Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 3/2017

01-05-2017 | Original Article

Mechanical properties of different esthetic and conventional orthodontic wires in bending tests

An in vitro study

Authors: Ahmad Alobeid, Cornelius Dirk, Susanne Reimann, Tarek El-Bialy, Andreas Jäger, Christoph Bourauel

Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Aims

The goal of this study was to determine the mechanical properties of different esthetic and conventional orthodontic wires in three-point and four-point bending tests, and in a biomechanical test employing three bracket systems.

Methods

The behavior of round wires with a diameter of 0.46 mm (0.018″) were investigated: uncoated nickel titanium (NiTi) wires, surface modified NiTi wires; FLI® Orthonol Wire® and glass fiber reinforced plastic wires. The biomechanical bending test was performed using the following bracket types: metal brackets (Discovery®, Dentaurum), ceramic brackets (Fascination®, Dentaurum), and plastic brackets (Elegance®, Dentaurum). All bending tests were performed in the orthodontic measurement and simulation system (OMSS) at a temperature of 37 °C. The classical three-point bending test was performed according to an ISO standard (DIN EN ISO 15841:2007) using the appropriate thrust die and supports with a predefined span of 10 mm. In the other tests the supports or interbracket distances were chosen such that the free wire length was also 10 mm (5 mm between adjacent brackets). All wires were loaded centrally to a maximum of 3.1 and 3.3 mm in the biomechanical test, respectively. The force was measured upon unloading with a loading velocity of 1 mm/min. Each specimen was loaded twice and a total of 10 specimens tested for each product. Weighted means and the error of the weighted mean were calculated for each product.

Results

Fiber reinforced wires displayed lowest forces in three-point bending with values of 0.4 N at a displacement of 1 mm and 0.7 N at a 2 mm displacement. In four-point bending the forces were 0.9 N and 1.4 N, respectively, at the same displacements. Almost all of the translucent wires showed fracture upon bending at displacements greater than 3 mm, independent of the bending test and bracket type. The different investigated NiTi wires, surface modified or conventional, only showed minor variation, e.g., 2.2 N for rematitan® Lite White and 2.0 N for rematitan®, 2.1 N for FLI® Coated Orthonol® and 1.7 N for Orthonol® in four-point bending. The rhodinized wire generated forces between these values (2.1 N).

Conclusion

The translucent wires had the lowest forces in all three bending tests; however, displacements above 3 mm resulted in increased risk of fracture. Forces of investigated NiTi wires were very high and in part above clinically recommended values.
Literature
1.
go back to reference ADA (1977) American Dental Association Specification No. 32 for orthodontic wires not containing precious metals. J Am Dent Assoc 95:1169–1171 ADA (1977) American Dental Association Specification No. 32 for orthodontic wires not containing precious metals. J Am Dent Assoc 95:1169–1171
2.
go back to reference Alavi S, Hosseini N (2012) Load-deflection and surface properties of coated and conventional superelastic orthodontic archwires in conventional and metal-insert ceramic brackets. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 9:133–138CrossRef Alavi S, Hosseini N (2012) Load-deflection and surface properties of coated and conventional superelastic orthodontic archwires in conventional and metal-insert ceramic brackets. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 9:133–138CrossRef
3.
go back to reference ANSI/ADA (2002) Specification No. 32 for orthodontic wires. In: Dental products: standards, technical specifications and technical reports. Council on Dental Materials ANSI/ADA (2002) Specification No. 32 for orthodontic wires. In: Dental products: standards, technical specifications and technical reports. Council on Dental Materials
4.
go back to reference Bourauel C, Drescher D, Thier M (1992) An experimental apparatus for the simulation of three-dimensional movements in orthodontics. J Biomed Eng 14:371–378CrossRefPubMed Bourauel C, Drescher D, Thier M (1992) An experimental apparatus for the simulation of three-dimensional movements in orthodontics. J Biomed Eng 14:371–378CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Bourauel C, Drescher D, Nolte LP (1993) The computer-aided development of orthodontic treatment elements made from NiTi memory alloys exemplified by a pseudoelastic retraction spring. Fortschr Kieferorthop 54:45–56CrossRefPubMed Bourauel C, Drescher D, Nolte LP (1993) The computer-aided development of orthodontic treatment elements made from NiTi memory alloys exemplified by a pseudoelastic retraction spring. Fortschr Kieferorthop 54:45–56CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Bradley TG (2013) Changes in orthodontic treatment modalities in the past 20 years: exploring the link between technology and scientific evidence. J Ir Dent Assoc 59:91–94PubMed Bradley TG (2013) Changes in orthodontic treatment modalities in the past 20 years: exploring the link between technology and scientific evidence. J Ir Dent Assoc 59:91–94PubMed
7.
go back to reference Brantley WA (2001) Structures and properties of orthodontic materials. In: Brantley WA, Eliades T (eds) Orthodontic materials: scientific and clinical aspects. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 1–26 Brantley WA (2001) Structures and properties of orthodontic materials. In: Brantley WA, Eliades T (eds) Orthodontic materials: scientific and clinical aspects. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 1–26
8.
go back to reference Brantley WA, Eliades T, Litsky AS (2001) Mechanics and mechanical testing of orthodontic materials. In: Brantley WA, Eliades T (eds) Orthodontic materials: scientific and clinical aspects. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 27–48 Brantley WA, Eliades T, Litsky AS (2001) Mechanics and mechanical testing of orthodontic materials. In: Brantley WA, Eliades T (eds) Orthodontic materials: scientific and clinical aspects. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 27–48
9.
go back to reference Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Lena A et al (2008) Force levels of fiber-reinforced composites and orthodontic stainless steel wires: a 3-point bending test. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 133:410–413CrossRef Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Lena A et al (2008) Force levels of fiber-reinforced composites and orthodontic stainless steel wires: a 3-point bending test. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 133:410–413CrossRef
10.
go back to reference DIN EN ISO 15841. (2007) Zahnheilkunde—Drähte für die Kieferorthopädie (ISO 15841:2006) Beuth Verlag, Berlin DIN EN ISO 15841. (2007) Zahnheilkunde—Drähte für die Kieferorthopädie (ISO 15841:2006) Beuth Verlag, Berlin
11.
go back to reference Drescher D, Bourauel C, Thier M (1991) Orthodontic measuring and simulating systems (OMSS) for the static and dynamic analysis of tooth movement. Fortschr Kieferorthop 52:133–140CrossRefPubMed Drescher D, Bourauel C, Thier M (1991) Orthodontic measuring and simulating systems (OMSS) for the static and dynamic analysis of tooth movement. Fortschr Kieferorthop 52:133–140CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Elayyan F, Silikas N, Bearn D (2008) Ex vivo surface and mechanical proper-ties of coated orthodontic archwires. Eur J Orthod 30:661–667CrossRefPubMed Elayyan F, Silikas N, Bearn D (2008) Ex vivo surface and mechanical proper-ties of coated orthodontic archwires. Eur J Orthod 30:661–667CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Elayyan F, Silikas N, Bearn D (2010) Mechanical properties of coated superelastic archwires in conventional and self-ligating orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 137:213–217CrossRef Elayyan F, Silikas N, Bearn D (2010) Mechanical properties of coated superelastic archwires in conventional and self-ligating orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 137:213–217CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Iijima M, Muguruma T, Brantley WA et al (2011) Comparisons of nanoindentation, 3-point bending, and tension tests for orthodontic wires. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 140:65–71CrossRef Iijima M, Muguruma T, Brantley WA et al (2011) Comparisons of nanoindentation, 3-point bending, and tension tests for orthodontic wires. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 140:65–71CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Juvvadi SR, Kailasam V, Padmanabhan S et al (2010) Physical, mechanical, and flexural properties of 3 orthodontic wires: an in vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 138:623–630CrossRef Juvvadi SR, Kailasam V, Padmanabhan S et al (2010) Physical, mechanical, and flexural properties of 3 orthodontic wires: an in vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 138:623–630CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kaphoor AA, Sundareswaran S (2012) Aesthetic nickel titanium wires—how much do they deliver? Eur J Orthod 34:603–609CrossRefPubMed Kaphoor AA, Sundareswaran S (2012) Aesthetic nickel titanium wires—how much do they deliver? Eur J Orthod 34:603–609CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Krishnan V, Kumar KJ (2004) Mechanical properties and surface characteristics of three archwire alloys. Angle Orthod 74:825–831PubMed Krishnan V, Kumar KJ (2004) Mechanical properties and surface characteristics of three archwire alloys. Angle Orthod 74:825–831PubMed
18.
go back to reference Kusy RP, Mims L, Whitley JQ (2001) Mechanical characteristics of various tempers of as-received cobalt-chromium archwires. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 119:274–291CrossRef Kusy RP, Mims L, Whitley JQ (2001) Mechanical characteristics of various tempers of as-received cobalt-chromium archwires. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 119:274–291CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Miura F, Mogi M, Ohura Y et al (1986) The super-elastic property of the Japanese NiTi alloy wire for use in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 90:1–10CrossRef Miura F, Mogi M, Ohura Y et al (1986) The super-elastic property of the Japanese NiTi alloy wire for use in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 90:1–10CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Nucera R, Gatto E, Borsellino C et al (2014) Influence of bracket-slot design on the forces released by superelastic nickel-titanium alignment wires in different deflection configurations. Angle Orthod 84:541–547CrossRefPubMed Nucera R, Gatto E, Borsellino C et al (2014) Influence of bracket-slot design on the forces released by superelastic nickel-titanium alignment wires in different deflection configurations. Angle Orthod 84:541–547CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Segner D, Ibe D (1995) Properties of superelastic wires and their relevance to orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod 17:395–402CrossRefPubMed Segner D, Ibe D (1995) Properties of superelastic wires and their relevance to orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod 17:395–402CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Sernetz F (2005) Standardization of orthodontic products-does it make sense? J Orofac Orthop 66:307–318CrossRefPubMed Sernetz F (2005) Standardization of orthodontic products-does it make sense? J Orofac Orthop 66:307–318CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Verstrynge A, van Humbeeck J, Willems G (2006) In-vitro evaluation of the material characteristics of stainless steel and beta-titanium orthodontic wires. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 130:460–470CrossRef Verstrynge A, van Humbeeck J, Willems G (2006) In-vitro evaluation of the material characteristics of stainless steel and beta-titanium orthodontic wires. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 130:460–470CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Vijayalakshmi RD, Nagachandran KS, Kummi P et al (2009) A comparative evaluation of metallurgical properties of stainless steel and TMA archwires with timolium and titanium niobium archwires—an in vitro study. Ind J Dent Res 20:448–452CrossRef Vijayalakshmi RD, Nagachandran KS, Kummi P et al (2009) A comparative evaluation of metallurgical properties of stainless steel and TMA archwires with timolium and titanium niobium archwires—an in vitro study. Ind J Dent Res 20:448–452CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Mechanical properties of different esthetic and conventional orthodontic wires in bending tests
An in vitro study
Authors
Ahmad Alobeid
Cornelius Dirk
Susanne Reimann
Tarek El-Bialy
Andreas Jäger
Christoph Bourauel
Publication date
01-05-2017
Publisher
Springer Medizin
Published in
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Electronic ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-016-0078-5

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 3/2017 Go to the issue