Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 7/2022

Open Access 21-03-2022 | Cystocele | Original Article

Long-term outcome after routine surgery for pelvic organ prolapse—A national register-based cohort study

Authors: Emil Nüssler, Gabriel Granåsen, Marie Bixo, Mats Löfgren

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 7/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is common, and women have an estimated 12–19% lifetime risk for needing POP surgery. Aims were to measure re-operation rates up to 10 years after POP surgery and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) 5 years after a first-time operation for POP.

Methods

This is a cohort study using the Swedish National Quality Register for Gynaecological Surgery (GynOp). We retrieved information from 32,086 POP-operated women up to 10 years later. After validation, a web-based PROM questionnaire was sent to 4380 women who 5 years previously had standard POP surgery. Main outcome measures were reoperations due to a relapse of prolapse and PROMs 5 years after the primary operation.

Results

Among women operated for all types of POP, 11% had re-operations 5 years later and an additional 4% 10 years later, with similar frequencies for various compartments/types of surgery. PROMs yielded a 75% response rate after 5 years. Cure rate was 68% for anterior, 70% for posterior, and 74% for combined anterior-posterior native repairs. Patient satisfaction exceeded 70%, and symptom reduction was still significant after 5 years (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Following primary prolapse surgery, re-operation rates are low, even after 10 years. A web-based survey for follow-up of PROMs after POP surgery is feasible and yields a high response rate after 5 years. The subjective cure rate after primary POP operations is high, with reduced symptoms and satisfied patients regardless of compartment. Standard prolapse surgery with native tissue repair produces satisfactory long-term results.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kurkijärvi K, Aaltonen R, Gissler M, Mäkinen J. Pelvic organ prolapse surgery in Finland from 1987 to 2009: a national register based study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;214:71–7.CrossRef Kurkijärvi K, Aaltonen R, Gissler M, Mäkinen J. Pelvic organ prolapse surgery in Finland from 1987 to 2009: a national register based study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;214:71–7.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference de Mattos Lourenco TR, Pergialiotis V, Durnea C, et al. A systematic review of reported outcomes and outcome measures in randomized controlled trials on apical prolapse surgery. Int J Gynaecol obstet: Off Organ Int Fed Gynaecol Obstet. 2019;145(1):4–11.CrossRef de Mattos Lourenco TR, Pergialiotis V, Durnea C, et al. A systematic review of reported outcomes and outcome measures in randomized controlled trials on apical prolapse surgery. Int J Gynaecol obstet: Off Organ Int Fed Gynaecol Obstet. 2019;145(1):4–11.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Brown JS, Waetjen LE, Subak LL, Thom DH, Van Den Eeden S, Vittinghoff E. Pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the United States, 1997. Am J obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(4):712–6.CrossRef Brown JS, Waetjen LE, Subak LL, Thom DH, Van Den Eeden S, Vittinghoff E. Pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the United States, 1997. Am J obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(4):712–6.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Palm S. Pelvic Organ Prolapse: The Silent Epidemic. Strategic Book Publishing; 2009. Palm S. Pelvic Organ Prolapse: The Silent Epidemic. Strategic Book Publishing; 2009.
7.
go back to reference Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic-organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(4):501–6.CrossRef Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic-organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(4):501–6.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Nováčková M, Pastor Z, Brtnický T, Chmel R. What is the risk of pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after vaginal hysterectomy with colporrhaphy? Ceska gynekologie. 2017;82(5):383–9.PubMed Nováčková M, Pastor Z, Brtnický T, Chmel R. What is the risk of pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after vaginal hysterectomy with colporrhaphy? Ceska gynekologie. 2017;82(5):383–9.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Hu C, Chen Y, Yi X, et al. Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence. Zhonghua fu chan ke za zhi. 2011;46(2):94–100.PubMed Hu C, Chen Y, Yi X, et al. Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence. Zhonghua fu chan ke za zhi. 2011;46(2):94–100.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Maher CM, Feiner B, Baessler K, Glazener CM. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: the updated summary version Cochrane review. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(11):1445–57.CrossRef Maher CM, Feiner B, Baessler K, Glazener CM. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: the updated summary version Cochrane review. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(11):1445–57.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Barber MD, Maher C. Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(11):1783–90.CrossRef Barber MD, Maher C. Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(11):1783–90.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Madsen LD, Nüssler E, Kesmodel US, Greisen S, Bek KM, Glavind-Kristensen M. Native-tissue repair of isolated primary rectocele compared with nonabsorbable mesh: patient-reported outcomes. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(1):49–57.CrossRef Madsen LD, Nüssler E, Kesmodel US, Greisen S, Bek KM, Glavind-Kristensen M. Native-tissue repair of isolated primary rectocele compared with nonabsorbable mesh: patient-reported outcomes. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(1):49–57.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Nüssler E, Eskildsen JK, Nüssler EK, Bixo M, Löfgren M. Impact of surgeon experience on routine prolapse operations. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(2):297–306.CrossRef Nüssler E, Eskildsen JK, Nüssler EK, Bixo M, Löfgren M. Impact of surgeon experience on routine prolapse operations. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(2):297–306.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Nüssler E, Granåsen G, Nüssler EK, Bixo M, Löfgren M. Repair of recurrent rectocele with posterior colporrhaphy or non-absorbable polypropylene mesh—patient-reported outcomes at 1-year follow-up. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(10):1679–87. Nüssler E, Granåsen G, Nüssler EK, Bixo M, Löfgren M. Repair of recurrent rectocele with posterior colporrhaphy or non-absorbable polypropylene mesh—patient-reported outcomes at 1-year follow-up. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(10):1679–87.
15.
go back to reference Nüssler E, Kesmodel US, Löfgren M, Nüssler EK. Operation for primary cystocele with anterior colporrhaphy or non-absorbable mesh: patient-reported outcomes. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(3):359–66.CrossRef Nüssler E, Kesmodel US, Löfgren M, Nüssler EK. Operation for primary cystocele with anterior colporrhaphy or non-absorbable mesh: patient-reported outcomes. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(3):359–66.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Nüssler EK, Greisen S, Kesmodel US, Löfgren M, Bek KM, Glavind-Kristensen M. Operation for recurrent cystocele with anterior colporrhaphy or non-absorbable mesh: patient reported outcomes. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(11):1925–31.CrossRef Nüssler EK, Greisen S, Kesmodel US, Löfgren M, Bek KM, Glavind-Kristensen M. Operation for recurrent cystocele with anterior colporrhaphy or non-absorbable mesh: patient reported outcomes. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(11):1925–31.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Nussler EK, Nussler E, Eskildsen JK, Lofgren M. Decisions to use surgical mesh in operations for pelvic organ prolapse: a question of geography? Int Urogynecol J. 2018. Nussler EK, Nussler E, Eskildsen JK, Lofgren M. Decisions to use surgical mesh in operations for pelvic organ prolapse: a question of geography? Int Urogynecol J. 2018.
18.
go back to reference Kulseng-Hanssen S, Borstad E. The development of a questionnaire to measure the severity of symptoms and the quality of life before and after surgery for stress incontinence. BJOG: An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;110(11):983–8.CrossRef Kulseng-Hanssen S, Borstad E. The development of a questionnaire to measure the severity of symptoms and the quality of life before and after surgery for stress incontinence. BJOG: An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;110(11):983–8.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Tegerstedt G, Miedel A, Maehle-Schmidt M, Nyren O, Hammarström M. A short-form questionnaire identified genital organ prolapse. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58(1):41–6.CrossRef Tegerstedt G, Miedel A, Maehle-Schmidt M, Nyren O, Hammarström M. A short-form questionnaire identified genital organ prolapse. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58(1):41–6.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Gillor M, Langer S, Dietz HP. Long-term subjective, clinical and sonographic outcomes after native-tissue and mesh-augmented posterior colporrhaphy. Int Urogynecol J. 2019. Gillor M, Langer S, Dietz HP. Long-term subjective, clinical and sonographic outcomes after native-tissue and mesh-augmented posterior colporrhaphy. Int Urogynecol J. 2019.
21.
go back to reference Kissane LM, Meyer I, Martin KD, Tan JC, Miller K, Richter HE. Impact of age on mid- to long-term outcomes of transvaginal native tissue repair for apical vaginal prolapse. Neurourol Urodynam. 2018;37(8):2860–6.CrossRef Kissane LM, Meyer I, Martin KD, Tan JC, Miller K, Richter HE. Impact of age on mid- to long-term outcomes of transvaginal native tissue repair for apical vaginal prolapse. Neurourol Urodynam. 2018;37(8):2860–6.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Mowat A, Maher D, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, Haya N, Maher C. Surgery for women with posterior compartment prolapse. Cochrane Database System Rev. 2018;3:Cd012975. Mowat A, Maher D, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, Haya N, Maher C. Surgery for women with posterior compartment prolapse. Cochrane Database System Rev. 2018;3:Cd012975.
23.
go back to reference Ladfors MB, Löfgren ME, Gabriel B, Olsson J-HA. Patient accept questionnaires integrated in clinical routine: a study by the Swedish National Register for Gynecological Surgery. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. 2002;81(5):437.CrossRef Ladfors MB, Löfgren ME, Gabriel B, Olsson J-HA. Patient accept questionnaires integrated in clinical routine: a study by the Swedish National Register for Gynecological Surgery. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. 2002;81(5):437.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Dällenbach P. To mesh or not to mesh: a review of pelvic organ reconstructive surgery. Int J Women's Health. 2015;7:331.CrossRef Dällenbach P. To mesh or not to mesh: a review of pelvic organ reconstructive surgery. Int J Women's Health. 2015;7:331.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Maher C, Baessler K. Surgical management of anterior vaginal wall prolapse: an evidencebased literature review. Int Urogynecol J. 2006;17(2):195–201.CrossRef Maher C, Baessler K. Surgical management of anterior vaginal wall prolapse: an evidencebased literature review. Int Urogynecol J. 2006;17(2):195–201.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Weber AM, Walters MD. Anterior vaginal prolapse: review of anatomy and techniques of surgical repair. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(2):311–8.CrossRef Weber AM, Walters MD. Anterior vaginal prolapse: review of anatomy and techniques of surgical repair. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(2):311–8.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Schmid C. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database System Rev. 2013(4). Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Schmid C. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database System Rev. 2013(4).
28.
go back to reference Milani AL, Damoiseaux A, IntHout J, Kluivers KB, Withagen MIJ. Long-term outcome of vaginal mesh or native tissue in recurrent prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(6):847–58.CrossRef Milani AL, Damoiseaux A, IntHout J, Kluivers KB, Withagen MIJ. Long-term outcome of vaginal mesh or native tissue in recurrent prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(6):847–58.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Milani R, Frigerio M, Vellucci FL, Palmieri S, Spelzini F, Manodoro S. Transvaginal native-tissue repair of vaginal vault prolapse. Minerva ginecologica. 2018;70(4):371–7.PubMed Milani R, Frigerio M, Vellucci FL, Palmieri S, Spelzini F, Manodoro S. Transvaginal native-tissue repair of vaginal vault prolapse. Minerva ginecologica. 2018;70(4):371–7.PubMed
30.
go back to reference Trompeter SE, Bettencourt R, Barrett-Connor E. Sexual activity and satisfaction in healthy community-dwelling older women. Am J Med 2012;125(1):37–43. e31. Trompeter SE, Bettencourt R, Barrett-Connor E. Sexual activity and satisfaction in healthy community-dwelling older women. Am J Med 2012;125(1):37–43. e31.
Metadata
Title
Long-term outcome after routine surgery for pelvic organ prolapse—A national register-based cohort study
Authors
Emil Nüssler
Gabriel Granåsen
Marie Bixo
Mats Löfgren
Publication date
21-03-2022
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 7/2022
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05156-y

Other articles of this Issue 7/2022

International Urogynecology Journal 7/2022 Go to the issue