Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
Published in: Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 4/2007

01-04-2007 | ORIGINAL PAPER

The prevalence of postpartum depression

The relative significance of three social status indices

Authors: Lisa S. Segre, PhD, Michael W. O’Hara, PhD, Stephan Arndt, PhD, Scott Stuart, MD

Published in: Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology | Issue 4/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Little is known about the prevalence of clinically significant postpartum depression in women of varying social status. The purpose of the present study was to examine the prevalence of postpartum depression as a function of three indices of social status: income, education and occupational prestige.

Method

A sample of 4,332 postpartum women completed a demographic interview and the Inventory to Diagnose Depression, a self-report scale developed to identify a major depressive episode in accordance with DSM diagnostic criteria. Logistic regression was used to assess the relative significance of the three social status variables as risk factors for postpartum depression controlling for the effects of correlated demographic variables.

Results

In the logistic regression, income, occupational prestige, marital status, and number of children were significant predictors of postpartum depression controlling for the effects of other related demographic characteristics. The Wald Chi Square value for each of these significant predictors indicates that income was the strongest predictor.

Conclusions

The prevalence of postpartum depression was significantly higher in financially poor relative to financially affluent women. Maternal depression screening programs targeting women who are financially poor are well placed. Future research is needed to replicate the present findings in a more ethnically diverse sample that includes the full age range of teenage mothers.
Literature
1.
American Psychiatric Association Committee on Nomenclature and Statistics (1980) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 3rd edn. Author, Washington, DC
2.
American Psychiatric Association (2000) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, DSM-IV-TR, 4th edn. American Psychiatric Association, Arlington, VirginiaCrossRef
3.
4.
Belle D, Doucet J (2003) Poverty, inequality, and discrimination as sources of depression among U.S. women. Psychol Women Quart 27:101–113CrossRef
5.
6.
Dearing E, Taylor BA, McCartney K (2004) Implications of family income dynamics for women’s depressive symptoms during the first 3 years after childbirth. Am J Public Health 94:1372–1377PubMedCrossRef
7.
Diener E, Biswas-Diener R (2002) Will money increase subjective well-being? Soc Indic Res 57:119–169CrossRef
8.
Dohrenwend BP, Dohrenwend BS (1969) Social status and psychological disorder: A causal inquiry. John Wiley, New York
9.
Dohrenwend BP, Schwartz S (1995) Socioeconomic status and psychiatric disorders. Curr Opin Psychiatry 8:138–141CrossRef
10.
Evans GW, English K (2002) The environment of poverty: multiple stressor exposure, psychophysiological stress, and socioemotional adjustment. Child Dev 73:1238–1248PubMedCrossRef
11.
Gavin NI, Gaynes BN, Lohr KN, Meltzer-Brody S, Gartlehner G, Swinson T (2005) Perinatal depression: a systematic review of prevalence and incidence. Obstet Gynecol 106:1071–1083PubMed
12.
Goldston DB, O’Hara MW, Schartz HA (1990) Reliability, validity, and preliminary normative data for the inventory to diagnose depression in a college population. Psychol Assessment 2:212–215CrossRef
13.
Gross KH, Wells CS, Radigan-Garcia A, Dietz PM (2002) Correlates of self-reports of being very depressed in the months after delivery: results from the pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system. Matern Child Health J 6:247–253PubMedCrossRef
14.
Hobfoll SE, Ritter C, Lavin J, Hulsizer MR, Cameron RP (1995) Depression prevalence and incidence among inner-city pregnant and postpartum women. J Consult Clin Psychol 63:445–453PubMedCrossRef
15.
Hollingshead AB (1975) Four factor index of social status. New Haven, CT
16.
Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression. John Wiley & Sons, New YorkCrossRef
17.
Howell EA, Mora PA, Horowitz CR, Leventhal H (2005) Racial and ethnic differences in factors associated with early postpartum depressive symptoms. Obstet Gynecol 105:1442–1450PubMed
18.
WHO International Consortium in Psychiatric Epidemiology (2000) Cross-national comparisons of the prevalences and correlates of mental disorders. Bull World Health Organ 78:413–426
19.
Kreiger N, Williams DR, Moss NE (1997) Measuring social class in U.S. public health research: concepts, methodologies, and guidelines. Annu Rev Public Health 18:341–378CrossRef
20.
Lorant V, Deliege D, Eaton W, Robert A, Phillippot P, Ansseau M (2003) Socioeconomic inequalities in depression: a meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol 157:98–112PubMedCrossRef
21.
O’Hara MW, Stuart S, Gorman LL, Wenzel A (2000) Efficacy of interpersonal psychotherapy for postpartum depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 57:1039–1045PubMedCrossRef
22.
O’Hara MW, Swain A (1996) Rates and risk of postpartum depression – a meta-analysis. Int Rev Psychiatry 8:37–54
23.
24.
Pires SA, Lazear KJ (2004) Maternal depression workshop. Annie E. Casey Foundation Community Health Summit, Washington, DC
25.
Segre LS, Losch ME, O’Hara MW (2006) Race/ethnicity and perinatal depressed mood. J Reproduct Infant Psychol 24:99–106CrossRef
26.
Segre LS, O’Hara MW (2005) Screening in the U.S. healthcare system. In: Henshaw C, Elliott S (eds) Screening for perinatal depression. Jessica Kinglsey Publishers, London
27.
Surgeon General (1999) Mental health: Culture, race, ethnicity – Supplement. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC
28.
The Postpartum Depression Law (2006) NJSA 42:2–176
29.
Turner RJ, Wheaton B, Lloyd DA (1995) The epidemiology of social stress. Am Sociol Rev 60:104–125CrossRef
30.
Uehara T, Sato T, Sakado K, Kameda K (1997) Discriminant validity of the Inventory to Diagnose Depression between patients with major depression and pure anxiety disorders. Psychiatry Res 71:57–61PubMedCrossRef
31.
Wells KB, Miranda J, Bauer MS, et al. (2002) Overcoming barriers to reducing the burden of affective disorders. Biol Psychiatry 52:655–675PubMedCrossRef
32.
Wisner KL, Peindl KS, Gigliotti T, Hanusa BH (1999) Obsessions and compulsions in women with postpartum depression. J Clin Psychiatry 60:176–180PubMed
33.
Wisner KL, Wheeler SB (1994) Prevention of recurrent postpartum major depression. Hosp Community Psych 45:1191–1196
34.
Zimmerman M, Coryell W, Corenthal C, Wilson S (1986) A self-report scale to diagnose major depressive disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 43:1076–1081PubMed
35.
Zimmerman M, Coryell W (1987) The inventory to diagnose depression (IDD): a self-report scale to diagnose major depressive disorders. J Consult Clin Psychol 55:55–59PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The prevalence of postpartum depression
The relative significance of three social status indices
Authors
Lisa S. Segre, PhD
Michael W. O’Hara, PhD
Stephan Arndt, PhD
Scott Stuart, MD
Publication date
01-04-2007
Publisher
D. Steinkopff-Verlag
Published in
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology / Issue 4/2007
Print ISSN: 0933-7954
Electronic ISSN: 1433-9285
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-007-0168-1

Other articles of this Issue 4/2007

Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 4/2007 Go to the issue

ORIGINAL PAPER

The relationship between cognitive dysfunction and stress sensitivity in schizophrenia

ORIGINAL PAPER

Gender differences in traumatic life events, coping strategies, perceived social support and sociodemographics among postconflict displaced persons in Ethiopia

ORIGINAL PAPER

Sociodemographic and clinical factors related to devaluation/discrimination and rejection experiences among users of mental health services

ORIGINAL PAPER

Properties of the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-25 (HSCL-25) and the Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-20) as screening instruments used in primary care in Afghanistan

ORIGINAL PAPER

Seemingly minor changes to a questionnaire can make a big difference to mean scores: a cautionary tale

ORIGINAL PAPER

Discrepant illness perceptions, affect and expressed emotion in people with psychosis and their carers