Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 2/2016

01-02-2016 | Original Article

IMRT and 3D conformal radiotherapy with or without elective nodal irradiation in locally advanced NSCLC

A direct comparison of PET-based treatment planning

Authors: Dr. med. Jochen Fleckenstein, MD, Katharina Kremp, MD, Stephanie Kremp, MSc, Jan Palm, MD, Christian Rübe, MD, PhD

Published in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie | Issue 2/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Aim

The potential of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) as opposed to three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) is analyzed for two different concepts of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET)-based target volume delineation in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC): involved-field radiotherapy (IF-RT) vs. elective nodal irradiation (ENI).

Methods

Treatment planning was performed for 41 patients with LA-NSCLC, using four different planning approaches (3D-CRT-IF, 3D-CRT-ENI, IMRT-IF, IMRT-ENI). ENI included a boost irradiation after 50 Gy. For each plan, maximum dose escalation was calculated based on prespecified normal tissue constraints. The maximum prescription dose (PD), tumor control probability (TCP), conformal indices (CI), and normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) were analyzed.

Results

IMRT resulted in statistically significant higher prescription doses for both target volume concepts as compared with 3D-CRT (ENI: 68.4 vs. 60.9 Gy, p < 0.001; IF: 74.3 vs. 70.1 Gy, p < 0.03). With IMRT-IF, a PD of at least 66 Gy was achieved for 95 % of all plans. For IF as compared with ENI, there was a considerable theoretical increase in TCP (IMRT: 27.3 vs. 17.7 %, p < 0.00001; 3D-CRT: 20.2 vs. 9.9 %, p < 0.00001). The esophageal NTCP showed a particularly good sparing with IMRT vs. 3D-CRT (ENI: 12.3 vs. 30.9 % p < 0.0001; IF: 15.9 vs. 24.1 %; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The IMRT technique and IF target volume delineation allow a significant dose escalation and an increase in TCP. IMRT results in an improved sparing of OARs as compared with 3D-CRT at equivalent dose levels.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Harris JP, Murphy JD, Hanlon A et al (2014) A population based comparative effectiveness study of radiotherapy techniques in stage III non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 88:872–884PubMedCrossRef Harris JP, Murphy JD, Hanlon A et al (2014) A population based comparative effectiveness study of radiotherapy techniques in stage III non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 88:872–884PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Shirvani SM, Jiang J, Gomez DR et al (2013) Intensity modulated radiotherapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer in the United States: predictors of use and association with toxicities. Lung Cancer 82:252–259PubMedCrossRef Shirvani SM, Jiang J, Gomez DR et al (2013) Intensity modulated radiotherapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer in the United States: predictors of use and association with toxicities. Lung Cancer 82:252–259PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bortfeld T, Jokivarsi K, Goitein M et al (2002) Effects of intra-fraction motion on IMRT dose delivery: statistical analysis and simulation. Phys Med Biol 47:2203–2220PubMedCrossRef Bortfeld T, Jokivarsi K, Goitein M et al (2002) Effects of intra-fraction motion on IMRT dose delivery: statistical analysis and simulation. Phys Med Biol 47:2203–2220PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Schaefer M, Münter MW, Thilmann C et al (2004) Influence of intra-fractional breathing movement in step-and-shoot IMRT. Phys Med. Biol 49:175–179 Schaefer M, Münter MW, Thilmann C et al (2004) Influence of intra-fractional breathing movement in step-and-shoot IMRT. Phys Med. Biol 49:175–179
5.
go back to reference Liao ZX, Komaki RR, Thames HD et al (2010) Influence of technologic advances on outcomes in patients with unresectabe, locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving concomitant chemoradiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 76:775–781PubMedCrossRef Liao ZX, Komaki RR, Thames HD et al (2010) Influence of technologic advances on outcomes in patients with unresectabe, locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving concomitant chemoradiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 76:775–781PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bradley J, Bae K, Choi N et al (2012) A phase II comparative study of gross tumor volume definition with or without PET/CT fusion in dosimetric planning for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): primary analysis of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0515. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 82:435–441PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Bradley J, Bae K, Choi N et al (2012) A phase II comparative study of gross tumor volume definition with or without PET/CT fusion in dosimetric planning for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): primary analysis of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0515. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 82:435–441PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Rosenzweig KE, Sura S, Jackson A et al (2007) Involved-field radiation therapy for inoperable non small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 35:5557–5561CrossRef Rosenzweig KE, Sura S, Jackson A et al (2007) Involved-field radiation therapy for inoperable non small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 35:5557–5561CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Sulman EP, Komaki R, Klopp AH et al (2009) Exclusion of selective nodal irradiation is associated with minimal elective nodal failure in non-small cell lung cancer. Radiat Oncol 4:5–11PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Sulman EP, Komaki R, Klopp AH et al (2009) Exclusion of selective nodal irradiation is associated with minimal elective nodal failure in non-small cell lung cancer. Radiat Oncol 4:5–11PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Belderbos JS, Kepka L, Kong FM et al (2008) Report from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) consultants’ meeting on elective nodal irradiation in lung cancer: non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 72:335–342PubMedCrossRef Belderbos JS, Kepka L, Kong FM et al (2008) Report from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) consultants’ meeting on elective nodal irradiation in lung cancer: non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 72:335–342PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Fleckenstein J, Hellwig D, Kremp S et al (2011) F-18-FDG-PET confined radiotherapy of locally advanced NSCLC with concomitant chemotherapy: results of the PET-PLAN pilot trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 81:e283–289 Fleckenstein J, Hellwig D, Kremp S et al (2011) F-18-FDG-PET confined radiotherapy of locally advanced NSCLC with concomitant chemotherapy: results of the PET-PLAN pilot trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 81:e283–289
11.
go back to reference Nestle U, Kremp S, Schaefer-Schuler A et al (2005) Comparison of different methods for delineation of 18F-FDG PET-positive tissue for target volume definition in radiotherapy of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. J Nucl Med 46:1342–1348 Nestle U, Kremp S, Schaefer-Schuler A et al (2005) Comparison of different methods for delineation of 18F-FDG PET-positive tissue for target volume definition in radiotherapy of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. J Nucl Med 46:1342–1348
12.
go back to reference Chapet O, Kong FM, Quint LE et al (2005) CT-based definition of thoracic lymph node stations: an atlas from the University of Michigan. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 63:170–178PubMedCrossRef Chapet O, Kong FM, Quint LE et al (2005) CT-based definition of thoracic lymph node stations: an atlas from the University of Michigan. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 63:170–178PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Mark LB, Bentzen SM, Deasy JO et al (2010) Radiation dose-volume effects in the lung. Int J Radiation Oncol Biol Phys 76:S70–S76CrossRef Mark LB, Bentzen SM, Deasy JO et al (2010) Radiation dose-volume effects in the lung. Int J Radiation Oncol Biol Phys 76:S70–S76CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Gagliardi G, Constine LS, Moiseenko V et al (2010) Radiation dose-volume effects in the heart. Int J Radiation Oncol Biol Phys 76:S77–S85CrossRef Gagliardi G, Constine LS, Moiseenko V et al (2010) Radiation dose-volume effects in the heart. Int J Radiation Oncol Biol Phys 76:S77–S85CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Werner-Wasik M, Yorke E, Deasy J et al (2010) Radiation dose-volume effects in the esophagus. Int J Radiation Oncol Biol Phys 76:S86–S93CrossRef Werner-Wasik M, Yorke E, Deasy J et al (2010) Radiation dose-volume effects in the esophagus. Int J Radiation Oncol Biol Phys 76:S86–S93CrossRef
16.
go back to reference ICRU. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. Prescribing, recording, and reporting photon-beam intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) (2010) ICRU Report 83. J ICRU 10:1–106CrossRef ICRU. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. Prescribing, recording, and reporting photon-beam intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) (2010) ICRU Report 83. J ICRU 10:1–106CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Baltas D, Kolotas C, Geramani K et al (1998) A conformal index (COIN) to evaluate implant quality and dose specification in brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 40:515–524PubMedCrossRef Baltas D, Kolotas C, Geramani K et al (1998) A conformal index (COIN) to evaluate implant quality and dose specification in brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 40:515–524PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Martel M, Ten Haken R, Hazuka M et al (1999) Estimation of tumor control probability model parameters from 3-D dose distributions of non-small cell lung cancer patients. Lung Cancer 24:31–37PubMedCrossRef Martel M, Ten Haken R, Hazuka M et al (1999) Estimation of tumor control probability model parameters from 3-D dose distributions of non-small cell lung cancer patients. Lung Cancer 24:31–37PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Källman P, Agren A, Brahme A. (1992) Tumor and normal tissue responses to fractionated non-uniform dose delivery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62:249–262CrossRef Källman P, Agren A, Brahme A. (1992) Tumor and normal tissue responses to fractionated non-uniform dose delivery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62:249–262CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Bradley JD, Paulus R, Komaki R (2015) et al. Standard-dose versus high-dose conformal radiotherapy with concurrent and consolidation carboplatin plus paclitaxel with or without cetuximab for patients with stage IIIA or IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer (RTOG 0617): a randomised, two-by-two factorial phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 16:187–199PubMedCrossRef Bradley JD, Paulus R, Komaki R (2015) et al. Standard-dose versus high-dose conformal radiotherapy with concurrent and consolidation carboplatin plus paclitaxel with or without cetuximab for patients with stage IIIA or IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer (RTOG 0617): a randomised, two-by-two factorial phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 16:187–199PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Shi A, Zhu G, Wu H et al (2010) Analysis of clinical and dosimetric factors associated with severe acute radiation pneumonitis in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with concurrent chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol 5:35PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Shi A, Zhu G, Wu H et al (2010) Analysis of clinical and dosimetric factors associated with severe acute radiation pneumonitis in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with concurrent chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol 5:35PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Grills IS, Yan D, Martinez AA et al (2003) Potential for reduced toxicity and dose escalation in the treatment of inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer: a comparison of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), 3D conformal radiation, and elective nodal irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 57:875–890PubMedCrossRef Grills IS, Yan D, Martinez AA et al (2003) Potential for reduced toxicity and dose escalation in the treatment of inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer: a comparison of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), 3D conformal radiation, and elective nodal irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 57:875–890PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Murshed H, Liu HH, Barker JL et al (2004) Dose and volume reduction for normal lung using intensity-modulated radiotherapy for advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 58:1258–1267PubMedCrossRef Murshed H, Liu HH, Barker JL et al (2004) Dose and volume reduction for normal lung using intensity-modulated radiotherapy for advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 58:1258–1267PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lievens Y, Nulens A, Gaber MA et al (2011) Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a dose-escalation planning study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 80:306–313PubMedCrossRef Lievens Y, Nulens A, Gaber MA et al (2011) Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a dose-escalation planning study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 80:306–313PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference De Ruysscher D, Faivre-Finn C, Nestle U et al (2010) European organisation for research and treatment of cancer recommendations for planning and delivery of high-dose, high-precision radiotherapy for lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:5301–5310PubMedCrossRef De Ruysscher D, Faivre-Finn C, Nestle U et al (2010) European organisation for research and treatment of cancer recommendations for planning and delivery of high-dose, high-precision radiotherapy for lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:5301–5310PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Yuan S, Sun X, Li M et al (2007) A randomized study of involved-field irradiation versus elective nodal irradiation in combination with concurrent chemotherapy for inoperable stage III nonsmall cell lung cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 30:239–244PubMedCrossRef Yuan S, Sun X, Li M et al (2007) A randomized study of involved-field irradiation versus elective nodal irradiation in combination with concurrent chemotherapy for inoperable stage III nonsmall cell lung cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 30:239–244PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference De Ruysscher D, Wanders S, van Haren E et al (2005) Selective mediastinal node irradiation based on FDG-PET scan data in patients with non – small-cell lung cancer: a prospective clinical study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62:988–994PubMedCrossRef De Ruysscher D, Wanders S, van Haren E et al (2005) Selective mediastinal node irradiation based on FDG-PET scan data in patients with non – small-cell lung cancer: a prospective clinical study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62:988–994PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Bezjak A, Rodrigues G, Hope A et al (2012) Intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of lung cancer. Clin Oncol 24:508–520CrossRef Bezjak A, Rodrigues G, Hope A et al (2012) Intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of lung cancer. Clin Oncol 24:508–520CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Govaert SL, Troost EG, Schuurbiers OC et al (2012) Treatment outcome and toxicity of intensity-modulated (chemo) radiotherapy in stage III non-small cell lung cancer patients. Radiat Oncol 7:150–156PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Govaert SL, Troost EG, Schuurbiers OC et al (2012) Treatment outcome and toxicity of intensity-modulated (chemo) radiotherapy in stage III non-small cell lung cancer patients. Radiat Oncol 7:150–156PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Jensen AD, Münter MW, Bischoff HG et al (2011) Combined treatment of nonsmall cell lung cancer NSCLC stage III with intensity-modulated RT radiotherapy and cetuximab. The NEAR trial. Cancer 117:2986–2994PubMedCrossRef Jensen AD, Münter MW, Bischoff HG et al (2011) Combined treatment of nonsmall cell lung cancer NSCLC stage III with intensity-modulated RT radiotherapy and cetuximab. The NEAR trial. Cancer 117:2986–2994PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference De Bree I, van Hinsberg MG, van Veelen LR et al (2012) High-dose radiotherapy in inoperable nonsmall cell lung cancer: comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy, dynamic IMRT and 3D conformal radiotherapy. Med Dosim 37:353–357PubMedCrossRef De Bree I, van Hinsberg MG, van Veelen LR et al (2012) High-dose radiotherapy in inoperable nonsmall cell lung cancer: comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy, dynamic IMRT and 3D conformal radiotherapy. Med Dosim 37:353–357PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Bertelsen A, Hansen O, Brink C (2012) Does VMAT for treatment of NSCLC patients increase the risk of pneumonitis compared to IMRT?—A planning study. Acta Oncol 51:752–758PubMedCrossRef Bertelsen A, Hansen O, Brink C (2012) Does VMAT for treatment of NSCLC patients increase the risk of pneumonitis compared to IMRT?—A planning study. Acta Oncol 51:752–758PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
IMRT and 3D conformal radiotherapy with or without elective nodal irradiation in locally advanced NSCLC
A direct comparison of PET-based treatment planning
Authors
Dr. med. Jochen Fleckenstein, MD
Katharina Kremp, MD
Stephanie Kremp, MSc
Jan Palm, MD
Christian Rübe, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-02-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0179-7158
Electronic ISSN: 1439-099X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-015-0900-9

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 2/2016 Go to the issue