Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Osteoporosis International 4/2006

01-04-2006 | Original Article

Detection of osteoporotic vertebral fractures using multidetector CT

Authors: J. S. Bauer, D. Müller, A. Ambekar, M. Dobritz, M. Matsuura, F. Eckstein, E. J. Rummeny, T. M. Link

Published in: Osteoporosis International | Issue 4/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Goals were to compare the performance of lateral radiographs and sagittal reformations (SR) of axial computed tomography (CT) datasets in identification of osteoporotic vertebral fractures and to assess for optimal slice thickness in axial CT datasets needed for reliable classification of these fractures.

Methods

Sixty-five vertebrae were harvested from 21 human cadaver spines and examined with a 64-row multidetector CT scanner. Axial images were acquired with a slice thickness of 0.6, 1, 2, 3 and 5 mm and SR were obtained using these datasets. In addition, specimens were radiographed in antero-posterior and lateral orientation. Vertebrae visualized in the different image datasets were separately graded by four radiologists according to the spinal fracture index (SFI) classification. Fracture status determined in a consensus reading of interactive reformations of the 0.6-mm CT dataset in all three dimensions served as a standard of reference in combination with pathological examinations.

Results

The average agreement for the 0.6-mm SR obtained between each radiologist and standard of reference for the grading of the fractures was very good (κ=0.81). It was good for the 1-, 2- and 3-mm SR (κ=0.70, 0.69 and 0.64), but only moderate for the radiographs (κ=0.52), and fair for the 5-mm SR (κ=0.33). When focusing only on detection of fractures, independent of the grading, all κ values improved by about 0.15, resulting in excellent values for the 0.6-mm through 3-mm SR (0.95<κ<0.79) and good values for the radiographs (κ=0.72). Ninety-five percent of the fractures could be identified using the 1-mm SR, but 18% of the fractures were missed on the radiographs.

Conclusions

Sagittal CT reformations could more accurately assess vertebral fractures than standard radiographs. But for reliable detection of these fractures, SR derived from axial images with a slice thickness of 3 mm or less are required. The thinnest available axial slice thickness performed best in fracture grading.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Center JR, Nguyen TV, Schneider D, Sambrook NP, Eisman JA (1999) Mortality after all major types of osteoporotic fracture in men and women: an observational study. Lancet 353:878–882CrossRefPubMed Center JR, Nguyen TV, Schneider D, Sambrook NP, Eisman JA (1999) Mortality after all major types of osteoporotic fracture in men and women: an observational study. Lancet 353:878–882CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference O’Neill TW, Cockerill W, Matthis C, Raspe HH, Lunt M, Cooper C, Banzer D, Cannata JB, Naves M, Felsch B, Felsenberg D, Janott J, Johnell O, Kanis JA, Kragl G, Lopes Vaz A, Lyritis G, Masaryk P, Poor G, Reid DM, Reisinger W, Scheidt-Nave C, Stepan JJ, Todd CJ, Woolf AD, Reeve J, Silman AJ (2004) Back pain, disability, and radiographic vertebral fracture in European women: a prospective study. Osteoporos Int 15:760–765PubMedCrossRef O’Neill TW, Cockerill W, Matthis C, Raspe HH, Lunt M, Cooper C, Banzer D, Cannata JB, Naves M, Felsch B, Felsenberg D, Janott J, Johnell O, Kanis JA, Kragl G, Lopes Vaz A, Lyritis G, Masaryk P, Poor G, Reid DM, Reisinger W, Scheidt-Nave C, Stepan JJ, Todd CJ, Woolf AD, Reeve J, Silman AJ (2004) Back pain, disability, and radiographic vertebral fracture in European women: a prospective study. Osteoporos Int 15:760–765PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Cockerill W, Lunt M, Silman AJ, Cooper C, Lips P, Bhalla AK, Cannata JB, Eastell R, Felsenberg D, Gennari C, Johnell O, Kanis JA, Kiss C, Masaryk P, Naves M, Poor G, Raspe H, Reid DM, Reeve J, Stepan J, Todd C, Woolf AD, O’Neill TW (2004) Health-related quality of life and radiographic vertebral fracture. Osteoporos Int 15:113–119CrossRefPubMed Cockerill W, Lunt M, Silman AJ, Cooper C, Lips P, Bhalla AK, Cannata JB, Eastell R, Felsenberg D, Gennari C, Johnell O, Kanis JA, Kiss C, Masaryk P, Naves M, Poor G, Raspe H, Reid DM, Reeve J, Stepan J, Todd C, Woolf AD, O’Neill TW (2004) Health-related quality of life and radiographic vertebral fracture. Osteoporos Int 15:113–119CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Doherty DA, Sanders KM, Kotowicz MA, Prince RL (2001) Lifetime and five-year age-specific risks of first and subsequent osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 12:16–23CrossRefPubMed Doherty DA, Sanders KM, Kotowicz MA, Prince RL (2001) Lifetime and five-year age-specific risks of first and subsequent osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 12:16–23CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Link TM, Guglielmi G, Kuijk van C, Adams J (2005) Radiologic assessment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures: diagnostic and prognostic implications. Eur Radiol 15:1521–1532CrossRefPubMed Link TM, Guglielmi G, Kuijk van C, Adams J (2005) Radiologic assessment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures: diagnostic and prognostic implications. Eur Radiol 15:1521–1532CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Ensrud K, Thompson D, Cauley J, Nevitt M, Kado D, Hochberg M, Santora A2, Black D (2000) Prevalent vertebral deformities predict mortality and hospitalization in older women with low bone mass. Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group. J Am Geriatr Soc 48:241–249PubMed Ensrud K, Thompson D, Cauley J, Nevitt M, Kado D, Hochberg M, Santora A2, Black D (2000) Prevalent vertebral deformities predict mortality and hospitalization in older women with low bone mass. Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group. J Am Geriatr Soc 48:241–249PubMed
7.
go back to reference Gehlbach S, Bigelow C, Heimisdottir M, May S, Walker M, Kirkwood J (2000) Recognition of vertebral fracture in a clinical setting. Osteoporos Int 11:577–582CrossRefPubMed Gehlbach S, Bigelow C, Heimisdottir M, May S, Walker M, Kirkwood J (2000) Recognition of vertebral fracture in a clinical setting. Osteoporos Int 11:577–582CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kim N, Rowe BH, Raymond G, Jen H, Colman I, Jackson SA, Siminoski KG, Chahal AM, Folk D, Majumdar SR (2004) Underreporting of vertebral fractures on routine chest radiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:297–300PubMed Kim N, Rowe BH, Raymond G, Jen H, Colman I, Jackson SA, Siminoski KG, Chahal AM, Folk D, Majumdar SR (2004) Underreporting of vertebral fractures on routine chest radiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:297–300PubMed
9.
go back to reference Mueller D, Isbary M, Boehm H, Bauer JS, Rummeny EJ, Link TM (2004) Recognition of osteoporosis-related vertebral fractures on chest radiographs in postmenopausal women. Radiology 233:305PubMedCrossRef Mueller D, Isbary M, Boehm H, Bauer JS, Rummeny EJ, Link TM (2004) Recognition of osteoporosis-related vertebral fractures on chest radiographs in postmenopausal women. Radiology 233:305PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Mui LW, Haramati LB, Alterman DD, Haramati N, Zelefsky MN, Hamerman D (2003) Evaluation of vertebral fractures on lateral chest radiographs of inner-city postmenopausal women. 73:550–554CrossRefPubMed Mui LW, Haramati LB, Alterman DD, Haramati N, Zelefsky MN, Hamerman D (2003) Evaluation of vertebral fractures on lateral chest radiographs of inner-city postmenopausal women. 73:550–554CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Delmas PD, van de LL, Watts NB, Eastell R, Genant H, Grauer A, Cahall DL (2005) Underdiagnosis of vertebral fractures is a worldwide problem: the IMPACT study. J Bone Miner Res 20:557–563PubMedCrossRef Delmas PD, van de LL, Watts NB, Eastell R, Genant H, Grauer A, Cahall DL (2005) Underdiagnosis of vertebral fractures is a worldwide problem: the IMPACT study. J Bone Miner Res 20:557–563PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Mueller D, Zeile M, Bauer JS, Rummeny EJ, Link TM (2005) Vertebral fractures and other spine pathologies only detected with sagittal reformations of routine thoracic and abdominal multisclice CT images. Submitted to RSNA Mueller D, Zeile M, Bauer JS, Rummeny EJ, Link TM (2005) Vertebral fractures and other spine pathologies only detected with sagittal reformations of routine thoracic and abdominal multisclice CT images. Submitted to RSNA
13.
go back to reference Ohnesorge B, Flohr T, Schaller S, Klingenbeck-Regn K, Becker C, Schopf UJ, Bruning R, Reiser MF (1999) [The technical bases and uses of multi-slice CT]. Radiologe 39:923–931CrossRefPubMed Ohnesorge B, Flohr T, Schaller S, Klingenbeck-Regn K, Becker C, Schopf UJ, Bruning R, Reiser MF (1999) [The technical bases and uses of multi-slice CT]. Radiologe 39:923–931CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Brandt MM, Wahl WL, Yeom K, Kazerooni E, Wang SC (2004) Computed tomographic scanning reduces cost and time of complete spine evaluation. J Trauma 56:1022–1026PubMed Brandt MM, Wahl WL, Yeom K, Kazerooni E, Wang SC (2004) Computed tomographic scanning reduces cost and time of complete spine evaluation. J Trauma 56:1022–1026PubMed
15.
16.
go back to reference Genant HK, Wu CY, van Kuijk C, Nevitt MC (1993) Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res 8:1137–1148PubMed Genant HK, Wu CY, van Kuijk C, Nevitt MC (1993) Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res 8:1137–1148PubMed
17.
go back to reference Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 20:37–46CrossRef Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 20:37–46CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Altman D (1991) Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman and Hall, London Altman D (1991) Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman and Hall, London
19.
go back to reference Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143:29–36PubMed Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143:29–36PubMed
20.
go back to reference Begemann PG, Kemper J, Gatzka C, Stork A, Nolte-Ernsting C, Adam G (2004) Value of multiplanar reformations (MPR) in multidetector CT (MDCT) of acute vertebral fractures: do we still have to read the transverse images? J Comput Assist Tomogr 28:572–580CrossRefPubMed Begemann PG, Kemper J, Gatzka C, Stork A, Nolte-Ernsting C, Adam G (2004) Value of multiplanar reformations (MPR) in multidetector CT (MDCT) of acute vertebral fractures: do we still have to read the transverse images? J Comput Assist Tomogr 28:572–580CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Gestring ML, Gracias VH, Feliciano MA, Reilly PM, Shapiro MB, Johnson JW, Klein W, Kauder DR, Schwab CW (2002) Evaluation of the lower spine after blunt trauma using abdominal computed tomographic scanning supplemented with lateral scanograms. J Trauma 53:9–14PubMedCrossRef Gestring ML, Gracias VH, Feliciano MA, Reilly PM, Shapiro MB, Johnson JW, Klein W, Kauder DR, Schwab CW (2002) Evaluation of the lower spine after blunt trauma using abdominal computed tomographic scanning supplemented with lateral scanograms. J Trauma 53:9–14PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Wintermark M, Mouhsine E, Theumann N, Mordasini P, van Melle G, Leyvraz PF, Schnyder P (2003) Thoracolumbar spine fractures in patients who have sustained severe trauma: depiction with multi-detector row CT. Radiology 227:681–689PubMedCrossRef Wintermark M, Mouhsine E, Theumann N, Mordasini P, van Melle G, Leyvraz PF, Schnyder P (2003) Thoracolumbar spine fractures in patients who have sustained severe trauma: depiction with multi-detector row CT. Radiology 227:681–689PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Link TM, Meier N, Rummeny EJ, Garman S, Steinbeck J, Schröder M, Oelerich M, Häussler MD (1996) Detection of artificial spine fractures using helical and conventional CT. Radiology 198:515–519PubMed Link TM, Meier N, Rummeny EJ, Garman S, Steinbeck J, Schröder M, Oelerich M, Häussler MD (1996) Detection of artificial spine fractures using helical and conventional CT. Radiology 198:515–519PubMed
24.
go back to reference Blackmore CC, Mann FA, Wilson AJ (2000) Helical CT in the primary trauma evaluation of the cervical spine: an evidence-based approach. Skeletal Radiol 29:632–639CrossRefPubMed Blackmore CC, Mann FA, Wilson AJ (2000) Helical CT in the primary trauma evaluation of the cervical spine: an evidence-based approach. Skeletal Radiol 29:632–639CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Daffner RH, Daffner SD (2002) Vertebral injuries: detection and implications. Eur J Radiol 42:100–116CrossRefPubMed Daffner RH, Daffner SD (2002) Vertebral injuries: detection and implications. Eur J Radiol 42:100–116CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Eastell R, Cedel SL, Wahner HW, Riggs BL, Melton LJ, III (1991) Classification of vertebral fractures. J Bone Miner Res 6:207–215PubMedCrossRef Eastell R, Cedel SL, Wahner HW, Riggs BL, Melton LJ, III (1991) Classification of vertebral fractures. J Bone Miner Res 6:207–215PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Leidig-Bruckner G, Genant HK, Minne HW, Storm T, Thamsborg G, Bruckner T, Sauer P, Schilling T, Soerensen OH, Ziegler R (1994) Comparison of a semiquantitative and a quantitative method for assessing vertebral fractures in osteoporosis. Bone 15:437–442CrossRefPubMed Leidig-Bruckner G, Genant HK, Minne HW, Storm T, Thamsborg G, Bruckner T, Sauer P, Schilling T, Soerensen OH, Ziegler R (1994) Comparison of a semiquantitative and a quantitative method for assessing vertebral fractures in osteoporosis. Bone 15:437–442CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Barnett E, Nordin B (1960) The radiological diagnosis of osteoporosis: a new approach. Clin Radiol 11:166–174CrossRefPubMed Barnett E, Nordin B (1960) The radiological diagnosis of osteoporosis: a new approach. Clin Radiol 11:166–174CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference McCloskey EV, Spector TD, Eyres KS, Fern ED, O'Rourke N, Vasikaran S, Kanis JA (1993) The assessment of vertebral deformity: a method for use in population studies and clinical trials. J Bone Miner Res 8:1137–1148PubMed McCloskey EV, Spector TD, Eyres KS, Fern ED, O'Rourke N, Vasikaran S, Kanis JA (1993) The assessment of vertebral deformity: a method for use in population studies and clinical trials. J Bone Miner Res 8:1137–1148PubMed
30.
go back to reference Wu C, van Kuijk C, Li J, Jiang Y, Chan M, Countryman P, Genant HK (2000) Comparison of digitized images with original radiography for semiquantitative assessment of osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 11:25–30CrossRefPubMed Wu C, van Kuijk C, Li J, Jiang Y, Chan M, Countryman P, Genant HK (2000) Comparison of digitized images with original radiography for semiquantitative assessment of osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 11:25–30CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Ettinger B, Block JE, Smith R, Cummings SR, Harris ST, Genant HK (1988) An examination of the association between vertebral deformities, physical disabilities and psychosocial problems. Maturitas 10:283–296CrossRefPubMed Ettinger B, Block JE, Smith R, Cummings SR, Harris ST, Genant HK (1988) An examination of the association between vertebral deformities, physical disabilities and psychosocial problems. Maturitas 10:283–296CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Storm T, Thamsborg G, Steiniche T, Genant HK, Sorensen OH (1990) Effect of intermittent cyclical etidronate therapy on bone mass and fracture rate in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 322:1265–1271PubMedCrossRef Storm T, Thamsborg G, Steiniche T, Genant HK, Sorensen OH (1990) Effect of intermittent cyclical etidronate therapy on bone mass and fracture rate in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 322:1265–1271PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Black DM, Palermo L, Nevitt MC, Genant HK, Christensen L, Cummings SR (1999) Defining incident vertebral deformity: a prospective comparison of several approaches. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. J Bone Miner Res 14:90–101PubMedCrossRef Black DM, Palermo L, Nevitt MC, Genant HK, Christensen L, Cummings SR (1999) Defining incident vertebral deformity: a prospective comparison of several approaches. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. J Bone Miner Res 14:90–101PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Lunt M, O’Neill TW, Felsenberg D, Reeve J, Kanis JA, Cooper C, Silman AJ (2003) Characteristics of a prevalent vertebral deformity predict subsequent vertebral fracture: results from the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS). Bone 33:505–513CrossRefPubMed Lunt M, O’Neill TW, Felsenberg D, Reeve J, Kanis JA, Cooper C, Silman AJ (2003) Characteristics of a prevalent vertebral deformity predict subsequent vertebral fracture: results from the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS). Bone 33:505–513CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference UNESCEAR (United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation) (2000) Sources and effects of ionising radiation. Vol 1: Sources, Annex D, Medical radiation exposures. United Nations, New York UNESCEAR (United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation) (2000) Sources and effects of ionising radiation. Vol 1: Sources, Annex D, Medical radiation exposures. United Nations, New York
36.
go back to reference Hart D, Wall BF (2004) UK population dose from medical X-ray examinations. Eur J Radiol 50:285–291CrossRefPubMed Hart D, Wall BF (2004) UK population dose from medical X-ray examinations. Eur J Radiol 50:285–291CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Ismail AA, Cockerill W, Cooper C, Finn JD, Abendroth K, Parisi G, Banzer D, Benevolenskaya LI, Bhalla AK, Armas JB, Cannata JB, Delmas PD, Dequeker J, Dilsen G, Eastell R, Ershova O, Falch JA, Felsch B, Havelka S, Hoszowski K, Jajic I, Kragl U, Johnell O, Lopez Vaz A, Lorenc R, Lyritis G, Marchand F, Masaryk P, Matthis C, Miazgowski T, Pols HA, Poor G, Rapado A, Raspe HH, Reid DM, Reisinger W, Janott J, Scheidt-Nave C, Stepan J, Todd C, Weber K, Woolf AD, Ambrecht G, Gowin W, Felsenberg D, Lunt M, Kanis JA, Reeve J, Silman AJ, O’Neill TW (2001) Prevalent vertebral deformity predicts incident hip though not distal forearm fracture: results from the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study. Osteoporos Int 12:85–90PubMedCrossRef Ismail AA, Cockerill W, Cooper C, Finn JD, Abendroth K, Parisi G, Banzer D, Benevolenskaya LI, Bhalla AK, Armas JB, Cannata JB, Delmas PD, Dequeker J, Dilsen G, Eastell R, Ershova O, Falch JA, Felsch B, Havelka S, Hoszowski K, Jajic I, Kragl U, Johnell O, Lopez Vaz A, Lorenc R, Lyritis G, Marchand F, Masaryk P, Matthis C, Miazgowski T, Pols HA, Poor G, Rapado A, Raspe HH, Reid DM, Reisinger W, Janott J, Scheidt-Nave C, Stepan J, Todd C, Weber K, Woolf AD, Ambrecht G, Gowin W, Felsenberg D, Lunt M, Kanis JA, Reeve J, Silman AJ, O’Neill TW (2001) Prevalent vertebral deformity predicts incident hip though not distal forearm fracture: results from the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study. Osteoporos Int 12:85–90PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Kado DM, Duong T, Stone KL, Ensrud KE, Nevitt MC, Greendale GA, Cummings SR (2003) Incident vertebral fractures and mortality in older women: a prospective study. Osteoporos Int 14:589–594CrossRefPubMed Kado DM, Duong T, Stone KL, Ensrud KE, Nevitt MC, Greendale GA, Cummings SR (2003) Incident vertebral fractures and mortality in older women: a prospective study. Osteoporos Int 14:589–594CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Melton LJ, III, Atkinson EJ, Khosla S, Oberg AL, Riggs BL (2005) Evaluation of a prediction model for long-term fracture risk. J Bone Miner Res 20:551–556PubMedCrossRef Melton LJ, III, Atkinson EJ, Khosla S, Oberg AL, Riggs BL (2005) Evaluation of a prediction model for long-term fracture risk. J Bone Miner Res 20:551–556PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Takada M, Wu CY, Lang TF, Genant HK (1998) Vertebral fracture assessment using the lateral scoutview of computed tomography in comparison with radiographs. Osteoporos Int 8:197–203CrossRefPubMed Takada M, Wu CY, Lang TF, Genant HK (1998) Vertebral fracture assessment using the lateral scoutview of computed tomography in comparison with radiographs. Osteoporos Int 8:197–203CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Detection of osteoporotic vertebral fractures using multidetector CT
Authors
J. S. Bauer
D. Müller
A. Ambekar
M. Dobritz
M. Matsuura
F. Eckstein
E. J. Rummeny
T. M. Link
Publication date
01-04-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Osteoporosis International / Issue 4/2006
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Electronic ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-005-0023-8

Other articles of this Issue 4/2006

Osteoporosis International 4/2006 Go to the issue