Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Osteoporosis International 1/2004

01-01-2004 | Original Article

Limited utility of clinical indices for the prediction of symptomatic fracture risk in postmenopausal women

Authors: Tuan V. Nguyen, Jacqueline R. Center, Nicholas A. Pocock, John A. Eisman

Published in: Osteoporosis International | Issue 1/2004

Login to get access

Abstract

Bone mineral density (BMD) is the primary predictor of fracture, and is utilised in the definition of osteoporosis. Mass screening for osteoporosis is, however, currently not recommended. The primary objective of this study was to develop, validate and assess a simple, non-invasive scoring system to identify women at high risk of fracture. Using baseline data of the Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study, a sample of 1256 women aged 60 or above was randomly divided into a development cohort (n=846) and a validation cohort (n=410). Low BMD was evaluated by DXA, with respect to 2.0 or 2.5 SD below the mean for young normal women at the femoral neck and lumbar spine. A logistic regression model was used to derive a predictive score, “DOEScore”, in the development cohort, and the performance of this score was then assessed in the validation cohort. Incident fractures over 9395 person-years (median of follow-up duration: 8.4 years) were identified by X-ray records. Approximately 57% and 40% of women (in both cohorts) had T-scores less than −2.0 and greater than −2.5, respectively. Only age, body weight, and previous fracture were significantly related to BMD at both the femoral neck and lumbar spine. These three variables were used in the development of the DOEScore. When applied to the validation cohort, the sensitivity and specificity of DOEScore were 0.82 and 0.52, respectively, for selecting women with T-scores less than −2.5; the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.75. These goodness-of-fit indices were comparable to, or better than, those obtained by the FOSTA, SOFSURF and ORAI score systems. However, neither the DOEScore nor other score systems reliably identify women with incident fractures; for DOEScore, the sensitivity and specificity were 0.52 and 0.49, respectively, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.48. Clinical risk scores can be used to identify women likely to have low BMD (albeit with low specificity), but they are not a useful tool to identify women who will have a fracture.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cummings SR, Melton LJ (2002) Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures. Lancet 359:1761–1767CrossRefPubMed Cummings SR, Melton LJ (2002) Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures. Lancet 359:1761–1767CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Nguyen TV, Eisman JA, Kelly PJ, Sambrook PN (1996) Risk factors for osteoporotic fractures in men. Am J Epidemiol 144:255–263PubMed Nguyen TV, Eisman JA, Kelly PJ, Sambrook PN (1996) Risk factors for osteoporotic fractures in men. Am J Epidemiol 144:255–263PubMed
3.
go back to reference Nguyen T, Sambrook P, Kelly P, Jones G, Lord S, Freund J, Eisman J (1993) Prediction of osteoporotic fractures by postural instability and bone density. BMJ 307:1111–1115PubMed Nguyen T, Sambrook P, Kelly P, Jones G, Lord S, Freund J, Eisman J (1993) Prediction of osteoporotic fractures by postural instability and bone density. BMJ 307:1111–1115PubMed
4.
go back to reference Kanis JA (1997) Diagnosis of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 7:S108–S116PubMed Kanis JA (1997) Diagnosis of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 7:S108–S116PubMed
5.
go back to reference Black DM, Cummings SR, Karpf DB, Cauley JA, Thompson DE, Nevitt MC, Bauer DC, Genant HK, Haskell WL, Marcus R, Ott SM, Torner JC, Quandt SA, Reiss TF, Ensrud KE (1996) Randomised trial of effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with existing vertebral fractures. Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group. Lancet 348:1535–1541PubMed Black DM, Cummings SR, Karpf DB, Cauley JA, Thompson DE, Nevitt MC, Bauer DC, Genant HK, Haskell WL, Marcus R, Ott SM, Torner JC, Quandt SA, Reiss TF, Ensrud KE (1996) Randomised trial of effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with existing vertebral fractures. Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group. Lancet 348:1535–1541PubMed
6.
go back to reference Ettinger B, Black DM, Mitlak BH, Knickerbocker RK, Nickelsen T, Genant HK, Christiansen C, Delmas PD, Zanchetta JR, Stakkestad J, Gluer CC, Krueger K, Cohen FJ, Eckert S, Ensrud KE, Avioli LV, Lips P, Cummings SR (1999) Reduction of vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with raloxifene: results from a 3-year randomized clinical trial. Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) Investigators. JAMA 282:637–645PubMed Ettinger B, Black DM, Mitlak BH, Knickerbocker RK, Nickelsen T, Genant HK, Christiansen C, Delmas PD, Zanchetta JR, Stakkestad J, Gluer CC, Krueger K, Cohen FJ, Eckert S, Ensrud KE, Avioli LV, Lips P, Cummings SR (1999) Reduction of vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with raloxifene: results from a 3-year randomized clinical trial. Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) Investigators. JAMA 282:637–645PubMed
7.
go back to reference Cummings SR, Black DM, Thompson DE, Applegate WB, Barrett-Connor E, Musliner TA, Palermo L, Prineas R, Rubin SM, Scott JC, Vogt T, Wallace R, Yates AJ, LaCroix AZ (1998) Effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with low bone density but without vertebral fractures: results from the Fracture Intervention Trial. JAMA 280:2077–2082PubMed Cummings SR, Black DM, Thompson DE, Applegate WB, Barrett-Connor E, Musliner TA, Palermo L, Prineas R, Rubin SM, Scott JC, Vogt T, Wallace R, Yates AJ, LaCroix AZ (1998) Effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with low bone density but without vertebral fractures: results from the Fracture Intervention Trial. JAMA 280:2077–2082PubMed
8.
go back to reference Burger H, van Daele PLA, Algra D, van den Ouweland FA, Grobbee DE, Hofman A, van Kujik C, Schutte HE, Birkenhager JC, Pols HAP (1994) The association between age and bone mineral density in men and women aged 55 years and over: the Rotterdam Study. Bone Miner Res 25:1–13 Burger H, van Daele PLA, Algra D, van den Ouweland FA, Grobbee DE, Hofman A, van Kujik C, Schutte HE, Birkenhager JC, Pols HAP (1994) The association between age and bone mineral density in men and women aged 55 years and over: the Rotterdam Study. Bone Miner Res 25:1–13
9.
go back to reference Edelstein SL, Barett-Connor E (1993) Relation between body size and bone mineral density in elderly men and women. Am J Epidemiol 138:160–169PubMed Edelstein SL, Barett-Connor E (1993) Relation between body size and bone mineral density in elderly men and women. Am J Epidemiol 138:160–169PubMed
10.
go back to reference Hannan MT, Felson DT, Anderson JJ (1992) Bone mineral density in elderly men and women: results from the Framingham Osteoporosis Study. J Bone Miner Res 7:547–553PubMed Hannan MT, Felson DT, Anderson JJ (1992) Bone mineral density in elderly men and women: results from the Framingham Osteoporosis Study. J Bone Miner Res 7:547–553PubMed
11.
go back to reference Nguyen TV, Kelly PJ, Sambrook PN, Gilbert C, Pocock NA, Eisman JA (1994) Life-style factors and bone density in the elderly: Implications for osteoporosis prevention. J Bone Miner Res 9:1339–1346PubMed Nguyen TV, Kelly PJ, Sambrook PN, Gilbert C, Pocock NA, Eisman JA (1994) Life-style factors and bone density in the elderly: Implications for osteoporosis prevention. J Bone Miner Res 9:1339–1346PubMed
12.
go back to reference Cadarette SM, Jaglal SB, Murray TM (1999) Validation of the Simple Calculated Osteoporosis Risk Estimation (SCORE) for patient selection for bone densitometry. Osteoporos Int 10:85–90CrossRefPubMed Cadarette SM, Jaglal SB, Murray TM (1999) Validation of the Simple Calculated Osteoporosis Risk Estimation (SCORE) for patient selection for bone densitometry. Osteoporos Int 10:85–90CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Black DM, Steinbuch M, Palermo L, Dargent-Molina P, Lindsay R, Hoseyni MS, Johnell O (2001) An assessment tool for predicting fracture risk in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 12:519–528CrossRef Black DM, Steinbuch M, Palermo L, Dargent-Molina P, Lindsay R, Hoseyni MS, Johnell O (2001) An assessment tool for predicting fracture risk in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 12:519–528CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lydick E, Cook K, Turpin J, Melton M, Stine R, Byrnes C (1998) Development and validation of a simple questionnaire to facilitate identification of women likely to have low bone density. Am J Manag Care 4:37–48PubMed Lydick E, Cook K, Turpin J, Melton M, Stine R, Byrnes C (1998) Development and validation of a simple questionnaire to facilitate identification of women likely to have low bone density. Am J Manag Care 4:37–48PubMed
15.
go back to reference Cadarette SM, Jaglal SB, Kreiger N, McIsaac WJ, Darlington GA, Tu JV (2000) Development and validation of the Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument to facilitate selection of women for bone densitometry. CMAJ 162:1289–1294PubMed Cadarette SM, Jaglal SB, Kreiger N, McIsaac WJ, Darlington GA, Tu JV (2000) Development and validation of the Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument to facilitate selection of women for bone densitometry. CMAJ 162:1289–1294PubMed
16.
go back to reference Weinstein L, Ullery B (2000) Identification of at-risk women for osteoporosis screening. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:547–549CrossRefPubMed Weinstein L, Ullery B (2000) Identification of at-risk women for osteoporosis screening. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:547–549CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Koh LK, Sedrine WB, Torralba TP, Kung A, Fujiwara S, Chan SP, Huang QR, Rajatanavin R, Tsai KS, Park HM, Reginster JY; Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians (OSTA) Research Group (2001) A simple tool to identify Asian women at increased risk of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 12:699–705CrossRefPubMed Koh LK, Sedrine WB, Torralba TP, Kung A, Fujiwara S, Chan SP, Huang QR, Rajatanavin R, Tsai KS, Park HM, Reginster JY; Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians (OSTA) Research Group (2001) A simple tool to identify Asian women at increased risk of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 12:699–705CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Black DM, Steinbuch M, Palermo L, Dargent-Molina P, Lindsay R, Hoseyni MS, Johnell O (2001) An assessment tool for predicting fracture risk in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 12:519–528CrossRef Black DM, Steinbuch M, Palermo L, Dargent-Molina P, Lindsay R, Hoseyni MS, Johnell O (2001) An assessment tool for predicting fracture risk in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 12:519–528CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Angus RM, Sambrook PN, Pocock NA, Eisman JA (1989) A simple method for assessing calcium intake in Caucasian women. J. Am Dietet Assoc 89:209–214 Angus RM, Sambrook PN, Pocock NA, Eisman JA (1989) A simple method for assessing calcium intake in Caucasian women. J. Am Dietet Assoc 89:209–214
20.
go back to reference Nguyen TV, Sambrook PN, Eisman JA (1997) Source of variability in bone density: implication for study design and analysis. J Bone Miner Res 12:124–135PubMed Nguyen TV, Sambrook PN, Eisman JA (1997) Source of variability in bone density: implication for study design and analysis. J Bone Miner Res 12:124–135PubMed
21.
go back to reference Seeman E (2000) Selection of individuals for prevention of fractures due to bone fragility. Bailliere’s Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 14:233–249 Seeman E (2000) Selection of individuals for prevention of fractures due to bone fragility. Bailliere’s Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 14:233–249
22.
go back to reference Mema HE, Meema S (1987) Postmenopausal osteoporosis: simple screening method for diagnosis before structural failure. Radiology 164:405–410PubMed Mema HE, Meema S (1987) Postmenopausal osteoporosis: simple screening method for diagnosis before structural failure. Radiology 164:405–410PubMed
23.
go back to reference Marshall D, Johnell O, Wedel H (1996) Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. BMJ 312:1254–1259PubMed Marshall D, Johnell O, Wedel H (1996) Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. BMJ 312:1254–1259PubMed
24.
go back to reference Center JR, Nguyen TV, Schneider D, Sambrook PN, Eisman JA (1999) Mortality after all major types of osteoporotic fracture in men and women: an observational study. Lancet 353:878–882PubMed Center JR, Nguyen TV, Schneider D, Sambrook PN, Eisman JA (1999) Mortality after all major types of osteoporotic fracture in men and women: an observational study. Lancet 353:878–882PubMed
25.
go back to reference National Osteoporosis Foundation (1999) Physician’s guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Excerpta Medica, Belle Mead, N.J. National Osteoporosis Foundation (1999) Physician’s guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Excerpta Medica, Belle Mead, N.J.
26.
go back to reference Silverman SL, Greenwald M, Klein RA, Drinkwater BL (1997) Effect of bone density information on decisions about hormone replacement therapy: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol 89:321–325PubMed Silverman SL, Greenwald M, Klein RA, Drinkwater BL (1997) Effect of bone density information on decisions about hormone replacement therapy: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol 89:321–325PubMed
27.
go back to reference Phillipov G, Mos E, Scinto S, Phillips PJ (1997) Initiation of hormone replacement therapy after diagnosis of osteoporosis by bone densitometry. Osteoporos Int 7:162–164PubMed Phillipov G, Mos E, Scinto S, Phillips PJ (1997) Initiation of hormone replacement therapy after diagnosis of osteoporosis by bone densitometry. Osteoporos Int 7:162–164PubMed
28.
go back to reference O’Neill S, Eisman JA, Glasziou P et al. (1997) The prevention and treatment of osteoporosis (consensus statement). Med J Aust 167:S4–S15 O’Neill S, Eisman JA, Glasziou P et al. (1997) The prevention and treatment of osteoporosis (consensus statement). Med J Aust 167:S4–S15
Metadata
Title
Limited utility of clinical indices for the prediction of symptomatic fracture risk in postmenopausal women
Authors
Tuan V. Nguyen
Jacqueline R. Center
Nicholas A. Pocock
John A. Eisman
Publication date
01-01-2004
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Osteoporosis International / Issue 1/2004
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Electronic ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-003-1511-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2004

Osteoporosis International 1/2004 Go to the issue