Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 6/2015

01-06-2015 | Original Article

The effect of age on stress and urgency urinary incontinence outcomes in women undergoing primary midurethral sling

Authors: Joseph M. Malek, David R. Ellington, Victoria Jauk, Jeff M. Szychowski, Alison M. Parden, Holly E. Richter

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 6/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The primary aim was to characterize stress urinary incontinence (SUI) symptom distress and impact after a midurethral sling (MUS) in women ≥70 compared to women <70 years of age.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of women undergoing a primary MUS was conducted. The primary outcome was SUI symptoms defined as either “moderately” or “quite a bit” responses to ≥1 of the two SUI questions of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20). Urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) was defined as either moderately or quite a bit responses to the UUI question of the PFDI-20. The Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7), Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ), and Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) questionnaires were also administered.

Results

The mean age of patients ≥70 years (n = 160) was 75.4 ± 4.5 and <70 years (n = 536) was 56.2 ± 9.4. Multivariable analysis revealed no difference in SUI failure rates in older compared to younger cohorts, adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.7, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.9–3.1. Women <70 demonstrated greater improvement in urinary incontinence (UI) symptom impact [−20.4 (33.0) vs −12.2 (30.7), p = 0.01] and women ≥70 had greater persistent UUI symptoms (31.5 vs 23.3 %, p = 0.04); there was no difference between cohorts in resolution of UUI (29.6 vs 34.2 %, p = 0.34). Younger women reported a greater impression of improvement compared to older women (67.7 vs 56.6 %, p = 0.01, respectively).

Conclusions

Older and younger women have similar SUI outcomes after MUS; however, older women have more persistent UUI and a worse impression of improvement of their urinary tract condition.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Groth T, Guralnick ML, O’Connor RC (2007) Review of female stress urinary incontinence. Minerva Med 98:203–209PubMed Groth T, Guralnick ML, O’Connor RC (2007) Review of female stress urinary incontinence. Minerva Med 98:203–209PubMed
2.
go back to reference Nilsson CG, Palva K, Rezapour M et al (2008) Eleven years prospective follow-up of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19:1043–1047CrossRefPubMed Nilsson CG, Palva K, Rezapour M et al (2008) Eleven years prospective follow-up of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19:1043–1047CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Oliphant SS, Wang L, Bunker CH et al (2009) Trends in stress urinary incontinence inpatient procedures in the United States, 1979–2004. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200:521.e1–521.e6CrossRef Oliphant SS, Wang L, Bunker CH et al (2009) Trends in stress urinary incontinence inpatient procedures in the United States, 1979–2004. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200:521.e1–521.e6CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Richter H, Albo ME, Zyczynski HM et al (2010) Retropubic versus transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence. N Engl J Med 362:2066–2076CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Richter H, Albo ME, Zyczynski HM et al (2010) Retropubic versus transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence. N Engl J Med 362:2066–2076CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
5.
go back to reference Anger JT, Litwin MS, Wang Q et al (2007) The effect of age on outcomes of sling surgery for urinary incontinence. J Am Geriatr Soc 55:1927–1931CrossRefPubMed Anger JT, Litwin MS, Wang Q et al (2007) The effect of age on outcomes of sling surgery for urinary incontinence. J Am Geriatr Soc 55:1927–1931CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Parden A, Gleason J, Jauk V et al (2013) Incontinence outcomes in women undergoing primary and repeat midurethral sling procedures. Obstet Gynecol 121:273–278PubMedCentralPubMed Parden A, Gleason J, Jauk V et al (2013) Incontinence outcomes in women undergoing primary and repeat midurethral sling procedures. Obstet Gynecol 121:273–278PubMedCentralPubMed
7.
go back to reference Ulmsten U, Henriksson L, Johnson P et al (1996) An ambulatory surgical procedure under local anesthesia for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 7:81–85CrossRefPubMed Ulmsten U, Henriksson L, Johnson P et al (1996) An ambulatory surgical procedure under local anesthesia for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 7:81–85CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Delorme E (2001) Transobturator urethral suspension: mini-invasive procedure in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women. Prog Urol 11:1306–1313PubMed Delorme E (2001) Transobturator urethral suspension: mini-invasive procedure in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women. Prog Urol 11:1306–1313PubMed
9.
go back to reference Barber MD, Chen Z, Lukacz E et al (2011) Further validation of the short form versions of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ). Neurourol Urodyn 30:541–546CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Barber MD, Chen Z, Lukacz E et al (2011) Further validation of the short form versions of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ). Neurourol Urodyn 30:541–546CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
10.
go back to reference Yalcin I, Bump R (2003) Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:98–101CrossRefPubMed Yalcin I, Bump R (2003) Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:98–101CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Burgio KL, Goode PS, Richter HE et al (2006) Global ratings of patient satisfaction and perceptions of improvement with treatment for urinary incontinence: validation of three global patient ratings. Neurourol Urodyn 25:411–417CrossRefPubMed Burgio KL, Goode PS, Richter HE et al (2006) Global ratings of patient satisfaction and perceptions of improvement with treatment for urinary incontinence: validation of three global patient ratings. Neurourol Urodyn 25:411–417CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Stav K, Dwyer PL, Rosamilia A et al (2010) Midurethral sling procedures for stress urinary incontinence in women over 80 years. Neurourol Urodyn 29:1262–1266CrossRefPubMed Stav K, Dwyer PL, Rosamilia A et al (2010) Midurethral sling procedures for stress urinary incontinence in women over 80 years. Neurourol Urodyn 29:1262–1266CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Barber MD, Spino C, Janz NK et al (2009) The minimum important differences for the urinary scales of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200:580.e1–580.e7CrossRef Barber MD, Spino C, Janz NK et al (2009) The minimum important differences for the urinary scales of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200:580.e1–580.e7CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Nager C, Sirls L, Litman H et al (2011) Baseline urodynamic predictors of treatment failure 1 year after midurethral sling surgery. J Urol 186:597–603CrossRefPubMed Nager C, Sirls L, Litman H et al (2011) Baseline urodynamic predictors of treatment failure 1 year after midurethral sling surgery. J Urol 186:597–603CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The effect of age on stress and urgency urinary incontinence outcomes in women undergoing primary midurethral sling
Authors
Joseph M. Malek
David R. Ellington
Victoria Jauk
Jeff M. Szychowski
Alison M. Parden
Holly E. Richter
Publication date
01-06-2015
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 6/2015
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2594-4

Other articles of this Issue 6/2015

International Urogynecology Journal 6/2015 Go to the issue