Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Urology 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Nephrostomy | Research

Effect of nephrostomy sheath size on renal pelvic pressure during endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery: artificial kidney model study

Authors: Takashi Iguchi, Shimpei Yamashita, Yasuo Kohjimoto, Tadashi Tanioku, Tomoyuki Kawamata, Isao Hara

Published in: BMC Urology | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to evaluate the intrarenal pelvic pressure in endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery using an artificial kidney model.

Methods

An artificial kidney model was created using the Urovac evacuator™. Four sizes of nephrostomy sheaths (MIP-L: 25/26 Fr, MIP-M: 16.5/17.5 Fr, MIP-S: 11/12 Fr, MIP-XS: 8.5/9.5 Fr) and two sizes of ureteral access sheaths (12/14 Fr and 10/12 Fr) were installed into the model. For each combination of nephrostomy and ureteral access sheath, renal pelvic pressure was measured with and without insertion of the retrograde flexible ureteroscope. Irrigation from the nephroscope was adjusted to 40–160 mmHg using an automatic irrigation device, and the irrigation of the ureteroscope was by spontaneous dripping at 80 cmH2O. Conditions were measured six times, and the renal pelvic pressure was compared in different conditions.

Results

Without ureteroscope insertion through the ureteral access sheath, the renal pelvic pressure never exceeded 30 mmHg. Meanwhile, when the ureteroscope was inserted, the renal pelvic pressure increased as the nephrostomy sheath and ureteral access sheath became narrower and as the irrigation pressure increased. Intrarenal pelvic pressure exceeded 30 mmHg when the irrigation pressure was increased in 12/14 Fr ureteral access sheath when MIP-XS was used, and in 10/12 Fr ureteral access sheath when MIP-XS and MIP-S were used.

Conclusions

The use of a thin nephrostomy sheath in endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery can lead to increased intrarenal pelvic pressure. Although our results are from an artificial kidney model, special care is suggested to be required when using a retrograde flexible ureteroscope simultaneously in treatment of patients.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
3.
go back to reference Bratt CG, Aurell M, Erlandson BE, Nilson AE, Nilsson S. Intrapelvic pressure and urinary flow rate in obstructed and nonobstructed human kidneys. J Urol. 1982;127:1136–42.CrossRefPubMed Bratt CG, Aurell M, Erlandson BE, Nilson AE, Nilsson S. Intrapelvic pressure and urinary flow rate in obstructed and nonobstructed human kidneys. J Urol. 1982;127:1136–42.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Rattner WH, Fink S, Murphy JJ. Pressure studies in the human ureter and renal pelvis. J Urol. 1957;78:359–62.CrossRefPubMed Rattner WH, Fink S, Murphy JJ. Pressure studies in the human ureter and renal pelvis. J Urol. 1957;78:359–62.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Thomsen HS, Dorph S, Larsen S, Talner LB. Intrarenal backflow and renal perfusion during increased intrapelvic pressure in excised porcine kidneys. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh). 1983;24:327–36.CrossRefPubMed Thomsen HS, Dorph S, Larsen S, Talner LB. Intrarenal backflow and renal perfusion during increased intrapelvic pressure in excised porcine kidneys. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh). 1983;24:327–36.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Akbulut F, Ucpinar B, Savun M, Kucuktopcu O, Ozgor F, Simsek A, et al. A major complication in micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy: upper calyceal perforation with extrarenal migration of stone fragments due to increased intrarenal pelvic pressure. Case Rep Urol. 2015;2015:792780.PubMedPubMedCentral Akbulut F, Ucpinar B, Savun M, Kucuktopcu O, Ozgor F, Simsek A, et al. A major complication in micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy: upper calyceal perforation with extrarenal migration of stone fragments due to increased intrarenal pelvic pressure. Case Rep Urol. 2015;2015:792780.PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Schwartz A, Caine M, Hermann G, Bittermann W. Spontaneous renal extravasation during intravenous urography. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1966;98:27–40.CrossRefPubMed Schwartz A, Caine M, Hermann G, Bittermann W. Spontaneous renal extravasation during intravenous urography. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1966;98:27–40.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kreydin EI, Eisner BH. Risk factors for sepsis after percutaneous renal stone surgery. Nat Rev Urol. 2013;10:598–605.CrossRefPubMed Kreydin EI, Eisner BH. Risk factors for sepsis after percutaneous renal stone surgery. Nat Rev Urol. 2013;10:598–605.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Schwalb DM, Eshghi M, Davidian M, Franco I. Morphological and physiological changes in the urinary tract associated with ureteral dilation and ureteropyeloscopy: an experimental study. J Urol. 1993;149:1576–85.CrossRefPubMed Schwalb DM, Eshghi M, Davidian M, Franco I. Morphological and physiological changes in the urinary tract associated with ureteral dilation and ureteropyeloscopy: an experimental study. J Urol. 1993;149:1576–85.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL, Monga M, Murad MH, Nelson CP, et al. Surgical management of stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, Part I. J Urol. 2016;196:1153–60.CrossRefPubMed Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL, Monga M, Murad MH, Nelson CP, et al. Surgical management of stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, Part I. J Urol. 2016;196:1153–60.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Straub M, et al. EAU guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2016;69:475–82.CrossRefPubMed Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Straub M, et al. EAU guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2016;69:475–82.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Sener TE, Cloutier J, Villa L, Marson F, Butticè S, Doizi S, et al. Can we provide low intrarenal pressures with good irrigation flow by decreasing the size of ureteral access sheaths? J Endourol. 2016;30:49–55.CrossRefPubMed Sener TE, Cloutier J, Villa L, Marson F, Butticè S, Doizi S, et al. Can we provide low intrarenal pressures with good irrigation flow by decreasing the size of ureteral access sheaths? J Endourol. 2016;30:49–55.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Yamashita S, Inoue T, Imai S, Iwahashi Y, Deguchi R, Muraoka S, et al. Thermography-based comparison of Irrigation temperatures between Moses Mode and virtual Basket Mode: an in Vitro Phantom Study. J Endourol. 2023;37(2):179–84.CrossRefPubMed Yamashita S, Inoue T, Imai S, Iwahashi Y, Deguchi R, Muraoka S, et al. Thermography-based comparison of Irrigation temperatures between Moses Mode and virtual Basket Mode: an in Vitro Phantom Study. J Endourol. 2023;37(2):179–84.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Wang J, Zhou DQ, He M, Li WG, Pang X, Yu XX, et al. Effects of renal pelvic high- pressure perfusion on nephrons in a porcine pyonephrosis model. Exp Ther Med. 2013;5:1389–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wang J, Zhou DQ, He M, Li WG, Pang X, Yu XX, et al. Effects of renal pelvic high- pressure perfusion on nephrons in a porcine pyonephrosis model. Exp Ther Med. 2013;5:1389–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Fang L, Xie G, Zheng Z, Liu W, Zhu J, Huang T, et al. The effect of ratio of endoscope-sheath diameter on intrapelvic pressure during flexible ureteroscopic lasertripsy. J Endourol. 2019;33:132–9.CrossRefPubMed Fang L, Xie G, Zheng Z, Liu W, Zhu J, Huang T, et al. The effect of ratio of endoscope-sheath diameter on intrapelvic pressure during flexible ureteroscopic lasertripsy. J Endourol. 2019;33:132–9.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Patel RM, Jefferson FA, Owyong M, Hofmann M, Ayad ML, Osann K, et al. Characterization of intracalyceal pressure during ureteroscopy. World J Urol. 2021;39:883–9.CrossRefPubMed Patel RM, Jefferson FA, Owyong M, Hofmann M, Ayad ML, Osann K, et al. Characterization of intracalyceal pressure during ureteroscopy. World J Urol. 2021;39:883–9.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Guohua Z, Wen Z, Xun L, Wenzhong C, Yongzhong H, Zhaohui H, et al. The influence of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy on renal pelvic pressure in vivo. Surg Laparoscop Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007;17:307–10.CrossRef Guohua Z, Wen Z, Xun L, Wenzhong C, Yongzhong H, Zhaohui H, et al. The influence of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy on renal pelvic pressure in vivo. Surg Laparoscop Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007;17:307–10.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Huusmann S, Wolters M, Schilling D, Kruck S, Bader M, Tokas T, et al. Pressure study of two miniaturised amplatz sheaths of 9.5 F and 12 F outer diameter for minimal invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MIP): an ex vivo organ model measurement. Aktuelle Urol. 2019;50(1):71–5.PubMed Huusmann S, Wolters M, Schilling D, Kruck S, Bader M, Tokas T, et al. Pressure study of two miniaturised amplatz sheaths of 9.5 F and 12 F outer diameter for minimal invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MIP): an ex vivo organ model measurement. Aktuelle Urol. 2019;50(1):71–5.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Doizi S, Uzan A, Keller EX, De Coninck V, Kamkoum H, Barghouthy Y, et al. Comparison of intrapelvic pressures during flexible ureteroscopy, mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy, standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in a kidney model. World J Urol. 2021;39:2709–17.CrossRefPubMed Doizi S, Uzan A, Keller EX, De Coninck V, Kamkoum H, Barghouthy Y, et al. Comparison of intrapelvic pressures during flexible ureteroscopy, mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy, standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in a kidney model. World J Urol. 2021;39:2709–17.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Effect of nephrostomy sheath size on renal pelvic pressure during endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery: artificial kidney model study
Authors
Takashi Iguchi
Shimpei Yamashita
Yasuo Kohjimoto
Tadashi Tanioku
Tomoyuki Kawamata
Isao Hara
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Urology / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2490
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-024-01458-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

BMC Urology 1/2024 Go to the issue