Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Osteoporosis International 5/2004

01-05-2004 | Original Article

Can the WHO definition of osteoporosis be applied to multi-site axial transmission quantitative ultrasound?

Authors: K. M. Knapp, G. M. Blake, T. D. Spector, I. Fogelman

Published in: Osteoporosis International | Issue 5/2004

Login to get access

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a highly prevalent but preventable disease and, as such, it is important that there are appropriate diagnostic criteria to identify those at risk of low trauma fracture. In 1994 the World Health Organization (WHO) introduced definitions of osteoporosis and osteopenia using T-scores, which identified 30% of all Caucasian post-menopausal women as having osteoporosis. However, the use of the WHO T-score thresholds of −2.5 for osteoporosis and −1.0 for osteopenia may be inappropriate at skeletal sites other than the spine, hip and forearm or when other modalities, such as quantitative ultrasound (QUS) are used. The aim of this study was to evaluate the age-dependence of T-scores for speed of sound (SOS) measurements at the radius, tibia, phalanx and metatarsal by use of the Sunlight Omnisense, to evaluate the prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia at these sites by use of the WHO criteria, and calculate appropriate equivalent T-score thresholds. The study population consisted of 278 healthy pre-menopausal women, 194 healthy post-menopausal women and 115 women with atraumatic vertebral fractures. All women had SOS measurements at the radius, tibia, phalanx and metatarsal and bone mineral density (BMD) measurements at the lumbar spine and hip. A group of healthy pre-menopausal women aged 20–40 years from the pre-menopausal group were used to estimate the population mean and SD for each of the SOS and BMD measurement sites. Healthy post-menopausal women were classified into normal, osteopenic or osteoporotic, based upon the standard WHO definition of osteoporosis and expressed as a percentage. We investigated the age-related decline in T-scores from 20–79 by stratifying the healthy subjects into 10-year age groups and calculating the mean T-score for each of these groups. Finally, we estimated appropriate T-score thresholds, using five different approaches. The prevalence of osteoporosis in the post-menopausal women aged 50 years and over ranged from 1.4 to 12.7% for SOS and 1.3 to 5.2% for BMD. The age-related decline in T-scores ranged from −0.92 to −1.80 for SOS measurements in the 60 to 69-year age group and −0.60 to −1.19 for BMD measurements in the same age group. The WHO definition was not suitable for use with SOS measurements, and revised T-score thresholds for the diagnosis of osteoporosis of −2.6, −3.0, −3.0 and −2.2 and for osteopenia of −1.4, −1.6, −2.3, and −1.4, for the radius, tibia, phalanx and metatarsal, respectively, were recommended.
Literature
go back to reference 1 Anonymous WHO Study Group (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for post-menopausal osteoporosis. WHO, Geneva 1 Anonymous WHO Study Group (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for post-menopausal osteoporosis. WHO, Geneva
go back to reference 2 Faulkner KG, Roberts LA, McClung MR (1996) Discrepancies in normative data between lunar and hologic DXA systems. Osteoporos Int 6:432–436PubMed 2 Faulkner KG, Roberts LA, McClung MR (1996) Discrepancies in normative data between lunar and hologic DXA systems. Osteoporos Int 6:432–436PubMed
go back to reference 3 Genant HK, Grman ME, Hangartner T, et al (1995) Standardisation of measurements for assessing BMD by DXA. Calcif Tissue Int 57:469PubMed 3 Genant HK, Grman ME, Hangartner T, et al (1995) Standardisation of measurements for assessing BMD by DXA. Calcif Tissue Int 57:469PubMed
go back to reference 4 Hanson J (1997) Standardisation of femur BMD. J Bone Miner Res 12:1316–1317PubMed 4 Hanson J (1997) Standardisation of femur BMD. J Bone Miner Res 12:1316–1317PubMed
go back to reference 5 Looker AC, Wahner HW, Dunn WL, et al (1995) Proximal femur bone mineral levels of US adults. Osteoporos Int 5:389–409PubMed 5 Looker AC, Wahner HW, Dunn WL, et al (1995) Proximal femur bone mineral levels of US adults. Osteoporos Int 5:389–409PubMed
go back to reference 6 Faulker KG, von Stetten E, Steiger P, et al (1998) Discrepancies in osteoporosis prevalence at different skeletal sites: impact on the WHO criteria. Bone 23: s194 6 Faulker KG, von Stetten E, Steiger P, et al (1998) Discrepancies in osteoporosis prevalence at different skeletal sites: impact on the WHO criteria. Bone 23: s194
go back to reference 7 Hans D, Schott A-M, Dargent-Molina P, et al (1998) Is the WHO criteria applicable to quantitative ultrasound measurement? The EPIDOS prospective study. Bone 23:s238 7 Hans D, Schott A-M, Dargent-Molina P, et al (1998) Is the WHO criteria applicable to quantitative ultrasound measurement? The EPIDOS prospective study. Bone 23:s238
go back to reference 8 Frost ML, Blake GM, Fogelman I (2000) Can the WHO criteria for diagnosing osteoporosis be applied to calcaneal quantitative ultrasound? Osteoporos Int 11:321–330CrossRefPubMed 8 Frost ML, Blake GM, Fogelman I (2000) Can the WHO criteria for diagnosing osteoporosis be applied to calcaneal quantitative ultrasound? Osteoporos Int 11:321–330CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference 9 Ish-Shalom S, Yaniv I, Singal C, et al (1999) Can the WHO osteoporosis criteria be applied to ultrasound measurements? 11th International Workshop on Calcified Tissues. Abstracts:34 9 Ish-Shalom S, Yaniv I, Singal C, et al (1999) Can the WHO osteoporosis criteria be applied to ultrasound measurements? 11th International Workshop on Calcified Tissues. Abstracts:34
go back to reference 10 Delmas PD (2000) Do we need to change the WHO definition of osteoporosis? Osteoporos Int 11:189–191CrossRefPubMed 10 Delmas PD (2000) Do we need to change the WHO definition of osteoporosis? Osteoporos Int 11:189–191CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference 11 Barkmann R, Kantorovich E, Singal C, et al (2000) A new method for quantitative ultrasound measurements at multiple skeletal sites. J Clin Densitom 3:1–7 11 Barkmann R, Kantorovich E, Singal C, et al (2000) A new method for quantitative ultrasound measurements at multiple skeletal sites. J Clin Densitom 3:1–7
go back to reference 12 Sunlight Ultrasound Technologies Ltd (1998) Sunlight Omnisense User Manual 12 Sunlight Ultrasound Technologies Ltd (1998) Sunlight Omnisense User Manual
go back to reference 13 Ryan PJ, Blake GM, Fogelman I (1992) Post-menopausal screening for osteopenia. Br J Rheumatol 31:823–828PubMed 13 Ryan PJ, Blake GM, Fogelman I (1992) Post-menopausal screening for osteopenia. Br J Rheumatol 31:823–828PubMed
go back to reference 14 Knapp KM, Blake GM, Spector TD, et al (2001) Multisite quantitative ultrasound: precision, age- and menopause-related changes, fracture discrimination, and T-score equivalence with dual energy absorptiometry. Osteoporos Int 12:456–464PubMed 14 Knapp KM, Blake GM, Spector TD, et al (2001) Multisite quantitative ultrasound: precision, age- and menopause-related changes, fracture discrimination, and T-score equivalence with dual energy absorptiometry. Osteoporos Int 12:456–464PubMed
go back to reference 15 Weiss M, Ben-Shlomo A, Hagag P, et al (2000) Reference database for bone speed of sound measurements by a novel quantitative multi-site ultrasound device. Osteoporos Int 11:688–696PubMed 15 Weiss M, Ben-Shlomo A, Hagag P, et al (2000) Reference database for bone speed of sound measurements by a novel quantitative multi-site ultrasound device. Osteoporos Int 11:688–696PubMed
go back to reference 16 Dennison E, Eastell R, Fall CHD, et al (1999) Determinants of bone loss in elderly men and women: a prospective population-based study. Osteoporos Int 10:384–391CrossRefPubMed 16 Dennison E, Eastell R, Fall CHD, et al (1999) Determinants of bone loss in elderly men and women: a prospective population-based study. Osteoporos Int 10:384–391CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference 17 Kontulainen S, Kannus P, Haapasalo H, et al (2001) Good maintenance of exercise-induced bone gain with decreased training of female tennis and squash players: a prospective 5-year follow-up study of young and old starters and controls. J Bone Miner Res 16:195–201PubMed 17 Kontulainen S, Kannus P, Haapasalo H, et al (2001) Good maintenance of exercise-induced bone gain with decreased training of female tennis and squash players: a prospective 5-year follow-up study of young and old starters and controls. J Bone Miner Res 16:195–201PubMed
go back to reference 18 Maddalozzo GF, Snow CM (2000) High intensity resistance training: effects on bone in older men and women. Calcif Tissue Int 66:399–404CrossRef 18 Maddalozzo GF, Snow CM (2000) High intensity resistance training: effects on bone in older men and women. Calcif Tissue Int 66:399–404CrossRef
go back to reference 19 Coupland CAC, Grainge MJ, Cliffe SJ, et al (2000) Occupational activity and bone mineral density in post-menopausal women in England. Osteoporos Int 11:310–315CrossRefPubMed 19 Coupland CAC, Grainge MJ, Cliffe SJ, et al (2000) Occupational activity and bone mineral density in post-menopausal women in England. Osteoporos Int 11:310–315CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference 20 Mulder JE, Michaeli D, Flaster ER, et al (2000) Comparison of bone mineral density of the phalanges, lumbar spine, hip and forearm for assessment of osteoporosis in post-menopausal women. J Clin Densitom 3:373–381PubMed 20 Mulder JE, Michaeli D, Flaster ER, et al (2000) Comparison of bone mineral density of the phalanges, lumbar spine, hip and forearm for assessment of osteoporosis in post-menopausal women. J Clin Densitom 3:373–381PubMed
go back to reference 21 Gürlek A, Bayraktar M, Ariyurek M (2000) Inappropriate reference range for peak bone mineral density in dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: implications for the interpretation of T-score. Osteoporos Int 11:809–813PubMed 21 Gürlek A, Bayraktar M, Ariyurek M (2000) Inappropriate reference range for peak bone mineral density in dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: implications for the interpretation of T-score. Osteoporos Int 11:809–813PubMed
go back to reference 22 Kim K II, Han I-K, Kim H, et al (2001) How reliable is the ultrasound densitometer for community screening to diagnose osteoporosis in spine, femur and forearm? J Clin Densitom 4:159–165CrossRefPubMed 22 Kim K II, Han I-K, Kim H, et al (2001) How reliable is the ultrasound densitometer for community screening to diagnose osteoporosis in spine, femur and forearm? J Clin Densitom 4:159–165CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference 23 Woodson G (2000) Dual X-ray absorptiometry T-score concordance and discordance between hip and spine measurement sites. J Clin Densitom 3:319–324 23 Woodson G (2000) Dual X-ray absorptiometry T-score concordance and discordance between hip and spine measurement sites. J Clin Densitom 3:319–324
go back to reference 24 Melton LJ (1995) How many women have osteoporosis now? J Bone Miner Res 10:175–177PubMed 24 Melton LJ (1995) How many women have osteoporosis now? J Bone Miner Res 10:175–177PubMed
go back to reference 25 Looker AC, Orwell ES, Johnston CC Jr, et al (1997) Prevalence of low femoral bone density in older US adults from NHANES III. J Bone Miner Res 12:1761–1768PubMed 25 Looker AC, Orwell ES, Johnston CC Jr, et al (1997) Prevalence of low femoral bone density in older US adults from NHANES III. J Bone Miner Res 12:1761–1768PubMed
go back to reference 26 Ballard PA, Purdie DW, Langton CM, et al (1998) Prevalence of osteoporosis and related risk factors in UK women in the seventh decade: osteoporosis case finding by clinical referral criteria or predictive model? Osteoporos Int 8:535–539CrossRefPubMed 26 Ballard PA, Purdie DW, Langton CM, et al (1998) Prevalence of osteoporosis and related risk factors in UK women in the seventh decade: osteoporosis case finding by clinical referral criteria or predictive model? Osteoporos Int 8:535–539CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference 27 Ahmed AIH, Ilic D, Blake GM, et al (1998) Review of 3,530 referrals for bone density measurements of spine and femur: evidence that radiographic osteopenia predicts low bone mass. Radiology 207:619–624PubMed 27 Ahmed AIH, Ilic D, Blake GM, et al (1998) Review of 3,530 referrals for bone density measurements of spine and femur: evidence that radiographic osteopenia predicts low bone mass. Radiology 207:619–624PubMed
go back to reference 28 Meyer HE, Tverdal A, Falch JA, et al (2000) Factors associated with mortality after hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 11:228–232CrossRefPubMed 28 Meyer HE, Tverdal A, Falch JA, et al (2000) Factors associated with mortality after hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 11:228–232CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference 29 National Osteoporosis Society (2001). Position statement on the use of quantitative ultrasound in the management of osteoporosis. NOS, UK 29 National Osteoporosis Society (2001). Position statement on the use of quantitative ultrasound in the management of osteoporosis. NOS, UK
go back to reference 30 Ryan PJ, Spector TD, Blake GM, et al (1993) A comparison of reference bone mineral density measurements derived from two sources: referred and population based. Br J Radiol 66:1138–1141PubMed 30 Ryan PJ, Spector TD, Blake GM, et al (1993) A comparison of reference bone mineral density measurements derived from two sources: referred and population based. Br J Radiol 66:1138–1141PubMed
go back to reference 31 Andrew T, Hart DJ, Sneider H, de Lange M, et al (2001) Are twins and singletons comparable? A study of disease-related and lifestyle characteristics in adult women. Twin Res 4:464–77CrossRefPubMed 31 Andrew T, Hart DJ, Sneider H, de Lange M, et al (2001) Are twins and singletons comparable? A study of disease-related and lifestyle characteristics in adult women. Twin Res 4:464–77CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference 32 Black D, Nevitt M, Palermo L, et al (1993) Prediction of new vertebral deformities. J Bone Miner Res 8 [Suppl 1]:S135 32 Black D, Nevitt M, Palermo L, et al (1993) Prediction of new vertebral deformities. J Bone Miner Res 8 [Suppl 1]:S135
go back to reference 33 Melton LJ (1993)Long-term fracture prediction by bone mineral assessment at different skeletal sites. J Bone Miner Res 8:1227–1233PubMed 33 Melton LJ (1993)Long-term fracture prediction by bone mineral assessment at different skeletal sites. J Bone Miner Res 8:1227–1233PubMed
go back to reference 34 Blake GM (2001) Peripheral or central densitometry: does it matter which technique we use? J Clin Densitom 4:83–96 34 Blake GM (2001) Peripheral or central densitometry: does it matter which technique we use? J Clin Densitom 4:83–96
Metadata
Title
Can the WHO definition of osteoporosis be applied to multi-site axial transmission quantitative ultrasound?
Authors
K. M. Knapp
G. M. Blake
T. D. Spector
I. Fogelman
Publication date
01-05-2004
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Osteoporosis International / Issue 5/2004
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Electronic ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-003-1555-4

Other articles of this Issue 5/2004

Osteoporosis International 5/2004 Go to the issue