Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 7/2015

01-07-2015 | Original Article

Effects of walking speeds and carrying techniques on intra-abdominal pressure in women

Authors: Tanner J. Coleman, Nadia M. Hamad, Janet M. Shaw, Marlene J. Egger, Yvonne Hsu, Robert Hitchcock, Huifeng Jin, Chan K. Choi, Ingrid E. Nygaard

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 7/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Walking speed and carrying technique affect intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) in women. In this study, we tested the feasibility of monitoring IAP outside the laboratory environment and compared IAP while study participants were (1) carrying 13.6 kg (similar to a 3-month old in car seat) in six different ways while walking 100 m; and (2) while walking 400 m at self-selected slow, normal, and fast paces.

Methods

Forty-six healthy women between 19 and 54 years completed the walking and lifting activities; the order for each was randomized. IAP was monitored with an intravaginal pressure transducer that wirelessly transmitted pressure data to a portable base station. We analyzed maximal peak IAP and area under the curve (AUC) IAP.

Results

Monitoring IAP outside of the laboratory was feasible. Mean maximal IAP during walking increased as pace increased: 42.5 [standard deviation (SD) 10.2], 50.5 (10.9), and 62.0 (12.1) cmH2O for slow, medium, and fast speeds, respectively: p < 0.0001 by mixed-model analysis of variance (ANOVA). The corresponding AUC of IAP for walking decreased as pace increased. The awkward carry, side carry, and front carry activities each resulted in higher mean maximal IAP [65.8 (10.6), 67.7 (12.8), and 77.3 (13.1) cmH2O, respectively] than the carry-in-backpack activity [55.5 (11.4) cmH2O; p < 0.0001].

Conclusion

Subtle variations in walking speed or method of carrying a toddler-size load can produce significant changes in IAP. Whether these changes increase the risk of pelvic floor disorders is not yet clear. However, these data suggest that further inquiry into optimal methods and appliances to assist women in carrying may create a lower IAP profile.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Nygaard I, Barber MD, Burgio KL et al (2008) Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. JAMA J Am Med Assoc 300:1311–1316CrossRef Nygaard I, Barber MD, Burgio KL et al (2008) Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. JAMA J Am Med Assoc 300:1311–1316CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Moalli PA, Ivy SJ, Meyn LA, Zyczynski HM (2003) Risk factors associated with pelvic floor disorders in women undergoing surgical repair. Obstet Gynecol 101:869PubMedCrossRef Moalli PA, Ivy SJ, Meyn LA, Zyczynski HM (2003) Risk factors associated with pelvic floor disorders in women undergoing surgical repair. Obstet Gynecol 101:869PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Coleman TJ, Thomsen JC, Maass SD, et al. (2011) Development of a wireless intra-vaginal transducer for monitoring intra-abdominal pressure in women. Biomed Microdevices 1–9 Coleman TJ, Thomsen JC, Maass SD, et al. (2011) Development of a wireless intra-vaginal transducer for monitoring intra-abdominal pressure in women. Biomed Microdevices 1–9
7.
go back to reference Johnson PJ, Rosenbluth EM, Nygaard IE et al (2009) Development of a novel intra-vaginal transducer with improved dynamic response. Biomed Microdevices 11:1213–1221PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Johnson PJ, Rosenbluth EM, Nygaard IE et al (2009) Development of a novel intra-vaginal transducer with improved dynamic response. Biomed Microdevices 11:1213–1221PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
8.
9.
go back to reference Shaw JM, Hamad NM, Coleman TJ et al (2014) Intra-abdominal pressures during activity in women using an intra-vaginal pressure transducer. J Sports Sci 32:1176–1185PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Shaw JM, Hamad NM, Coleman TJ et al (2014) Intra-abdominal pressures during activity in women using an intra-vaginal pressure transducer. J Sports Sci 32:1176–1185PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Thomas S, Reading J, Shephard RJ (1992) Revision of the physical activity readiness questionnaire (PAR-Q). Can J Sport Sci Thomas S, Reading J, Shephard RJ (1992) Revision of the physical activity readiness questionnaire (PAR-Q). Can J Sport Sci
12.
go back to reference Hamad N, Shaw J, Nygaard I et al (2013) More complicated than it looks: the vagaries of calculating intra-abdominal pressure. J Strength Cond Res 27:3204–3215PubMedCrossRef Hamad N, Shaw J, Nygaard I et al (2013) More complicated than it looks: the vagaries of calculating intra-abdominal pressure. J Strength Cond Res 27:3204–3215PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Harrell FE (2001) Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. Springer, New YorkCrossRef Harrell FE (2001) Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. Springer, New YorkCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Grillner S, Nilsson J, Thorstensson A (1978) Intra-abdominal pressure changes during natural movements in man. Acta Physiol Scand 103:275–283PubMedCrossRef Grillner S, Nilsson J, Thorstensson A (1978) Intra-abdominal pressure changes during natural movements in man. Acta Physiol Scand 103:275–283PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference McCarthy TA (1982) Validity of rectal pressure measurements as indication of intra-abdominal pressure changes during urodynamic evaluation. Urology 20:657–660PubMedCrossRef McCarthy TA (1982) Validity of rectal pressure measurements as indication of intra-abdominal pressure changes during urodynamic evaluation. Urology 20:657–660PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Fusco MA, Martin RS et al (2001) Estimation of intra-abdominal pressure by bladder pressure measurement: validity and methodology. J Trauma 50:297PubMedCrossRef Fusco MA, Martin RS et al (2001) Estimation of intra-abdominal pressure by bladder pressure measurement: validity and methodology. J Trauma 50:297PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Dolan LM, Dixon WE, Brown K et al (2005) Randomized comparison of vaginal and rectal measurement of intra-abdominal pressure during subtracted dual-channel cystometry. Urology 65:1059–1063PubMedCrossRef Dolan LM, Dixon WE, Brown K et al (2005) Randomized comparison of vaginal and rectal measurement of intra-abdominal pressure during subtracted dual-channel cystometry. Urology 65:1059–1063PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Iberti TJ, Kelly KM, Gentili DR et al (1987) A simple technique to accurately determine intra-abdominal pressure. Crit Care Med 15:1140PubMedCrossRef Iberti TJ, Kelly KM, Gentili DR et al (1987) A simple technique to accurately determine intra-abdominal pressure. Crit Care Med 15:1140PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lewis Wall L, Hewitt JK, Helms MJ (1995) Are vaginal and rectal pressures equivalent approximations of one another for the purpose of performing subtracted cystometry? Obstet Gynecol 85:488–493CrossRef Lewis Wall L, Hewitt JK, Helms MJ (1995) Are vaginal and rectal pressures equivalent approximations of one another for the purpose of performing subtracted cystometry? Obstet Gynecol 85:488–493CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Egger MJ, Hamad NM, Hitchcock RW, Coleman TJ, Shaw JM, Hsu Y, Nygaard IE. (2014) Reproducibility of intra-abdominal pressure measured during physical activities via a wireless vaginal transducer. In press, female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery Egger MJ, Hamad NM, Hitchcock RW, Coleman TJ, Shaw JM, Hsu Y, Nygaard IE. (2014) Reproducibility of intra-abdominal pressure measured during physical activities via a wireless vaginal transducer. In press, female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery
Metadata
Title
Effects of walking speeds and carrying techniques on intra-abdominal pressure in women
Authors
Tanner J. Coleman
Nadia M. Hamad
Janet M. Shaw
Marlene J. Egger
Yvonne Hsu
Robert Hitchcock
Huifeng Jin
Chan K. Choi
Ingrid E. Nygaard
Publication date
01-07-2015
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 7/2015
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2593-5

Other articles of this Issue 7/2015

International Urogynecology Journal 7/2015 Go to the issue

Urogynecology Digest

Urogynecology digest