Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 9/2018

01-09-2018 | Original Article

A randomized comparison of a single-incision needleless (Contasure-needleless®) mini-sling versus an inside-out transobturator (Contasure-KIM®) mid-urethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: 24-month follow-up results

Authors: Ozan Dogan, Aski Ellibes Kaya, Cigdem Pulatoglu, Alper Basbug, Murat Yassa

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 9/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

There is a shortage of reliable data on the efficiency of the under-investigated mini-slings to treat stress urinary incontinence (SUI). We aimed to compare the effectiveness of the single-incision needleless mini-sling (SIMS) with the transobturator inside-out mid-urethral sling (TOT).

Materials and methods

Two hundred one women with clinically proven SUI were included in this single-center prospective randomized trial. The patients were randomly allocated to the groups. All surgeries were done by the same single surgeon. Examinations were done by one other blinded surgeon. The patients were followed up for 24 months. Objective cure was defined as the absence of SUI and negative cough-stress test. Subjective cure was defined as no stress leakage of urine after surgery in a validated questionnaire. Failure of the surgery was defined as the need for reoperation. Every complaint was categorized by the IUGA/ICS Classification of Prosthesis-related Complications.

Results

The objective (85.4% versus 89.9%, p = 0.362) and subjective (87.6% versus 89.9%, p = 0.636) cure rates were similar with the TOT and SIMS at the postoperative month 24, respectively. The mesh exposure ≤ 1 cm rate was 3.4% for both groups, and the mesh exposure > 1 cm rate was 2.2% for both groups. Overall failure rates were 3.4% and 2.2% for the TOT and SIMS group, respectively. No viscus organ perforation was noted. Complications with the SIMS procedure were less painful compared with TOT (p = 0.024).

Conclusions

Single-incision needleless mini-slings exhibited similar cure rates as the trans-obturator mid-urethral slings from both the patient and clinician points of view in 24 months of follow-up. Mini-slings resulted in significantly less postoperative pain than trans-obturator mid-urethral slings.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wu J, et al. Predicting the number of women who will undergo incontinence and prolapse surgery, 2010 to 2050. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205:230.e1–5.CrossRef Wu J, et al. Predicting the number of women who will undergo incontinence and prolapse surgery, 2010 to 2050. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205:230.e1–5.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Gibson, Wagg. Are older women more likely to receive surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence since the introduction of the mid-urethral sling? An examination of hospital episode statistics data. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;123:1386–92.CrossRef Gibson, Wagg. Are older women more likely to receive surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence since the introduction of the mid-urethral sling? An examination of hospital episode statistics data. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;123:1386–92.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Sung VW, Schleinitz MD, Rardin CR, Ward RM, Myers DL. Comparison of retropubic vs transobturator approach to midurethral slings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197:3–11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sung VW, Schleinitz MD, Rardin CR, Ward RM, Myers DL. Comparison of retropubic vs transobturator approach to midurethral slings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197:3–11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference US Food and Drug Administration. FDA strengthens requirements for surgical mesh for the transvaginal repair of pelvic organ prolapse to address safety risks. (2017). US Food and Drug Administration. FDA strengthens requirements for surgical mesh for the transvaginal repair of pelvic organ prolapse to address safety risks. (2017).
6.
go back to reference Nager C. Midurethral slings: evidence-based medicine vs the medicolegal system. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214:708.e1–5.CrossRef Nager C. Midurethral slings: evidence-based medicine vs the medicolegal system. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214:708.e1–5.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Rac G, et al. Stress urinary incontinence surgery trends in academic female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery urology practice in the setting of the food and drug administration public health notifications. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36:1155–60.CrossRefPubMed Rac G, et al. Stress urinary incontinence surgery trends in academic female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery urology practice in the setting of the food and drug administration public health notifications. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36:1155–60.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Viereck, et al. Guideline-based strategies in the surgical treatment of female urinary incontinence: the new gold standard is almost the same as the old one. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2016;76:865–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Viereck, et al. Guideline-based strategies in the surgical treatment of female urinary incontinence: the new gold standard is almost the same as the old one. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2016;76:865–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Schellart R, et al. A randomized comparison of a single-incision midurethral sling and a transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: results of 12-mo follow-up. Eur Urol. 2014;66:1179–85.CrossRefPubMed Schellart R, et al. A randomized comparison of a single-incision midurethral sling and a transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: results of 12-mo follow-up. Eur Urol. 2014;66:1179–85.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Waltregny D. Editorial comment on: complication rates of tension-free Midurethral slings in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing tension-free Midurethral tapes to other surgical procedures and different devices. Eur Urol. 2008;53:308–9.CrossRefPubMed Waltregny D. Editorial comment on: complication rates of tension-free Midurethral slings in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing tension-free Midurethral tapes to other surgical procedures and different devices. Eur Urol. 2008;53:308–9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Haylen B, et al. An international urogynecological association (IUGA)/international continence society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses (meshes, implants, tapes) and grafts in female pelvic floor surgery. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011;30:2–12.CrossRefPubMed Haylen B, et al. An international urogynecological association (IUGA)/international continence society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses (meshes, implants, tapes) and grafts in female pelvic floor surgery. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011;30:2–12.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Sivaslioglu A, Unlubilgin E, Aydogmus S, Keskin L, Dolen I. A prospective randomized controlled trial of the transobturator tape and tissue fixation mini-sling in patients with stress urinary incontinence: 5-year results. J Urol. 2012;188:194–9.CrossRefPubMed Sivaslioglu A, Unlubilgin E, Aydogmus S, Keskin L, Dolen I. A prospective randomized controlled trial of the transobturator tape and tissue fixation mini-sling in patients with stress urinary incontinence: 5-year results. J Urol. 2012;188:194–9.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Fernandez-Gonzalez S, Franco E, Miao X, Tardiu L. Contasure-needleless® compared with Monarc® for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28:1077–84.CrossRefPubMed Fernandez-Gonzalez S, Franco E, Miao X, Tardiu L. Contasure-needleless® compared with Monarc® for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28:1077–84.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Franco EM, Tardiu LA. Contasure-needleless® single incision sling compared with transobturator TVT-O® for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: long-term results. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26:213–8.CrossRef Franco EM, Tardiu LA. Contasure-needleless® single incision sling compared with transobturator TVT-O® for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: long-term results. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26:213–8.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Schweitzer K, et al. Postoperative pain after adjustable single-incision or Transobturator sling for incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125:27.CrossRefPubMed Schweitzer K, et al. Postoperative pain after adjustable single-incision or Transobturator sling for incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125:27.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Cetinel B, Ozkan B, Can G. The validation study of ICIQ-SF Turkish version. Turkish J Urol. 2004;30:332–8. Cetinel B, Ozkan B, Can G. The validation study of ICIQ-SF Turkish version. Turkish J Urol. 2004;30:332–8.
18.
go back to reference Taner CE, Okay G. Early complications of the transobturator tape and mini sling procedure. Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;11:1.CrossRef Taner CE, Okay G. Early complications of the transobturator tape and mini sling procedure. Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;11:1.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Welk B, Al-Hothi H, Winick-Ng J. Removal or revision of vaginal mesh used for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. JAMA Surg. 2015;150:1–9.CrossRef Welk B, Al-Hothi H, Winick-Ng J. Removal or revision of vaginal mesh used for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. JAMA Surg. 2015;150:1–9.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Lee J, Rosamilia A, Dwyer P, Lim Y, Muller R. Randomized trial of a single incision versus an outside-in transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: 12 month results. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213:35.e1–9.CrossRef Lee J, Rosamilia A, Dwyer P, Lim Y, Muller R. Randomized trial of a single incision versus an outside-in transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: 12 month results. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213:35.e1–9.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Chang C-P, et al. Comparison of single-incision mini-slings (Ajust) and standard transobturator midurethral slings (align) in the management of female stress urinary incontinence: a 1-year follow-up. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;54:726–30.CrossRefPubMed Chang C-P, et al. Comparison of single-incision mini-slings (Ajust) and standard transobturator midurethral slings (align) in the management of female stress urinary incontinence: a 1-year follow-up. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;54:726–30.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Mostafa A, Lim C, Hopper L, Madhuvrata P, Abdel-Fattah M. Single-incision mini-slings versus standard midurethral slings in surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness and complications. Eur Urol. 2014;65:402–27.CrossRefPubMed Mostafa A, Lim C, Hopper L, Madhuvrata P, Abdel-Fattah M. Single-incision mini-slings versus standard midurethral slings in surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness and complications. Eur Urol. 2014;65:402–27.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Masata J, et al. Comparison of the efficacy of tension-free vaginal tape obturator (TVT-O) and single-incision tension-free vaginal tape (Ajust™) in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a 1-year follow-up randomized trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27:1497–505.CrossRefPubMed Masata J, et al. Comparison of the efficacy of tension-free vaginal tape obturator (TVT-O) and single-incision tension-free vaginal tape (Ajust™) in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a 1-year follow-up randomized trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27:1497–505.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Abdel-Fattah M, Ford J, Lim C, Madhuvrata P. Single-incision mini-slings versus standard Midurethral slings in surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence: a meta-analysis of effectiveness and complications. Eur Urol. 2011;60:468–80.CrossRefPubMed Abdel-Fattah M, Ford J, Lim C, Madhuvrata P. Single-incision mini-slings versus standard Midurethral slings in surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence: a meta-analysis of effectiveness and complications. Eur Urol. 2011;60:468–80.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Miklos J, et al. The IUGA/ICS classification of synthetic mesh complications in female pelvic floor reconstructive surgery: a multicenter study. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27:933–8.CrossRefPubMed Miklos J, et al. The IUGA/ICS classification of synthetic mesh complications in female pelvic floor reconstructive surgery: a multicenter study. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27:933–8.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Djehdian L, et al. Transobturator sling compared with single-incision mini-sling for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:553.CrossRefPubMed Djehdian L, et al. Transobturator sling compared with single-incision mini-sling for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:553.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Padilla-Fernández B, et al. Results of the surgical correction of urinary stress incontinence according to the type of transobturator tape utilized. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2013;85:149–53.CrossRefPubMed Padilla-Fernández B, et al. Results of the surgical correction of urinary stress incontinence according to the type of transobturator tape utilized. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2013;85:149–53.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Firoozi F, et al. Purely transvaginal/perineal management of complications from commercial prolapse kits using a new prostheses/grafts complication classification system. J Urol. 2012;187:1674–9.CrossRefPubMed Firoozi F, et al. Purely transvaginal/perineal management of complications from commercial prolapse kits using a new prostheses/grafts complication classification system. J Urol. 2012;187:1674–9.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Marcus-Braun N, von Theobald P. Mesh removal following transvaginal mesh placement: a case series of 104 operations. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21:423–30.CrossRefPubMed Marcus-Braun N, von Theobald P. Mesh removal following transvaginal mesh placement: a case series of 104 operations. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21:423–30.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Tunitsky E, Abbott S, Barber M. Interrater reliability of the international continence society and international urogynecological association (ICS/IUGA) classification system for mesh-related complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206:442.e1–6.CrossRef Tunitsky E, Abbott S, Barber M. Interrater reliability of the international continence society and international urogynecological association (ICS/IUGA) classification system for mesh-related complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206:442.e1–6.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A randomized comparison of a single-incision needleless (Contasure-needleless®) mini-sling versus an inside-out transobturator (Contasure-KIM®) mid-urethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: 24-month follow-up results
Authors
Ozan Dogan
Aski Ellibes Kaya
Cigdem Pulatoglu
Alper Basbug
Murat Yassa
Publication date
01-09-2018
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 9/2018
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3624-4

Other articles of this Issue 9/2018

International Urogynecology Journal 9/2018 Go to the issue