Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Intensive Care Medicine
Published in: Intensive Care Medicine 5/2014

01-05-2014 | Correspondence

Assessment of agreement and trending between haemodynamic monitors is still challenging

Authors: Oliver Hunsicker, Aarne Feldheiser, Klaus-Dieter Wernecke, Claudia Spies

Published in: Intensive Care Medicine | Issue 5/2014

Login to get access

Excerpt

Dear Editor, …
Literature
1.
Petzoldt M, Riedel C, Braeunig J et al (2013) Stroke volume determination using transcardiopulmonary thermodilution and arterial pulse contour analysis in severe aortic valve disease. Intensive Care Med 39(4):601–611. doi:10.​1007/​s00134-012-2786-7 PubMedCrossRef
2.
Critchley LA, Critchley JA (1999) A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit Comput 15(2):85–91PubMedCrossRef
3.
Cecconi M, Rhodes A, Poloniecki J, Della Rocca G, Grounds RM (2009) Bench-to-bedside review: the importance of the precision of the reference technique in method comparison studies—with specific reference to the measurement of cardiac output. Crit Care 13(1):201PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
4.
Critchley LA, Lee A, Ho AM (2010) A critical review of the ability of continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output. Anesth Analg 111(5):1180–1192PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Assessment of agreement and trending between haemodynamic monitors is still challenging
Authors
Oliver Hunsicker
Aarne Feldheiser
Klaus-Dieter Wernecke
Claudia Spies
Publication date
01-05-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine / Issue 5/2014
Print ISSN: 0342-4642
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1238
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-014-3268-x

Other articles of this Issue 5/2014

Intensive Care Medicine 5/2014 Go to the issue

Original

Screening for critical illness polyneuromyopathy with single nerve conduction studies

From the Inside

Music and medicine

Original

Video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for orotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Correspondence

Clinical research in the ICU: response to Kompanje et al.

Imaging in Intensive Care Medicine

An anterior chest wall abscess penetrating the pleural cavity

Letter

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in pediatric recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: an updated analysis of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization experience