Published in:
Open Access
01-09-2008 | Original
Subject–ventilator synchrony during neural versus pneumatically triggered non-invasive helmet ventilation
Authors:
Onnen Moerer, Jennifer Beck, Lukas Brander, Roberta Costa, Michael Quintel, Arthur S. Slutsky, Fabrice Brunet, Christer Sinderby
Published in:
Intensive Care Medicine
|
Issue 9/2008
Login to get access
Abstract
Objective
Patient–ventilator synchrony during non-invasive pressure support ventilation with the helmet device is often compromised when conventional pneumatic triggering and cycling-off were used. A possible solution to this shortcoming is to replace the pneumatic triggering with neural triggering and cycling-off—using the diaphragm electrical activity (EAdi). This signal is insensitive to leaks and to the compliance of the ventilator circuit.
Design
Randomized, single-blinded, experimental study.
Setting
University Hospital.
Participants and subjects
Seven healthy human volunteers.
Interventions
Pneumatic triggering and cycling-off were compared to neural triggering and cycling-off during NIV delivered with the helmet.
Measurements and results
Triggering and cycling-off delays, wasted efforts, and breathing comfort were determined during restricted breathing efforts (<20% of voluntary maximum EAdi) with various combinations of pressure support (PSV) (5, 10, 20 cm H2O) and respiratory rates (10, 20, 30 breath/min). During pneumatic triggering and cycling-off, the subject–ventilator synchrony was progressively more impaired with increasing respiratory rate and levels of PSV (p < 0.001). During neural triggering and cycling-off, effect of increasing respiratory rate and levels of PSV on subject–ventilator synchrony was minimal. Breathing comfort was higher during neural triggering than during pneumatic triggering (p < 0.001).
Conclusions
The present study demonstrates in healthy subjects that subject–ventilator synchrony, trigger effort, and breathing comfort with a helmet interface are considerably less impaired during increasing levels of PSV and respiratory rates with neural triggering and cycling-off, compared to conventional pneumatic triggering and cycling-off.