Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Intensive Care Medicine 8/2021

01-08-2021 | COVID-19 | Original

Implementation of new ECMO centers during the COVID-19 pandemic: experience and results from the Middle East and India

Authors: Ahmed A. Rabie, Mohamed H. Azzam, Abdulrahman A. Al-Fares, Akram Abdelbary, Hani N. Mufti, Ibrahim F. Hassan, Arpan Chakraborty, Pranay Oza, Alyaa Elhazmi, Huda Alfoudri, Suneel Kumar Pooboni, Abdulrahman Alharthy, Daniel Brodie, Bishoy Zakhary, Kiran Shekar, Marta Velia Antonini, Nicholas A. Barrett, Giles Peek, Alain Combes, Yaseen M. Arabi

Published in: Intensive Care Medicine | Issue 8/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) use for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients has increased during the course of the pandemic. As uncertainty existed regarding patient’s outcomes, early guidelines recommended against establishing new ECMO centers. We aimed to explore the epidemiology and outcomes of ECMO for COVID-19 related cardiopulmonary failure in five countries in the Middle East and India and to evaluate the results of ECMO in 5 new centers.

Methods

This is a retrospective, multicenter international, observational study conducted in 19 ECMO centers in five countries in the Middle East and India from March 1, 2020, to September 30, 2020. We included patients with COVID-19 who received ECMO for refractory hypoxemia and severe respiratory acidosis with or without circulatory failure. Data collection included demographic data, ECMO-related specific data, pre-ECMO patient condition, 24 h post-ECMO initiation data, and outcome. The primary outcome was survival to home discharge. Secondary outcomes included mortality during ECMO, survival to decannulation, and outcomes stratified by center type.

Results

Three hundred and seven COVID-19 patients received ECMO support during the study period, of whom 78 (25%) were treated in the new ECMO centers. The median age was 45 years (interquartile range IQR 37–52), and 81% were men. New center patients were younger, were less frequently male, had received higher PEEP, more frequently inotropes and prone positioning before ECMO and were less frequently retrieved from a peripheral center on ECMO. Survival to home discharge was 45%. In patients treated in new and established centers, survival was 55 and 41% (p = 0.03), respectively. Multivariable analysis retained only a SOFA score < 12 at ECMO initiation as associated with survival (odds ratio, OR 1.93 (95% CI 1.05–3.58), p = 0.034), but not treatment in a new center (OR 1.65 (95% CI 0.75–3.67)).

Conclusions

During pandemics, ECMO may provide favorable outcomes in highly selected patients as resources allow. Newly formed ECMO centers with appropriate supervision of regional experts may have satisfactory results.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Peek GJ, Mugford M, Tiruvoipati R, Wilson A, Allen E, Thalanany MM, Hibbert CL, Truesdale A, Clemens F, Cooper N, Firmin RK, Elbourne D (2009) Efficacy and economic assessment of conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure (CESAR): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 374(9698):1351–1363. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(09)61069-2CrossRefPubMed Peek GJ, Mugford M, Tiruvoipati R, Wilson A, Allen E, Thalanany MM, Hibbert CL, Truesdale A, Clemens F, Cooper N, Firmin RK, Elbourne D (2009) Efficacy and economic assessment of conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure (CESAR): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 374(9698):1351–1363. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​s0140-6736(09)61069-2CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Combes A, Hajage D, Capellier G, Demoule A, Lavoué S, Guervilly C, Da Silva D, Zafrani L, Tirot P, Veber B, Maury E, Levy B, Cohen Y, Richard C, Kalfon P, Bouadma L, Mehdaoui H, Beduneau G, Lebreton G, Brochard L, Ferguson ND, Fan E, Slutsky AS, Brodie D, Mercat A, EOLIA Trial Group, REVA, ECMONet (2018) Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 378(21):1965–1975. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1800385CrossRefPubMed Combes A, Hajage D, Capellier G, Demoule A, Lavoué S, Guervilly C, Da Silva D, Zafrani L, Tirot P, Veber B, Maury E, Levy B, Cohen Y, Richard C, Kalfon P, Bouadma L, Mehdaoui H, Beduneau G, Lebreton G, Brochard L, Ferguson ND, Fan E, Slutsky AS, Brodie D, Mercat A, EOLIA Trial Group, REVA, ECMONet (2018) Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 378(21):1965–1975. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1056/​NEJMoa1800385CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Zakhary B, Shekar K, Diaz R, Badulak J, Johnston L et al (2020) Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) ECMOed Taskforce. Position Paper on Global Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Education and Educational Agenda for the Future: a statement from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization ECMOed Taskforce. Crit Care Med 48(3):406–414. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000004158CrossRefPubMed Zakhary B, Shekar K, Diaz R, Badulak J, Johnston L et al (2020) Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) ECMOed Taskforce. Position Paper on Global Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Education and Educational Agenda for the Future: a statement from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization ECMOed Taskforce. Crit Care Med 48(3):406–414. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​CCM.​0000000000004158​CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, et al, On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (1996) The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. Intensive Care Med 22(7):707–710. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01709751CrossRefPubMed Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, et al, On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (1996) The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. Intensive Care Med 22(7):707–710. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​BF01709751CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Schmidt M, Bailey M, Sheldrake J, Hodgson C, Aubron C, Rycus PT, Scheinkestel C, Cooper DJ, Brodie D, Pellegrino V, Combes A, Pilcher D (2014) Predicting survival after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory failure. The Respiratory Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Survival Prediction (RESP) score. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 189(11):1374–1382. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201311-2023OCCrossRefPubMed Schmidt M, Bailey M, Sheldrake J, Hodgson C, Aubron C, Rycus PT, Scheinkestel C, Cooper DJ, Brodie D, Pellegrino V, Combes A, Pilcher D (2014) Predicting survival after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory failure. The Respiratory Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Survival Prediction (RESP) score. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 189(11):1374–1382. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1164/​rccm.​201311-2023OCCrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Barbaro RP, MacLaren G, Boonstra PS, Iwashyna TJ, Slutsky AS, Fan E, Bartlett RH, Tonna JE, Hyslop R, Fanning JJ, Rycus PT, Hyer SJ, Anders MM, Agerstrand CL, Hryniewicz K, Diaz R, Lorusso R, Combes A, Brodie D, Organization ELS (2020) Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in COVID-19: an international cohort study of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry. Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32008-0CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Barbaro RP, MacLaren G, Boonstra PS, Iwashyna TJ, Slutsky AS, Fan E, Bartlett RH, Tonna JE, Hyslop R, Fanning JJ, Rycus PT, Hyer SJ, Anders MM, Agerstrand CL, Hryniewicz K, Diaz R, Lorusso R, Combes A, Brodie D, Organization ELS (2020) Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in COVID-19: an international cohort study of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry. Lancet. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S0140-6736(20)32008-0CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Shekar K, Slutsky AS, Brodie D (2020) ECMO for severe ARDS associated with COVID-19: now we know we can, but should we? Lancet Respir Med 8:1066–1068CrossRef Shekar K, Slutsky AS, Brodie D (2020) ECMO for severe ARDS associated with COVID-19: now we know we can, but should we? Lancet Respir Med 8:1066–1068CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Guervilly C, Prud’homme E, Pauly V, Bourenne J, Hraiech S, Daviet F, Adda M, Coiffard B, Forel JM, Roch A, Persico N, Papazian L (2019) Prone positioning and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome: time for a randomized trial? Intensive Care Med 45(7):1040–1042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05570-9CrossRefPubMed Guervilly C, Prud’homme E, Pauly V, Bourenne J, Hraiech S, Daviet F, Adda M, Coiffard B, Forel JM, Roch A, Persico N, Papazian L (2019) Prone positioning and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome: time for a randomized trial? Intensive Care Med 45(7):1040–1042. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00134-019-05570-9CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Implementation of new ECMO centers during the COVID-19 pandemic: experience and results from the Middle East and India
Authors
Ahmed A. Rabie
Mohamed H. Azzam
Abdulrahman A. Al-Fares
Akram Abdelbary
Hani N. Mufti
Ibrahim F. Hassan
Arpan Chakraborty
Pranay Oza
Alyaa Elhazmi
Huda Alfoudri
Suneel Kumar Pooboni
Abdulrahman Alharthy
Daniel Brodie
Bishoy Zakhary
Kiran Shekar
Marta Velia Antonini
Nicholas A. Barrett
Giles Peek
Alain Combes
Yaseen M. Arabi
Publication date
01-08-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Keywords
COVID-19
ECMO
ECMO
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine / Issue 8/2021
Print ISSN: 0342-4642
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1238
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-021-06451-w

Other articles of this Issue 8/2021

Intensive Care Medicine 8/2021 Go to the issue

From the Inside

Chrysalis