Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 10/2017

01-10-2017 | Original Article

Three-dimensional volume rendering of pelvic models and paraurethral masses based on MRI cross-sectional images

Authors: Stergios K. Doumouchtsis, Daron A. Nazarian, Nivedita Gauthaman, Constantin M. Durnea, Graham Munneke

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 10/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Aims

Our aim was to assess the feasibility of rendering 3D pelvic models using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of patients with vaginal, urethral and paraurethral lesions and obtain additional information previously unavailable through 2D imaging modalities.

Methods

A purposive sample of five female patients 26-40 years old undergoing investigations for vaginal or paraurethral mass was obtained in a tertiary teaching hospital. 3D volume renderings of the bladder, urethra and paraurethral masses were constructed using 3D-Slicer v.3.4.0. Spatial dimensions were determined and compared with findings from clinical, MRI, surgical and histopathological reports.
The quality of information regarding size and location of paraurethral masses obtained from 3D models was compared with information from cross-sectional MRI and review of clinical, surgical and histopathological findings.

Results

The analysis of rendered 3D models yielded detailed anatomical dimensions and provided information that was in agreement and in higher detail than information based on clinical examination, cross-sectional 2D MRI analysis and histopathological reports. High-quality pelvic 3D models were rendered with the characteristics and resolution to allow identification and detailed viewing of the spatial relationship between anatomical structures.

Conclusions

To our knowledge, this is the first preliminary study to evaluate the role of MRI-based 3D pelvic models for investigating paraurethral masses. This is a feasible technique and may prove a useful addition to conventional 2D MRI. Further prospective studies are required to evaluate this modality for investigating such lesions and planning appropriate management.
Literature
5.
go back to reference Romanzi LJ, Groutz A, Blaivas JG. Urethral diverticulum in women: diverse presentations resulting in diagnostic delay and mismanagement. J Urol. 2000;164(2):428–33.CrossRefPubMed Romanzi LJ, Groutz A, Blaivas JG. Urethral diverticulum in women: diverse presentations resulting in diagnostic delay and mismanagement. J Urol. 2000;164(2):428–33.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Lee JW, Fynes MM. Female urethral diverticula. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;19(6):875–93.CrossRefPubMed Lee JW, Fynes MM. Female urethral diverticula. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;19(6):875–93.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Müller-Stich BP, Löb N, Wald D, Bruckner T, Meinzer H, Kadmon M, et al. Regular three-dimensional presentations improve in the identification of surgical liver anatomy – a randomized study. BMC Med Educ. 2013;25(13):131–8.CrossRef Müller-Stich BP, Löb N, Wald D, Bruckner T, Meinzer H, Kadmon M, et al. Regular three-dimensional presentations improve in the identification of surgical liver anatomy – a randomized study. BMC Med Educ. 2013;25(13):131–8.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kraima AC, Smit NN, Jansma D, Wallner C, Bleys RL, van de Velde CJH, et al. Toward a highly‐detailed 3D pelvic model: approaching an ultra‐specific level for surgical simulation and anatomical education. Clin Anat. 2013;26(3):333–8.CrossRefPubMed Kraima AC, Smit NN, Jansma D, Wallner C, Bleys RL, van de Velde CJH, et al. Toward a highly‐detailed 3D pelvic model: approaching an ultra‐specific level for surgical simulation and anatomical education. Clin Anat. 2013;26(3):333–8.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Beriault S, Al Subaie F, Mok K, Sadikot AF, Pike GB. Automatic trajectory planning of DBS neurosurgery form multimodal MRI datasets. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2011;14:259–66.PubMed Beriault S, Al Subaie F, Mok K, Sadikot AF, Pike GB. Automatic trajectory planning of DBS neurosurgery form multimodal MRI datasets. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2011;14:259–66.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Lesage D, Angelini ED, Bloch I, Funka-Lea G. A review of 3D vessel lumen segmentation techniques: models, features and extraction schemes. Med Image Anal. 2009;13(6):819–45.CrossRefPubMed Lesage D, Angelini ED, Bloch I, Funka-Lea G. A review of 3D vessel lumen segmentation techniques: models, features and extraction schemes. Med Image Anal. 2009;13(6):819–45.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Debarba HG, Zanchet DJ, Fracaro D, Maciel A, Kalil AN (2010). Efficient liver surgery planning in 3D based on functional segment classification and volumetric information. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 4797-4800. Debarba HG, Zanchet DJ, Fracaro D, Maciel A, Kalil AN (2010). Efficient liver surgery planning in 3D based on functional segment classification and volumetric information. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 4797-4800.
15.
go back to reference Reitinger B, Bornik A, Beichel R, Schmalstieg D. Liver surgery planning using virtual reality. IEEE Comput Graph Appl. 2006;26(6):36–47.CrossRefPubMed Reitinger B, Bornik A, Beichel R, Schmalstieg D. Liver surgery planning using virtual reality. IEEE Comput Graph Appl. 2006;26(6):36–47.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Heng PA, Cheng CY, Wong TT, Wu W, Xu Y, Xie Y, et al. Virtual reality techniques. application to anatomic visualization and orthopaedics training. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;442:5–12.CrossRefPubMed Heng PA, Cheng CY, Wong TT, Wu W, Xu Y, Xie Y, et al. Virtual reality techniques. application to anatomic visualization and orthopaedics training. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;442:5–12.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Jolesz FA, Nabavi A, Kikinis R. Integration of interventional MRI with computer‐assisted surgery. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;13(1):69–77.CrossRefPubMed Jolesz FA, Nabavi A, Kikinis R. Integration of interventional MRI with computer‐assisted surgery. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;13(1):69–77.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Nardos R, Thurmond A, Holland A, Gregory WT. Pelvic floor levator hiatus measurements: MRI versus ultrasound. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2014;20:216.CrossRefPubMed Nardos R, Thurmond A, Holland A, Gregory WT. Pelvic floor levator hiatus measurements: MRI versus ultrasound. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2014;20:216.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Three-dimensional volume rendering of pelvic models and paraurethral masses based on MRI cross-sectional images
Authors
Stergios K. Doumouchtsis
Daron A. Nazarian
Nivedita Gauthaman
Constantin M. Durnea
Graham Munneke
Publication date
01-10-2017
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 10/2017
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3317-4

Other articles of this Issue 10/2017

International Urogynecology Journal 10/2017 Go to the issue

Urogynecology Digest

Urogynecology digest