Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Urology 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Adrenalectomy | Research

A novel method of tunneling retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy: a prospective study

Authors: Pengcheng Zhang, Yuhan Pei, Yunlai Zhi, Fanghu Sun

Published in: BMC Urology | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To introduce the surgical technique and our team’s extensive experience with tunnel method in laparoscopic adrenalectomy.

Methods

From July 2019 to June 2022, we independently designed and conducted 83 cases of " Tunnel Method Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy,” a prospective study. There were 45 male and 38 female patients, ages ranged from 25 to 73 years(mean: 44.6 years).The cases included 59 adrenal cortical adenomas, 9 pheochromocytomas, 6 cysts, 4 myelolipomas, 1 ganglioneuroma, and 4 cases of adrenal cortical hyperplasia. In terms of anatomical location, there were 39 cases on the left side, 42 on the right side, and 2 bilateral cases. Tumor diameters ranged from 0.6 to 5.9 cm(mean: 2.9 cm). Utilizing ultrasound monitoring, percutaneous puncture was made either directly to the target organ or its vicinity, and the puncture path was manually marked. Then, under the direct view of a single-port single-channel laparoscope, the path to the target organ in the retroperitoneum or its vicinity was further delineated and separated. This approach allowed for the insertion of the laparoscope and surgical instruments through the affected adrenal gland, thereby separating the surface of the target organ to create sufficient operational space for the adrenalectomy.

Results

All 83 surgeries were successfully completed. A breakdown of the surgical approach reveals that 51 surgeries were done using one puncture hole, 25 with two puncture holes, and 7 with three puncture holes. The operation time ranged from 31 to 105 min (mean: 47 min), with a blood loss of 10 to 220mL (mean: 40 mL). Notably, there were no conversions to open surgery and no intraoperative complications. Postoperative follow-up ranged from 6 to 28 months, during which after re-examination using ultrasound, CT, and other imaging methods, there were no recurrences or other complications detected.

Conclusions

The completion of the tunnel method laparoscopic adrenalectomy represents a breakthrough, transitioning from the traditional step-by-step separation of retroperitoneal tissues to reach the target organ in conventional retroperitoneoscopic surgery. This method directly accesses the target organ, substantially reducing the damage and complications associated with tissue separation in retroperitoneoscopic surgery, As a result, it provides a new option for minimally invasive surgery of retroperitoneal organs and introduces innovative concepts to retroperitoneoscopic surgery.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chih-Chin Yu,Yao-Chou Tsai. Current surgical technique and outcomes of laparoendoscopic single-site adrenalectomy. Urol Sci. 2017;28(2):59–62.CrossRef Chih-Chin Yu,Yao-Chou Tsai. Current surgical technique and outcomes of laparoendoscopic single-site adrenalectomy. Urol Sci. 2017;28(2):59–62.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Wen S-HCC-NHS-C et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy compared with conventional laparoscopy and open surgery. Urol Sci 2016 28(1),36–41. Wen S-HCC-NHS-C et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy compared with conventional laparoscopy and open surgery. Urol Sci 2016 28(1),36–41.
3.
go back to reference Conzo G, Tartaglia E, Gambardella CD, et al. Minimally invasive approach for adrenal lesions: systematic review of laparoscopic versus retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy and assessment of risk factors for complications. Int J Surg. 2016;28:118–23. Conzo G, Tartaglia E, Gambardella CD, et al. Minimally invasive approach for adrenal lesions: systematic review of laparoscopic versus retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy and assessment of risk factors for complications. Int J Surg. 2016;28:118–23.
4.
go back to reference Carlos E. Costa Almeida,Teresa Caroço,posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy—case series. Int J Surg Case Rep 2018,51:174–7. Carlos E. Costa Almeida,Teresa Caroço,posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy—case series. Int J Surg Case Rep 2018,51:174–7.
5.
go back to reference Nicola PRAH, Lee et al. Impact of novel techniques on minimally invasive adrenal surgery: trends and outcomes from a contemporary international large series in urology. World J Urol 2016,34(10):1473–9. Nicola PRAH, Lee et al. Impact of novel techniques on minimally invasive adrenal surgery: trends and outcomes from a contemporary international large series in urology. World J Urol 2016,34(10):1473–9.
6.
go back to reference Andreas Kiriakopoulos,Athanassios Petralias,Dimitrios Linos. Posterior retroperitoneoscopic versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy in sporadic and MENIIA pheochromocytomas.Surgical Endoscopy,2015, 29 (8):2164–70. Andreas Kiriakopoulos,Athanassios Petralias,Dimitrios Linos. Posterior retroperitoneoscopic versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy in sporadic and MENIIA pheochromocytomas.Surgical Endoscopy,2015, 29 (8):2164–70.
7.
go back to reference Sun F, FU B, KE M et al. Retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy in semilateral supine position[J]. Chin J Urol, 2011: 509–11. Sun F, FU B, KE M et al. Retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy in semilateral supine position[J]. Chin J Urol, 2011: 509–11.
8.
go back to reference Antonio AG,Fabrizio, Di Maida R, Tellini et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy with 3D preoperative surgical planning: video presentation of the florentine experience. International Braz J Urol. 2021;47 (6):1272–1273. Antonio AG,Fabrizio, Di Maida R, Tellini et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy with 3D preoperative surgical planning: video presentation of the florentine experience. International Braz J Urol. 2021;47 (6):1272–1273.
9.
go back to reference Young Jun Chai,Jung-Woo Woo,Hyungju Kwon et al. Comparative outcomes of lateral transperitoneal adrenalectomy versus posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy in consecutive patients: A single surgeon’s experience. Asian J Surg 2016,39(2):74–80. Young Jun Chai,Jung-Woo Woo,Hyungju Kwon et al. Comparative outcomes of lateral transperitoneal adrenalectomy versus posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy in consecutive patients: A single surgeon’s experience. Asian J Surg 2016,39(2):74–80.
10.
go back to reference Ibrahim Halil Bozkurt,Murat Arslan,Tarik Yonguc et al. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for large adrenal masses: is it really more complicated? Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2015,31(12):644–8. Ibrahim Halil Bozkurt,Murat Arslan,Tarik Yonguc et al. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for large adrenal masses: is it really more complicated? Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2015,31(12):644–8.
11.
go back to reference Kusaka M, Sugimoto M, Fukami N, et al. Initial experience with a tailor-made Simulation and Navigation Program using a 3-D printer model of kidney transplantation surgery. Transpl Proc. 2015;47(3):596–9.CrossRef Kusaka M, Sugimoto M, Fukami N, et al. Initial experience with a tailor-made Simulation and Navigation Program using a 3-D printer model of kidney transplantation surgery. Transpl Proc. 2015;47(3):596–9.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Yu-Mi Ryang,Jimmy Villard,Thomas Obermüller,Benjamin Friedrich,Petra Wolf,Jens Gempt,Florian Ringel,Bernhard Meyer. Learning curve of 3D fluoroscopy image–guided pedicle screw placement in the thoracolumbar spine. Spine J 2015,15(3):467–76. Yu-Mi Ryang,Jimmy Villard,Thomas Obermüller,Benjamin Friedrich,Petra Wolf,Jens Gempt,Florian Ringel,Bernhard Meyer. Learning curve of 3D fluoroscopy image–guided pedicle screw placement in the thoracolumbar spine. Spine J 2015,15(3):467–76.
13.
go back to reference Sun F, FU B, KE M, et al. Single-port retroperitoneoscopic decortication for renal cysts [J]. Chin J Urol. 2013;34(9):662–5. Sun F, FU B, KE M, et al. Single-port retroperitoneoscopic decortication for renal cysts [J]. Chin J Urol. 2013;34(9):662–5.
Metadata
Title
A novel method of tunneling retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy: a prospective study
Authors
Pengcheng Zhang
Yuhan Pei
Yunlai Zhi
Fanghu Sun
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Urology / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2490
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-024-01484-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

BMC Urology 1/2024 Go to the issue