Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Experimental Brain Research 2/2007

01-09-2007 | Research Note

Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on the excitability of the leg motor cortex

Authors: Dean T. Jeffery, Jonathan A. Norton, Francois D. Roy, Monica A. Gorassini

Published in: Experimental Brain Research | Issue 2/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the human motor cortex at an intensity of 1 mA has been shown to be efficacious in increasing (via anodal tDCS) or decreasing (via cathodal tDCS) the excitability of corticospinal projections to muscles of the hand. In this study, we examined whether tDCS at currents of 2 mA could effect similar changes in the excitability of deeper cortical structures that innervate muscles of the lower leg. Similar to the hand area, 10 min of stimulation with the anode over the leg area of the motor cortex increased the excitability of corticospinal tract projections to the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle, as reflected by an increase in the amplitude of the motor evoked potentials (MEPs) evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation. MEP amplitudes recorded at rest and during a background contraction were increased following anodal tDCS and remained elevated at 60 min compared to baseline values by 59 and 35%, respectively. However, in contrast to the hand, hyperpolarizing cathodal stimulation at equivalent currents had minimal effect on the amplitude of the MEPs recorded at rest or during background contraction of the TA muscle. These results suggest that it is more difficult to suppress the excitability of the leg motor cortex with cathodal tDCS than the hand area of the motor cortex.
Literature
go back to reference Agnew WF, McCreery DB (1987) Considerations for safety in the use of extracranial stimulation for motor evoked potentials. Neurosurgery 20:143–147PubMedCrossRef Agnew WF, McCreery DB (1987) Considerations for safety in the use of extracranial stimulation for motor evoked potentials. Neurosurgery 20:143–147PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Devanne H, Lavoie BA, Capaday C (1997) Input–output properties and gain changes in the human corticospinal pathway. Exp Brain Res 114:329–338PubMedCrossRef Devanne H, Lavoie BA, Capaday C (1997) Input–output properties and gain changes in the human corticospinal pathway. Exp Brain Res 114:329–338PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Fraser C, Power M, Hamdy S, Rothwell J, Hobday D, Hollander I, Tyrell P, Hobson A, Williams S, Thompson D (2002) Driving plasticity in human adult motor cortex is associated with improved motor function after brain injury. Neuron 34:831–840PubMedCrossRef Fraser C, Power M, Hamdy S, Rothwell J, Hobday D, Hollander I, Tyrell P, Hobson A, Williams S, Thompson D (2002) Driving plasticity in human adult motor cortex is associated with improved motor function after brain injury. Neuron 34:831–840PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Fregni F, Boggio PS, Lima MC, Ferreira, Wagner T, Rigonatti SP, Castro AW, Souza DR, Riberto M, Freedman SD, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A (2006) A sham-controlled, phase II trial of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of central pain in traumatic spinal cord injury. Pain 122:197–209PubMedCrossRef Fregni F, Boggio PS, Lima MC, Ferreira, Wagner T, Rigonatti SP, Castro AW, Souza DR, Riberto M, Freedman SD, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A (2006) A sham-controlled, phase II trial of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of central pain in traumatic spinal cord injury. Pain 122:197–209PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hummel F, Celnik PA, Giraux P, Floel A, Wu WH, Gerloff C, Cohen LG (2005) Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. Brain 128:490–499PubMedCrossRef Hummel F, Celnik PA, Giraux P, Floel A, Wu WH, Gerloff C, Cohen LG (2005) Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. Brain 128:490–499PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hummel F, Cohen LG (2006) Non-invasive brain stimulation: a new strategy to improve neurorehabilitation after stroke? Lancet Neurol 5:708–712PubMedCrossRef Hummel F, Cohen LG (2006) Non-invasive brain stimulation: a new strategy to improve neurorehabilitation after stroke? Lancet Neurol 5:708–712PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Iyer MB, Mattu U, Grafman J, Lomarev M, Sato S, Wassermann EM (2005) Safety and cognitive effect of frontal DC brain polarization in healthy individuals. Neurology 64:872–875PubMed Iyer MB, Mattu U, Grafman J, Lomarev M, Sato S, Wassermann EM (2005) Safety and cognitive effect of frontal DC brain polarization in healthy individuals. Neurology 64:872–875PubMed
go back to reference Liebetanz D, Nitsche MA, Tergau F, Paulus W (2002) Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability. Brain 125:2238–2247PubMedCrossRef Liebetanz D, Nitsche MA, Tergau F, Paulus W (2002) Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability. Brain 125:2238–2247PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Matsumura M, Sawaguchi T, Oishi T, Ueki K, Kubota K (1991) Behavioral deficits induced by local injection of bicuculline and muscimol into the primate motor and premotor cortex. J Neurophysiol 65:1542–1553PubMed Matsumura M, Sawaguchi T, Oishi T, Ueki K, Kubota K (1991) Behavioral deficits induced by local injection of bicuculline and muscimol into the primate motor and premotor cortex. J Neurophysiol 65:1542–1553PubMed
go back to reference McCreery DB, Agnew WF, Yuen TGH, Bullara L (1990) Charge density and charge per phase as cofactors in neural injury induced by electrical stimulation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 37:996–1001PubMedCrossRef McCreery DB, Agnew WF, Yuen TGH, Bullara L (1990) Charge density and charge per phase as cofactors in neural injury induced by electrical stimulation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 37:996–1001PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Miranda PC, Lomarev M, Hallet M (2006) Modeling the current distribution during transcranial direct current stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 117:1623–1629PubMedCrossRef Miranda PC, Lomarev M, Hallet M (2006) Modeling the current distribution during transcranial direct current stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 117:1623–1629PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Nitsche MA, Paulus W (2000) Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol (Lond) 527:633–639CrossRef Nitsche MA, Paulus W (2000) Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol (Lond) 527:633–639CrossRef
go back to reference Nitsche MA, Paulus W (2001) Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology 57:1899–1901PubMed Nitsche MA, Paulus W (2001) Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology 57:1899–1901PubMed
go back to reference Nitsche MA, Liebetanz D, Lang N, Antal A, Tergau F, Paulus W (2003a) Safety criteria for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in humans. Clin Neurophysiol 114:2220–2222PubMedCrossRef Nitsche MA, Liebetanz D, Lang N, Antal A, Tergau F, Paulus W (2003a) Safety criteria for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in humans. Clin Neurophysiol 114:2220–2222PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Nitsche MA, Schauenburg A, Lang N, Liebetanz D, Exner C, Paulus W, Tergau F (2003b) Facilitation of implicit motor learning by weak transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex in the human. J Cogn Neurosci 15:619–626PubMedCrossRef Nitsche MA, Schauenburg A, Lang N, Liebetanz D, Exner C, Paulus W, Tergau F (2003b) Facilitation of implicit motor learning by weak transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex in the human. J Cogn Neurosci 15:619–626PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Nitsche MA, Liebetanz D, Antal A, Lang N, Tergau F, Paulus W (2003c) Modulation of cortical excitability by weak direct current stimulation—technical, safety and functional aspects. Suppl Clin Neurophysiol 56:255–276PubMed Nitsche MA, Liebetanz D, Antal A, Lang N, Tergau F, Paulus W (2003c) Modulation of cortical excitability by weak direct current stimulation—technical, safety and functional aspects. Suppl Clin Neurophysiol 56:255–276PubMed
go back to reference Nitsche MA, Nitsche MS, Klein CC, Tergau F, Rothwell JC, Paulus W (2003d) Level of action of cathodal DC polarization induced inhibition of the human motor cortex. Clin Neurophysiol 114:600–604PubMedCrossRef Nitsche MA, Nitsche MS, Klein CC, Tergau F, Rothwell JC, Paulus W (2003d) Level of action of cathodal DC polarization induced inhibition of the human motor cortex. Clin Neurophysiol 114:600–604PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Nitsche MA, Seeber A, Frommann K, Klein CC, Rochford C, Nitsche MS, Fricke K, Liebetanz D, Lang N, Antal A, Paulus W, Tergau F (2005) Modulating parameters of excitability during and after transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. J Physiol (Lond) 568:291–303CrossRef Nitsche MA, Seeber A, Frommann K, Klein CC, Rochford C, Nitsche MS, Fricke K, Liebetanz D, Lang N, Antal A, Paulus W, Tergau F (2005) Modulating parameters of excitability during and after transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. J Physiol (Lond) 568:291–303CrossRef
go back to reference Nitsche MA, Niehaus L, Hoffmann K, Hengst S, Liebetanz D, Paulus W, Meyer BU (2004) MRI study of human brain exposed to weak direct current stimulation of the frontal cortex. Clin Neurophysiol 115:2419–2423PubMedCrossRef Nitsche MA, Niehaus L, Hoffmann K, Hengst S, Liebetanz D, Paulus W, Meyer BU (2004) MRI study of human brain exposed to weak direct current stimulation of the frontal cortex. Clin Neurophysiol 115:2419–2423PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Nitsche MA, Doemkes S, Karakose T, Antal A, Liebetanz D, Lang N, Tergau F, Paulus W (2007) Shaping the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. J Neurophysiol 97:3109–3117PubMedCrossRef Nitsche MA, Doemkes S, Karakose T, Antal A, Liebetanz D, Lang N, Tergau F, Paulus W (2007) Shaping the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. J Neurophysiol 97:3109–3117PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Pascual Leone A, Valls-Solp J, Wassermann EM, Hallett M (1994) Responses to rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex. Brain 117:847–858PubMedCrossRef Pascual Leone A, Valls-Solp J, Wassermann EM, Hallett M (1994) Responses to rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex. Brain 117:847–858PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Priori A (2003) Brain polarization in humans: a reappraisal of an old tool for prolonged non-invasive modulation of brain exciteability. Clin Neurophysiol 114:589–595PubMedCrossRef Priori A (2003) Brain polarization in humans: a reappraisal of an old tool for prolonged non-invasive modulation of brain exciteability. Clin Neurophysiol 114:589–595PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Stefan K, Kunesch E, Cohen LG, Benecke R, Classen J (2000) Induction of plasticity in the human motor cortex by paired associative stimulation. Brain 123:572–584PubMedCrossRef Stefan K, Kunesch E, Cohen LG, Benecke R, Classen J (2000) Induction of plasticity in the human motor cortex by paired associative stimulation. Brain 123:572–584PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Talelli P, Rothwell J (2006) Does brain stimulation after stroke have a future? Curr Opin Neurol 19:543–550PubMedCrossRef Talelli P, Rothwell J (2006) Does brain stimulation after stroke have a future? Curr Opin Neurol 19:543–550PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Thomas SL, Gorassini MA (2005) Increases in corticospinal tract function by treadmill training after incomplete spinal cord injury. J Neurophysiol 94:2844–2855PubMedCrossRef Thomas SL, Gorassini MA (2005) Increases in corticospinal tract function by treadmill training after incomplete spinal cord injury. J Neurophysiol 94:2844–2855PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Tokimura H, Di Lazzaro V, Tokimura Y, Oliviero A, Profice P, Insola A, Mazzone P, Tonali P, Rothwell JC (2000) Short-latency inhibition of human motor cortex by somatosensory input from the hand. J Physiol (Lond) 523:503–513CrossRef Tokimura H, Di Lazzaro V, Tokimura Y, Oliviero A, Profice P, Insola A, Mazzone P, Tonali P, Rothwell JC (2000) Short-latency inhibition of human motor cortex by somatosensory input from the hand. J Physiol (Lond) 523:503–513CrossRef
go back to reference Yuen TGH, Agnew WF, Bullara LA, Jacques S, McCreery DB (1981) Histological evaluation of neural damage from electrical stimulation: considerations for the selection of parameters for clinical application. Neurosurgery 9:292–299PubMedCrossRef Yuen TGH, Agnew WF, Bullara LA, Jacques S, McCreery DB (1981) Histological evaluation of neural damage from electrical stimulation: considerations for the selection of parameters for clinical application. Neurosurgery 9:292–299PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on the excitability of the leg motor cortex
Authors
Dean T. Jeffery
Jonathan A. Norton
Francois D. Roy
Monica A. Gorassini
Publication date
01-09-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Experimental Brain Research / Issue 2/2007
Print ISSN: 0014-4819
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1106
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-007-1093-y

Other articles of this Issue 2/2007

Experimental Brain Research 2/2007 Go to the issue