Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 10/2010

01-10-2010 | Original Article

Preoperative Valsalva voiding increases the risk of urinary retention after midurethral sling placement

Authors: Khanh N. Pham, Nicole Topp, Michael L. Guralnick, Sumana Koduri, Julianne R. Newcomer, Robert Corey O’Connor

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 10/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

A subset of neurologically normal females void by efficient Valsalva, not detrusor contraction. We determined the incidence of urinary retention following midurethral sling (MUS) placement in women that void by detrusor contraction versus Valsalva.

Methods

Review of patients undergoing MUS insertion between 2002 and 2009 for urodynamic stress incontinence was performed. Women with concomitant pelvic surgery, previous incontinence surgery, or preoperative incomplete bladder emptying were excluded. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on preoperative urodynamic findings—those that voided with a detrusor contraction >10 cm of water and those that voided by Valsalva.

Results

One hundred seven patients were available for analysis. The postoperative urinary retention rate was 22% and 5% in the Valsalva and non-Valsalva groups, respectively (p < 0.05). Mean retention duration was 3 weeks for each cohort (range 1–6).

Conclusions

Women voiding by Valsalva are at increased risk of urinary retention following MUS placement.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Petros P, Ulmsten U (1995) Intravaginal slingplasty. An ambulatory surgical procedure for treatment of female urinary stress incontinence. Scand J Urol Nephrol 29:75–82CrossRefPubMed Petros P, Ulmsten U (1995) Intravaginal slingplasty. An ambulatory surgical procedure for treatment of female urinary stress incontinence. Scand J Urol Nephrol 29:75–82CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Morey AF, Medendorp AR, Noller MW et al (2006) Transobturator versus transabdominal mid urethral slings: a multi-institutional comparison of obstructive voiding complications. J Urol 175:1014–1017CrossRefPubMed Morey AF, Medendorp AR, Noller MW et al (2006) Transobturator versus transabdominal mid urethral slings: a multi-institutional comparison of obstructive voiding complications. J Urol 175:1014–1017CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Paick J, Cho MC, Oh S et al (2007) Factors influencing the outcome of mid urethral sling procedures for female urinary incontinence. J Urol 178:985–989CrossRefPubMed Paick J, Cho MC, Oh S et al (2007) Factors influencing the outcome of mid urethral sling procedures for female urinary incontinence. J Urol 178:985–989CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Charalambous S, Touloupidis S, Fatles G et al (2008) Transvaginal versus transobturator approach for synthetic sling placement in patients with stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 19:357–360CrossRef Charalambous S, Touloupidis S, Fatles G et al (2008) Transvaginal versus transobturator approach for synthetic sling placement in patients with stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 19:357–360CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Jones R, Abrams P, Hilton P et al (2010) Risk of tape-related complications after TVT is at least 4%. Neurourol Urodyn 29:40–41CrossRefPubMed Jones R, Abrams P, Hilton P et al (2010) Risk of tape-related complications after TVT is at least 4%. Neurourol Urodyn 29:40–41CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Klutke C, Siegel S, Carlin B et al (2001) Urinary retention after tension-free vaginal tape procedure: incidence and treatment. Urology 58:697–701CrossRefPubMed Klutke C, Siegel S, Carlin B et al (2001) Urinary retention after tension-free vaginal tape procedure: incidence and treatment. Urology 58:697–701CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Barron KI, Savageau JA, Young SB et al (2006) Prediction of successful voiding immediately after outpatient mid-urethral sling. Int Urogynecol J 17:570–575CrossRef Barron KI, Savageau JA, Young SB et al (2006) Prediction of successful voiding immediately after outpatient mid-urethral sling. Int Urogynecol J 17:570–575CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Meschia M, Bertozzi R, Pifarotti P et al (2007) Peri-operative morbidity and early results of a randomized trial comparing TVT and TVT-O. Int Urogynecol J 18:1257–1261CrossRef Meschia M, Bertozzi R, Pifarotti P et al (2007) Peri-operative morbidity and early results of a randomized trial comparing TVT and TVT-O. Int Urogynecol J 18:1257–1261CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Miller ER (1996) Physiology of the lower urinary tract. Urol Clin N Am 23:171–176CrossRef Miller ER (1996) Physiology of the lower urinary tract. Urol Clin N Am 23:171–176CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Bhatia NN, Bergman A (1984) Urodynamic predictability of voiding following incontinence surgery. Obstet Gynecol 63:85–91PubMed Bhatia NN, Bergman A (1984) Urodynamic predictability of voiding following incontinence surgery. Obstet Gynecol 63:85–91PubMed
11.
go back to reference Miller EA, Amundsen CL, Toh KL et al (2003) Preoperative urodynamic evaluation may predict voiding dysfunction in women undergoing pubovaginal sling. J Urol 169:2234–2237CrossRefPubMed Miller EA, Amundsen CL, Toh KL et al (2003) Preoperative urodynamic evaluation may predict voiding dysfunction in women undergoing pubovaginal sling. J Urol 169:2234–2237CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Debodinance P, Delporte P, Engrand JB et al (2002) Tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) in the treatment of urinary stress incontinence: 3 years experience involving 256 operations. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 105:49–58CrossRefPubMed Debodinance P, Delporte P, Engrand JB et al (2002) Tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) in the treatment of urinary stress incontinence: 3 years experience involving 256 operations. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 105:49–58CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Weinberger MW, Ostergard DR (1996) Postoperative catheterization, urinary retention, and permanent voiding dysfunction after polytetrafluoroethylene suburethral sling placement. Obstet Gynecol 87:50–54CrossRefPubMed Weinberger MW, Ostergard DR (1996) Postoperative catheterization, urinary retention, and permanent voiding dysfunction after polytetrafluoroethylene suburethral sling placement. Obstet Gynecol 87:50–54CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Lemack GE, Krauss S, Litman H et al (2008) Normal preoperative urodynamic testing does not predict voiding dysfunction after Burch colposuspension versus pubovaginal sling. J Urol 189:2076–2080CrossRef Lemack GE, Krauss S, Litman H et al (2008) Normal preoperative urodynamic testing does not predict voiding dysfunction after Burch colposuspension versus pubovaginal sling. J Urol 189:2076–2080CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Duckett JR, Patil A, Papanikolaou NS (2008) Predicting early voiding dysfunction after tension-free vaginal tape. J Obstet Gynaecol 28:89–92CrossRefPubMed Duckett JR, Patil A, Papanikolaou NS (2008) Predicting early voiding dysfunction after tension-free vaginal tape. J Obstet Gynaecol 28:89–92CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Wheeler TL, Richter HE, Greer WJ et al (2008) Predictors of success with postoperative voiding trials after a mid urethral sling procedure. J Urol 179:600–604CrossRefPubMed Wheeler TL, Richter HE, Greer WJ et al (2008) Predictors of success with postoperative voiding trials after a mid urethral sling procedure. J Urol 179:600–604CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Salin A, Conquy S, Elie C et al (2007) Identification of risk factors for voiding dysfunction following TVT placement. Eur Urol 51:782–787CrossRefPubMed Salin A, Conquy S, Elie C et al (2007) Identification of risk factors for voiding dysfunction following TVT placement. Eur Urol 51:782–787CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Preoperative Valsalva voiding increases the risk of urinary retention after midurethral sling placement
Authors
Khanh N. Pham
Nicole Topp
Michael L. Guralnick
Sumana Koduri
Julianne R. Newcomer
Robert Corey O’Connor
Publication date
01-10-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 10/2010
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1177-2

Other articles of this Issue 10/2010

International Urogynecology Journal 10/2010 Go to the issue