Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Osteoporosis International 8/2007

01-08-2007 | Review

A systematic review of persistence and compliance with bisphosphonates for osteoporosis

Authors: J. A. Cramer, D. T. Gold, S. L. Silverman, E. M. Lewiecki

Published in: Osteoporosis International | Issue 8/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Summary

Fourteen reports utilizing data from de-identified administrative databases were reviewed. Studies contained at least one measure of patient persistence or compliance with bisphosphonates or bisphosphonates and other anti-osteoporosis medications. These studies confirm that women with osteoporosis have suboptimal persistence and compliance rates with bisphosphonate therapy.

Introduction

This review summarizes patient persistence and compliance with bisphosphonates for the treatment of osteoporosis.

Methods

We conducted a MEDLINE search for the period from January 1998 to May 2006, using a detailed list of terms related to persistence and compliance with anti-osteoporosis medications. Studies were included if they contained at least one measure of persistence or compliance derived from de-identified administrative databases containing patient demographics and prescription information.

Results

We reviewed 14 reports, which described 14 databases. The percentage of patients persisting with therapy for 1 year ranged from 17.9% to 78.0%. Compliance, assessed as mean medication possession ratio (MPR), ranged from 0.59 to 0.81. When comparing compliance with weekly and daily bisphosphonates, the mean MPR was consistently higher for weekly versus daily therapy (0.58 to 0.76 versus 0.46 to 0.64 for patients receiving weekly and daily bisphosphonate therapy respectively). Persistence was also improved in patients receiving weekly bisphosphonates, assessed by both length of persistence (194 to 269 days [weekly] and 134 to 208 days [daily]) and percentage of persistent patients at the end of the follow-up period (35.7% to 69.7% [weekly] and 26.1% to 55.7% [daily]).

Conclusion

Although patients using weekly bisphosphonate medication follow their prescribed dosing regimens better than those using daily therapy, overall compliance and persistence rates were suboptimal.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Woolf AD, Pfleger B (2003) Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bull World Health Organ 81:646–656PubMed Woolf AD, Pfleger B (2003) Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bull World Health Organ 81:646–656PubMed
2.
go back to reference Nairus J, Ahmadi S, Baker S et al (2000) Quantitative ultrasound: an indicator of osteoporosis in perimenopausal women. J Clin Densitom 3:141–147PubMedCrossRef Nairus J, Ahmadi S, Baker S et al (2000) Quantitative ultrasound: an indicator of osteoporosis in perimenopausal women. J Clin Densitom 3:141–147PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Frost ML, Blake GM, Fogelman (2001) Changes in QUS and BMD measurements with antiresorptive therapy: a two-year longitudinal study. Calcif Tissue Int 69:138–146PubMedCrossRef Frost ML, Blake GM, Fogelman (2001) Changes in QUS and BMD measurements with antiresorptive therapy: a two-year longitudinal study. Calcif Tissue Int 69:138–146PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Frost ML, Blake GM, Fogelman I (2001) Quantitative ultrasound and bone mineral density are equally strongly associated with risk factors for osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 16:406–416PubMedCrossRef Frost ML, Blake GM, Fogelman I (2001) Quantitative ultrasound and bone mineral density are equally strongly associated with risk factors for osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 16:406–416PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Nelson DA, Molloy R, Kleerekoper M (1998) Prevalence of osteoporosis in women referred for bone density testing: utility of multiple skeletal sites. J Clin Densitom 1:5–11PubMedCrossRef Nelson DA, Molloy R, Kleerekoper M (1998) Prevalence of osteoporosis in women referred for bone density testing: utility of multiple skeletal sites. J Clin Densitom 1:5–11PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference McCombs JS, Thiebaud P, McLaughlin-Miley C et al (2004) Compliance with drug therapies for the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis. Maturitas 48:271–287PubMedCrossRef McCombs JS, Thiebaud P, McLaughlin-Miley C et al (2004) Compliance with drug therapies for the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis. Maturitas 48:271–287PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Caro JJ, Ishak KJ, Huybrechts KF et al (2004) The impact of compliance with osteoporosis therapy on fracture rates in actual practice. Osteoporos Int 15:1003–1008PubMedCrossRef Caro JJ, Ishak KJ, Huybrechts KF et al (2004) The impact of compliance with osteoporosis therapy on fracture rates in actual practice. Osteoporos Int 15:1003–1008PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Yood RA, Emani S, Reed JI et al (2003) Compliance with pharmacologic therapy for osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 14:965–968PubMedCrossRef Yood RA, Emani S, Reed JI et al (2003) Compliance with pharmacologic therapy for osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 14:965–968PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Rossini M, Bianchi G, Di Munno O et al (2006) Determinants of adherence to osteoporosis treatment in clinical practice. Osteoporos Int 17:914–921PubMedCrossRef Rossini M, Bianchi G, Di Munno O et al (2006) Determinants of adherence to osteoporosis treatment in clinical practice. Osteoporos Int 17:914–921PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Segal E, Tamir A, Ish-Shalom S (2003) Compliance of osteoporotic patients with different treatment regimens. Isr Med Assoc J 5:859–862PubMed Segal E, Tamir A, Ish-Shalom S (2003) Compliance of osteoporotic patients with different treatment regimens. Isr Med Assoc J 5:859–862PubMed
12.
go back to reference Tosteson AN, Grove MR, Hammond CS et al (2003) Early discontinuation of treatment for osteoporosis. Am J Med 115:209–216PubMedCrossRef Tosteson AN, Grove MR, Hammond CS et al (2003) Early discontinuation of treatment for osteoporosis. Am J Med 115:209–216PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Unson CG, Siccion E, Gaztambide J et al (2003) Nonadherence and osteoporosis treatment preferences of older women: a qualitative study. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 12:1037–1045CrossRef Unson CG, Siccion E, Gaztambide J et al (2003) Nonadherence and osteoporosis treatment preferences of older women: a qualitative study. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 12:1037–1045CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Burrell A, Wong P, Ollendorf D et al (2005) Defining compliance/adherence and persistence: ISPOR Special Interest Working Group. Value Health 8:A194–A195 Burrell A, Wong P, Ollendorf D et al (2005) Defining compliance/adherence and persistence: ISPOR Special Interest Working Group. Value Health 8:A194–A195
16.
go back to reference Dezii CM (2001) Persistence with drug therapy: a practical approach using administrative claims data. Manag Care 10:42–45PubMed Dezii CM (2001) Persistence with drug therapy: a practical approach using administrative claims data. Manag Care 10:42–45PubMed
17.
go back to reference Papaioannou A, Ioannidis G, Adachi JD et al (2003) Adherence to bisphosphonates and hormone replacement therapy in a tertiary care setting of patients in the CANDOO database. Osteoporos Int 14:808–813PubMedCrossRef Papaioannou A, Ioannidis G, Adachi JD et al (2003) Adherence to bisphosphonates and hormone replacement therapy in a tertiary care setting of patients in the CANDOO database. Osteoporos Int 14:808–813PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Solomon DH, Avorn J, Katz JN et al (2005) Compliance with osteoporosis medications. Arch Intern Med 165:2414–2419PubMedCrossRef Solomon DH, Avorn J, Katz JN et al (2005) Compliance with osteoporosis medications. Arch Intern Med 165:2414–2419PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Huybrechts KF, Ishak KJ, Caro JJ (2006) Assessment of compliance with osteoporosis treatment and its consequences in a managed care population. Bone 38:922–928PubMedCrossRef Huybrechts KF, Ishak KJ, Caro JJ (2006) Assessment of compliance with osteoporosis treatment and its consequences in a managed care population. Bone 38:922–928PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Siris E, Harris S, Rosen C et al (2006) Adherence to bisphosphonate therapy and fracture rates in osteoporotic women: relationship to vertebral and non-vertebral fractures from 2 US claims databases. Mayo Clin Proc 81:1013–1022PubMed Siris E, Harris S, Rosen C et al (2006) Adherence to bisphosphonate therapy and fracture rates in osteoporotic women: relationship to vertebral and non-vertebral fractures from 2 US claims databases. Mayo Clin Proc 81:1013–1022PubMed
21.
go back to reference Lo JC, Pressman AR, Omar MA et al (2006) Persistence with weekly alendronate therapy among postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 17:922–928PubMedCrossRef Lo JC, Pressman AR, Omar MA et al (2006) Persistence with weekly alendronate therapy among postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 17:922–928PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Recker RR, Gallagher R, MacCosbe PE (2005) Effect of dosing frequency on bisphosphonate medication adherence in a large longitudinal cohort of women. Mayo Clin Proc 80:856–861PubMedCrossRef Recker RR, Gallagher R, MacCosbe PE (2005) Effect of dosing frequency on bisphosphonate medication adherence in a large longitudinal cohort of women. Mayo Clin Proc 80:856–861PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Sunyecz J, Gallagher R, MacCosbe P (2006) Persistence with medication in women taking daily versus weekly bisphosphonates for osteoporosis. Female patient 31:21–28 Sunyecz J, Gallagher R, MacCosbe P (2006) Persistence with medication in women taking daily versus weekly bisphosphonates for osteoporosis. Female patient 31:21–28
24.
go back to reference Ettinger M, Gallagher R, MacCosbe P (2006) Medication persistence with weekly vs. daily doses of oral bisphosphonates. Endocr Pract 12:522–528PubMed Ettinger M, Gallagher R, MacCosbe P (2006) Medication persistence with weekly vs. daily doses of oral bisphosphonates. Endocr Pract 12:522–528PubMed
25.
go back to reference Cramer JA, Amonkar MM, Hebborn A et al (2005) Compliance and persistence with bisphosphonate dosing regimens among women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Curr Med Res Opin 21:1453–1460PubMedCrossRef Cramer JA, Amonkar MM, Hebborn A et al (2005) Compliance and persistence with bisphosphonate dosing regimens among women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Curr Med Res Opin 21:1453–1460PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Brankin E, Walker M, Lynch NO et al (2006) The impact of dosing frequency on compliance and persistence with bisphosphonates among postmenopausal women in the UK: evidence from three databases. Curr Med Res Opin 22:1249–1258PubMedCrossRef Brankin E, Walker M, Lynch NO et al (2006) The impact of dosing frequency on compliance and persistence with bisphosphonates among postmenopausal women in the UK: evidence from three databases. Curr Med Res Opin 22:1249–1258PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Cramer JA, Lynch NO, Gaudin A-F et al (2006) The effect of dosing frequency on compliance and persistence with bisphosphonate therapy: a comparison of studies in the United States, the United Kingdom, and France. Clin Ther 28:1686–1694PubMedCrossRef Cramer JA, Lynch NO, Gaudin A-F et al (2006) The effect of dosing frequency on compliance and persistence with bisphosphonate therapy: a comparison of studies in the United States, the United Kingdom, and France. Clin Ther 28:1686–1694PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Gold DT, Safi W, Trinh H (2006) Patient preference and adherence: comparative US studies between two bisphosphonates, weekly risedronate and monthly ibandronate. Curr Res Med Opin 22:2383–2391CrossRef Gold DT, Safi W, Trinh H (2006) Patient preference and adherence: comparative US studies between two bisphosphonates, weekly risedronate and monthly ibandronate. Curr Res Med Opin 22:2383–2391CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Cramer JA (1998) Consequences of intermittent treatment for hypertension: the case for medication compliance and persistence. Am J Manag Care 4:1563–1568PubMed Cramer JA (1998) Consequences of intermittent treatment for hypertension: the case for medication compliance and persistence. Am J Manag Care 4:1563–1568PubMed
30.
go back to reference Caspard H, Chan AK, Walker AM (2005) Compliance with a statin treatment in a usual-care setting: retrospective database analysis over 3 years after treatment initiation in health maintenance organization enrollees with dyslipidemia. Clin Ther 27:1639–1646PubMedCrossRef Caspard H, Chan AK, Walker AM (2005) Compliance with a statin treatment in a usual-care setting: retrospective database analysis over 3 years after treatment initiation in health maintenance organization enrollees with dyslipidemia. Clin Ther 27:1639–1646PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Delmas PD, Adami S, Strugala C et al (2006) Intravenous ibandronate injections in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: one-year results from the dosing intravenous administration study. Arthritis Rheum 54:1838–1846PubMedCrossRef Delmas PD, Adami S, Strugala C et al (2006) Intravenous ibandronate injections in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: one-year results from the dosing intravenous administration study. Arthritis Rheum 54:1838–1846PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Claxton AJ, Cramer J, Pierce C (2001) A systematic review of the associations between dose regimens and medication compliance. Clin Ther 23:1296–1310PubMedCrossRef Claxton AJ, Cramer J, Pierce C (2001) A systematic review of the associations between dose regimens and medication compliance. Clin Ther 23:1296–1310PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Simon JA, Lewiecki EM, Smith ME et al (2002) Patient preference for once-weekly alendronate 70 mg versus once-daily alendronate 10 mg: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, crossover study. Clin Ther 24:1871–1886PubMedCrossRef Simon JA, Lewiecki EM, Smith ME et al (2002) Patient preference for once-weekly alendronate 70 mg versus once-daily alendronate 10 mg: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, crossover study. Clin Ther 24:1871–1886PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Reginster JY, Felsenberg D, Cooper C et al (2006) A new concept for bisphosphonate therapy: a rationale for the development of monthly oral dosing of ibandronate. Osteoporos Int 2006 17:159–166CrossRef Reginster JY, Felsenberg D, Cooper C et al (2006) A new concept for bisphosphonate therapy: a rationale for the development of monthly oral dosing of ibandronate. Osteoporos Int 2006 17:159–166CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A systematic review of persistence and compliance with bisphosphonates for osteoporosis
Authors
J. A. Cramer
D. T. Gold
S. L. Silverman
E. M. Lewiecki
Publication date
01-08-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Osteoporosis International / Issue 8/2007
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Electronic ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-006-0322-8

Other articles of this Issue 8/2007

Osteoporosis International 8/2007 Go to the issue