Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 10/2016

01-10-2016 | Knee

Accuracy of diagnostic tests for prosthetic joint infection: a systematic review

Authors: Sufian S. Ahmad, Ahmed Shaker, Mo Saffarini, Antonia F. Chen, Michael T. Hirschmann, Sandro Kohl

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 10/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

There are few evidence-based recommendations on the most effective methods for diagnosing prosthetic joint infections (PJIs), and the potency of tests in relation to each other also remains vague. This systematic review aimed to (1) identify systematic reviews reporting accuracies of available approaches for diagnosing PJI, (2) critically appraise their quality and bias, and (3) compare the available approaches in terms of accuracy for diagnosing PJI.

Methods

PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched for meta-analyses reporting accuracies of different diagnostic modalities for PJIs. Thirteen systematic reviews met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and their data were extracted and tabulated by two reviewers in duplicate and independent manners.

Results

The 13 articles reported diagnostic accuracy from 278 clinical studies comprising 27,754 patients and evaluating 13 diagnostic tests grouped into 7 broad categories. Implant sonication had the highest positive likelihood ratio (17.2), followed by bacteriology (15.3) and synovial fluid differentiated cytology (13.3). The highest negative likelihood ratio was for interleukin (IL)-6 serum marker (0.03) followed by synovial fluid cytology and differentiation (0.12 and 0.13, respectively).

Conclusion

The diagnostic tests that are most likely to rule out PJI include serum IL-6, serum C-reactive protein, and synovial fluid cytology. On the other hand, the diagnostic test that is most likely to confirm PJI is implant sonication. Nuclear imaging showed low overall accuracy as diagnostic tests for PJI. The findings of this study could enable clinicians to confirm or rule out PJIs using the most accurate, rapid, least invasive, and cost-effective tools available, thereby enabling fast treatment before formation of resistant biofilms and degradation of patient conditions.

Level of evidence

Systematic review, Level IV.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Abou El-Khier NT, El Ganainy Ael R, Elgeidy A, Rakha SA (2013) Assessment of interleukin-6 and other inflammatory markers in the diagnosis of Egyptian patients with periprosthetic joint infection. Egypt J Immunol 20(2):93–99PubMed
2.
Benito N, Franco M, Ribera A, Soriano A, Rodriguez-Pardo D, Sorli L, Fresco G, Del Toro MD, Guio L, Sanchez-Rivas E, Bahamande A, Riera M, Esteban J, Etxaburu JM, Martinez-Alvarez J, Jover-Saenz A, Duenas C, Ramos A, Sobrino B, Euba G, Morata L, Pigrau C, Coll P, Mur I, Ariza J (2016) Time trends in the etiology of prosthetic joint infections: a multicenter cohort study. Clin Microbiol Infect. doi:10.​1016/​j.​cmi.​2016.​05.​004 PubMed
3.
Berbari E, Mabry T, Tsaras G, Spangehl M, Erwin PJ, Murad MH, Steckelberg J, Osmon D (2010) Inflammatory blood laboratory levels as markers of prosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(11):2102–2109CrossRefPubMed
4.
Bereza PL, Ekiel A, Augusciak-Duma A, Aptekorz M, Wilk I, Kusz DJ, Wojciechowski P, Martirosian G (2013) Identification of silent prosthetic joint infection: preliminary report of a prospective controlled study. Int Orthop 37(10):2037–2043CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Bozic KJ (2015) The role of the payment system in improving value in healthcare. J Arthroplasty 30(3):341–342CrossRefPubMed
6.
Brammen L, Palestro C, Sinzinger H (2015) Radionuclide imaging: past, present and future outlook in the diagnosis of infected prosthetic joints. Hell J Nucl Med 18(Suppl 1):95–102PubMed
7.
Della Valle C, Parvizi J, Bauer TW, Dicesare PE, Evans RP, Segreti J, Spangehl M, Watters WC 3rd, Keith M, Turkelson CM, Wies JL, Sluka P, Hitchcock K (2010) Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 18(12):760–770CrossRefPubMed
8.
Di Cesare PE, Chang E, Preston CF, Liu CJ (2005) Serum interleukin-6 as a marker of periprosthetic infection following total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(9):1921–1927CrossRefPubMed
9.
Elgeidi A, Elganainy AE, Abou Elkhier N, Rakha S (2014) Interleukin-6 and other inflammatory markers in diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection. Int Orthop 38(12):2591–2595CrossRefPubMed
10.
Fink B, Gebhard A, Fuerst M, Berger I, Schafer P (2013) High diagnostic value of synovial biopsy in periprosthetic joint infection of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(3):956–964CrossRefPubMed
11.
Fink B, Makowiak C, Fuerst M, Berger I, Schafer P, Frommelt L (2008) The value of synovial biopsy, joint aspiration and C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of late peri-prosthetic infection of total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90(7):874–878CrossRefPubMed
12.
Font-Vizcarra L, Garcia S, Martinez-Pastor JC, Sierra JM, Soriano A (2010) Blood culture flasks for culturing synovial fluid in prosthetic joint infections. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(8):2238–2243CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Frangiamore SJ, Saleh A, Kovac MF, Grosso MJ, Zhang X, Bauer TW, Daly TM, Ricchetti ET, Iannotti JP (2015) Synovial fluid interleukin-6 as a predictor of periprosthetic shoulder infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97(1):63–70CrossRefPubMed
14.
Gallo J, Kolar M, Dendis M, Loveckova Y, Sauer P, Zapletalova J, Koukalova D (2008) Culture and PCR analysis of joint fluid in the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection. New Microbiol 31(1):97–104PubMed
15.
Gallo J, Raska M, Dendis M, Florschutz AV, Kolar M (2004) Molecular diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection. A review of evidence. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub 148(2):123–129CrossRefPubMed
16.
17.
Gemmel F, Van den Wyngaert H, Love C, Welling MM, Gemmel P, Palestro CJ (2012) Prosthetic joint infections: radionuclide state-of-the-art imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 39(5):892–909CrossRefPubMed
18.
Glas AS, Lijmer JG, Prins MH, Bonsel GJ, Bossuyt PM (2003) The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance. J Clin Epidemiol 56(11):1129–1135CrossRefPubMed
19.
Gollwitzer H, Dombrowski Y, Prodinger PM, Peric M, Summer B, Hapfelmeier A, Saldamli B, Pankow F, von Eisenhart-Rothe R, Imhoff AB, Schauber J, Thomas P, Burgkart R, Banke IJ (2013) Antimicrobial peptides and proinflammatory cytokines in periprosthetic joint infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(7):644–651CrossRefPubMed
20.
Grosso MJ, Frangiamore SJ, Saleh A, Kovac MF, Hayashi R, Ricchetti ET, Bauer TW, Iannotti JP (2014) Poor utility of serum interleukin-6 levels to predict indolent periprosthetic shoulder infections. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 23(9):1277–1281CrossRefPubMed
21.
Gundtoft PH, Pedersen AB, Schonheyder HC, Overgaard S (2016) Validation of the diagnosis ‘prosthetic joint infection’ in the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Bone Joint J 98-b(3):320–325CrossRefPubMed
22.
Hsu W, Hearty TM (2012) Radionuclide imaging in the diagnosis and management of orthopaedic disease. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 20(3):151–159CrossRefPubMed
23.
Jin H, Yuan L, Li C, Kan Y, Hao R, Yang J (2014) Diagnostic performance of FDG PET or PET/CT in prosthetic infection after arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 58(1):85–93PubMed
24.
Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M (2007) Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(4):780–785CrossRefPubMed
25.
Kurtz SM, Lau E, Watson H, Schmier JK, Parvizi J (2012) Economic burden of periprosthetic joint infection in the United States. J Arthroplasty 27(8 Suppl):61–65.e61
26.
Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Lau E, Bozic KJ (2014) Impact of the economic downturn on total joint replacement demand in the United States: updated projections to 2021. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(8):624–630CrossRefPubMed
27.
Kwee TC, Kwee RM, Alavi A (2008) FDG-PET for diagnosing prosthetic joint infection: systematic review and metaanalysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 35(11):2122–2132CrossRefPubMed
28.
Marmor S, Bauer T, Desplaces N, Heym B, Roux AL, Sol O, Roge J, Mahe F, Desire L, Aegerter P, Ghout I, Ropers J, Gaillard JL, Rottman M (2016) Multiplex antibody detection for noninvasive genus-level diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection. J Clin Microbiol 54(4):1065–1073CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Matar WY, Jafari SM, Restrepo C, Austin M, Purtill JJ, Parvizi J (2010) Preventing infection in total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(Suppl 2):36–46CrossRefPubMed
30.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6(7):e1000097CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Osmon DR, Berbari EF, Berendt AR, Lew D, Zimmerli W, Steckelberg JM, Rao N, Hanssen A, Wilson WR (2013) Diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 56(1):e1–e25CrossRefPubMed
32.
Ouyang Z, Li H, Liu X, Zhai Z, Li X (2014) Prosthesis infection: diagnosis after total joint arthroplasty with three-phase bone scintigraphy. Ann Nucl Med 28(10):994–1003CrossRefPubMed
33.
Pakos EE, Trikalinos TA, Fotopoulos AD, Ioannidis JP (2007) Prosthesis infection: diagnosis after total joint arthroplasty with antigranulocyte scintigraphy with 99mTc-labeled monoclonal antibodies–a meta-analysis. Radiology 242(1):101–108CrossRefPubMed
34.
Parvizi J, Zmistowski B, Berbari EF, Bauer TW, Springer BD, Della Valle CJ, Garvin KL, Wongworawat MD, Fehring TK, Osmon DR, Barrack RL, Berend KR, Esterhai JL, Gioe TJ, Kurtz SM, Masri BA, Spangehl MJ, Segreti J (2011) New definition for periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty 26(8):1136–1138CrossRef
35.
36.
Parvizi J, Gehrke T, Chen AF (2013) Proceedings of the international consensus on periprosthetic joint infection. Bone Joint J 95-b(11):1450–1452CrossRefPubMed
37.
Peel TN, Dylla BL, Hughes JG, Lynch DT, Greenwood-Quaintance KE, Cheng AC, Mandrekar JN, Patel R (2016) Improved diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection by culturing periprosthetic tissue specimens in blood culture bottles. MBio 7(1):e01776–01715CrossRef
38.
Qu X, Zhai Z, Li H, Li H, Liu X, Zhu Z, Wang Y, Liu G, Dai K (2013) PCR-based diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection. J Clin Microbiol 51(8):2742–2746CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
Qu X, Zhai Z, Liu X, Li H, Wu C, Li Y, Li H, Zhu Z, Qin A, Dai K (2014) Evaluation of white cell count and differential in synovial fluid for diagnosing infections after total hip or knee arthroplasty. PLoS One 9(1):e84751CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
40.
Qu X, Zhai Z, Wu C, Jin F, Li H, Wang L, Liu G, Liu X, Wang W, Li H, Zhang X, Zhu Z, Dai K (2013) Preoperative aspiration culture for preoperative diagnosis of infection in total hip or knee arthroplasty. J Clin Microbiol 51(11):3830–3834CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
41.
Sharma R, Vannabouathong C, Bains S, Marshall A, MacDonald SJ, Parvizi J, Bhandari M (2011) Meta-analyses in joint arthroplasty: a review of quantity, quality, and impact. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(24):2304–2309CrossRefPubMed
42.
43.
Topolski MS, Chin PY, Sperling JW, Cofield RH (2006) Revision shoulder arthroplasty with positive intraoperative cultures: the value of preoperative studies and intraoperative histology. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 15(4):402–406CrossRefPubMed
44.
Tsaras G, Maduka-Ezeh A, Inwards CY, Mabry T, Erwin PJ, Murad MH, Montori VM, West CP, Osmon DR, Berbari EF (2012) Utility of intraoperative frozen section histopathology in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94(18):1700–1711CrossRefPubMed
45.
Villacis D, Merriman JA, Yalamanchili R, Omid R, Itamura J, Rick Hatch GF 3rd (2014) Serum interleukin-6 as a marker of periprosthetic shoulder infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(1):41–45CrossRefPubMed
46.
Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J (2003) The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 3:25CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
47.
Xing D, Ma X, Ma J, Wang J, Chen Y, Yang Y (2013) Use of anti-granulocyte scintigraphy with 99mTc-labeled monoclonal antibodies for the diagnosis of periprosthetic infection in patients after total joint arthroplasty: a diagnostic meta-analysis. PLoS One 8(7):e69857CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
48.
Yuan K, Chen HL, Cui ZM (2014) Diagnostic accuracy of C-reactive protein for periprosthetic joint infection: a meta-analysis. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 15(5):548–559CrossRef
49.
Zhai Z, Li H, Qin A, Liu G, Liu X, Wu C, Li H, Zhu Z, Qu X, Dai K (2014) Meta-analysis of sonication fluid samples from prosthetic components for diagnosis of infection after total joint arthroplasty. J Clin Microbiol 52(5):1730–1736CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
50.
Zhao X, Guo C, Zhao GS, Lin T, Shi ZL, Yan SG (2013) Ten versus five polymorphonuclear leukocytes as threshold in frozen section tests for periprosthetic infection: a meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty 28(6):913–917CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Accuracy of diagnostic tests for prosthetic joint infection: a systematic review
Authors
Sufian S. Ahmad
Ahmed Shaker
Mo Saffarini
Antonia F. Chen
Michael T. Hirschmann
Sandro Kohl
Publication date
01-10-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 10/2016
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4230-y

Other articles of this Issue 10/2016

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 10/2016 Go to the issue

Knee

High rate of implant loosening for uncemented resurfacing-type medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Knee

Medial femoral condyle fracture as an intraoperative complication of Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement

Knee

Arthrotomy versus arthroscopy in the treatment of septic arthritis of the knee in adults: a randomized clinical trial

Knee

Short-interval two-stage approach to primary total knee arthroplasty for acutely septic osteoarthritic knees

Knee

The incidence of implant fractures after knee arthroplasty

Knee

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) distribution shows a better kinetic pattern than C-reactive protein distribution for the follow-up of early inflammation after total knee arthroplasty