Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 9/2010

01-09-2010 | Knee

Rotational and translational laxity after computer-navigated single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Authors: M. Hofbauer, P. Valentin, R. Kdolsky, R. C. Ostermann, A. Graf, M. Figl, S. Aldrian

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 9/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Based on biomechanical cadaver studies, anatomic double-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) was introduced to achieve better stability in the knee, particularly in respect of rotatory loads. Previously, the success of ACL reconstruction was believed to be mainly dependent on correct positioning of the graft, irrespective of the number of reconstructed bundles for which computer-assisted surgery was developed to avoid malpositioning of the tunnel. The aim of the present study is to compare rotational and translational stability after computer-navigated standard single-bundle, and anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction. The authors investigated 55 consecutive patients who had undergone the single-bundle or double-bundle ACL reconstruction procedure with the use of autogenous hamstring tendon grafts and EndoButton® fixation, and the patients had been followed for a minimum period of 24 months. Intraoperative, anteroposterior and rotational laxity was measured with the computer navigation system, and compared between groups. Both surgical procedures significantly reduced anteroposterior displacement (AP) and internal rotation (IR) of the tibia compared to the pre-operative ACL-deficient knee (P < 0.05). No significant differences were registered between groups with regard to anteroposterior displacement of the tibia. A significantly greater reduction in internal rotation was noted in the double-bundle group (15.6°) compared to the single-bundle group (7.1°). The IKDC and Lysholm score were significantly higher in the double-bundle group. However, the results were excellent in both groups. The use of a computer-assisted ACL reconstruction, which is a highly accurate method of graft placement, could be useful for inexperienced surgeons to avoid malposition. Whether double-bundle ACL reconstruction, which was associated with improved rotational laxity and significantly better IKDC and Lysholm scores compared to the standard single-bundle ACL reconstruction procedure, provide an influence in terms of avoiding osteoarthritis or meniscus degeneration, long-term results of at least 5 years are needed.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Adachi N, Ochi M, Uchio Y et al (2004) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a single- versus double-bundle multistranded hamstring tendons. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:515–520PubMed Adachi N, Ochi M, Uchio Y et al (2004) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a single- versus double-bundle multistranded hamstring tendons. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:515–520PubMed
2.
go back to reference Aglietti P, Giron F, Buzzi R et al (2004) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: bone-patellar tendon bone compared with double semitendinosus and gracilis tendon grafts: a prospective randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:2143–2155PubMed Aglietti P, Giron F, Buzzi R et al (2004) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: bone-patellar tendon bone compared with double semitendinosus and gracilis tendon grafts: a prospective randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:2143–2155PubMed
3.
go back to reference Aglietti P, Giron F, Cuomo P et al (2007) Single- and double-incision double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 454:108–113CrossRefPubMed Aglietti P, Giron F, Cuomo P et al (2007) Single- and double-incision double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 454:108–113CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Amis A, Bull AMJ, Lie DT (2005) Biomechanics of rotational instability and anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Oper Tech Orthop 15:29–35CrossRef Amis A, Bull AMJ, Lie DT (2005) Biomechanics of rotational instability and anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Oper Tech Orthop 15:29–35CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Anderson AF, Snyder RB, Lipscomb AB Jr (2001) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A prospective randomized study of three surgical methods. Am J Sports Med 29:272–279PubMed Anderson AF, Snyder RB, Lipscomb AB Jr (2001) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A prospective randomized study of three surgical methods. Am J Sports Med 29:272–279PubMed
6.
go back to reference Boden B, Griffin L, Garrett W (2000) Etiology and prevention of noncontact ACL injury. Phys Sports Med 28:1–14 Boden B, Griffin L, Garrett W (2000) Etiology and prevention of noncontact ACL injury. Phys Sports Med 28:1–14
7.
go back to reference Brandsson S, Karlsson J, Swärd L et al (2002) Kinematics and laxity of the knee joint after anterior anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: pre- and postoperative radiostereometric studies. Am J Sports Med 30:361–367PubMed Brandsson S, Karlsson J, Swärd L et al (2002) Kinematics and laxity of the knee joint after anterior anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: pre- and postoperative radiostereometric studies. Am J Sports Med 30:361–367PubMed
8.
go back to reference Buoncristiani AM, Tjoumakaris FP, Starman JS et al (2006) Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 22:1000–1006CrossRefPubMed Buoncristiani AM, Tjoumakaris FP, Starman JS et al (2006) Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 22:1000–1006CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Caborn DN, Chang HC (2005) Single femoral socket double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using tibialis anterior tendon: description of a new technique. Arthroscopy 21:1273CrossRefPubMed Caborn DN, Chang HC (2005) Single femoral socket double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using tibialis anterior tendon: description of a new technique. Arthroscopy 21:1273CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Colombet P, Robinson J, Christel P et al (2007) Using navigation to measure rotation kinematics during ACL reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 454:59–65CrossRefPubMed Colombet P, Robinson J, Christel P et al (2007) Using navigation to measure rotation kinematics during ACL reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 454:59–65CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Crawford C, Nyland J, Landes S et al (2007) Anatomic double bundle ACL reconstruction: a literature review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:946–964CrossRefPubMed Crawford C, Nyland J, Landes S et al (2007) Anatomic double bundle ACL reconstruction: a literature review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:946–964CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Daniel DM, Stone ML, Dobson BE et al (1994) Fate of the ACL-injured patient: a prospective outcome study. Am J Sports Med 22:632–644CrossRefPubMed Daniel DM, Stone ML, Dobson BE et al (1994) Fate of the ACL-injured patient: a prospective outcome study. Am J Sports Med 22:632–644CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Ejerhed L, Kartus J, Sernert N et al (2003) Patellar tendon or semitendinosus tendon autografts for anterior ligament reconstruction? A prospective randomized study with a two-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 31:19–25PubMed Ejerhed L, Kartus J, Sernert N et al (2003) Patellar tendon or semitendinosus tendon autografts for anterior ligament reconstruction? A prospective randomized study with a two-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 31:19–25PubMed
14.
go back to reference Freedman KB, D’Amato MJ, Nedeff DD et al (2003) Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a metaanalysis comparing patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autografts. Am J Sports Med 31:2–11PubMed Freedman KB, D’Amato MJ, Nedeff DD et al (2003) Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a metaanalysis comparing patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autografts. Am J Sports Med 31:2–11PubMed
15.
go back to reference Gabriel MT, Wong EK, Woo SL et al (2004) Distribution of in situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament in response to rotatory loads. J Orthop Res 22:85–89CrossRefPubMed Gabriel MT, Wong EK, Woo SL et al (2004) Distribution of in situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament in response to rotatory loads. J Orthop Res 22:85–89CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference George MS, Dunn WR, Spindler KP (2006) Current concepts review: revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 20:26–2037 George MS, Dunn WR, Spindler KP (2006) Current concepts review: revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 20:26–2037
17.
go back to reference Girgis FG, Marshal JL, Monajem A (1975) The cruciate ligaments of the knee joint; anatomical, functional and experimental analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 106:216–231 Girgis FG, Marshal JL, Monajem A (1975) The cruciate ligaments of the knee joint; anatomical, functional and experimental analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 106:216–231
18.
go back to reference Hefti F, Müller W (1993) Current state of evaluation of knee ligament lesions. The new IKDC knee evaluation form. Orthopäde 22:351–362PubMed Hefti F, Müller W (1993) Current state of evaluation of knee ligament lesions. The new IKDC knee evaluation form. Orthopäde 22:351–362PubMed
19.
go back to reference Ishibashi Y, Tsuda E, Tazawa K et al (2005) Intraoperative evaluation of the anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the OrthoPilot navigation system. Orthopedics 28:1277–1282 Ishibashi Y, Tsuda E, Tazawa K et al (2005) Intraoperative evaluation of the anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the OrthoPilot navigation system. Orthopedics 28:1277–1282
20.
go back to reference Kocher MS, Steadman JR, Briggs KK, et al (2004) Relationships between objective assessment of ligament stability and subjective assessment of symptoms and function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 32:629–634 Kocher MS, Steadman JR, Briggs KK, et al (2004) Relationships between objective assessment of ligament stability and subjective assessment of symptoms and function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 32:629–634
21.
go back to reference Kodali P, Yang S, Koh J (2008) Computer-assisted surgery for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Sports Med Arthrosc 16:67–76CrossRefPubMed Kodali P, Yang S, Koh J (2008) Computer-assisted surgery for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Sports Med Arthrosc 16:67–76CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Koh J (2005) Computer-assisted navigation and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: accuracy and outcomes. Orthopedics 28:1283–1287 Koh J (2005) Computer-assisted navigation and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: accuracy and outcomes. Orthopedics 28:1283–1287
23.
go back to reference Laxdal G, Kartus J, Hansson L et al (2005) A prospective randomized comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 15:34–42CrossRef Laxdal G, Kartus J, Hansson L et al (2005) A prospective randomized comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 15:34–42CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lopomo N, Zaffagnini S, Bignozzi S, et al (2009) Pivot-shift test: analysis and quantification of knee laxity parameters using a navigation system. J Orthop Res. doi:10.1002/jor.20966 Lopomo N, Zaffagnini S, Bignozzi S, et al (2009) Pivot-shift test: analysis and quantification of knee laxity parameters using a navigation system. J Orthop Res. doi:10.​1002/​jor.​20966
25.
go back to reference Lysholm J, Gillquist J (1982) Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med 10:150–153CrossRefPubMed Lysholm J, Gillquist J (1982) Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med 10:150–153CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Mae T, Shino K, Miyama T (2001) Single- versus two-femoral socket anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction technique: biomechanical analysis using a robotic simulator. Arthroscopy 17:708–716CrossRefPubMed Mae T, Shino K, Miyama T (2001) Single- versus two-femoral socket anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction technique: biomechanical analysis using a robotic simulator. Arthroscopy 17:708–716CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Marcacci M, Molgora AP, Zaffagnini S et al (2003) Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstrings. Arthroscopy 19:540–546CrossRefPubMed Marcacci M, Molgora AP, Zaffagnini S et al (2003) Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstrings. Arthroscopy 19:540–546CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Meredick RB, Kennan JV, Appleby D et al (2007) Outcome of single-bundle versus double-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 36:1414–1421CrossRef Meredick RB, Kennan JV, Appleby D et al (2007) Outcome of single-bundle versus double-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 36:1414–1421CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Picard F, Digioia AM, Moody J et al (2001) Accuracy in tunnel placement for ACL reconstruction. Comparison of traditional arthroscopic and computer-assisted navigation techniques. Comput Aided Surg 6:279–289CrossRefPubMed Picard F, Digioia AM, Moody J et al (2001) Accuracy in tunnel placement for ACL reconstruction. Comparison of traditional arthroscopic and computer-assisted navigation techniques. Comput Aided Surg 6:279–289CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Sakane M, Fox RJ, Woo SL et al (1997) In situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament and its bundles in response to anterior tibial loads. J Orthop Res 15:285–293CrossRefPubMed Sakane M, Fox RJ, Woo SL et al (1997) In situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament and its bundles in response to anterior tibial loads. J Orthop Res 15:285–293CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Steckel H, Starman JS, Baums MH, Klinger HM, Schultz W, Fu FH (2007) The double-bundle technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic overview. Scand J Med Sci Sports 17:99–108PubMed Steckel H, Starman JS, Baums MH, Klinger HM, Schultz W, Fu FH (2007) The double-bundle technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic overview. Scand J Med Sci Sports 17:99–108PubMed
32.
go back to reference Tashman S, Collon D, Anderson K et al (2004) Abnormal rotational motion during running after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 32:975–983CrossRefPubMed Tashman S, Collon D, Anderson K et al (2004) Abnormal rotational motion during running after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 32:975–983CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Tegner Y, Lysolm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 198:43–49PubMed Tegner Y, Lysolm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 198:43–49PubMed
34.
go back to reference Yagi M, Kuroda R, Nagamune K et al (2006) Double-bundle ACL reconstruction can improve rotational stability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 454:100–107CrossRef Yagi M, Kuroda R, Nagamune K et al (2006) Double-bundle ACL reconstruction can improve rotational stability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 454:100–107CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Yagi M, Wong EK, Kanamori A et al (2002) Biochemical analysis of an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 30:660–666PubMed Yagi M, Wong EK, Kanamori A et al (2002) Biochemical analysis of an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 30:660–666PubMed
36.
go back to reference Yasuda K, Kondo E, Ichiyama H et al (2006) Clinical evaluation of anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedure using hamstring tendon grafts: comparisons among 3 different procedures. Arthroscopy 22:240–251CrossRefPubMed Yasuda K, Kondo E, Ichiyama H et al (2006) Clinical evaluation of anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedure using hamstring tendon grafts: comparisons among 3 different procedures. Arthroscopy 22:240–251CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Zelle BA, Vidal AF, Brucker PU et al (2007) Double-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: anatomic and biomechanical rationale. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 15:87–96PubMed Zelle BA, Vidal AF, Brucker PU et al (2007) Double-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: anatomic and biomechanical rationale. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 15:87–96PubMed
Metadata
Title
Rotational and translational laxity after computer-navigated single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Authors
M. Hofbauer
P. Valentin
R. Kdolsky
R. C. Ostermann
A. Graf
M. Figl
S. Aldrian
Publication date
01-09-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 9/2010
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-009-0992-9

Other articles of this Issue 9/2010

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 9/2010 Go to the issue