Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 2/2006

01-02-2006 | Original Article

Vaginal pessaries in managing women with pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence: patient characteristics and factors contributing to success

Authors: Lesley-Ann M. Hanson, Jane A. Schulz, Catherine G. Flood, Bonita Cooley, Florence Tam

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 2/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective: An aging population has resulted in higher prevalence of urinary incontinence (UI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP). This study examines a nurse-run clinic and analyzes the factors contributing to successful pessary use. Study design: A retrospective chart review of 1,216 patients was completed. History, pelvic examination and pessary fitting was done. Data was analyzed utilizing a categorical model of maximum-likelihood estimation to investigate relationships. Results: Median patient age was 63 years. Median number of pessaries tried was two. Eighty-five percent of post-menopausal women were on hormone replacement therapy (HRT) prior to fitting. Highest success rate of 78% was in the group on both systemic and local HRT. Success rates ranged from 58% for urge incontinence to 83% for uterine prolapse. Prior vaginal surgery was a factor impacting success. In our series highest success rates for fitting were obtained with ring pessaries, ring with support, and gellhorns. Conclusions: This model is a viable, option for the conservative management of UI and POP. Local HRT plays an important role in successful pessary fitting. Complications are rare.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Bhatia NN, Bergman A (1985) Pessary test in women with urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 65:325–327 Bhatia NN, Bergman A (1985) Pessary test in women with urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 65:325–327
3.
go back to reference Maubon AJ, Boncoeur-Martel MP, Juhan V, Courtieu CR, Thurmond AS, Aubas P, Mares P, Rouanet JP (2000) Static and dynamic MRI of a urinary control intra-vaginal device. Eur Radiol 10:879–884PubMed Maubon AJ, Boncoeur-Martel MP, Juhan V, Courtieu CR, Thurmond AS, Aubas P, Mares P, Rouanet JP (2000) Static and dynamic MRI of a urinary control intra-vaginal device. Eur Radiol 10:879–884PubMed
4.
go back to reference Hextall A, Boos K, Cardozo L, Toozs-Hobson P, Anders K, Khullar V (1998) Videocystourethrography with a ring pessary in situ: a clinically useful preoperative investigation for continent women with urogenital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 9:205–209CrossRef Hextall A, Boos K, Cardozo L, Toozs-Hobson P, Anders K, Khullar V (1998) Videocystourethrography with a ring pessary in situ: a clinically useful preoperative investigation for continent women with urogenital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 9:205–209CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Poma PA (2000) Nonsurgical management of genital prolapse: A review and recommendations for clinical practice. J Reprod Med 45(10):789–797PubMed Poma PA (2000) Nonsurgical management of genital prolapse: A review and recommendations for clinical practice. J Reprod Med 45(10):789–797PubMed
6.
go back to reference Pott-Grinstein E, Newcomer JR (2001) Gynecologists’ patterns of prescribing pessaries. J Reprod Med 46(3):205–208PubMed Pott-Grinstein E, Newcomer JR (2001) Gynecologists’ patterns of prescribing pessaries. J Reprod Med 46(3):205–208PubMed
7.
go back to reference Davila GW (1996) Vaginal prolapse: management with nonsurgical techniques. Postgrad Med 99(4):171–185PubMed Davila GW (1996) Vaginal prolapse: management with nonsurgical techniques. Postgrad Med 99(4):171–185PubMed
8.
go back to reference Wu V, Farrell SA (1997) A simplified protocol for pessary management. Obstet Gynecol 90(6):990–994PubMed Wu V, Farrell SA (1997) A simplified protocol for pessary management. Obstet Gynecol 90(6):990–994PubMed
9.
go back to reference Farrell SA (2001) Pessaries for the management of stress urinary incontinence. J Obstet Gynecol 23(12):1184–1189 Farrell SA (2001) Pessaries for the management of stress urinary incontinence. J Obstet Gynecol 23(12):1184–1189
10.
go back to reference Nygaard IE (1995) Prevention of exercise incontinence with mechanical devices. J Reprod Med 40(2):89–94PubMed Nygaard IE (1995) Prevention of exercise incontinence with mechanical devices. J Reprod Med 40(2):89–94PubMed
11.
go back to reference Palumbo MV (2000) Pessary placement and management. Ostomy/Wound Manag 46(12):40–45 Palumbo MV (2000) Pessary placement and management. Ostomy/Wound Manag 46(12):40–45
12.
go back to reference Sulak PJ, Kuehl TJ, Shull BL (1993) Vaginal pessaries and their use in pelvic relaxation. J Reprod Med 38(12):919–923PubMed Sulak PJ, Kuehl TJ, Shull BL (1993) Vaginal pessaries and their use in pelvic relaxation. J Reprod Med 38(12):919–923PubMed
13.
go back to reference Flood CG, Hanson LAM (2003) Support devices. In: Drutz HP, Herschorn S, Diamant NE (eds) Female pelvic medicine and reconstructive pelvic surgery. Springer-Verlag, London, pp 289–298 Flood CG, Hanson LAM (2003) Support devices. In: Drutz HP, Herschorn S, Diamant NE (eds) Female pelvic medicine and reconstructive pelvic surgery. Springer-Verlag, London, pp 289–298
Metadata
Title
Vaginal pessaries in managing women with pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence: patient characteristics and factors contributing to success
Authors
Lesley-Ann M. Hanson
Jane A. Schulz
Catherine G. Flood
Bonita Cooley
Florence Tam
Publication date
01-02-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 2/2006
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-005-1362-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2006

International Urogynecology Journal 2/2006 Go to the issue