Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Osteoporosis International 9/2013

01-09-2013 | Original Article

Influence of recency and duration of glucocorticoid use on bone mineral density and risk of fractures: population-based cohort study

Authors: S. R. Majumdar, S. N. Morin, L. M. Lix, W. D. Leslie

Published in: Osteoporosis International | Issue 9/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Summary

Although systemic glucocorticoids are commonly used, it is difficult to obtain accurate exposure history. In 50,000 patients, we confirmed that glucocorticoids were associated with reductions in bone mineral density (BMD) and increases in fracture and documented that recent and prolonged durations of exposure were particularly associated with adverse events—dose information did not improve risk prediction.

Introduction

Systemic glucocorticoid use, defined as ever having taken supra-physiologic doses for 90-days or more, is a risk factor for low BMD and fractures. This definition does not distinguish recent (vs remote) exposure.

Methods

Within a population-based clinical BMD registry in Manitoba, Canada, we identified all adults over age 40 years tested between 1998 and 2007 and then undertook a cohort study. We identified all oral glucocorticoid dispensations from 1995 to 2009 and stratified exposure by timing (“recent” if within 12 months vs “remote”) and duration (short [<90 days] vs prolonged [≥90 days]). Osteoporosis-related risk factors and treatments and major fractures were obtained using administrative health data.

Results

A total of 12,818 of 52,070 (25 %) subjects had used glucocorticoids prior to BMD testing; the most common exposure was remote short (n = 6453) vs recent prolonged (n = 2896) vs recent short (n = 2644) vs remote prolonged (n = 825). Compared to 39,252 never-users, only recent prolonged glucocorticoid use was significantly associated with femoral neck T-score (ANCOVA-adjusted difference −0.13, 95 % CI −0.16 to −0.10, p < 0.001). There were 2,842 major (566 hip) fractures over median 5-year follow-up. Compared with never-users, only recent prolonged glucocorticoid use was significantly associated with BMD-independent increases in risk of incident major fracture (5.4 vs 7.7 %, adjusted HR 1.25, 95 % CI 1.07–1.45, p = 0.004) and hip fracture (1.1 vs 1.8 %, adjusted HR 1.61, 95 % CI 1.18–2.20, p = 0.003).

Conclusions

Recent and prolonged glucocorticoid use (but neither remote nor recent short courses) was independently associated with reduced BMD and increased risk of fractures. These findings should permit clinicians to identify a high-risk group of patients that might benefit from osteoporosis prevention.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Majumdar SR, Lix LM, Yogendran M, Morin SN, Metge CJ, Leslie WD (2012) Population-based trends in osteoporosis management after new initiations of long-term systemic glucocorticoids (1998–2008). J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97:1236–1242PubMedCrossRef Majumdar SR, Lix LM, Yogendran M, Morin SN, Metge CJ, Leslie WD (2012) Population-based trends in osteoporosis management after new initiations of long-term systemic glucocorticoids (1998–2008). J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97:1236–1242PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Lekamwasam S, Adachi JD, Agnusdei D, Bilezikian J, Boonen S et al (2012) A framework for the development of guidelines for the management of glucocorticoid induced osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 23:2257–2276PubMedCrossRef Lekamwasam S, Adachi JD, Agnusdei D, Bilezikian J, Boonen S et al (2012) A framework for the development of guidelines for the management of glucocorticoid induced osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 23:2257–2276PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Van Staa TP, Luefkens HG, Cooper C (2002) The epidemiology of corticosteroid induced osteoporosis: a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 13:777–787PubMedCrossRef Van Staa TP, Luefkens HG, Cooper C (2002) The epidemiology of corticosteroid induced osteoporosis: a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 13:777–787PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Johansson H, Oden A, Johnell O, de Laet C et al (2004) A meta-analysis of prior corticosteroid use fracture risk. J Bone Miner Res 19:893–899PubMedCrossRef Kanis JA, Johansson H, Oden A, Johnell O, de Laet C et al (2004) A meta-analysis of prior corticosteroid use fracture risk. J Bone Miner Res 19:893–899PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Van Staa TP, Leufkens HG, Abenhaim L, Zhang B, Cooper C (2000) Oral corticosteroids and fracture risk: relationship to daily and cumulative dose. Rheumatology 39:1383–1389PubMedCrossRef Van Staa TP, Leufkens HG, Abenhaim L, Zhang B, Cooper C (2000) Oral corticosteroids and fracture risk: relationship to daily and cumulative dose. Rheumatology 39:1383–1389PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Van Staa TP, Leufkens HG, Abenhaim L, Zhang B, Cooper C (2000) Use of oral corticosteroids and risk of fractures. J Bone Miner Res 15:993–1000PubMedCrossRef Van Staa TP, Leufkens HG, Abenhaim L, Zhang B, Cooper C (2000) Use of oral corticosteroids and risk of fractures. J Bone Miner Res 15:993–1000PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference De Vries F, Bracke M, Leufkens HG, Lammers JW, Cooper C, van Staa TP (2007) Fracture risk with intermittent high-dose oral glucocorticoid therapy. Arthritis Rheum 56:208–214PubMedCrossRef De Vries F, Bracke M, Leufkens HG, Lammers JW, Cooper C, van Staa TP (2007) Fracture risk with intermittent high-dose oral glucocorticoid therapy. Arthritis Rheum 56:208–214PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Johansson H, Oden A, McCloskey EV (2011) Guidance for the adjustment of FRAX according to the dose of glucocorticoids. Osteoporos Int 22:809–816PubMedCrossRef Kanis JA, Johansson H, Oden A, McCloskey EV (2011) Guidance for the adjustment of FRAX according to the dose of glucocorticoids. Osteoporos Int 22:809–816PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Oden A, Johansson H, Borgstrom F, Strom O, McCloskey E (2009) FRAX and its application to clinical practice. Bone 44:734–743PubMedCrossRef Kanis JA, Oden A, Johansson H, Borgstrom F, Strom O, McCloskey E (2009) FRAX and its application to clinical practice. Bone 44:734–743PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Leslie WD, Lix LM, Tsang JF (2007) Single-site vs multi-site bone density measurement for fracture prediction. Arch Intern Med 167:1641–1647PubMedCrossRef Leslie WD, Lix LM, Tsang JF (2007) Single-site vs multi-site bone density measurement for fracture prediction. Arch Intern Med 167:1641–1647PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Leslie WD, Caetano PA, MacWilliam LR, Finlayson GS (2005) Construction and validation of a population-based bone densitometry database. J Clin Densitom 8:25–30PubMedCrossRef Leslie WD, Caetano PA, MacWilliam LR, Finlayson GS (2005) Construction and validation of a population-based bone densitometry database. J Clin Densitom 8:25–30PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Targownik LE, Lix LM, Leung S, Leslie WD (2010) Proton pump inhibitor use is not associated with osteoporosis or accelerated bone mineral density loss. Gastroenterol 138:896–904CrossRef Targownik LE, Lix LM, Leung S, Leslie WD (2010) Proton pump inhibitor use is not associated with osteoporosis or accelerated bone mineral density loss. Gastroenterol 138:896–904CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Majumdar SR, Ezekowitz JA, Lix LM, Leslie WD (2012) Heart failure is a clinically and densitometrically independent risk factor for osteoporotic fractures: population-based cohort study of 45,509 subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97:1179–1186PubMedCrossRef Majumdar SR, Ezekowitz JA, Lix LM, Leslie WD (2012) Heart failure is a clinically and densitometrically independent risk factor for osteoporotic fractures: population-based cohort study of 45,509 subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97:1179–1186PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Influence of recency and duration of glucocorticoid use on bone mineral density and risk of fractures: population-based cohort study
Authors
S. R. Majumdar
S. N. Morin
L. M. Lix
W. D. Leslie
Publication date
01-09-2013
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Osteoporosis International / Issue 9/2013
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Electronic ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-013-2352-3

Other articles of this Issue 9/2013

Osteoporosis International 9/2013 Go to the issue