Top

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

Published in:

01-03-2013 | Knee

ACL–PCL and intercondylar notch impingement: magnetic resonance imaging of native and double-bundle ACL-reconstructed knees

Authors: Eric J. Kropf, Wei Shen, Carola F. van Eck, Volker Musahl, James J. Irrgang, Freddie H. Fu

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 3/2013

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to: (1) define the relationship between the ACL and PCL in normal knees; (2) determine whether ACL–PCL impingement occurs in native knees; and (3) determine whether there is a difference in impingement between double-bundle reconstructed and native knees.

Methods

Eight subjects were identified (age 20–50; 6 females, 2 males). All were at least 1-year status postanatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction (allograft; AM = 8 mm; PL = 7 mm) and had no history of injury or surgery to the contralateral knee. MRIs of both knees were performed with the knee at 0 and 30° of flexion. The images were evaluated by a non-treating surgeon and two musculoskeletal radiologists. Coronal and sagittal angles of AM and PL bundles, Liu’s PCL index and the distance between ACL and PCL on modified axial oblique images were recorded. Impingement was graded (1) no contact; (2) contact without deformation; or (3) contact and distortion of PCL contour.

Results

Seventy-five percent (6) of the native ACL’s showed no contact with the roof of the intercondylar notch or PCL, compared to 25 % (2) of the double-bundle reconstructed ACLs. One double-bundle reconstructed ACL showed intercondylar notch roof and ACL–PCL impingement (12.5 %). Significant differences were found between the native ACL and the double-bundle reconstructed ACL for the coronal angle of the AM (79° vs. 72°, p = 0.002) and PL bundle (75° vs. 58°, p = 0.001). No differences in ROM or stability were noted at any follow-up interval between groups based on MRI impingement grade.

Conclusion

ACL–PCL contact occurred in 25 % of native knees. Contact between the ACL graft and PCL occurred in 75 % of double-bundle reconstructed knees. ACL–PCL impingement, both contact and distortion of the PCL, occurred in one knee after double-bundle reconstruction. This study offers perspective on what can be considered normal contact between the ACL and PCL and how impingement after ACL reconstruction can be detected on MRI.

Level of evidence

Cohort Study, Level III.

Araujo PH, van Eck CF, Macalena JA, Fu FH (2011) Advances in the three-portal technique for anatomical single- or double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1239–1242PubMedCrossRef

Bylski-Austrow DI, Grood ES, Hefzy MS, Holden JP, Butler DL (1990) Anterior cruciate ligament replacements: a mechanical study of femoral attachment location, flexion angle at tensioning, and initial tension. J Orthop Res 8:522–531PubMedCrossRef

Casagranda BU, Maxwell NJ, Kavanagh EC, Towers JD, Shen W, Fu FH (2009) Normal appearance and complications of double-bundle and selective-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using optimal MRI techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:1407–1415PubMedCrossRef

Everhart JS, Flanigan DC, Simon RA, Chaudhari AM (2010) Association of noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury with presence and thickness of a bony ridge on the anteromedial aspect of the femoral intercondylar notch. Am J Sports Med 38:1667–1673PubMedCrossRef

Fujimoto E, Sumen Y, Deie M, Yasumoto M, Kobayashi K, Ochi M (2004) Anterior cruciate ligament graft impingement against the posterior cruciate ligament: diagnosis using MRI plus three-dimensional reconstruction software. Magn Reson Imaging 22:1125–1129PubMedCrossRef

Gertel TH, Lew WD, Lewis JL, Stewart NJ, Hunter RE (1993) Effect of anterior cruciate ligament graft tensioning direction, magnitude, and flexion angle on knee biomechanics. Am J Sports Med 21:572–581PubMedCrossRef

Howell SM (1992) Arthroscopic roofplasty: a method for correcting an extension deficit caused by roof impingement of an anterior cruciate ligament graft. Arthroscopy 8:375–379PubMedCrossRef

Howell SM, Berns GS, Farley TE (1991) Unimpinged and impinged anterior cruciate ligament grafts: MR signal intensity measurements. Radiology 179:639–643PubMed

Iriuchishima T, Horaguchi T, Kubomura T, Morimoto Y, Fu FH (2011) Evaluation of the intercondylar roof impingement after anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using 3D-CT. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:674–679PubMedCrossRef

10.

Iriuchishima T, Shirakura K, Horaguchi T, Morimoto Y, Fu FH (2011) Full knee extension magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of intercondylar roof impingement after anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(Suppl 1):S22–S28PubMedCrossRef

11.

Iriuchishima T, Tajima G, Ingham SJ, Shen W, Smolinski P, Fu FH (2010) Impingement pressure in the anatomical and nonanatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaver study. Am J Sports Med 38:1611–1617PubMedCrossRef

12.

Jagodzinski M, Richter GM, Passler HH (2000) Biomechanical analysis of knee hyperextension and of the impingement of the anterior cruciate ligament: a cinematographic MRI study with impact on tibial tunnel positioning in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 8:11–19PubMedCrossRef

13.

Katsuragi R, Yasuda K, Tsujino J, Keira M, Kaneda K (2000) The effect of nonphysiologically high initial tension on the mechanical properties of in situ frozen anterior cruciate ligament in a canine model. Am J Sports Med 28:47–56PubMed

14.

Kopf S, Pombo MW, Szczodry M, Irrgang JJ, Fu FH (2011) Size variability of the human anterior cruciate ligament insertion sites. Am J Sports Med 39:108–113PubMedCrossRef

15.

Maak TG, Bedi A, Raphael BS, Citak M, Suero EM, Wickiewicz T, Pearle AD (2011) Effect of femoral socket position on graft impingement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 39:1018–1023PubMedCrossRef

16.

Nishimori M, Sumen Y, Sakaridani K, Nakamura M (2007) An evaluation of reconstructed ACL impingement on PCL using MRI. Magn Reson Imaging 25:722–726PubMedCrossRef

17.

Shen W, Forsythe B, Ingham SM, Honkamp NJ, Fu FH (2008) Application of the anatomic double-bundle reconstruction concept to revision and augmentation anterior cruciate ligament surgeries. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(Suppl 4):20–34PubMedCrossRef

18.

Simmons R, Howell SM, Hull ML (2003) Effect of the angle of the femoral and tibial tunnels in the coronal plane and incremental excision of the posterior cruciate ligament on tension of an anterior cruciate ligament graft: an in vitro study J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:1018–1029

19.

Strobel MJ, Castillo RJ, Weiler A (2001) Reflex extension loss after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction due to femoral “high noon” graft placement. Arthroscopy 17:408–411PubMedCrossRef

20.

van Eck CF, Lesniak BP, Schreiber VM, Fu FH (2010) Anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction flowchart. Arthroscopy 26:258–268PubMedCrossRef

21.

van Eck CF, Martins CA, Vyas SM, Celentano U, van Dijk CN, Fu FH (2010) Femoral intercondylar notch shape and dimensions in ACL-injured patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1257–1262PubMedCrossRef

22.

van Eck CF, Schreiber VM, Liu TT, Fu FH (2010) The anatomic approach to primary, revision and augmentation anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1154–1163PubMedCrossRef

23.

van Eck CF, Schreiber VM, Mejia HA, Samuelsson K, van Dijk CN, Karlsson J, Fu FH (2010) “Anatomic” anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of surgical techniques and reporting of surgical data. Arthroscopy 26:S2–S12PubMedCrossRef

24.

Yamazaki J, Muneta T, Koga H, Sekiya I, Ju YJ, Morito T, Yagishita K (2011) Radiographic description of femoral tunnel placement expressed as intercondylar clock time in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:418–423PubMedCrossRef

25.

Yoshiya S, Andrish JT, Manley MT, Bauer TW (1987) Graft tension in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. An in vivo study in dogs. Am J Sports Med 15:464–470PubMedCrossRef

26.

Yoshiya S, Kurosaka M, Ouchi K, Kuroda R, Mizuno K (2002) Graft tension and knee stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 394:154–160

Title: ACL–PCL and intercondylar notch impingement: magnetic resonance imaging of native and double-bundle ACL-reconstructed knees
Authors: Eric J. Kropf
Wei Shen
Carola F. van Eck
Volker Musahl
James J. Irrgang
Freddie H. Fu
Publication date: 01-03-2013
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 3/2013
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2052-0

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

ACL–PCL and intercondylar notch impingement: magnetic resonance imaging of native and double-bundle ACL-reconstructed knees

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Level of evidence

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Level of evidence

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 3/2013

Symptomatic mucoid degeneration of the anterior cruciate ligament

Hip- and knee-strength assessments using a hand-held dynamometer with external belt-fixation are inter-tester reliable

Revision ACL reconstruction using contralateral hamstrings

Revision total knee arthroplasty with varus–valgus constrained prosthesis versus posterior stabilized prosthesis

Change of signal intensity in the displaced medial meniscus after its reduction on MRI

Autologous chondrocyte implantation in children and adolescents