Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Osteoporosis International 1/2009

01-01-2009 | Original Article

Accounting for body size deviations when reporting bone mineral density variables in children

Authors: C. E. Webber, A. Sala, R. D. Barr

Published in: Osteoporosis International | Issue 1/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Summary

In a child, bone mineral density (BMD) may differ from an age-expected normal value, not only because of the presence of disease, but also because of deviations of height or weight from population averages. Appropriate adjustment for body size deviations simplifies interpretation of BMD measurements.

Introduction

For children, a bone mineral density (BMD) measurement is normally expressed as a Z score. Interpretation is complicated when weight or height distinctly differ from age-matched children. We develop a procedure to allow for the influence of body size deviations upon measured BMD.

Methods

We examined the relation between body size deviation and spine, hip and whole body BMD deviation in 179 normal children (91 girls). Expressions were developed that allowed derivation of an expected BMD based on age, gender and body size deviation. The difference between measured and expected BMD was expressed as a HAW score (Height-, Age-, Weight-adjusted score).

Results

In a second independent sample of 26 normal children (14 girls), measured spine, total femur and whole body BMD all fell within the same single normal range after accounting for age, gender and body size deviations. When traditional Z scores and HAW scores were compared in 154 children, 17.5% showed differences of more than 1 unit and such differences were associated with height and weight deviations.

Conclusion

For almost 1 in 5 children, body size deviations influence BMD to an extent that could alter clinical management.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Webber CE, Beaumont LF, Morrison J et al (2007) Age predicted values for lumbar spine, proximal femur and whole body bone mineral density; results from a population of normal children aged 3 to 18 years. Can Assoc Radiol J 58:37–45PubMed Webber CE, Beaumont LF, Morrison J et al (2007) Age predicted values for lumbar spine, proximal femur and whole body bone mineral density; results from a population of normal children aged 3 to 18 years. Can Assoc Radiol J 58:37–45PubMed
2.
go back to reference Jones G, Ma D, Cameron F (2006) Bone density interpretation and relevance in Caucasian children aged 9–17 years of age: insights from a population-based fracture study. J Clin Densit 9:202–209CrossRef Jones G, Ma D, Cameron F (2006) Bone density interpretation and relevance in Caucasian children aged 9–17 years of age: insights from a population-based fracture study. J Clin Densit 9:202–209CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Goulding A, Jones IE, Taylor RW et al (2000) More broken bones: a 4-year double cohort study of young girls with and without distal forearm fractures. J Bone Min Res 15:2011–2018CrossRef Goulding A, Jones IE, Taylor RW et al (2000) More broken bones: a 4-year double cohort study of young girls with and without distal forearm fractures. J Bone Min Res 15:2011–2018CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ma DQ, Jones G (2002) Clinical risk factors but not bone density are associated with prevalent fractures in prepubertal children. J Paediatr Child Health 38:497–500PubMedCrossRef Ma DQ, Jones G (2002) Clinical risk factors but not bone density are associated with prevalent fractures in prepubertal children. J Paediatr Child Health 38:497–500PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Jones IE, Williams SM, Goulding A (2004) Associations of birth weight and length, childhood size and smoking with bone fractures during growth: evidence from a birth cohort study. Am J Epidemiol 159:343–350PubMedCrossRef Jones IE, Williams SM, Goulding A (2004) Associations of birth weight and length, childhood size and smoking with bone fractures during growth: evidence from a birth cohort study. Am J Epidemiol 159:343–350PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Chevalley Y, Rizzoli R, Hans D et al (2005) Interaction between calcium intake and menarcheal age on bone mass gain: an eight year follow-up study from prepuberty to postmenarche. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:44–51PubMedCrossRef Chevalley Y, Rizzoli R, Hans D et al (2005) Interaction between calcium intake and menarcheal age on bone mass gain: an eight year follow-up study from prepuberty to postmenarche. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:44–51PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Goulding A, Grant AM, Williams SM (2005) Bone and body composition of children and adolescents with repeated forearm fractures. J Bone Min Res 20:2090–2096CrossRef Goulding A, Grant AM, Williams SM (2005) Bone and body composition of children and adolescents with repeated forearm fractures. J Bone Min Res 20:2090–2096CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ferrari SL, Chevalley T, Bonjour J-P et al (2006) Childhood fractures are associated with decreased bone mass gain during puberty: an early marker of persistent bone fragility? J Bone Min Res 21:501–507CrossRef Ferrari SL, Chevalley T, Bonjour J-P et al (2006) Childhood fractures are associated with decreased bone mass gain during puberty: an early marker of persistent bone fragility? J Bone Min Res 21:501–507CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Rauch F, Neu C, Manz F et al (2001) The development of metaphyseal cortex—implications for distal radius fractures during growth. J Bone Min Res 16:1547–1555CrossRef Rauch F, Neu C, Manz F et al (2001) The development of metaphyseal cortex—implications for distal radius fractures during growth. J Bone Min Res 16:1547–1555CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Gafni RI, Baron J (2004) Overdiagnosis of osteoporosis in children due to misinterpretation of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). J Pediatr 144:253–257PubMedCrossRef Gafni RI, Baron J (2004) Overdiagnosis of osteoporosis in children due to misinterpretation of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). J Pediatr 144:253–257PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lu PW, Briody JN, Ogle GD et al (1994) Bone mineral density of total body, spine, and femoral neck in children and young adults: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study. J Bone Min Res 9:1451–1458CrossRef Lu PW, Briody JN, Ogle GD et al (1994) Bone mineral density of total body, spine, and femoral neck in children and young adults: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study. J Bone Min Res 9:1451–1458CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Mølgaard C, Thomsen BL, Prentice A et al (1997) Whole body bone mineral content in healthy children and adolescents. Arch Dis Child 76:9–15PubMedCrossRef Mølgaard C, Thomsen BL, Prentice A et al (1997) Whole body bone mineral content in healthy children and adolescents. Arch Dis Child 76:9–15PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Warner JT, Cowan FJ, Dunstan FDJ et al (1998) Measured and predicted bone mineral content in healthy boys and girls aged 6–16 years: adjustment for body size and puberty. Acta Paediatr 87:244–249PubMedCrossRef Warner JT, Cowan FJ, Dunstan FDJ et al (1998) Measured and predicted bone mineral content in healthy boys and girls aged 6–16 years: adjustment for body size and puberty. Acta Paediatr 87:244–249PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Fewtrell MS, Gordon I, Biassoni L et al (2005) Dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the lumbar spine in a clinical paediatric setting: does the method of size adjustment matter? Bone 37:413–419PubMedCrossRef Fewtrell MS, Gordon I, Biassoni L et al (2005) Dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the lumbar spine in a clinical paediatric setting: does the method of size adjustment matter? Bone 37:413–419PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Prentice A, Parsons TJ, Cole TJ (1994) Uncritical use of bone mineral density in absorptiometry may lead to size-related artifacts in the identification of bone mineral determinants. Am J Clin Nutr 60:837–842PubMed Prentice A, Parsons TJ, Cole TJ (1994) Uncritical use of bone mineral density in absorptiometry may lead to size-related artifacts in the identification of bone mineral determinants. Am J Clin Nutr 60:837–842PubMed
16.
go back to reference Horlick M, Wang J, Pierson RN et al (2004) Prediction models for evaluation of total-body bone mass with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry among children and adolescents. Pediatrics 114:e337–e345PubMedCrossRef Horlick M, Wang J, Pierson RN et al (2004) Prediction models for evaluation of total-body bone mass with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry among children and adolescents. Pediatrics 114:e337–e345PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Sala A, Webber CE, Morrison J et al (2007) Whole body mineral mass, lean body mass and fat mass measured by dual photon absorptiometry in a population of normal Canadian children and adolescents. Can Assoc Radiol J 58:46–52PubMed Sala A, Webber CE, Morrison J et al (2007) Whole body mineral mass, lean body mass and fat mass measured by dual photon absorptiometry in a population of normal Canadian children and adolescents. Can Assoc Radiol J 58:46–52PubMed
19.
go back to reference Binkoviyz LA, Henwood MJ (2007) Pediatric DXA: technique and interpretation. Pediatr Radiol 37:21–31CrossRef Binkoviyz LA, Henwood MJ (2007) Pediatric DXA: technique and interpretation. Pediatr Radiol 37:21–31CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Accounting for body size deviations when reporting bone mineral density variables in children
Authors
C. E. Webber
A. Sala
R. D. Barr
Publication date
01-01-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Osteoporosis International / Issue 1/2009
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Electronic ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-008-0642-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

Osteoporosis International 1/2009 Go to the issue