Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 2/2013

01-02-2013 | Original Article

Perioperative experience of pelvic organ prolapse repair with the Prolift® and Elevate® vaginal mesh procedures

Authors: Gregory P. McLennan, Larry T. Sirls, Kim A. Killinger, Dmitriy Nikolavsky, Judith A. Boura, Melissa C. Fischer, Kenneth M. Peters

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 2/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

We compared the operative and immediate postoperative experience of the trocar-based Prolift® and non-trocar-based Elevate® techniques used to repair vaginal prolapse.

Methods

A retrospective review of Prolift and Elevate repairs was performed. Baseline characteristics and operative and postoperative variables evaluated included compartment(s) repaired, adjacent organ injury, operative time (OT), change in hemoglobin (ΔH), pain score, narcotic use, length of stay (LOS), and short-term complications. Categorical variables were assessed as counts and percent frequency. Data were compared using chi-squared analysis and paired t test.

Results

Prolift (n = 143) and Elevate (n = 77) patients were similar in age (p = 0.19). Concurrent hysterectomy was done in 22 (15.4 %) and 24 (31.2 %), respectively, and concurrent midurethral sling placed in 100 (70 %) and 50 (65 %), respectively. LOS (median, 25th,75th) after anterior/apical compartment repairs was shorter with Elevate, whether with (1.0; 1.0,1.5 vs. 2.0 days;1.0, 2.0; p = 0.003) or without (2.0; 1.0, 2.0 vs. 2.0 days; 2.0, 3.0; p = 0.024) hysterectomy, but no differences in OT, ΔH, pain score, or narcotic use occurred. Posterior compartment mean pain scores were lower with Prolift (3.6 ± 2.2 vs. 1.7 ± 1.5, p = 0.035), and three-compartment-repair pain scores were lower with Elevate (0.6 ± 1.3 vs 2.5 ± 1.9; p = 0.013). Three bladder injuries occurred with Prolift but none with Elevate.

Conclusions

Operative and postoperative experiences were similar between groups; however, Elevate anterior/apical repairs had shorter LOS, which might reflect more aggressive discharge planning. There were no bowel or major vascular injuries, and the Prolift trocar bladder injuries did not alter the surgical procedure.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Carey MH, Higgs P, Goh J (2009) Vaginal repair with mesh versus colporrhaphy for prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Brit J Obstet Gynecol 116(10):1380–1386CrossRef Carey MH, Higgs P, Goh J (2009) Vaginal repair with mesh versus colporrhaphy for prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Brit J Obstet Gynecol 116(10):1380–1386CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K et al (2010) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD004014PubMed Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K et al (2010) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD004014PubMed
3.
go back to reference Altman D, Vayrynen T, Engh ME (2011) Anterior colporrhaphy versus transvaginal mesh for pelvic-organ prolapse. N Eng J Med 364(19):1826–1836CrossRef Altman D, Vayrynen T, Engh ME (2011) Anterior colporrhaphy versus transvaginal mesh for pelvic-organ prolapse. N Eng J Med 364(19):1826–1836CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hiltunen R, Takala T, Heiskanen E et al (2010) Outcomes after anterior vaginal wall repair with mesh: a randomized, controlled trial with a 3 year follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203(3):235PubMed Hiltunen R, Takala T, Heiskanen E et al (2010) Outcomes after anterior vaginal wall repair with mesh: a randomized, controlled trial with a 3 year follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203(3):235PubMed
6.
go back to reference Simon M, Debodinance P (2011) Vaginal prolapse repair using the Prolift® kit: a registry of 100 successive cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 158(1):104–109PubMedCrossRef Simon M, Debodinance P (2011) Vaginal prolapse repair using the Prolift® kit: a registry of 100 successive cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 158(1):104–109PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Nair R, Nnochiri A, Barnick C et al (2011) Transvaginal mesh (Prolift ®): 2-year anatomic outcomes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 158(2):358–360PubMedCrossRef Nair R, Nnochiri A, Barnick C et al (2011) Transvaginal mesh (Prolift ®): 2-year anatomic outcomes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 158(2):358–360PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Littman PM, Culligan PJ (2009) The rapid evolution of vaginal mesh delivery systems for the correction of pelvic organ prolapse: Part 1. The Female Patient 34:1–8 Littman PM, Culligan PJ (2009) The rapid evolution of vaginal mesh delivery systems for the correction of pelvic organ prolapse: Part 1. The Female Patient 34:1–8
9.
go back to reference Gammaitoni AR, Fine P, Alvarez N et al (2003) Clinical application of opioid equianalgesic data. Clin J Pain 19(5):286–297PubMedCrossRef Gammaitoni AR, Fine P, Alvarez N et al (2003) Clinical application of opioid equianalgesic data. Clin J Pain 19(5):286–297PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Rooney K, Kenton K, Mueller ER et al (2006) Advanced anterior vaginal wall prolapse is highly correlated with apical prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195(6):1837–1840PubMedCrossRef Rooney K, Kenton K, Mueller ER et al (2006) Advanced anterior vaginal wall prolapse is highly correlated with apical prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195(6):1837–1840PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Elliot CS, Hsieh MH, Sokol ER et al (2012) Robot-Assisted versus open sacrocolpopexy: a cost- minimization analysis. J Urol 187(2):638–643CrossRef Elliot CS, Hsieh MH, Sokol ER et al (2012) Robot-Assisted versus open sacrocolpopexy: a cost- minimization analysis. J Urol 187(2):638–643CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Geller EJ, Siddiqui NY, Wu JM (2008) Short-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy compared with abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol 112(6):1201–1206PubMedCrossRef Geller EJ, Siddiqui NY, Wu JM (2008) Short-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy compared with abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol 112(6):1201–1206PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lee MH, Ingvertsen BT, Kirpensteijn J et al (2006) Quantification of surgical blood loss. Vet Surg 35(4):388–393PubMedCrossRef Lee MH, Ingvertsen BT, Kirpensteijn J et al (2006) Quantification of surgical blood loss. Vet Surg 35(4):388–393PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Perioperative experience of pelvic organ prolapse repair with the Prolift® and Elevate® vaginal mesh procedures
Authors
Gregory P. McLennan
Larry T. Sirls
Kim A. Killinger
Dmitriy Nikolavsky
Judith A. Boura
Melissa C. Fischer
Kenneth M. Peters
Publication date
01-02-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 2/2013
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1830-z

Other articles of this Issue 2/2013

International Urogynecology Journal 2/2013 Go to the issue