Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 1/2005

01-02-2005 | Original Article

Symptoms of voiding dysfunction: what do they really mean?

Authors: H. P. Dietz, B. T. Haylen

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 1/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Many women presenting with pelvic floor dysfunction will complain of voiding symptoms. This study examines the relationship between such symptoms and uroflowmetry parameters in 414 women with complaints of pelvic floor dysfunction who underwent free uroflowmetry with a weight transducer type flowmeter. Symptoms of voiding dysfunction were ascertained by interview, with symptoms rated positive if they occurred more than occasionally. Symptoms were correlated with maximum urine flow rate and maximum urine flow rate centiles: 356 women voided between 50 and 600 ml; these datasets were used for analysis. Average age was 57.4 years (range: 17–86). Symptoms of voiding dysfunction were common (62%): 26% of women described hesitancy, 28% a poor stream, 26% stop- start voiding, 15% straining to void, and 35% incomplete emptying/need to revoid. As a group, symptoms of voiding dysfunction were associated with reduced maximum urine flow rate centiles (28.1 vs 36.3, p= 0.011). The strength of the association varied markedly, with only hesitancy (p=0.002), poor stream (p<0.001), and stop-start voiding (p=0.014) reaching significance. Hesitancy, poor stream, and stop-start voiding were the only symptoms predictive of voiding impairment. Straining to void and the sensation of incomplete emptying or the need to revoid were not associated with a significant reduction in maximum flow rate centiles.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Groutz A, Gordon D, Lessing JB, Wolman I, Jaffa A, David MP (1999) Prevalence and characteristics of voiding difficulties in women: are subjective symptoms substantiated by objective urodynamic data? Urology 54:268–272CrossRefPubMed Groutz A, Gordon D, Lessing JB, Wolman I, Jaffa A, David MP (1999) Prevalence and characteristics of voiding difficulties in women: are subjective symptoms substantiated by objective urodynamic data? Urology 54:268–272CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Haylen BT, Law MG, Frazer M, Schulz S (1999) Urine flow rates and residual urine volumes in urogynecology patients. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 10:378–383CrossRefPubMed Haylen BT, Law MG, Frazer M, Schulz S (1999) Urine flow rates and residual urine volumes in urogynecology patients. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 10:378–383CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Haylen BT (2000) Voiding difficulty in women (review). Int Urogynecol J 11:1–3 Haylen BT (2000) Voiding difficulty in women (review). Int Urogynecol J 11:1–3
4.
go back to reference Onyeka BA (2003) A prospective study of the contribution of uroflowmetry in urodynamic investigation. J Obstet Gynaecol 23:191–192CrossRefPubMed Onyeka BA (2003) A prospective study of the contribution of uroflowmetry in urodynamic investigation. J Obstet Gynaecol 23:191–192CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Rosenzweig BA, Pushkin S, Blumenfeld D, Bhatia NN (1992) Prevalence of abnormal urodynamic test results in continent women with severe genitourinary prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 79:539–542PubMed Rosenzweig BA, Pushkin S, Blumenfeld D, Bhatia NN (1992) Prevalence of abnormal urodynamic test results in continent women with severe genitourinary prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 79:539–542PubMed
6.
go back to reference Coates KW, Harris RL, Cundiff GW, Bump RC (1997) Uroflowmetry in women with urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Br J Urol 80:217–221CrossRefPubMed Coates KW, Harris RL, Cundiff GW, Bump RC (1997) Uroflowmetry in women with urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Br J Urol 80:217–221CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Stanton SL, Ozsoy C, Hilton P (1983) Voiding difficulties in the female: prevalence, clinical and urodynamic review. Obstet Gynecol 61:144–147PubMed Stanton SL, Ozsoy C, Hilton P (1983) Voiding difficulties in the female: prevalence, clinical and urodynamic review. Obstet Gynecol 61:144–147PubMed
8.
go back to reference Lose G, Jorgensen L, Mortensen SO, Molsted-Pedersen L, Kristensen JK (1987) Voiding difficulties after colposuspension. Obstet Gynecol 69:33–38PubMed Lose G, Jorgensen L, Mortensen SO, Molsted-Pedersen L, Kristensen JK (1987) Voiding difficulties after colposuspension. Obstet Gynecol 69:33–38PubMed
9.
go back to reference Haylen BT, Ashby D, Sutherst JR, Frazer MI, West CR (1989) Maximum and average urine flow rates in normal male and female populations—the Liverpool nomograms. Br J Urol 64:30–38PubMed Haylen BT, Ashby D, Sutherst JR, Frazer MI, West CR (1989) Maximum and average urine flow rates in normal male and female populations—the Liverpool nomograms. Br J Urol 64:30–38PubMed
10.
go back to reference Schwartz BF, Soderdahl DW, Thrasher JB (1998) Home flow rates in evaluation of lower urinary tract symptoms in men. Tech Urol 4:15–17PubMed Schwartz BF, Soderdahl DW, Thrasher JB (1998) Home flow rates in evaluation of lower urinary tract symptoms in men. Tech Urol 4:15–17PubMed
11.
go back to reference Homma Y, Imajo C, Kawabe K (1995) Maximum flow rate—the single uroflowmetric parameter in clinical trials for benign prostatic hyperplasia? Int J Urol 2:322–325PubMed Homma Y, Imajo C, Kawabe K (1995) Maximum flow rate—the single uroflowmetric parameter in clinical trials for benign prostatic hyperplasia? Int J Urol 2:322–325PubMed
12.
go back to reference Fantl JA, Smith PJ, Schneider V, Hurt WG, Dunn LJ (1983) Fluid weight uroflowmetry in women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 145:1017–1024PubMed Fantl JA, Smith PJ, Schneider V, Hurt WG, Dunn LJ (1983) Fluid weight uroflowmetry in women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 145:1017–1024PubMed
13.
go back to reference Haylen B (2001) Uroflowmetry. In: Cardozo L, Staskin D (eds) Female urology and urogynaecology. Isis Medical Media, London, pp 183–195 Haylen B (2001) Uroflowmetry. In: Cardozo L, Staskin D (eds) Female urology and urogynaecology. Isis Medical Media, London, pp 183–195
14.
go back to reference Wall LL, Hewitt JK (1996) Voiding function after Burch colposuspension for stress incontinence. J Reprod Med 41:161–165PubMed Wall LL, Hewitt JK (1996) Voiding function after Burch colposuspension for stress incontinence. J Reprod Med 41:161–165PubMed
15.
go back to reference McLennan MT, Melick CF, Bent AE (1998) Clinical and urodynamic predictors of delayed voiding after fascia lata suburethral sling. Obstet Gynecol 92:608–612CrossRefPubMed McLennan MT, Melick CF, Bent AE (1998) Clinical and urodynamic predictors of delayed voiding after fascia lata suburethral sling. Obstet Gynecol 92:608–612CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Korda A, Peat B, Hunter P (1989) Experience with silastic slings for female urinary incontinence. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 29:150–154PubMed Korda A, Peat B, Hunter P (1989) Experience with silastic slings for female urinary incontinence. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 29:150–154PubMed
17.
go back to reference Dietz HP, Mouritsen AL, Ellis G, Wilson PD (2002) Voiding function after TVT. Int Urogynecol J 13:S21CrossRef Dietz HP, Mouritsen AL, Ellis G, Wilson PD (2002) Voiding function after TVT. Int Urogynecol J 13:S21CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Dietz HP, Haylen BT, Vancaillie TG (2002) Female pelvic organ prolapse and voiding function. Int Urogynecol J 13:284–288CrossRef Dietz HP, Haylen BT, Vancaillie TG (2002) Female pelvic organ prolapse and voiding function. Int Urogynecol J 13:284–288CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Haylen BT (1988) Screening for voiding difficulties in women. University of Liverpool, pp 90–109 Haylen BT (1988) Screening for voiding difficulties in women. University of Liverpool, pp 90–109
Metadata
Title
Symptoms of voiding dysfunction: what do they really mean?
Authors
H. P. Dietz
B. T. Haylen
Publication date
01-02-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 1/2005
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-004-1213-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2005

International Urogynecology Journal 1/2005 Go to the issue