Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Experimental Brain Research 2/2006

01-04-2006 | Research Article

The effect of force and conformance on tactile intensive and spatial sensitivity

Authors: Gregory O. Gibson, James C. Craig

Published in: Experimental Brain Research | Issue 2/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

The effect of force on intensive and spatial processing was examined with three measures of tactile sensitivity. One of the measures based on intensive cues is the smooth-grooved (SM/GV) task, and the two other measures based on spatial cues are the grating orientation and gap detection tasks. Measures were made at two locations that vary in sensitivity and in the density of innervation of the primary afferent fibers, the right index fingerpad and the palmar surface of the proximal phalanx (fingerbase). At each location, psychometric functions were generated for each of the three measures for two forces (50 and 200 g). The results indicated that increasing force led to marked improvement on the task that relied on intensive cues; however, on the tasks that relied on spatial cues, force had no effect on performance. Biomechanical measures were made of the depth to which the skin invades the grooves of the contactors (conformance) at the two test sites, with the two forces, and with different groove widths. Conformance was found to be a joint function of force and groove width. Further, performance on the SM/GV task could be predicted by the amount of conformance. The psychophysical results are consistent with the view that increasing conformance increases neural activity in the primary afferent fibers, and that this increase in neural activity improves SM/GV performance, but has little effect on the quality of the spatial image.
Literature
go back to reference Craig JC (1999) Grating orientation as a measure of tactile spatial acuity. Somatosens Mot Res 16:197–206PubMedCrossRef Craig JC (1999) Grating orientation as a measure of tactile spatial acuity. Somatosens Mot Res 16:197–206PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Craig JC, Lyle KB (2001) A comparison of tactile spatial sensitivity on the palm and fingerpad. Percept Psychophys 63:337–347PubMed Craig JC, Lyle KB (2001) A comparison of tactile spatial sensitivity on the palm and fingerpad. Percept Psychophys 63:337–347PubMed
go back to reference Darian-Smith I, Kenins P (1980) Innervation density of mechanoreceptive fibers supplying glabrous skin of the monkey’s index finger. J Physiol 309:147–155PubMed Darian-Smith I, Kenins P (1980) Innervation density of mechanoreceptive fibers supplying glabrous skin of the monkey’s index finger. J Physiol 309:147–155PubMed
go back to reference Essock EA, Krebs WK, Prather JR (1997) Superior sensitivity for tactile stimuli oriented proximally-distally on the finger: implications for mixed class 1 and class 2 anisotropies. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 23:515–527CrossRef Essock EA, Krebs WK, Prather JR (1997) Superior sensitivity for tactile stimuli oriented proximally-distally on the finger: implications for mixed class 1 and class 2 anisotropies. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 23:515–527CrossRef
go back to reference Gibson GO, Craig JC (2002) Relative roles of spatial and intensive cues in the discrimination of spatial tactile stimuli. Percept Psychophys 64:1095–1107PubMed Gibson GO, Craig JC (2002) Relative roles of spatial and intensive cues in the discrimination of spatial tactile stimuli. Percept Psychophys 64:1095–1107PubMed
go back to reference Gibson GO, Craig JC (2005) Tactile spatial sensitivity and anisotropy. Percept Psychophys 67:1061–1079PubMed Gibson GO, Craig JC (2005) Tactile spatial sensitivity and anisotropy. Percept Psychophys 67:1061–1079PubMed
go back to reference Goldreich D, Kanics IM (2003) Tactile acuity is enhanced in blindness. J Neurosci 23:3439–3445PubMed Goldreich D, Kanics IM (2003) Tactile acuity is enhanced in blindness. J Neurosci 23:3439–3445PubMed
go back to reference Johansson RS, Vallbo ÅB (1979) Tactile sensibility in the human hand: relative and absolute densities of four types of mechanoreceptive units in glabrous skin. J Physiol 286:283–300PubMed Johansson RS, Vallbo ÅB (1979) Tactile sensibility in the human hand: relative and absolute densities of four types of mechanoreceptive units in glabrous skin. J Physiol 286:283–300PubMed
go back to reference Johansson RS, Vallbo ÅB (1983) Tactile sensory coding in the glabrous skin of the human hand. Trends Neurosci 6:27–32CrossRef Johansson RS, Vallbo ÅB (1983) Tactile sensory coding in the glabrous skin of the human hand. Trends Neurosci 6:27–32CrossRef
go back to reference Johansson RS, Landström U, Lundström R (1982) Sensitivity to edges of mechanoreceptive afferent units innervating the glabrous skin of the human hand. Brain Res 244:27–32PubMedCrossRef Johansson RS, Landström U, Lundström R (1982) Sensitivity to edges of mechanoreceptive afferent units innervating the glabrous skin of the human hand. Brain Res 244:27–32PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Johnson KO, Phillips JR (1981) Tactile spatial resolution: I. Two-point discrimination, gap detection, grating resolution, and letter recognition. J Neurophysiol 46:1177–1191PubMed Johnson KO, Phillips JR (1981) Tactile spatial resolution: I. Two-point discrimination, gap detection, grating resolution, and letter recognition. J Neurophysiol 46:1177–1191PubMed
go back to reference LaMotte RH, Srinivasan MA (1987a) Tactile discrimination of shape: responses of slowly adapting mechanoreceptive afferents to a step stroked across the monkey fingerpad. J Neurosci 7:1655–1671PubMed LaMotte RH, Srinivasan MA (1987a) Tactile discrimination of shape: responses of slowly adapting mechanoreceptive afferents to a step stroked across the monkey fingerpad. J Neurosci 7:1655–1671PubMed
go back to reference LaMotte RH, Srinivasan MA (1987b) Tactile discrimination of shape: responses of rapidly adapting mechanoreceptive afferents to a step stroked across the monkey fingerpad. J Neurosci 7:1672–1681PubMed LaMotte RH, Srinivasan MA (1987b) Tactile discrimination of shape: responses of rapidly adapting mechanoreceptive afferents to a step stroked across the monkey fingerpad. J Neurosci 7:1672–1681PubMed
go back to reference Loomis JM (1985) Tactile recognition of raised characters: a parametric study. Bull Psychon Soc 23:18–20 Loomis JM (1985) Tactile recognition of raised characters: a parametric study. Bull Psychon Soc 23:18–20
go back to reference Patel J, Essick GK, Kelly DG (1997) Utility of square-wave gratings to assess perioral spatial acuity. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 55:593–601PubMedCrossRef Patel J, Essick GK, Kelly DG (1997) Utility of square-wave gratings to assess perioral spatial acuity. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 55:593–601PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Phillips JR, Johnson KO (1981) Tactile spatial resolution: II. Neural representation of bars, edges, and gratings in monkey primary afferents. J Neurophysiol 46:1192–1203PubMed Phillips JR, Johnson KO (1981) Tactile spatial resolution: II. Neural representation of bars, edges, and gratings in monkey primary afferents. J Neurophysiol 46:1192–1203PubMed
go back to reference Sathian K, Zangaladze A (1996) Tactile spatial acuity at the human fingertip and lip: bilateral symmetry and interdigit variability. Neurology 46:1464–1466PubMed Sathian K, Zangaladze A (1996) Tactile spatial acuity at the human fingertip and lip: bilateral symmetry and interdigit variability. Neurology 46:1464–1466PubMed
go back to reference Smith AM, Gosselin G, Houde B (2002) Deployment of fingertip forces in tactile exploration. Exp Brain Res 147:209–218PubMedCrossRef Smith AM, Gosselin G, Houde B (2002) Deployment of fingertip forces in tactile exploration. Exp Brain Res 147:209–218PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Stevens JC, Choo KK (1996) Spatial acuity of the body surface over the life span. Somatosens Mot Res 13:153–166PubMedCrossRef Stevens JC, Choo KK (1996) Spatial acuity of the body surface over the life span. Somatosens Mot Res 13:153–166PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Stevens JC, Patterson MQ (1995) Dimensions of spatial acuity in the touch sense: changes over the life span. Somatosens Mot Res 12:29–47PubMedCrossRef Stevens JC, Patterson MQ (1995) Dimensions of spatial acuity in the touch sense: changes over the life span. Somatosens Mot Res 12:29–47PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Stevens JC, Alvarez-Reeves M, Dipietro L, Mack GW, Green BG (2003) Decline of tactile acuity in aging: a study of body site, blood flow, and lifetime habits of smoking and physical activity. Somatosens Mot Res 20:271–279PubMedCrossRef Stevens JC, Alvarez-Reeves M, Dipietro L, Mack GW, Green BG (2003) Decline of tactile acuity in aging: a study of body site, blood flow, and lifetime habits of smoking and physical activity. Somatosens Mot Res 20:271–279PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Van Boven RW, Johnson KO (1994a) The limit of tactile spatial resolution in humans: grating orientation discrimination at the lip, tongue and finger. Neurology 44:2361–2366PubMed Van Boven RW, Johnson KO (1994a) The limit of tactile spatial resolution in humans: grating orientation discrimination at the lip, tongue and finger. Neurology 44:2361–2366PubMed
go back to reference Van Boven RW, Johnson KO (1994b) A psychophysical study of the mechanisms of sensory recovery following nerve injury in humans. Brain 117(Pt 1):149–167PubMedCrossRef Van Boven RW, Johnson KO (1994b) A psychophysical study of the mechanisms of sensory recovery following nerve injury in humans. Brain 117(Pt 1):149–167PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Vega-Bermudez F, Johnson KO (1999) SA1 and RA receptive fields, response variability, and population responses mapped with a probe array. J Neurophysiol 81:2701–2710PubMed Vega-Bermudez F, Johnson KO (1999) SA1 and RA receptive fields, response variability, and population responses mapped with a probe array. J Neurophysiol 81:2701–2710PubMed
go back to reference Vega-Bermudez F, Johnson KO (2001) Differences in spatial acuity between digits. Neurology 56:1389–1391PubMed Vega-Bermudez F, Johnson KO (2001) Differences in spatial acuity between digits. Neurology 56:1389–1391PubMed
go back to reference Vega-Bermudez F, Johnson KO (2004) Fingertip skin conformance accounts, in part, for differences in tactile spatial acuity in young subjects, but not for the decline in spatial acuity with aging. Percept Psychophys 66:60–67PubMed Vega-Bermudez F, Johnson KO (2004) Fingertip skin conformance accounts, in part, for differences in tactile spatial acuity in young subjects, but not for the decline in spatial acuity with aging. Percept Psychophys 66:60–67PubMed
go back to reference Werner G, Mountcastle VB (1968) Quantitative relations between mechanical stimuli to the skin and neural responses evoked by them. In: Kenshalo DR (ed) The skin senses. C.C. Thomas, Springfield, pp 112–137 Werner G, Mountcastle VB (1968) Quantitative relations between mechanical stimuli to the skin and neural responses evoked by them. In: Kenshalo DR (ed) The skin senses. C.C. Thomas, Springfield, pp 112–137
go back to reference Wheat HE, Goodwin AW (2000) Tactile discrimination of gaps by slowly adapting afferents: effects of population parameters and anisotropy in the fingerpad. J Neurophysiol 84:1430–1444PubMed Wheat HE, Goodwin AW (2000) Tactile discrimination of gaps by slowly adapting afferents: effects of population parameters and anisotropy in the fingerpad. J Neurophysiol 84:1430–1444PubMed
go back to reference Woodward KL (1993) The relationship between skin compliance, age, gender, and tactile discriminative thresholds in humans. Somatosens Mot Res 10:63–67PubMedCrossRef Woodward KL (1993) The relationship between skin compliance, age, gender, and tactile discriminative thresholds in humans. Somatosens Mot Res 10:63–67PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The effect of force and conformance on tactile intensive and spatial sensitivity
Authors
Gregory O. Gibson
James C. Craig
Publication date
01-04-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Experimental Brain Research / Issue 2/2006
Print ISSN: 0014-4819
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1106
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-0200-1

Other articles of this Issue 2/2006

Experimental Brain Research 2/2006 Go to the issue