Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Diabetologia 6/2003

01-06-2003 | Article

Variations in process and outcomes of diabetes care by socio-economic status in Salford, UK

Authors: Dr. R. Edwards, J. A. Burns, P. McElduff, R. J. Young, J. P. New

Published in: Diabetologia | Issue 6/2003

Login to get access

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis

Our aim was to investigate trends in provision and outcomes of care by socio-economic status among patients with diabetes in Salford, United Kingdom.

Methods

Salford is a deprived urban area in North West England. Data for people with diabetes who were younger than 20 years of age (4034 patients in the year 1993 and 5671 by the year 2000) were extracted from the Diabetes Information System. Age-standardised means, proportions and attainment of targets were calculated for: processes of care indicators, intermediate outcomes and prescribing of preventive drug treatments in 1993 to 1994 and in 2000 to 2001 by quintiles of Townsend deprivation score. We did comparisons of means and proportions using age-adjusted linear regression and of trends using generalised estimating equations. Rate ratios for first microvascular and first macrovascular complication were estimated from proportional hazards models.

Results

Marked improvements occurred in all indicators. For patients managed in primary care, blood pressure and cholesterol measurement increased from 53% to 64% (p<0.001) and 27% to 61% (p<0.001) respectively; whilst mean systolic blood pressure decreased from 147 to 140 mmHg (p<0.001) and cholesterol concentrations from 6.0 to 5.1 mmol/l (p<0.001). Mean HbA1c increased from 7.8 to 8.1% (p<0.001). Prescribing of aspirin, anti-hypertensive and lipid-lowering drugs increased greatly. Trends varied little by socio-economic status. Patients from more affluent areas generally received more frequent clinical monitoring and preventive treatments, and had a lower BMI (29.5 vs 30.2 kg/m2; p=0.009) and HbA1c (7.8 vs 8.2% p=0.006), though risks of first microvascular or macrovascular complications were similar.

Conclusion/interpretation

Improvements in process and outcomes of care are possible for patients from all socio-economic groups. Socio-economic deprivation does not preclude high quality diabetes care.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chaturvedi N, Stephenson JM, Fuller JH (1996) The relationship between socioeconomic status and diabetes control and complications in the EURODIAB IDDM complications study. Diabetes Care 19:423–430PubMed Chaturvedi N, Stephenson JM, Fuller JH (1996) The relationship between socioeconomic status and diabetes control and complications in the EURODIAB IDDM complications study. Diabetes Care 19:423–430PubMed
2.
go back to reference Chaturvedi N, Jarrett J, Shipley MJ et al. (1998) Socioeconomic gradient in morbidity and mortality in people with diabetes: cohort study findings from the Whitehall Study and the WHO Multinational Study of Vascular Disease in Diabetes. BMJ 316:100–105PubMed Chaturvedi N, Jarrett J, Shipley MJ et al. (1998) Socioeconomic gradient in morbidity and mortality in people with diabetes: cohort study findings from the Whitehall Study and the WHO Multinational Study of Vascular Disease in Diabetes. BMJ 316:100–105PubMed
3.
go back to reference Connolly VM, Kesson CM (1996) Socioeconomic status and clustering of cardiovascular disease risk factors in diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 19:419–422PubMed Connolly VM, Kesson CM (1996) Socioeconomic status and clustering of cardiovascular disease risk factors in diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 19:419–422PubMed
4.
go back to reference Unwin N, Binns D, Elliott K et al. (1996) The relationships between cardiovascular risk factors and socio-economic status in people with diabetes. Diabet Med 13:72–79CrossRefPubMed Unwin N, Binns D, Elliott K et al. (1996) The relationships between cardiovascular risk factors and socio-economic status in people with diabetes. Diabet Med 13:72–79CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Mülhauser I, Overmann H, Bender R et al. (1998) Social status and the quality of care for adult people with Type I (insulin dependent) diabetes mellitus—a population-based study. Diabetologia41:1139–1150 Mülhauser I, Overmann H, Bender R et al. (1998) Social status and the quality of care for adult people with Type I (insulin dependent) diabetes mellitus—a population-based study. Diabetologia41:1139–1150
6.
go back to reference Nilsson PM, Johansson S-E, Sundquist J (1997) Low educational status is a risk factor for mortality among diabetic people. Diabet Med 15:213–219CrossRef Nilsson PM, Johansson S-E, Sundquist J (1997) Low educational status is a risk factor for mortality among diabetic people. Diabet Med 15:213–219CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Roper NA, Bilous RW, Kelly WF et al. (2001) Excess mortality in a population with diabetes and the impact of material deprivation: longitudinal, population based study. BMJ 322:1389–1393PubMed Roper NA, Bilous RW, Kelly WF et al. (2001) Excess mortality in a population with diabetes and the impact of material deprivation: longitudinal, population based study. BMJ 322:1389–1393PubMed
8.
go back to reference Koskinen SV, Martelin TP, Valkonen T (1996) Socioeconomic differences in mortality among diabetic people in Finland: five year follow up. BMJ 313:975–978PubMed Koskinen SV, Martelin TP, Valkonen T (1996) Socioeconomic differences in mortality among diabetic people in Finland: five year follow up. BMJ 313:975–978PubMed
9.
go back to reference Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group (1993) The Effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Eng J Med 329:979–985 Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group (1993) The Effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Eng J Med 329:979–985
10.
go back to reference Kelly WF, Mahmood R, Turner S et al. (1994) Geographical mapping of diabetic patients from the deprived inner city show less insulin therapy and more hyperglycaemia. Diabet Med 11:344–348PubMed Kelly WF, Mahmood R, Turner S et al. (1994) Geographical mapping of diabetic patients from the deprived inner city show less insulin therapy and more hyperglycaemia. Diabet Med 11:344–348PubMed
11.
go back to reference Pringle M, Stewart-Evans C, Coupland C et al.. (1993). Influences on control in diabetes mellitus: patient, doctor, practice, or delivery of care? BMJ 306:630–634 Pringle M, Stewart-Evans C, Coupland C et al.. (1993). Influences on control in diabetes mellitus: patient, doctor, practice, or delivery of care? BMJ 306:630–634
12.
13.
go back to reference Leese B, Bosanquet N (1995). Change in general practice and its effects on service provision in areas with different socioeconomic characteristics. BMJ 311:546–550PubMed Leese B, Bosanquet N (1995). Change in general practice and its effects on service provision in areas with different socioeconomic characteristics. BMJ 311:546–550PubMed
14.
go back to reference Khunti K, Ganguli S, Lowy A (2001) Inequalities in provision of systematic care for patients with diabetes. Fam Pract 18:27–32CrossRefPubMed Khunti K, Ganguli S, Lowy A (2001) Inequalities in provision of systematic care for patients with diabetes. Fam Pract 18:27–32CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Khunti K, Ganguli S, Baker R et al. (2001) Features of primary care associated with variations in process and outcome of care of people with diabetes care. Br J Gen Pract 51:356–360PubMed Khunti K, Ganguli S, Baker R et al. (2001) Features of primary care associated with variations in process and outcome of care of people with diabetes care. Br J Gen Pract 51:356–360PubMed
16.
go back to reference Campbell SM, Hann M, Hacker J et al. (2001) Identifying predictors of high quality care in English general practice: observational study. BMJ 323:784–787CrossRefPubMed Campbell SM, Hann M, Hacker J et al. (2001) Identifying predictors of high quality care in English general practice: observational study. BMJ 323:784–787CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference North West Public Health Observatory (accessed on 10–09–2002). Information sources; http://www.nwpho.org.uk/information/ North West Public Health Observatory (accessed on 10–09–2002). Information sources; http://​www.​nwpho.​org.​uk/​information/​
18.
go back to reference New JP, Hollis S, Campbell F et al. (2000) Measuring clinical performance and outcomes from diabetes information systems: an observational study. Diabetologia 43:836–843CrossRefPubMed New JP, Hollis S, Campbell F et al. (2000) Measuring clinical performance and outcomes from diabetes information systems: an observational study. Diabetologia 43:836–843CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Vaughan NJ, Home PD (1995) The UK Diabetes Dataset: a standard for information exchange. Diabetes Audit Working Group of the Research Unit of the Royal College of Physicians. British Diabetic Association. Diabet Med 12:717–722PubMed Vaughan NJ, Home PD (1995) The UK Diabetes Dataset: a standard for information exchange. Diabetes Audit Working Group of the Research Unit of the Royal College of Physicians. British Diabetic Association. Diabet Med 12:717–722PubMed
20.
go back to reference New JP, Burns JA, Hollis S, Bennett J, Young RY (2002) Improving ascertainment rates for macrovascular disease within Electronic Diabetes Records using data linkage. Diabet Med 19 [Supp 2]:218 New JP, Burns JA, Hollis S, Bennett J, Young RY (2002) Improving ascertainment rates for macrovascular disease within Electronic Diabetes Records using data linkage. Diabet Med 19 [Supp 2]:218
21.
go back to reference Townsend P, Phillimore P, Beattie A, Helm C (1988) Health and deprivation: inequality and the North. Croom: Helm, London Townsend P, Phillimore P, Beattie A, Helm C (1988) Health and deprivation: inequality and the North. Croom: Helm, London
22.
go back to reference Ramsay L E, Williams B, Johnston GD et al. (2000) British Hypertension Society guidelines for hypertension management 1999: summary. BMJ 319:630–635 Ramsay L E, Williams B, Johnston GD et al. (2000) British Hypertension Society guidelines for hypertension management 1999: summary. BMJ 319:630–635
23.
go back to reference Diggle PJ, Liang KY, Zeger SL. (1994) Analysis of longitudinal data. Oxford University Press, Oxford Diggle PJ, Liang KY, Zeger SL. (1994) Analysis of longitudinal data. Oxford University Press, Oxford
24.
go back to reference UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group (1998). Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: (UKPDS 38). BMJ 317:703–713PubMed UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group (1998). Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: (UKPDS 38). BMJ 317:703–713PubMed
25.
go back to reference UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group (1998) Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risks of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 352:837–854PubMed UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group (1998) Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risks of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 352:837–854PubMed
Metadata
Title
Variations in process and outcomes of diabetes care by socio-economic status in Salford, UK
Authors
Dr. R. Edwards
J. A. Burns
P. McElduff
R. J. Young
J. P. New
Publication date
01-06-2003
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Diabetologia / Issue 6/2003
Print ISSN: 0012-186X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-003-1102-z

Other articles of this Issue 6/2003

Diabetologia 6/2003 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine