Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Drug Investigation 9/2012

01-09-2012 | Adis Drug Evaluation

Azilsartan Medoxomil

A Review of its Use in Hypertension

Author: Caroline M. Perry

Published in: Clinical Drug Investigation | Issue 9/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Azilsartan medoxomil (Edarbi®; Ipreziv™) is an orally administered angiotensin II receptor type 1 antagonist (blocker) used in the treatment of adults with essential hypertension. This article reviews data on the clinical efficacy and tolerability of azilsartan medoxomil in adults with essential hypertension and provides a summary of its pharmacological properties.
Azilsartan medoxomil is a prodrug that undergoes rapid hydrolysis in the gastrointestinal tract after oral administration to the bioactive moiety azilsartan, before systemic absorption. Azilsartan medoxomil produces antihypertensive effects by selectively blocking the binding of angiotensin II to the angiotensin type 1 (AT1) receptor, thereby antagonizing the pressor response activity of angiotensin II.
In vitro, azilsartan produced greater and more sustained AT1 receptor binding/blockade activity than several comparator angiotensin II receptor antagonists. Azilsartan medoxomil reduces blood pressure (BP) in hypertensive adults. In addition, the drug has been shown to have pleiotropic effects (i.e. effects beyond AT1 receptor blockade).
In adults with essential hypertension, azilsartan medoxomil 20, 40 or 80 mg effectively reduced BP over a 24-hour period with once-daily administration in three major, randomized, controlled trials in which the primary endpoints were changes from baseline in 24-hour mean systolic BP (SBP) at week 6 (two trials) or week 24, assessed by ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). In the two 6-week trials, azilsartan medoxomil showed dose-dependent efficacy over all evaluated dosages and was more effective than placebo in lowering SBP. At the maximum approved dosage of 80 mg once daily, azilsartan medoxomil was significantly more effective than maximum dosages of olmesartan medoxomil (40 mg once daily) or valsartan (320 mg once daily), based on primary endpoint assessments. Mean reductions in clinic measurements of SBP and diastolic BP (DBP) measurements were also generally greater with azilsartan medoxomil 80 mg once daily than with the comparator drugs in these 6-week studies.
Over a longer treatment period of 24 weeks, azilsartan medoxomil showed sustained BP-lowering efficacy, with the reduction in 24-hour mean SBP at week 24 significantly greater with azilsartan medoxomil 40 or 80 mg once daily than with valsartan 320 mg once daily. Mean reductions from baseline in mean clinic SBP and DBP as well as DBP by ABPM were also significantly greater with azilsartan medoxomil 40 or 80 mg once daily than with valsartan.
Azilsartan medoxomil was generally well tolerated, with a tolerability profile similar to that of placebo in the 6-week trials. Across the three major trials, headache and dizziness were among the most common adverse events. Overall, rates of treatment discontinuation as a result of adverse events were low in the 6-week and 24-week trials.
In conclusion, once-daily azilsartan medoxomil effectively lowers BP in adults with essential hypertension and has shown better antihypertensive efficacy than maximum therapeutic dosages of olmesartan medoxomil or valsartan in major trials of up to 24 weeks’ duration. Azilsartan medoxomil is generally well tolerated and the low rates of discontinuation due to adverse events suggest that patients are likely to persist with long-term treatment. Azilsartan medoxomil is therefore a useful and attractive new option for lowering BP in patients with essential hypertension, particularly for those not able to tolerate other antihypertensive drugs. Further studies are required to evaluate the effects of azilsartan medoxomil on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kearney PM, Whelton M, Reynolds K, et al. Global burden of hypertension: analysis of worldwide data. Lancet 2005 Jan 15–21; 365(9455): 217–23PubMed Kearney PM, Whelton M, Reynolds K, et al. Global burden of hypertension: analysis of worldwide data. Lancet 2005 Jan 15–21; 365(9455): 217–23PubMed
2.
go back to reference Hypertension. Clinical management of primary hypertension in adults. NICE Clinical Guideline 127 (Aug 2011) [online]. Available from URL: http://www.nice.org.uk.pdf [Accessed 2012 July 30] Hypertension. Clinical management of primary hypertension in adults. NICE Clinical Guideline 127 (Aug 2011) [online]. Available from URL: http://​www.​nice.​org.​uk.pdf [Accessed 2012 July 30]
3.
go back to reference Wolf-Maier K, Cooper RS, Banegas JR, et al. Hypertension prevalence and blood pressure levels in 6 European countries, Canada, and the United States. JAMA 2003 May 14; 289(18): 2363–9PubMedCrossRef Wolf-Maier K, Cooper RS, Banegas JR, et al. Hypertension prevalence and blood pressure levels in 6 European countries, Canada, and the United States. JAMA 2003 May 14; 289(18): 2363–9PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lawes CM, Van der Hoorn S, Rodgers A. Global burden of blood-pressure-related disease, 2001. Lancet 2008 May 3; 371(9623): 1513–8PubMedCrossRef Lawes CM, Van der Hoorn S, Rodgers A. Global burden of blood-pressure-related disease, 2001. Lancet 2008 May 3; 371(9623): 1513–8PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Mancia G, De Backer G, Dominiczak A, et al. 2007 guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: The Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2007 Jun; 28(12): 1462–536PubMed Mancia G, De Backer G, Dominiczak A, et al. 2007 guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: The Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2007 Jun; 28(12): 1462–536PubMed
7.
go back to reference Mancia G, Laurent S, Agabiti-Rosei E, et al. Reappraisal of European guidelines on hypertension management: a European Society of Hypertension Task Force document. J Hypertens 2009; 27(11): 2121–58PubMedCrossRef Mancia G, Laurent S, Agabiti-Rosei E, et al. Reappraisal of European guidelines on hypertension management: a European Society of Hypertension Task Force document. J Hypertens 2009; 27(11): 2121–58PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Egan BM, Zhao Y, Axon RN. US trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension, 1988–2008. JAMA 2010 May 26; 303(20): 2043–50PubMedCrossRef Egan BM, Zhao Y, Axon RN. US trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension, 1988–2008. JAMA 2010 May 26; 303(20): 2043–50PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High BP. Hypertension 2003; 42(6): 1206–52PubMedCrossRef Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High BP. Hypertension 2003; 42(6): 1206–52PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference World Health Organisation. Global atlas on cardiovascular disease prevention and control 2011 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.who.int [Accessed 2012 Jul 30] World Health Organisation. Global atlas on cardiovascular disease prevention and control 2011 [online]. Available from URL: http://​www.​who.​int [Accessed 2012 Jul 30]
12.
go back to reference French CJ, Zaman AK, Sobel BE. The angiotensin receptor blocker, azilsartan medoxomil (TAK-491), suppresses vascular wall expression of plasminogen activator inhibitor type-I protein potentially facilitating the stabilization of atherosclerotic plaques. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 2011 Aug; 58(2): 143–8PubMedCrossRef French CJ, Zaman AK, Sobel BE. The angiotensin receptor blocker, azilsartan medoxomil (TAK-491), suppresses vascular wall expression of plasminogen activator inhibitor type-I protein potentially facilitating the stabilization of atherosclerotic plaques. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 2011 Aug; 58(2): 143–8PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kajiya T, Ho C, Wang J, et al. Molecular and cellular effects of azilsartan: a new generation angiotensin II receptor blocker. J Hypertens 2011; 29(12): 2476–83PubMedCrossRef Kajiya T, Ho C, Wang J, et al. Molecular and cellular effects of azilsartan: a new generation angiotensin II receptor blocker. J Hypertens 2011; 29(12): 2476–83PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Zhao M, Li Y, Wang J, et al. Azilsartan treatment improves insulin sensitivity in obese spontaneously hypertensive Koletsky rats. Diabetes Obes Metab 2011 Dec; 13(12): 1123–9PubMedCrossRef Zhao M, Li Y, Wang J, et al. Azilsartan treatment improves insulin sensitivity in obese spontaneously hypertensive Koletsky rats. Diabetes Obes Metab 2011 Dec; 13(12): 1123–9PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ojima M, Igata H, Tanaka M, et al. In vitro antagonistic properties of a new angiotensin type 1 receptor blocker, azilsartan, in receptor binding and function studies. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2011; 336(3): 801–8PubMedCrossRef Ojima M, Igata H, Tanaka M, et al. In vitro antagonistic properties of a new angiotensin type 1 receptor blocker, azilsartan, in receptor binding and function studies. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2011; 336(3): 801–8PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kusumoto K, Igata H, Ojima M, et al. Antihypertensive, insulin-sensitising and renoprotective effects of a novel, potent and long-acting angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker, azilsartan medoxomil, in rat and dog models. Eur J Pharmacol 2011 Nov 1; 669(1–3): 84–93PubMedCrossRef Kusumoto K, Igata H, Ojima M, et al. Antihypertensive, insulin-sensitising and renoprotective effects of a novel, potent and long-acting angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker, azilsartan medoxomil, in rat and dog models. Eur J Pharmacol 2011 Nov 1; 669(1–3): 84–93PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Baker WL, White WB. Azilsartan Medoxomil: a new angiotensin II receptor antagonist for treatment of hypertension. Ann Pharmacother 2011 Dec; 45(12): 1506–15PubMedCrossRef Baker WL, White WB. Azilsartan Medoxomil: a new angiotensin II receptor antagonist for treatment of hypertension. Ann Pharmacother 2011 Dec; 45(12): 1506–15PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Volpe M, Savoia C. New treatment options in the management of hypertension: appraising the potential role of azilsartan medoxomil. Integr Blood Press Control 2012; (5): 19–25PubMedCrossRef Volpe M, Savoia C. New treatment options in the management of hypertension: appraising the potential role of azilsartan medoxomil. Integr Blood Press Control 2012; (5): 19–25PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Bakris GL, Sica D, Weber M, et al. The comparative effects of azilsartan medoxomil and olmesartan on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2011; 13(2): 81–8CrossRef Bakris GL, Sica D, Weber M, et al. The comparative effects of azilsartan medoxomil and olmesartan on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2011; 13(2): 81–8CrossRef
21.
go back to reference White WB, Weber MA, Sica D, et al. Effects of the angiotensin receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil versus olmesartan and valsartan on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure in patients with stages 1 and 2 hypertension. Hypertension 2011; 57(3): 413–20PubMedCrossRef White WB, Weber MA, Sica D, et al. Effects of the angiotensin receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil versus olmesartan and valsartan on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure in patients with stages 1 and 2 hypertension. Hypertension 2011; 57(3): 413–20PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Sica D, White WB, Weber MA, et al. Comparison of the novel angiotensin II receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil vs valsartan by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2011; 13(7): 467–72CrossRef Sica D, White WB, Weber MA, et al. Comparison of the novel angiotensin II receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil vs valsartan by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2011; 13(7): 467–72CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Kurtz TW, Kajiya T. Differential pharmacology and benefit/risk of azilsartan compared to other sartans. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2012; 8: 133–43PubMedCrossRef Kurtz TW, Kajiya T. Differential pharmacology and benefit/risk of azilsartan compared to other sartans. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2012; 8: 133–43PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Benson SC, Pershadsingh HA, Ho CI, et al. Identification of telmisartan as a unique angiotensin II receptor antagonist with selective PPARg-modulating activity. Hypertension 2004 May; 43: 993–1002PubMedCrossRef Benson SC, Pershadsingh HA, Ho CI, et al. Identification of telmisartan as a unique angiotensin II receptor antagonist with selective PPARg-modulating activity. Hypertension 2004 May; 43: 993–1002PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Schupp M, Janke J, Clasen R, et al. Angiotensin type 1 receptor blockers induce peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gactivity. Circulation 2004; 109(17): 2054–7PubMedCrossRef Schupp M, Janke J, Clasen R, et al. Angiotensin type 1 receptor blockers induce peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gactivity. Circulation 2004; 109(17): 2054–7PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference He H, Yang D, Ma L, et al. Telmisartan prevents weight gain and obesity through activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-d-dependent pathways. Hypertension 2010 Apr; 55(4): 869–79PubMedCrossRef He H, Yang D, Ma L, et al. Telmisartan prevents weight gain and obesity through activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-d-dependent pathways. Hypertension 2010 Apr; 55(4): 869–79PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Clemenz M, Frost N, Schupp M, et al. Liver-specific peroxisome proliferator-activated a target gene regulation by the angiotensin type 1 receptor blocker telmisartan. Diabetes 2008 May; 57(5): 1405–13PubMedCrossRef Clemenz M, Frost N, Schupp M, et al. Liver-specific peroxisome proliferator-activated a target gene regulation by the angiotensin type 1 receptor blocker telmisartan. Diabetes 2008 May; 57(5): 1405–13PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Preston R, Karim A, Garg D, et al. Single-center phase I study of the single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics and safety of azilsartan medoxomil (AZL-M) in hepatic impairment [abstract no. PII-99]. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2012 Mar; 91 Suppl. 1: S89 Preston R, Karim A, Garg D, et al. Single-center phase I study of the single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics and safety of azilsartan medoxomil (AZL-M) in hepatic impairment [abstract no. PII-99]. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2012 Mar; 91 Suppl. 1: S89
29.
go back to reference Harrell R, Karim A, Zhang W, et al. Effects of age, gender, and race on the safety and pharmacokinetics of single and multiple doses of azilsartan medoxomil in healthy subjects [abstract no. PII-69]. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2012 Mar; 91 Suppl. 1: S78 Harrell R, Karim A, Zhang W, et al. Effects of age, gender, and race on the safety and pharmacokinetics of single and multiple doses of azilsartan medoxomil in healthy subjects [abstract no. PII-69]. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2012 Mar; 91 Suppl. 1: S78
30.
go back to reference Bonner G, Bakris GL, Sica D, et al. Comparison of antihypertensive efficacy of the new angiotensin receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil with ramipril [abstract no. PP.16.112]. J Hypertens 2010; 28 Suppl. A: e 283 Bonner G, Bakris GL, Sica D, et al. Comparison of antihypertensive efficacy of the new angiotensin receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil with ramipril [abstract no. PP.16.112]. J Hypertens 2010; 28 Suppl. A: e 283
31.
go back to reference Sussman M, Leahy M, Friedman M, et al. Effects of azilsartan medoxomil versus valsartan and olmesartan medoxomil on the achievement of systolic blood pressure goals among hypertensive patients with diabetes [abstract no. PCV21]. Value Health 2011; 14(3): A36CrossRef Sussman M, Leahy M, Friedman M, et al. Effects of azilsartan medoxomil versus valsartan and olmesartan medoxomil on the achievement of systolic blood pressure goals among hypertensive patients with diabetes [abstract no. PCV21]. Value Health 2011; 14(3): A36CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Menzin J, Leahy MJ, Friedman M, et al. Effects of azilsartan medoxomil versus valsartan and olmesartan medoxomil on the achievement of systolic blood pressure goals in essential hypertension [abstract]. J Manag Care Pharm 2011; 17(3): 247 Menzin J, Leahy MJ, Friedman M, et al. Effects of azilsartan medoxomil versus valsartan and olmesartan medoxomil on the achievement of systolic blood pressure goals in essential hypertension [abstract]. J Manag Care Pharm 2011; 17(3): 247
33.
go back to reference Sica D, Bakris G, White WB, et al. New angiotensin II receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil coadministered with chlorthalidone provides potent blood pressure reduction in stage 2 hypertension [ASH abstract PO-238]. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2010; 12 Suppl. 1: A114 Sica D, Bakris G, White WB, et al. New angiotensin II receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil coadministered with chlorthalidone provides potent blood pressure reduction in stage 2 hypertension [ASH abstract PO-238]. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2010; 12 Suppl. 1: A114
34.
go back to reference Cushman WC, Bakris GL, White WB, et al. Azilsartan medoxomil plus chlorthalidone reduces blood pressure more effectively than olmesartan plus hydrochlorothiazide in stage 2 systolic hypertension. Hypertension 2012 Aug; 60(2): 310–8PubMedCrossRef Cushman WC, Bakris GL, White WB, et al. Azilsartan medoxomil plus chlorthalidone reduces blood pressure more effectively than olmesartan plus hydrochlorothiazide in stage 2 systolic hypertension. Hypertension 2012 Aug; 60(2): 310–8PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Sica D, Bakris GL, White WB, et al. Blood pressure-lowering efficacy of the fixed-dose combination of azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone: a factorial study. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2012 May; 14(5): 284–92CrossRef Sica D, Bakris GL, White WB, et al. Blood pressure-lowering efficacy of the fixed-dose combination of azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone: a factorial study. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2012 May; 14(5): 284–92CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Weber MA, White WB, Sica D, et al. Antihypertensive efficacy of the new angiotensin receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil in combination with amlodipine [abstract no. PO-241]. J Clin Hypertension (Greenwich) 2010 April; Suppl. 1: A115–116 Weber MA, White WB, Sica D, et al. Antihypertensive efficacy of the new angiotensin receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil in combination with amlodipine [abstract no. PO-241]. J Clin Hypertension (Greenwich) 2010 April; Suppl. 1: A115–116
37.
go back to reference Rakugi H, Enya K, Sugiura K, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of azilsartan with that of candesartan cilexetil in Japanese patients with grade I–II essential hypertension: a randomized, double-blind clinical study. Hypertens Res 2012 May; 35(5): 552–8PubMedCrossRef Rakugi H, Enya K, Sugiura K, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of azilsartan with that of candesartan cilexetil in Japanese patients with grade I–II essential hypertension: a randomized, double-blind clinical study. Hypertens Res 2012 May; 35(5): 552–8PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Hunt T, Karim A, Ye Z, et al. Azilsartan medoxomil does not affect the QTc interval in healthy subjects: randomized, double-blind, placebo- and positive-controlled crossover study [abstract no. PII-70]. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2012 Mar; 91 Suppl. 1: S78 Hunt T, Karim A, Ye Z, et al. Azilsartan medoxomil does not affect the QTc interval in healthy subjects: randomized, double-blind, placebo- and positive-controlled crossover study [abstract no. PII-70]. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2012 Mar; 91 Suppl. 1: S78
39.
40.
go back to reference Ruilope LM. Current challenges in the clinical management of hypertension. Nat Rev Cardiol 2011 Oct 25; 9(5): 267–75PubMedCrossRef Ruilope LM. Current challenges in the clinical management of hypertension. Nat Rev Cardiol 2011 Oct 25; 9(5): 267–75PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Jones JD, Jackson SH, Agboton C, et al. Azilsartan medoxomil (Edarbi) the eighth angiotensin II receptor blocker. P&T 2011; 36(10): 634–40 Jones JD, Jackson SH, Agboton C, et al. Azilsartan medoxomil (Edarbi) the eighth angiotensin II receptor blocker. P&T 2011; 36(10): 634–40
42.
go back to reference Takeda Pharmaceutical Company L. Takeda’s Edarbi (azilsartan medoxomil) receives European marketing authorisation for the treatment of essential hypertension. Media Rel 2011 Dec 8 Takeda Pharmaceutical Company L. Takeda’s Edarbi (azilsartan medoxomil) receives European marketing authorisation for the treatment of essential hypertension. Media Rel 2011 Dec 8
43.
go back to reference Hodgkinson J, Mant J, Martin U, et al. Relative effectiveness of clinic and home blood pressure monitoring compared with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in diagnosis of hypertension: systematic review. Br Med J 2011 Jun 24; 342: d3621CrossRef Hodgkinson J, Mant J, Martin U, et al. Relative effectiveness of clinic and home blood pressure monitoring compared with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in diagnosis of hypertension: systematic review. Br Med J 2011 Jun 24; 342: d3621CrossRef
44.
go back to reference de la Sierra A, Banegas JR, Segura J, et al. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and development of cardiovascular events in high-risk patients included in the Spanish ABPM registry: the CARDIORISC Event study. J. Hypertension 2012 April; 30(4): 713–9CrossRef de la Sierra A, Banegas JR, Segura J, et al. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and development of cardiovascular events in high-risk patients included in the Spanish ABPM registry: the CARDIORISC Event study. J. Hypertension 2012 April; 30(4): 713–9CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Fabia MJ, Abdilla N, Oltra R, et al. Antihypertensive activity of angiotensin II AT1 receptor antagonists: a systematic review of studies with 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. J Hypertens 2007 Jul; 25(7): 1327–36PubMedCrossRef Fabia MJ, Abdilla N, Oltra R, et al. Antihypertensive activity of angiotensin II AT1 receptor antagonists: a systematic review of studies with 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. J Hypertens 2007 Jul; 25(7): 1327–36PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference O’Brien E. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurement in clinical practice and research: a critical review of a technique in need of implementation. J Intern Med 2011 May; 269(5): 478–95PubMedCrossRef O’Brien E. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurement in clinical practice and research: a critical review of a technique in need of implementation. J Intern Med 2011 May; 269(5): 478–95PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Pickering TG, White WB, Giles TD, et al. When and how to use self (home) and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. J Amer Soc Hypertens 2008 May–Jun; 2(3): 119–24CrossRef Pickering TG, White WB, Giles TD, et al. When and how to use self (home) and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. J Amer Soc Hypertens 2008 May–Jun; 2(3): 119–24CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Azilsartan Medoxomil
A Review of its Use in Hypertension
Author
Caroline M. Perry
Publication date
01-09-2012
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Clinical Drug Investigation / Issue 9/2012
Print ISSN: 1173-2563
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1918
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03261917

Other articles of this Issue 9/2012

Clinical Drug Investigation 9/2012 Go to the issue