Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Experimental Brain Research 2/2004

01-11-2004 | Research Article

Probability detection mechanisms and motor learning

Authors: O. V. Lungu, T. Wächter, T. Liu, D. T. Willingham, J. Ashe

Published in: Experimental Brain Research | Issue 2/2004

Login to get access

Abstract

The automatic detection of patterns or regularities in the environment is central to certain forms of motor learning, which are largely procedural and implicit. The rules underlying the detection and use of probabilistic information in the perceptual-motor domain are largely unknown. We conducted two experiments involving a motor learning task with direct and crossed mapping of motor responses in which probabilities were present at the stimulus set level, the response set level, and at the level of stimulus-response (S-R) mapping. We manipulated only one level at a time, while controlling for the other two. The results show that probabilities were detected only when present at the S-R mapping and motor levels, but not at the perceptual one (experiment 1), unless the perceptual features have a dimensional overlap with the S-R mapping rule (experiment 2). The effects of probability detection were mostly facilitatory at the S-R mapping, both facilitatory and inhibitory at the perceptual level, and predominantly inhibitory at the response-set level. The facilitatory effects were based on learning the absolute frequencies first and transitional probabilities later (for the S-R mapping rule) or both types of information at the same time (for perceptual level), whereas the inhibitory effects were based on learning first the transitional probabilities. Our data suggest that both absolute frequencies and transitional probabilities are used in motor learning, but in different temporal orders, according to the probabilistic properties of the environment. The results support the idea that separate neural circuits may be involved in detecting absolute frequencies as compared to transitional probabilities.
Footnotes
1
Informal questioning of the subjects after the experiment revealed that some of them (n =6) were aware of the probability distributions in the mapping condition (e.g., one color being more frequent than the other), but not in perceptual or movement ones.
 
2
The two types of stimuli are not distributed perfectly 50%–50% in this table given the fact that first stimulus in each random block is omitted from the counting (because there is no other one that precedes it).
 
Literature
go back to reference Anastasopoulou T, Harvey N (1999) Assessing sequential knowledge through performance measures: the influence of short-term sequential effects. Q J Exp Psychol 52A:423–448CrossRef Anastasopoulou T, Harvey N (1999) Assessing sequential knowledge through performance measures: the influence of short-term sequential effects. Q J Exp Psychol 52A:423–448CrossRef
go back to reference Barber P, O’Leary M (1997) The relevance of salience: towards an activational account of irrelevant stimulus-response compatibility effects. In: Hommel B, Prinz W (eds) Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility. Elsevier Science B.V., pp 135–172 Barber P, O’Leary M (1997) The relevance of salience: towards an activational account of irrelevant stimulus-response compatibility effects. In: Hommel B, Prinz W (eds) Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility. Elsevier Science B.V., pp 135–172
go back to reference Berns GS, Cohen JD, Mintun MA (1997) Brain regions responsive to novelty in the absence of awareness. Science 276:1272–1275CrossRefPubMed Berns GS, Cohen JD, Mintun MA (1997) Brain regions responsive to novelty in the absence of awareness. Science 276:1272–1275CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Bischoff-Grethe A, Proper SM, Mao H, Daniels KA, Berns GS (2000) Conscious and unconscious processing of nonverbal predictability in Wernicke’s area. J Neurosci 20:1975–1981PubMed Bischoff-Grethe A, Proper SM, Mao H, Daniels KA, Berns GS (2000) Conscious and unconscious processing of nonverbal predictability in Wernicke’s area. J Neurosci 20:1975–1981PubMed
go back to reference Bischoff-Grethe A, Martin M, Mao H, Berns GS (2001) The context of uncertainty modulates the subcortical response to predictability. J Cogn Neurosci 13:986–993CrossRefPubMed Bischoff-Grethe A, Martin M, Mao H, Berns GS (2001) The context of uncertainty modulates the subcortical response to predictability. J Cogn Neurosci 13:986–993CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Bischoff-Grethe A, Goedert KM, Willingham DT, Grafton ST (2004) Neural substrates of response-based sequence learning using fMRI. J Cogn Neurosci 16:127–138CrossRefPubMed Bischoff-Grethe A, Goedert KM, Willingham DT, Grafton ST (2004) Neural substrates of response-based sequence learning using fMRI. J Cogn Neurosci 16:127–138CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Cleeremans A, McClelland JL (1991) Learning the structure of event sequences. J Exp Psychol Gen 120:235–253CrossRefPubMed Cleeremans A, McClelland JL (1991) Learning the structure of event sequences. J Exp Psychol Gen 120:235–253CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Cohen A, Ivry R, Keele S (1990) Attention and structure in sequence learning. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cog 16:17–30CrossRef Cohen A, Ivry R, Keele S (1990) Attention and structure in sequence learning. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cog 16:17–30CrossRef
go back to reference Dassonville P, Zhu X-H, Lewis SM, E FH, Kim SG, Ugurbil K, Ashe J (1997) Choice and stimulus-response compatibility: effect on cortical motor activation. Soc Neurosci Abs 23:1948 Dassonville P, Zhu X-H, Lewis SM, E FH, Kim SG, Ugurbil K, Ashe J (1997) Choice and stimulus-response compatibility: effect on cortical motor activation. Soc Neurosci Abs 23:1948
go back to reference De Jong R (1997) Compatibility effects on performance and executive control in dynamic task setting. In: Hommel B, Prinz W (eds) Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility. Elsevier Science B.V., pp 223–239 De Jong R (1997) Compatibility effects on performance and executive control in dynamic task setting. In: Hommel B, Prinz W (eds) Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility. Elsevier Science B.V., pp 223–239
go back to reference Eimer M (1995) Stimulus-response compatibility and automatic response activation: evidence from psychophysiological studies. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21:837–854CrossRefPubMed Eimer M (1995) Stimulus-response compatibility and automatic response activation: evidence from psychophysiological studies. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21:837–854CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Eliassen JC, Souza T, Sanes JN (2001) Human brain activation accompanying explicitly directed movement sequence learning. Exp Brain Res 141:269–280CrossRefPubMed Eliassen JC, Souza T, Sanes JN (2001) Human brain activation accompanying explicitly directed movement sequence learning. Exp Brain Res 141:269–280CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Grafton ST, Hazeltine E, Ivry R (1995) Functional mapping of sequence learning in normal humans. J Cog Neurosci 7:497–510 Grafton ST, Hazeltine E, Ivry R (1995) Functional mapping of sequence learning in normal humans. J Cog Neurosci 7:497–510
go back to reference Hazeltine E, Grafton ST, Ivry R (1997) Attention and stimulus characteristics determine the locus of motor-sequence encoding. A PET study. Brain 120:123–140CrossRefPubMed Hazeltine E, Grafton ST, Ivry R (1997) Attention and stimulus characteristics determine the locus of motor-sequence encoding. A PET study. Brain 120:123–140CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Heyes CM, Foster CL (2002) Motor learning by observation: evidence from a serial reaction time task. Q J Exp Psychol A 55:593–607CrossRefPubMed Heyes CM, Foster CL (2002) Motor learning by observation: evidence from a serial reaction time task. Q J Exp Psychol A 55:593–607CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hoffmann J, Sebald A (1996) Stimulus and reaction patterns in serial choice reactions. J Exp Psychol 43:40–68 Hoffmann J, Sebald A (1996) Stimulus and reaction patterns in serial choice reactions. J Exp Psychol 43:40–68
go back to reference Hoffmann J, Sebald A, Stocker C (2001) Irrelevant response effects improve serial learning in serial reaction time tasks. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 27:470–482PubMed Hoffmann J, Sebald A, Stocker C (2001) Irrelevant response effects improve serial learning in serial reaction time tasks. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 27:470–482PubMed
go back to reference Howard JH Jr, Mutter SA, Howard DV (1992) Serial pattern learning by event observation. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 18:1029–1039CrossRefPubMed Howard JH Jr, Mutter SA, Howard DV (1992) Serial pattern learning by event observation. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 18:1029–1039CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Huettel SA, Mack PB, McCarthy G (2002) Perceiving patterns in random series: dynamic processing of sequence in prefrontal cortex. Nat Neurosci 5:485–490PubMed Huettel SA, Mack PB, McCarthy G (2002) Perceiving patterns in random series: dynamic processing of sequence in prefrontal cortex. Nat Neurosci 5:485–490PubMed
go back to reference Hunt RH, Aslin RN (2001) Statistical learning in a serial reaction time task: access to separable statistical cues by individual learners. J Exp Psychol Gen 130:658–680CrossRefPubMed Hunt RH, Aslin RN (2001) Statistical learning in a serial reaction time task: access to separable statistical cues by individual learners. J Exp Psychol Gen 130:658–680CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Jimenez L, Mendez C (1999) Which attention is needed for implicit sequence learning? J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cog 25:236–259CrossRef Jimenez L, Mendez C (1999) Which attention is needed for implicit sequence learning? J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cog 25:236–259CrossRef
go back to reference Jimenez L, Mendez C (2001) Implicit sequence learning with competing explicit cues. Q J Exp Psychol A 54:345–369CrossRefPubMed Jimenez L, Mendez C (2001) Implicit sequence learning with competing explicit cues. Q J Exp Psychol A 54:345–369CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Koch I, Hoffmann J (2000) The role of stimulus-based and response-based spatial information in sequence learning. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 26:863–882CrossRefPubMed Koch I, Hoffmann J (2000) The role of stimulus-based and response-based spatial information in sequence learning. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 26:863–882CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Kornblum S, Hasbroucq T, Osman A (1990) Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility—a model and taxonomy. Psychol Rev 97:253–270CrossRefPubMed Kornblum S, Hasbroucq T, Osman A (1990) Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility—a model and taxonomy. Psychol Rev 97:253–270CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Mayr U (1996) Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 22:350–364CrossRefPubMed Mayr U (1996) Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 22:350–364CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Nattkemper D, Prinz W (1993) Processing structured event sequences. In: Bundensen C, Larsen A (eds) Proceedings of the sixth conference of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology, pp 21–22 Nattkemper D, Prinz W (1993) Processing structured event sequences. In: Bundensen C, Larsen A (eds) Proceedings of the sixth conference of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology, pp 21–22
go back to reference Nattkemper D, Prinz W (1997) Stimulus and response anticipation in a serial reaction time task. Psychol Res 60:98–112 Nattkemper D, Prinz W (1997) Stimulus and response anticipation in a serial reaction time task. Psychol Res 60:98–112
go back to reference Nissen MJ, Bullemer P (1987) Attentional requirements of learning: evidence from performance measures. Cog Psychol 19:1–32 Nissen MJ, Bullemer P (1987) Attentional requirements of learning: evidence from performance measures. Cog Psychol 19:1–32
go back to reference Rogers RD, Monsell S (1995) The cost of predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. J Exp Psychol Gen 124:207–231CrossRef Rogers RD, Monsell S (1995) The cost of predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. J Exp Psychol Gen 124:207–231CrossRef
go back to reference Sakai K, Hikosaka O, Miyauchi S, Takino R, Sasaki Y, Putz B (1998) Transition of brain activation from frontal to parietal areas in visuomotor sequence learning. J Neurosci 18:1827–1840PubMed Sakai K, Hikosaka O, Miyauchi S, Takino R, Sasaki Y, Putz B (1998) Transition of brain activation from frontal to parietal areas in visuomotor sequence learning. J Neurosci 18:1827–1840PubMed
go back to reference Schvaneveldt RW, Gomez RL (1998) Attention and probabilistic sequence learning. Psychol Res 175–190 Schvaneveldt RW, Gomez RL (1998) Attention and probabilistic sequence learning. Psychol Res 175–190
go back to reference Seidler RD, Purushotham A, Kim SG, Ugurbil K, Willingham D, Ashe J (2001) Neural substrates for encoding and expression of implicit learning. Society for Neuroscience Seidler RD, Purushotham A, Kim SG, Ugurbil K, Willingham D, Ashe J (2001) Neural substrates for encoding and expression of implicit learning. Society for Neuroscience
go back to reference Seidler RD, Purushotham A, Kim SG, Ugurbil K, Willingham D, Ashe J (2002) Cerebellum activation associated with performance change but not motor learning. Science. 296:2043–2046 Seidler RD, Purushotham A, Kim SG, Ugurbil K, Willingham D, Ashe J (2002) Cerebellum activation associated with performance change but not motor learning. Science. 296:2043–2046
go back to reference Stadler MA (1992) Statistical structure and implicit serial learning. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cog 18:318–327CrossRef Stadler MA (1992) Statistical structure and implicit serial learning. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cog 18:318–327CrossRef
go back to reference Willingham DB (1999) Implicit motor sequence learning is not purely perceptual. Mem Cognit 27:561–572PubMed Willingham DB (1999) Implicit motor sequence learning is not purely perceptual. Mem Cognit 27:561–572PubMed
go back to reference Willingham DB, Nissen MJ, Bullemer P (1989) On the development of procedural knowledge. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cog 15:1047–1060CrossRef Willingham DB, Nissen MJ, Bullemer P (1989) On the development of procedural knowledge. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cog 15:1047–1060CrossRef
go back to reference Willingham DB, Wells LA, Farrell JM, Stemwedel ME (2000) Implicit motor sequence learning is represented in response locations. Mem Cognit 28:366–375PubMed Willingham DB, Wells LA, Farrell JM, Stemwedel ME (2000) Implicit motor sequence learning is represented in response locations. Mem Cognit 28:366–375PubMed
go back to reference Willingham DB, Salidis J, Gabrieli JD (2002) Direct comparison of neural systems mediating conscious and unconscious skill learning. J Neurophysiol 88:1451–1460PubMed Willingham DB, Salidis J, Gabrieli JD (2002) Direct comparison of neural systems mediating conscious and unconscious skill learning. J Neurophysiol 88:1451–1460PubMed
go back to reference Young ME, Wasserman EA (2001) Entropy and variability discrimination. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 27:278–293CrossRefPubMed Young ME, Wasserman EA (2001) Entropy and variability discrimination. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 27:278–293CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Zhang H, Kornblum S (1998) The effects of stimulus-response mapping and irrelevant stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus overlap in four-choice stroop tasks with single-carrier stimuli. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24:3–19CrossRefPubMed Zhang H, Kornblum S (1998) The effects of stimulus-response mapping and irrelevant stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus overlap in four-choice stroop tasks with single-carrier stimuli. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24:3–19CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Ziessler M (1994) The impact of motor responses on serial-pattern learning. Psychol Res 57:30–41PubMed Ziessler M (1994) The impact of motor responses on serial-pattern learning. Psychol Res 57:30–41PubMed
go back to reference Ziessler M, Nattkemper D (2001) Learning of event sequences is based on response-effect learning: further evidence from a serial reaction task. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 27:595–613CrossRefPubMed Ziessler M, Nattkemper D (2001) Learning of event sequences is based on response-effect learning: further evidence from a serial reaction task. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 27:595–613CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Probability detection mechanisms and motor learning
Authors
O. V. Lungu
T. Wächter
T. Liu
D. T. Willingham
J. Ashe
Publication date
01-11-2004
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Experimental Brain Research / Issue 2/2004
Print ISSN: 0014-4819
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1106
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-004-1945-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2004

Experimental Brain Research 2/2004 Go to the issue