Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 10/2019

01-10-2019 | Arthroscopy | KNEE

What are the prevalence and risk factors for repeat ipsilateral knee arthroscopy?

Authors: Omar A. Behery, Kelly I. Suchman, Albit R. Paoli, Tyler A. Luthringer, Kirk A. Campbell, Joseph A. Bosco

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 10/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The number of arthroscopic knee surgeries performed annually has increased over the last decade. It remains unclear what proportion of individuals undergoing knee arthroscopy is at risk for subsequent ipsilateral procedures. Better knowledge of risk factors and the incidence of reoperative ipsilateral arthroscopy are important in setting expectations and counselling patients on treatment options. The aim of this study is to determine the incidence of repeat ipsilateral knee arthroscopy, and the risk factors associated with subsequent surgery over long-term follow-up.

Methods

The New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative Systems outpatient database was reviewed from 2003 to 2016 to identify patients who underwent elective, primary knee arthroscopy for one of the following diagnosis-related categories of procedures: Group 1: cartilage repair and transfer; Group 2: osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) lesions; Group 3: meniscal repair, debridement, chondroplasty, and synovectomy; Group 4: multiple different procedures. Subjects were followed for 10 years to determine the odds of subsequent ipsilateral knee arthroscopy. Risk factors including the group of arthroscopic surgery, age group, gender, race, insurance type, surgeon volume, and comorbidities were analysed to identify factors predicting subsequent surgery.

Results

A total of 765,144 patients who underwent knee arthroscopy between 2003 and 2016, were identified. The majority (751,873) underwent meniscus-related arthroscopy. The proportion of patients undergoing subsequent ipsilateral knee arthroscopy was 2.1% at 1-year, 5.5% at 5 years, and 6.7% at 10 years of follow-up. Among patients who underwent subsequent arthroscopic surgery at 1-, 5-, and 10-year follow-up, there was a greater proportion of patients with worker’s compensation insurance (p < 0.001), index operations performed by very high volume surgeons (p < 0.001), and cartilage restoration index procedures (p < 0.001), compared with those who never underwent repeat ipsilateral surgery.

Conclusion

Understanding the incidence of subsequent knee arthroscopy after index procedure in different age groups and the patterns over 10 years of follow-up is important in counselling patients and setting future expectations. The majority of subsequent surgeries occur within the first 5 years after index surgery, and subjects tend to have higher odds of ipsilateral reoperation for up to 10 years if they have worker’s compensation insurance, or if their index surgery was performed by a very high volume surgeon, or was a cartilage restoration procedure.

Level of evidence

III.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Boyd JA, Gradisar IM (2016) Total knee arthroplasty after knee arthroscopy in patients older than 50 years. Orthopedics 39:e1041–e1044CrossRefPubMed Boyd JA, Gradisar IM (2016) Total knee arthroplasty after knee arthroscopy in patients older than 50 years. Orthopedics 39:e1041–e1044CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Cullen KA, Hall MJ, Golosinskiy A (2009) Ambulatory surgery in the United States, 2006. Natl Health Stat Rep (11):1–25 Cullen KA, Hall MJ, Golosinskiy A (2009) Ambulatory surgery in the United States, 2006. Natl Health Stat Rep (11):1–25
5.
go back to reference Frank RM, Lee S, Levy D, Poland S, Smith M, Scalise N et al (2017) Osteochondral allograft transplantation of the knee: analysis of failures at 5 years. Am J Sports Med 45:864–874CrossRefPubMed Frank RM, Lee S, Levy D, Poland S, Smith M, Scalise N et al (2017) Osteochondral allograft transplantation of the knee: analysis of failures at 5 years. Am J Sports Med 45:864–874CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Frank RM, McCormick F, Rosas S, Amoo-Achampong K, Erickson B, Bach BR Jr et al (2018) Reoperation rates after cartilage restoration procedures in the knee: analysis of a large US commercial database. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 47:1–15 Frank RM, McCormick F, Rosas S, Amoo-Achampong K, Erickson B, Bach BR Jr et al (2018) Reoperation rates after cartilage restoration procedures in the knee: analysis of a large US commercial database. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 47:1–15
7.
go back to reference Gundle KR, McGlaston TJ, Ramappa AJ (2010) Effect of insurance status on the rate of surgery following a meniscal tear. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:2452–2456CrossRefPubMed Gundle KR, McGlaston TJ, Ramappa AJ (2010) Effect of insurance status on the rate of surgery following a meniscal tear. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:2452–2456CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hawker G, Guan J, Judge A, Dieppe P (2008) Knee arthroscopy in England and Ontario: patterns of use, changes over time, and relationship to total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:2337–2345CrossRefPubMed Hawker G, Guan J, Judge A, Dieppe P (2008) Knee arthroscopy in England and Ontario: patterns of use, changes over time, and relationship to total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:2337–2345CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Jameson SS, Dowen D, James P, Serrano-Pedraza I, Reed MR, Deehan DJ (2011) The burden of arthroscopy of the knee: a contemporary analysis of data from the English NHS. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:1327–1333CrossRefPubMed Jameson SS, Dowen D, James P, Serrano-Pedraza I, Reed MR, Deehan DJ (2011) The burden of arthroscopy of the knee: a contemporary analysis of data from the English NHS. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:1327–1333CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Khan M, Evaniew N, Bedi A, Ayeni OR, Bhandari M (2014) Arthroscopic surgery for degenerative tears of the meniscus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ 186:1057–1064CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Khan M, Evaniew N, Bedi A, Ayeni OR, Bhandari M (2014) Arthroscopic surgery for degenerative tears of the meniscus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ 186:1057–1064CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Lubowitz JH, Appleby D (2011) Cost-effectiveness analysis of the most common orthopaedic surgery procedures: knee arthroscopy and knee anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 27:1317–1322CrossRefPubMed Lubowitz JH, Appleby D (2011) Cost-effectiveness analysis of the most common orthopaedic surgery procedures: knee arthroscopy and knee anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 27:1317–1322CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Mahure SA, Mollon B, Shamah SD, Zuckerman JD, Kwon YW, Rokito AS (2016) The incidence of subsequent surgery after outpatient arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 32:1531–1541CrossRefPubMed Mahure SA, Mollon B, Shamah SD, Zuckerman JD, Kwon YW, Rokito AS (2016) The incidence of subsequent surgery after outpatient arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 32:1531–1541CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference McCormick F, Harris JD, Abrams GD, Hussey KE, Wilson H, Frank R et al (2014) Survival and reoperation rates after meniscal allograft transplantation: analysis of failures for 172 consecutive transplants at a minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 42:892–897CrossRefPubMed McCormick F, Harris JD, Abrams GD, Hussey KE, Wilson H, Frank R et al (2014) Survival and reoperation rates after meniscal allograft transplantation: analysis of failures for 172 consecutive transplants at a minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 42:892–897CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Mickey RM, Greenland S (1989) The impact of confounder selection criteria on effect estimation. Am J Epidemiol 129:125–137CrossRefPubMed Mickey RM, Greenland S (1989) The impact of confounder selection criteria on effect estimation. Am J Epidemiol 129:125–137CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Montgomery SR, Foster BD, Ngo SS, Terrell RD, Wang JC, Petrigliano FA et al (2014) Trends in the surgical treatment of articular cartilage defects of the knee in the United States. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:2070–2075CrossRefPubMed Montgomery SR, Foster BD, Ngo SS, Terrell RD, Wang JC, Petrigliano FA et al (2014) Trends in the surgical treatment of articular cartilage defects of the knee in the United States. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:2070–2075CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Patel AA, Singh K, Nunley RM, Minhas SV (2016) Administrative databases in orthopaedic research: pearls and pitfalls of big data. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 24:172–179CrossRefPubMed Patel AA, Singh K, Nunley RM, Minhas SV (2016) Administrative databases in orthopaedic research: pearls and pitfalls of big data. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 24:172–179CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Salzler MJ, Lin A, Miller CD, Herold S, Irrgang JJ, Harner CD (2014) Complications after arthroscopic knee surgery. Am J Sports Med 42:292–296CrossRefPubMed Salzler MJ, Lin A, Miller CD, Herold S, Irrgang JJ, Harner CD (2014) Complications after arthroscopic knee surgery. Am J Sports Med 42:292–296CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Suchman KI, Behery OA, Mai DH, Anil U, Bosco JA (2018) The demographic and geographic trends of meniscal procedures in New York State: an analysis of 649,470 patients over 13 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 100:1581–1588CrossRefPubMed Suchman KI, Behery OA, Mai DH, Anil U, Bosco JA (2018) The demographic and geographic trends of meniscal procedures in New York State: an analysis of 649,470 patients over 13 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 100:1581–1588CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Wylie JD, Hartley MK, Kapron AL, Aoki SK, Maak TG (2016) Failures and reoperations after matrix-assisted cartilage repair of the knee: a systematic review. Arthroscopy 32:386–392CrossRefPubMed Wylie JD, Hartley MK, Kapron AL, Aoki SK, Maak TG (2016) Failures and reoperations after matrix-assisted cartilage repair of the knee: a systematic review. Arthroscopy 32:386–392CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
What are the prevalence and risk factors for repeat ipsilateral knee arthroscopy?
Authors
Omar A. Behery
Kelly I. Suchman
Albit R. Paoli
Tyler A. Luthringer
Kirk A. Campbell
Joseph A. Bosco
Publication date
01-10-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 10/2019
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05348-y

Other articles of this Issue 10/2019

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 10/2019 Go to the issue