Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 5/2003

01-09-2003 | Knee

Basic principles for surgical reconstruction of the PCL in chronic posterior knee instability

Author: Pascal Christel

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 5/2003

Login to get access

Abstract

This article describes the various options which are available for posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction in a chronic situation. On the femoral side, one- or two-bundle grafts may be used. In laboratory conditions, 2-bundle reconstruction makes it possible to mimic more closely the biomechanics of the native PCL. However, until now there is no clear-cut clinical evidence that 2-bundle reconstruction leads to a better outcome than the 1-bundle one. On the tibial side, either a tunnel or an inlay technique can be used. The advantages and drawbacks of both techniques are still subject to debate. The results of the laboratory tests are currently in favour of the inlay fixation; however, again, the clinical issue remains to be established. In any case, proper PCL graft positioning is the key issue for a successful reconstruction. Finally, in combined posterior and postero-lateral instabilities it is necessary to correct all the components of the instability and to perform a high tibial valgus osteotomy in the case of varus alignment.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ahn JH, Ha CW (2000) Posterior trans-septal portal for arthroscopic surgery of the knee joint. Arthroscopy 16:774–779PubMed Ahn JH, Ha CW (2000) Posterior trans-septal portal for arthroscopic surgery of the knee joint. Arthroscopy 16:774–779PubMed
2.
go back to reference Berg EE (1995) Posterior cruciate ligament tibial inlay reconstruction. Arthroscopy 11:69–76PubMed Berg EE (1995) Posterior cruciate ligament tibial inlay reconstruction. Arthroscopy 11:69–76PubMed
3.
go back to reference Bergfeld JA, McAllister DR, Parker RD et al (2001) A biomechanical comparison of PCL reconstruction techniques. Am J Sports Med 29:129–136PubMed Bergfeld JA, McAllister DR, Parker RD et al (2001) A biomechanical comparison of PCL reconstruction techniques. Am J Sports Med 29:129–136PubMed
4.
go back to reference Burks RT, Schaffer JJ (1990) A simplified approach of the tibial attachment of the posterior cruciate ligament. Clin Orthop 254:216–219PubMed Burks RT, Schaffer JJ (1990) A simplified approach of the tibial attachment of the posterior cruciate ligament. Clin Orthop 254:216–219PubMed
5.
go back to reference Cain EL, Clancy WG (2002) Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction : two-bundle technique. J Knee Surg 15:108–113PubMed Cain EL, Clancy WG (2002) Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction : two-bundle technique. J Knee Surg 15:108–113PubMed
6.
go back to reference Chen CH, Chen WJ, Shih CH (2000) Arthroscopic double-bundled posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps tendon-patellar bone autograft. Arthroscopy 16:780–782PubMed Chen CH, Chen WJ, Shih CH (2000) Arthroscopic double-bundled posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps tendon-patellar bone autograft. Arthroscopy 16:780–782PubMed
7.
go back to reference Chen CH, Chen WJ, Shih CH (2001) One-incision technique for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps tendon-patellar bone autograft. Arthroscopy 17:329–332PubMed Chen CH, Chen WJ, Shih CH (2001) One-incision technique for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps tendon-patellar bone autograft. Arthroscopy 17:329–332PubMed
8.
go back to reference Christel P, Djian P, Charon PH (1999) Arthroscopic PCL reconstruction with 2-bundle bone-tendon-bone patellar autograft. Arthroscopy 15: S42 Christel P, Djian P, Charon PH (1999) Arthroscopic PCL reconstruction with 2-bundle bone-tendon-bone patellar autograft. Arthroscopy 15: S42
9.
go back to reference Cooper D (2002) Tibial inlay fixation – surgical technique. In: AOSSM specialty day abstract book. AOSSM, Rosemont, p 62 Cooper D (2002) Tibial inlay fixation – surgical technique. In: AOSSM specialty day abstract book. AOSSM, Rosemont, p 62
10.
go back to reference Fu FH, Harner CD, Vince KG (1994) Knee surgery. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore Fu FH, Harner CD, Vince KG (1994) Knee surgery. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore
11.
go back to reference Giffin JR, Maemmerle MJ, Vogrin TM, Harner CD (2002) Single- versus double-bundle PCL reconstruction : a biomechanical analysis. J Knee Surg 15:114–120PubMed Giffin JR, Maemmerle MJ, Vogrin TM, Harner CD (2002) Single- versus double-bundle PCL reconstruction : a biomechanical analysis. J Knee Surg 15:114–120PubMed
12.
go back to reference Grood ES, Hefzy MS, Lindenfield TN (1989) Factors affecting the region of most isometric femoral attachments. Part I: The posterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sport Med 17:197–207 Grood ES, Hefzy MS, Lindenfield TN (1989) Factors affecting the region of most isometric femoral attachments. Part I: The posterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sport Med 17:197–207
13.
go back to reference Harner CD, Höher J, Vogrin TM, Carlin GJ, Woo SL-Y (1998) The effects of a popliteus muscle load on in situ forces in the posterior cruciate ligament and on the knee kinematics. A human cadaveric study. Am J Sports Med 26:669–673PubMed Harner CD, Höher J, Vogrin TM, Carlin GJ, Woo SL-Y (1998) The effects of a popliteus muscle load on in situ forces in the posterior cruciate ligament and on the knee kinematics. A human cadaveric study. Am J Sports Med 26:669–673PubMed
14.
go back to reference Harner CD, Baek GHG, Vogrin TM, Carlin GJ, Kashiwagushi S, Woo SL-Y (1999) Quantitative analysis of human cruciate ligament insertions. Arthroscopy 15:741–749PubMed Harner CD, Baek GHG, Vogrin TM, Carlin GJ, Kashiwagushi S, Woo SL-Y (1999) Quantitative analysis of human cruciate ligament insertions. Arthroscopy 15:741–749PubMed
15.
go back to reference Harner CD, Janaushek MA, Kanamori A et al (2000) Biomechanical analysis of a double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 28:144–151PubMed Harner CD, Janaushek MA, Kanamori A et al (2000) Biomechanical analysis of a double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 28:144–151PubMed
16.
go back to reference Höher J, Harner CD, Vogrin TM, Baek GH, Carlin GJ, Woo SL-Y (1998) In situ forces in the posterolateral structures of the knee under posterior tibial loading in the intact and posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. J Orthop Res 16:675–681PubMed Höher J, Harner CD, Vogrin TM, Baek GH, Carlin GJ, Woo SL-Y (1998) In situ forces in the posterolateral structures of the knee under posterior tibial loading in the intact and posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. J Orthop Res 16:675–681PubMed
17.
go back to reference Höher J, Scheffler S, Weiler A (2003) Graft choice and graft fixation in PCL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc (in press) Höher J, Scheffler S, Weiler A (2003) Graft choice and graft fixation in PCL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc (in press)
18.
go back to reference Juergensen K, Edwards JC, Jakob RP (1994) Positioning of the posterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2:133–137PubMed Juergensen K, Edwards JC, Jakob RP (1994) Positioning of the posterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2:133–137PubMed
19.
go back to reference Jung YB, Tae SK, Yum JK (1998) Reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament with modified tibial inlay technique (BPTB). Arthroscopy 14:S19 Jung YB, Tae SK, Yum JK (1998) Reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament with modified tibial inlay technique (BPTB). Arthroscopy 14:S19
20.
go back to reference Kantaras AT, Johnson DL (2002) The medial meniscal root as a landmark for tibial tunnel position in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 18:99–101PubMed Kantaras AT, Johnson DL (2002) The medial meniscal root as a landmark for tibial tunnel position in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 18:99–101PubMed
21.
go back to reference Kim SJ, Shin SJ, Kim HK, Jahng JS, Kim HS (2000) Comparison of 1- and 2-incision posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Arthroscopy 16:268–278PubMed Kim SJ, Shin SJ, Kim HK, Jahng JS, Kim HS (2000) Comparison of 1- and 2-incision posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Arthroscopy 16:268–278PubMed
22.
go back to reference Mannor DA, Shearn JT, Grood ES, Noyes FR, Levy MS (2000) Two-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. An in vitro analysis of graft placement and tension. Am J Sports Med 28:833–845PubMed Mannor DA, Shearn JT, Grood ES, Noyes FR, Levy MS (2000) Two-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. An in vitro analysis of graft placement and tension. Am J Sports Med 28:833–845PubMed
23.
go back to reference Mariani PP, Adriani E, Bellelli A, Maresca G (1999) Magnetic resonance imaging of tunnel placement in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 15:733–740PubMed Mariani PP, Adriani E, Bellelli A, Maresca G (1999) Magnetic resonance imaging of tunnel placement in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 15:733–740PubMed
24.
go back to reference Markolf KL, Zemanovic JR, McAllister DR (2002) Cyclic loading of posterior cruciate ligament replacements fixed with tibial tunnel and tibial inlay method. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:518–524CrossRef Markolf KL, Zemanovic JR, McAllister DR (2002) Cyclic loading of posterior cruciate ligament replacements fixed with tibial tunnel and tibial inlay method. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:518–524CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Matava MJ, Sethi NS, Totty WG (2000) Proximity of the posterior cruciate ligament insertion to the popliteal artery as a function of the knee flexion angle: implications for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 16:769–804 Matava MJ, Sethi NS, Totty WG (2000) Proximity of the posterior cruciate ligament insertion to the popliteal artery as a function of the knee flexion angle: implications for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 16:769–804
26.
go back to reference Miller MD, Gordon WT (1999) Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: tibial inlay technique — principles and procedures. Oper Tech Sports Med 7:127–133 Miller MD, Gordon WT (1999) Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: tibial inlay technique — principles and procedures. Oper Tech Sports Med 7:127–133
27.
go back to reference Miller MD, Kline AJ, Gonzales J, Beach WR (2002) Vascular risk associated with a posterior approach for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the inlay technique. J Knee Surg 15:137–140PubMed Miller MD, Kline AJ, Gonzales J, Beach WR (2002) Vascular risk associated with a posterior approach for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the inlay technique. J Knee Surg 15:137–140PubMed
28.
go back to reference Morgan CD, Kalman VR, Grawl DM (1997) The anatomic origin of the posterior cruciate ligament: where is it? Reference landmark for PCL reconstruction. Arthroscopy 13:325–331PubMed Morgan CD, Kalman VR, Grawl DM (1997) The anatomic origin of the posterior cruciate ligament: where is it? Reference landmark for PCL reconstruction. Arthroscopy 13:325–331PubMed
29.
go back to reference Ohkoshi Y, Nagasaki S, Yamamoto K et al (2001) A new endoscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: minimization of graft angulation. Arthroscopy 17:258–263PubMed Ohkoshi Y, Nagasaki S, Yamamoto K et al (2001) A new endoscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: minimization of graft angulation. Arthroscopy 17:258–263PubMed
30.
go back to reference Race A, Amis AA (1998) PCL reconstruction: in vitro biomechanical comparison of "isometric" versus single and double bundled "anatomic" grafts. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:173–179PubMed Race A, Amis AA (1998) PCL reconstruction: in vitro biomechanical comparison of "isometric" versus single and double bundled "anatomic" grafts. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:173–179PubMed
31.
go back to reference Stähelin AC, Südkamp NP, Weiler A (2001) Anatomic double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendons. Arthroscopy 17:88–97PubMed Stähelin AC, Südkamp NP, Weiler A (2001) Anatomic double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendons. Arthroscopy 17:88–97PubMed
32.
go back to reference Stone JD, Carlin GJ, Ishibashi Y, Harner CD (1996) Assessment of PCL graft performance using robotic technology. Am J Sports Med 24:824–828PubMed Stone JD, Carlin GJ, Ishibashi Y, Harner CD (1996) Assessment of PCL graft performance using robotic technology. Am J Sports Med 24:824–828PubMed
33.
go back to reference Strobel MJ, Weiler A, Schultz MS, Russe K, Eichhorn HJ (2002) Fixed posterior subluxation in posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees. Diagnosis and treatment of a new clinical sign. Am J Sports Med 30:32–38PubMed Strobel MJ, Weiler A, Schultz MS, Russe K, Eichhorn HJ (2002) Fixed posterior subluxation in posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees. Diagnosis and treatment of a new clinical sign. Am J Sports Med 30:32–38PubMed
34.
go back to reference Trickey EL (1967) Rupture of the posterior cruciate ligament of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 50:334 Trickey EL (1967) Rupture of the posterior cruciate ligament of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 50:334
Metadata
Title
Basic principles for surgical reconstruction of the PCL in chronic posterior knee instability
Author
Pascal Christel
Publication date
01-09-2003
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 5/2003
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-003-0407-2

Other articles of this Issue 5/2003

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 5/2003 Go to the issue