Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 9/2014

01-09-2014 | Original Article

Perioperative complications of robotic sacrocolpopexy for post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse

Authors: Mallika Anand, Joshua L. Woelk, Amy L. Weaver, Emanuel C. Trabuco, Christopher J. Klingele, John B. Gebhart

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 9/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Open abdominal sacrocolpopexy has been the preferred treatment for post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse. In light of the rise in popularity of less invasive robotic sacrocolpopexy, our objective was to compare perioperative complications of robotic vs open sacrocolpopexy.

Methods

This was a single-institution, retrospective cohort study of robotic and open sacrocolpopexies. Robotic sacrocolpopexies performed between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2009 were compared with open cases performed between 1 January 2002 and 31 December 2006. Baseline and intraoperative variables of the groups were compared. Complications were compared univariately and in a multivariable logistic regression model to adjust for prior transabdominal surgery.

Results

A total of 50 robotic and 87 open sacrocolpopexies were analyzed. Baseline characteristics were similar, but patients in the open group had more prior transabdominal surgeries. The robotically assisted group had decreased estimated blood loss (median, 100 mL vs 150 mL; P = 0.002) and hospital stay (median, 2 days vs 3 days; P < 0.001), but increased operative time (median, 4.6 vs 2.9 h; P < 0.001), cystotomy (10.0 % [5 out of 50] vs 1.1 % [1 out of 87]; P = 0.02), and vaginotomy (24.0 % [12 out of 50] vs 5.7 % [5 out of 87]; P = 0.003). Two patients in the robotically assisted group had postoperative hernia. There were no differences in rates of ureteral or bowel injury, urinary tract infection, ileus, bowel obstruction, or overall complications.

Conclusions

Overall complication rates of robotic and open sacrocolpopexy were not significantly different. The robotically assisted group experienced shorter hospital stay but increased operative times and increased incidence of cystotomy and vaginotomy, possibly reflecting the learning curve of robotic sacrocolpopexy.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Schmid C (2013) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD004014PubMed Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Schmid C (2013) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD004014PubMed
3.
go back to reference Ostrzenski A (1996) Laparoscopic colposuspension for total vaginal prolapse. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 55(2):147–152PubMed Ostrzenski A (1996) Laparoscopic colposuspension for total vaginal prolapse. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 55(2):147–152PubMed
4.
go back to reference Di Marco DS, Chow GK, Gettman MT, Elliott DS (2004) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of vaginal vault prolapse. Urology 63(2):373–376PubMedCrossRef Di Marco DS, Chow GK, Gettman MT, Elliott DS (2004) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of vaginal vault prolapse. Urology 63(2):373–376PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Advincula AP, Song A (2007) The role of robotic surgery in gynecology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 19(4):331–336PubMedCrossRef Advincula AP, Song A (2007) The role of robotic surgery in gynecology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 19(4):331–336PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Parnell BA, Matthews CA (2011) Robot-assisted techniques and outcomes in the realm of pelvic reconstructive surgery. Clin Obstet Gynecol 54(3):412–419PubMedCrossRef Parnell BA, Matthews CA (2011) Robot-assisted techniques and outcomes in the realm of pelvic reconstructive surgery. Clin Obstet Gynecol 54(3):412–419PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Geller EJ, Siddiqui NY, Wu JM, Visco AG (2008) Short-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy compared with abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol 112(6):1201–1206PubMedCrossRef Geller EJ, Siddiqui NY, Wu JM, Visco AG (2008) Short-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy compared with abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol 112(6):1201–1206PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Siddiqui NY, Geller EJ, Visco AG (2012) Symptomatic and anatomic 1-year outcomes after robotic and abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 206(5):435.e1–435.e5CrossRef Siddiqui NY, Geller EJ, Visco AG (2012) Symptomatic and anatomic 1-year outcomes after robotic and abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 206(5):435.e1–435.e5CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40(5):373–383PubMedCrossRef Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40(5):373–383PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Freeman RM, Pantazis K, Thomson A, Frappell J, Bombieri L, Moran P et al (2013) A randomised controlled trial of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: LAS study. Int Urogynecol J 24(3):377–384PubMedCrossRef Freeman RM, Pantazis K, Thomson A, Frappell J, Bombieri L, Moran P et al (2013) A randomised controlled trial of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: LAS study. Int Urogynecol J 24(3):377–384PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Akl MN, Long JB, Giles DL, Cornella JL, Pettit PD, Chen AH et al (2009) Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: technique and learning curve. Surg Endosc 23(10):2390–2394PubMedCrossRef Akl MN, Long JB, Giles DL, Cornella JL, Pettit PD, Chen AH et al (2009) Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: technique and learning curve. Surg Endosc 23(10):2390–2394PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Mustafa S, Amit A, Filmar S, Deutsch M, Netzer I, Itskovitz-Eldor J et al (2012) Implementation of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: establishment of a learning curve and short-term outcomes. Arch Gynecol Obstet 286(4):983–988PubMed Mustafa S, Amit A, Filmar S, Deutsch M, Netzer I, Itskovitz-Eldor J et al (2012) Implementation of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: establishment of a learning curve and short-term outcomes. Arch Gynecol Obstet 286(4):983–988PubMed
13.
go back to reference Woelk JL, Casiano ER, Weaver AL, Gostout BS, Trabuco EC, Gebhart JB (2013) The learning curve of robotic hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 121(1):87–95PubMed Woelk JL, Casiano ER, Weaver AL, Gostout BS, Trabuco EC, Gebhart JB (2013) The learning curve of robotic hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 121(1):87–95PubMed
14.
go back to reference Lenihan JP Jr, Kovanda C, Seshadri-Kreaden U (2008) What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery? J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15(5):589–594PubMed Lenihan JP Jr, Kovanda C, Seshadri-Kreaden U (2008) What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery? J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15(5):589–594PubMed
15.
go back to reference Bell MC, Torgerson JL, Kreaden U (2009) The first 100 da Vinci hysterectomies: an analysis of the learning curve for a single surgeon. S D Med 62(3):93–95 Bell MC, Torgerson JL, Kreaden U (2009) The first 100 da Vinci hysterectomies: an analysis of the learning curve for a single surgeon. S D Med 62(3):93–95
16.
go back to reference Yamamoto M, Minikel L, Zaritsky E (2011) Laparoscopic 5-mm trocar site herniation and literature review. JSLS 15(1):122–126PubMedCentralPubMed Yamamoto M, Minikel L, Zaritsky E (2011) Laparoscopic 5-mm trocar site herniation and literature review. JSLS 15(1):122–126PubMedCentralPubMed
Metadata
Title
Perioperative complications of robotic sacrocolpopexy for post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse
Authors
Mallika Anand
Joshua L. Woelk
Amy L. Weaver
Emanuel C. Trabuco
Christopher J. Klingele
John B. Gebhart
Publication date
01-09-2014
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 9/2014
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2379-9

Other articles of this Issue 9/2014

International Urogynecology Journal 9/2014 Go to the issue