Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 4/2014

01-04-2014 | Hip

Cross-cultural adaptation to Swedish and validation of the Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS) for pain, symptoms and physical function in patients with hip and groin disability due to femoro-acetabular impingement

Authors: Roland Thomeé, Pall Jónasson, Kristian Thorborg, Mikael Sansone, Mattias Ahldén, Christoffer Thomeé, Jon Karlsson, Adad Baranto

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 4/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

There is a lack of standardised outcome measures in Swedish for active, young and middle-aged patients with hip and groin disability. The purpose of this study was to adapt the Danish version of the Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS) patient-reported outcome instrument for use in Swedish patients and evaluate the adaptation according to the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Status Measurement Instruments checklist.

Methods

Cross-cultural adaptation was performed in several steps, including translation, back-translation, expert review and pretesting. The final version was evaluated for reliability, validity and responsiveness. Five hundred and two patients (337 men and 167 women, mean age 37, range 15–75) were included in the study.

Results

Cronbach’s alpha for the six HAGOS-S subscales ranged from 0.77 to 0.89. Significant correlations were obtained with the international Hip Outcome Tool average score (r s = 0.37–0.68; p < 0.01) and a standardised instrument, the EuroQol, EQ-5D total score (r s = 0.40–0.60, p = 0.01), for use as a measurement of health outcome. Test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient) ranged from 0.81 to 0.87 for the six HAGOS-S subscales. The smallest detectable change ranged from 7.8 to 16.1 at individual level and 1.6–3.2 at group level. Factor analysis revealed that the six HAGOS-S subscales had one strong factor per subscale. Effect sizes were generally medium or large.

Conclusion

The Swedish version of the HAGOS is a valid, reliable and responsive instrument that can be used both for research and in the clinical setting at individual and group level.

Level of evidence

Diagnostic study, Level I.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 25:3186–3191PubMedCrossRef Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 25:3186–3191PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Busija L, Osborne RH, Nilsdotter A, Buchbinder R, Roos EM (2008) Magnitude and meaningfulness of change in SF-36 scores in four types of orthopedic surgery. Health Qual Life Outcomes 6:55PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Busija L, Osborne RH, Nilsdotter A, Buchbinder R, Roos EM (2008) Magnitude and meaningfulness of change in SF-36 scores in four types of orthopedic surgery. Health Qual Life Outcomes 6:55PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton MJ, Jones DR (1998) Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technol Assess 2(i–iv):1–74PubMed Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton MJ, Jones DR (1998) Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technol Assess 2(i–iv):1–74PubMed
4.
go back to reference Griffin DR, Parsons N, Mohtadi NG, Safran MR (2012) A short version of the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12) for use in routine clinical practice. Arthroscopy 28:611–616; quiz 616–618PubMedCrossRef Griffin DR, Parsons N, Mohtadi NG, Safran MR (2012) A short version of the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12) for use in routine clinical practice. Arthroscopy 28:611–616; quiz 616–618PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, Bonsel G, Badia X (2011) Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res 20:1727–1736PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, Bonsel G, Badia X (2011) Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res 20:1727–1736PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hinman RS, Dobson F, Takla A, O’Donnell J, Bennell KL (2013) Which is the most useful patient-reported outcome in femoroacetabular impingement? Test-retest reliability of six questionnaires. Br J Sports Med Hinman RS, Dobson F, Takla A, O’Donnell J, Bennell KL (2013) Which is the most useful patient-reported outcome in femoroacetabular impingement? Test-retest reliability of six questionnaires. Br J Sports Med
7.
go back to reference Jonasson P, Karlsson J, Baranto A, Swärd L, Sansone M, Thomeé C, Ahldén M, Thomeé R (2013) A standardized outcome measure for pain, symptoms and physical function in patients with femoroacetabular impingement. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the iHOT12 according to the COSMIN checklist. Submitted Jonasson P, Karlsson J, Baranto A, Swärd L, Sansone M, Thomeé C, Ahldén M, Thomeé R (2013) A standardized outcome measure for pain, symptoms and physical function in patients with femoroacetabular impingement. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the iHOT12 according to the COSMIN checklist. Submitted
8.
go back to reference Kemp JL, Collins NJ, Roos EM, Crossley KM (2013) Psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures for hip arthroscopic surgery. Am J Sports Med Kemp JL, Collins NJ, Roos EM, Crossley KM (2013) Psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures for hip arthroscopic surgery. Am J Sports Med
9.
go back to reference Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, Bouter LM, de Vet HC (2009) Cosmin checklist manual Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, Bouter LM, de Vet HC (2009) Cosmin checklist manual
10.
go back to reference Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, Bouter LM, de Vet HC (2010) The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res 19:539–549PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, Bouter LM, de Vet HC (2010) The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res 19:539–549PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Naal FD, Miozzari HH, Wyss TF, Notzli HP (2011) Surgical hip dislocation for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement in high-level athletes. Am J Sports Med 39:544–550PubMedCrossRef Naal FD, Miozzari HH, Wyss TF, Notzli HP (2011) Surgical hip dislocation for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement in high-level athletes. Am J Sports Med 39:544–550PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW (2003) Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care 41:582–592PubMed Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW (2003) Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care 41:582–592PubMed
13.
go back to reference Streiner DL, Norman GR (2008) Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRef Streiner DL, Norman GR (2008) Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60:34–42PubMedCrossRef Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60:34–42PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Thorborg K, Holmich P, Christensen R, Petersen J, Roos EM (2011) The Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS): development and validation according to the COSMIN checklist. Br J Sports Med 45:478–491PubMedCrossRef Thorborg K, Holmich P, Christensen R, Petersen J, Roos EM (2011) The Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS): development and validation according to the COSMIN checklist. Br J Sports Med 45:478–491PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Thorborg K, Roos EM, Bartels EM, Petersen J, Holmich P (2010) Validity, reliability and responsiveness of patient-reported outcome questionnaires when assessing hip and groin disability: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med 44:1186–1196PubMedCrossRef Thorborg K, Roos EM, Bartels EM, Petersen J, Holmich P (2010) Validity, reliability and responsiveness of patient-reported outcome questionnaires when assessing hip and groin disability: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med 44:1186–1196PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Weir JP (2005) Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res 19:231–240PubMed Weir JP (2005) Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res 19:231–240PubMed
Metadata
Title
Cross-cultural adaptation to Swedish and validation of the Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS) for pain, symptoms and physical function in patients with hip and groin disability due to femoro-acetabular impingement
Authors
Roland Thomeé
Pall Jónasson
Kristian Thorborg
Mikael Sansone
Mattias Ahldén
Christoffer Thomeé
Jon Karlsson
Adad Baranto
Publication date
01-04-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 4/2014
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2721-7

Other articles of this Issue 4/2014

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 4/2014 Go to the issue