Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 5/2014

01-05-2014 | Knee

Serial MRI and clinical assessment of cyclops lesions

Authors: Satyen Gohil, Travis M. Falconer, William Breidahl, Peter O. Annear

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 5/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

‘Clinical cyclops syndrome’ is associated with pain and a palpable ‘clunk’ at terminal extension with the loss of full extension. The aims of this prospective controlled study were: (1) to assess whether the minimal debridement of the ACL stump and notch is associated with an increased incidence of clinical cyclops lesions, (2) to look at the incidence and natural history of ‘MRI cyclops’ lesions using serial MRI’s and (3) to assess whether ‘MRI cyclops’ lesions are associated with the loss of extension.

Methods

Forty-eight patients were randomized for ACL reconstruction into standard (23) and minimal debridement (24) techniques. One patient was excluded from the study. All patients underwent MR scanning postoperatively at 2, 6 and 12 months, together with the clinical assessment using a KT-1000 arthrometer and International Knee Documentation Committee evaluation. All observations were made by investigators blinded to the surgical technique.

Results

There was no statistical difference in the incidence of cyclops lesions between the two groups (n.s.). The overall incidence of cyclops lesions was 46.8 % (22 of 47). The natural history is variable with some getting larger, smaller or remaining static in size. Of patients with cyclops lesions, 17 patients (77 %) had cyclops lesions in the setting of full extension. Five patients (23 %) had loss of extension at 12 months with no MRI cyclops detected at 2 months.

Conclusions

The natural history is variable; although once present, the majority of cyclops remain static or regress in size. The onset of cyclops lesions is usually between 6- and 12-month post-ACL reconstruction. Minimal debridement does not lead to an increased incidence of clinical cyclops lesions. The authors conclude that loss of extension is multi-factorial, and there is a discrepancy between what we term ‘MRI cyclops’ and true ‘clinical cyclops’.

Level of evidence

Case–control study, Level II.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bradley DM, Berqman AG, Dillinqham MF (2000) MR imaging of cyclops lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:719–726PubMedCrossRef Bradley DM, Berqman AG, Dillinqham MF (2000) MR imaging of cyclops lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:719–726PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Cha J, Choi SH, Kwon JW et al (2012) Analysis of cyclops lesions after different anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions: a comparison of the single bundle and remnant bundle preservation techniques. Skeletal Radiol 41:997–1002PubMedCrossRef Cha J, Choi SH, Kwon JW et al (2012) Analysis of cyclops lesions after different anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions: a comparison of the single bundle and remnant bundle preservation techniques. Skeletal Radiol 41:997–1002PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Delince P, Krallis P, Descamps PY et al (1998) Different aspects of the cyclops lesion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a multifactorial etiopathogenesis. Arthroscopy 14:869–876PubMedCrossRef Delince P, Krallis P, Descamps PY et al (1998) Different aspects of the cyclops lesion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a multifactorial etiopathogenesis. Arthroscopy 14:869–876PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Gohil S, Breidahl W, Annear PO (2007) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autologous double hamstrings: a comparison of standard versus minimal debridement techniques using MRI to assess revascularisation. J Bone Joint Surg 89-B:1165–1171CrossRef Gohil S, Breidahl W, Annear PO (2007) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autologous double hamstrings: a comparison of standard versus minimal debridement techniques using MRI to assess revascularisation. J Bone Joint Surg 89-B:1165–1171CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Jackson DW, Schaefer RK (1990) Cyclops syndrome: loss of extension following intra-articular anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 6:171–178PubMedCrossRef Jackson DW, Schaefer RK (1990) Cyclops syndrome: loss of extension following intra-articular anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 6:171–178PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Jin HA, Jae CY, Hyoung SY (2007) Second-look arthroscopic findings of 208 patients after ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:242–248CrossRef Jin HA, Jae CY, Hyoung SY (2007) Second-look arthroscopic findings of 208 patients after ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:242–248CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lindenfeld TN, Em Wojtys, Husain A (1999) Operative treatment of arthrofibrosis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg 81-A(12):1772–1784 Lindenfeld TN, Em Wojtys, Husain A (1999) Operative treatment of arthrofibrosis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg 81-A(12):1772–1784
8.
go back to reference Mayr HO, Weig T, Plitz W (2004) Arthrofibrosis following ACL reconstruction-Reasons and outcome. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124:518–522PubMedCrossRef Mayr HO, Weig T, Plitz W (2004) Arthrofibrosis following ACL reconstruction-Reasons and outcome. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124:518–522PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference McMahon PJ, Dettling JR, Yocum LA (1999) The cyclops lesion: a cause of diminished knee extension after rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopy 15:757–761PubMedCrossRef McMahon PJ, Dettling JR, Yocum LA (1999) The cyclops lesion: a cause of diminished knee extension after rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopy 15:757–761PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Muellner T, Kdolsky R, Grossschmidt K et al (1999) Cyclops and cyclopoid formation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: clinical and histomorphological differences. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7:284–289PubMedCrossRef Muellner T, Kdolsky R, Grossschmidt K et al (1999) Cyclops and cyclopoid formation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: clinical and histomorphological differences. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7:284–289PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Recht MP, Piraino DW (1995) Localized anterior arthrofibrosis (cyclops lesion) after reconstruction of the ACL: MR imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 165:383–385PubMedCrossRef Recht MP, Piraino DW (1995) Localized anterior arthrofibrosis (cyclops lesion) after reconstruction of the ACL: MR imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 165:383–385PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Shelbourne KD, Patel DV, Martini DJ (1996) Classification and management of arthrofibrosis of the knee after ACL reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 24(6):857–862PubMedCrossRef Shelbourne KD, Patel DV, Martini DJ (1996) Classification and management of arthrofibrosis of the knee after ACL reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 24(6):857–862PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Shelbourne KD, Patel DV (1999) Treatment of limited motion after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7:85–92PubMedCrossRef Shelbourne KD, Patel DV (1999) Treatment of limited motion after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7:85–92PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Tonin M, Saciri V, Veselko M et al (2001) Progressive loss of knee extension after injury: cyclops syndrome due to a lesion of the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 29:545–549PubMed Tonin M, Saciri V, Veselko M et al (2001) Progressive loss of knee extension after injury: cyclops syndrome due to a lesion of the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 29:545–549PubMed
15.
go back to reference Wang J, Yingfang A (2009) Analysis of different kinds of cyclops lesions with or without extension loss. Arthroscopy 25(6):626–631PubMedCrossRef Wang J, Yingfang A (2009) Analysis of different kinds of cyclops lesions with or without extension loss. Arthroscopy 25(6):626–631PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Serial MRI and clinical assessment of cyclops lesions
Authors
Satyen Gohil
Travis M. Falconer
William Breidahl
Peter O. Annear
Publication date
01-05-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 5/2014
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2480-5

Other articles of this Issue 5/2014

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 5/2014 Go to the issue