival C, Bard C, Fleury M (2003) Aged-related differences in the attentional cost of pointing movements. Neurosci Lett 338(2):169–173PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Roche RA, Commins S, Agnew F, Cassidy S, Corapi K, Leibbrand S, Lipson Z, Rickard J, Sorohan J, Wynne C, O’Mara SM (2007) Concurrent task performance enhances low-level visuomotor learning. Percept Psychophys 69(4):513–522PubMedCrossRef Roche RA, Commins S, Agnew F, Cassidy S, Corapi K, Leibbrand S, Lipson Z, Rickard J, Sorohan J, Wynne C, O’Mara SM (2007) Concurrent task performance enhances low-level visuomotor learning. Percept Psychophys 69(4):513–522PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Ruthruff E, Van Selst M, Johnston JC, Remington R (2006) How does practice reduce dual-task interference: integration, automatization, or just stage-shortening? Psychol Res 70(2):125–142PubMedCrossRef Ruthruff E, Van Selst M, Johnston JC, Remington R (2006) How does practice reduce dual-task interference: integration, automatization, or just stage-shortening? Psychol Res 70(2):125–142PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Salmoni A, Sullivan S, Starkes J (1976) The attention demands of movements: a critique of the probe technique. J Mot Behav 8(3):161–169 Salmoni A, Sullivan S, Starkes J (1976) The attention demands of movements: a critique of the probe technique. J Mot Behav 8(3):161–169
go back to reference Schmidt RA, Lee TD (2005) Motor learning concepts and research methods. In: Schmidt RA, Lee TD (eds) Motor control and learning: a behavioral emphasis, 4th edn. Human Kinetics, Champaign, pp 301–320 Schmidt RA, Lee TD (2005) Motor learning concepts and research methods. In: Schmidt RA, Lee TD (eds) Motor control and learning: a behavioral emphasis, 4th edn. Human Kinetics, Champaign, pp 301–320
go back to reference Schumacher EH, Schwarb H (2009) Parallel response selection disrupts sequence learning under dual-task conditions. J Exp Psychol Gen 138(2):270–290PubMedCrossRef Schumacher EH, Schwarb H (2009) Parallel response selection disrupts sequence learning under dual-task conditions. J Exp Psychol Gen 138(2):270–290PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Wickens CD (2002) Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theo Issues Ergonomics Sci 3(2):159–177CrossRef Wickens CD (2002) Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theo Issues Ergonomics Sci 3(2):159–177CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Dual-task practice enhances motor learning: a preliminary investigation
Authors
Hui-Ting Goh
Katherine J. Sullivan
James Gordon
Gabriele Wulf
Carolee J. Winstein
Publication date
01-10-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Experimental Brain Research / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 0014-4819
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1106
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3206-5

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

Experimental Brain Research 3/2012 Go to the issue