Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pediatrics 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Research

The puppet interview to measure illness perceptions in paediatric oncology: development and psychometric properties in acute treatment and follow-up care

Authors: Kristina Herzog, Florian Schepper, Jessy Herrmann, Julia Martini

Published in: BMC Pediatrics | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Illness perceptions comprise assumptions about symptoms, timeline, consequences, controllability, and emotional responses to an illness. Recent evidence shows that illness perceptions are associated with coping and well-being. So far, assessment in paediatric care was based on parental report only, since no instrument for the direct assessment of young children was available. We aim to describe the development (incl. indication and contraindication) of an innovative puppet interview to assess illness perceptions in children with cancer from the age of four years. Moreover, we investigate longitudinal trajectories and examine psychometric properties.

Methods

The puppet interview was developed based on the Illness-Perception-Questionnaire-Revised and the Berkeley-Puppet-Interview. Longitudinal trajectories and psychometric properties were examined in a sample of patient-parent dyads (N = 75) in a prospective longitudinal study in acute treatment with a 1-year follow-up (study 1: nT1 = 41, nT2 = 27) and in a cross-sectional study in follow-up care (study 2, n = 34).

Results

The puppet interview is comprehensible and well-received by children in acute treatment and follow-up care. There were significant differences in perceptions of a chronic timeline (U = 301.00, p = .008), consequences (U = 251.00, p = .008), and emotional representations (U = 244.50, p = .020) between children in acute treatment and children in follow-up care. Over the course of one year, children in acute treatment perceived more symptoms as part of their illness (MT1 = 3.6, SDT1 = 2.9, MT2 = 4.5, SDT2 = 3.1, n = 27, Z = -2.603, p = .009). We found expected intercorrelations between illness perception dimensions, e.g. between perception of consequences and emotional representations (rτ = .27, p = .033), and between perception of a chronic timeline and consequences (rτ = .38, p = .001). Moreover, we found confirming results regarding construct validity, as child’s perceptions of symptoms correlated with their self-rated HRQoL (rτ = -.32, padj. = .014). Also parent-rated subscale on illness-specific aspects of child’s HRQoL correlated with child’s perception of symptoms (rτ = -.26, padj. = .016), cyclicity (rτ = -.28, padj. = .016), and consequences (rτ = -.34, padj. = .014). Acceptable internal consistency was shown for the dimensions timeline-acute/chronic and personal control.

Conclusions

Parental report can now be complemented by a self-report of illness perceptions in children aged four years and older. This will allow for the further adaptation of medical and psychosocial care during and after acute cancer treatment.

Trial registration

The study has been pre-registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (registered 30/06/2020; DRK-S00022034) and at the Open Science Foundation (https://​osf.​io/​7xr6z).
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Leventhal H, Meyer D, Nerenz D. The common sense representation of illness danger. Contrib Med Psychol. 1980;2:7–30. Leventhal H, Meyer D, Nerenz D. The common sense representation of illness danger. Contrib Med Psychol. 1980;2:7–30.
6.
go back to reference Gaab J, Bunschoten SL, Sprott H, Ehlert U. Psychometric evaluation of a German translation of the Illness Perception Questionnaire. Orlando, USA: 62. Annual Scientific Meeting of the American Psychosomatic Society (APS); 2004. Gaab J, Bunschoten SL, Sprott H, Ehlert U. Psychometric evaluation of a German translation of the Illness Perception Questionnaire. Orlando, USA: 62. Annual Scientific Meeting of the American Psychosomatic Society (APS); 2004.
10.
go back to reference Fischer MJ, Ketelaar M, van der Veere PJ, Verhoef M, Wadman RI, Visser-Meily JMA, van der Pol WL, Schröder CD. Illness perceptions in pediatric Spinal Muscular Atrophy: agreement between children and their parents, and its association with quality of life. J Dev Phys Disabil. 2021;33:297–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-020-09749-7.CrossRef Fischer MJ, Ketelaar M, van der Veere PJ, Verhoef M, Wadman RI, Visser-Meily JMA, van der Pol WL, Schröder CD. Illness perceptions in pediatric Spinal Muscular Atrophy: agreement between children and their parents, and its association with quality of life. J Dev Phys Disabil. 2021;33:297–310. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10882-020-09749-7.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Matza LS, Patrick DL, Riley AW, Alexander JJ, Rajmil L, Pleil AM, Bullinger M. Pediatric patient-reported outcome instruments for research to support medical product labeling: Report of the ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices for the Assessment of Children and Adolescents Task Force. Value in Health. 2013;16(4):461–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2013.04.004.CrossRefPubMed Matza LS, Patrick DL, Riley AW, Alexander JJ, Rajmil L, Pleil AM, Bullinger M. Pediatric patient-reported outcome instruments for research to support medical product labeling: Report of the ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices for the Assessment of Children and Adolescents Task Force. Value in Health. 2013;16(4):461–79. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jval.​2013.​04.​004.CrossRefPubMed
17.
19.
go back to reference Klasen H, Woerner W, Rothenberger A, Goodman R. Die deutsche Fassung des Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-Deu) – Übersicht und Bewertung erster Validierungs- und Normierungsbefunde. The German version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-Deu)—Overview and evaluation of initial validation and normative studies. 2003;52:491–502. Klasen H, Woerner W, Rothenberger A, Goodman R. Die deutsche Fassung des Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-Deu) – Übersicht und Bewertung erster Validierungs- und Normierungsbefunde. The German version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-Deu)—Overview and evaluation of initial validation and normative studies. 2003;52:491–502.
20.
22.
go back to reference Kemper, C. J., Beierlein, C., Kovaleva, A., & Rammstedt, B. (2012). Eine Kurzskala zur Messung von Optimismus-Pessimismus [A short scale to measure optimism/pessimism]. 24. Kemper, C. J., Beierlein, C., Kovaleva, A., & Rammstedt, B. (2012). Eine Kurzskala zur Messung von Optimismus-Pessimismus [A short scale to measure optimism/pessimism]. 24.
25.
go back to reference Ablow JC, Measelle JR. Berkeley Puppet Interview: Administration and scoring system manuals. Berkeley, CA: University of California; 1993. Ablow JC, Measelle JR. Berkeley Puppet Interview: Administration and scoring system manuals. Berkeley, CA: University of California; 1993.
27.
go back to reference Coombes L, Bristowe K, Ellis-Smith C, Aworinde J, Fraser LK, Downing J, Bluebond-Langner M, Chambers L, Murtagh FEM, Harding R. Enhancing validity, reliability and participation in self-reported health outcome measurement for children and young people: A systematic review of recall period, response scale format, and administration modality. Qual Life Res. 2021;30(7):1803–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02814-4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Coombes L, Bristowe K, Ellis-Smith C, Aworinde J, Fraser LK, Downing J, Bluebond-Langner M, Chambers L, Murtagh FEM, Harding R. Enhancing validity, reliability and participation in self-reported health outcome measurement for children and young people: A systematic review of recall period, response scale format, and administration modality. Qual Life Res. 2021;30(7):1803–32. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11136-021-02814-4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Bortz, J., Döring, N. Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation für Human-und Sozialwissenschaftler Research methods and evaluation for human and social scientists (4. Aufl.). Springer-Verlag. 2007 Bortz, J., Döring, N. Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation für Human-und Sozialwissenschaftler Research methods and evaluation for human and social scientists (4. Aufl.). Springer-Verlag. 2007
30.
go back to reference Glattacker M, Bengel J, Jäckel WH. Die deutschsprachige Version des Illness Perception Questionnaire-Revised: Psychometrische Evaluation an Patienten mit chronisch somatischen Erkrankungen [The German version of the Illness Perception Questionnaire-Revised: Psychometric evaluation in patients with chronic somatic illnesses]. Zeitschrift für Gesundheitspsychologie. 2009;17(4):158–69. https://doi.org/10.1026/0943-8149.17.4.158.CrossRef Glattacker M, Bengel J, Jäckel WH. Die deutschsprachige Version des Illness Perception Questionnaire-Revised: Psychometrische Evaluation an Patienten mit chronisch somatischen Erkrankungen [The German version of the Illness Perception Questionnaire-Revised: Psychometric evaluation in patients with chronic somatic illnesses]. Zeitschrift für Gesundheitspsychologie. 2009;17(4):158–69. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1026/​0943-8149.​17.​4.​158.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Petermann F, Wiedebusch S. Patientenschulung mit Kindern: Wie lassen sich subjektive Krankheits- und Behandlungskonzepte berücksichtigen [Patient education with children: How to take illness and treatment perceptions into account]. Kindheit und Entwicklung. 2001;10(1):13–27.CrossRef Petermann F, Wiedebusch S. Patientenschulung mit Kindern: Wie lassen sich subjektive Krankheits- und Behandlungskonzepte berücksichtigen [Patient education with children: How to take illness and treatment perceptions into account]. Kindheit und Entwicklung. 2001;10(1):13–27.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Scharloo M, Baatenburg de Jong RJ, Langeveld TP, van Velzen-Verkaik E, Doorn-op den Akker MM, Kaptein AA. Quality of life and illness perceptions in patients with recently diagnosed head and neck cancer. Head Neck J Sci Specialties Head Neck. 2005;27(10):857–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.20251.CrossRef Scharloo M, Baatenburg de Jong RJ, Langeveld TP, van Velzen-Verkaik E, Doorn-op den Akker MM, Kaptein AA. Quality of life and illness perceptions in patients with recently diagnosed head and neck cancer. Head Neck J Sci Specialties Head Neck. 2005;27(10):857–63. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​hed.​20251.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Fonseca M, Missotten P, Etienne A-M, Dupuis G, Lemétayer F, Spitz E. The impact of children’s illness perceptions on paediatric cancer patients’ quality of life. Psycho-Oncology. 2010;19(Suppl. 2) 126. https://hdl.handle.net/2268/69448. Fonseca M, Missotten P, Etienne A-M, Dupuis G, Lemétayer F, Spitz E. The impact of children’s illness perceptions on paediatric cancer patients’ quality of life. Psycho-Oncology. 2010;19(Suppl. 2) 126. https://​hdl.​handle.​net/​2268/​69448.
42.
go back to reference Stiensmeier-Pelster J, Schürmann M, Duda K. Depressions-Inventar für Kinder und Jugendliche (DIKJ) Depression inventory for children and adolescents (DIKJ). CJ Hogrefe: Verlag für Psychologie Dr; 1989. Stiensmeier-Pelster J, Schürmann M, Duda K. Depressions-Inventar für Kinder und Jugendliche (DIKJ) Depression inventory for children and adolescents (DIKJ). CJ Hogrefe: Verlag für Psychologie Dr; 1989.
43.
go back to reference Montgomery KE, Vos K, Raybin JL, Ward J, Balian C, Gilger EA, Li Z. Comparison of child self-report and parent proxy-report of symptoms: Results from a longitudinal symptom assessment study of children with advanced cancer. J Specialists Pediatr Nurs. 2021;26(3):e12316. https://doi.org/10.1111/jspn.12316.CrossRef Montgomery KE, Vos K, Raybin JL, Ward J, Balian C, Gilger EA, Li Z. Comparison of child self-report and parent proxy-report of symptoms: Results from a longitudinal symptom assessment study of children with advanced cancer. J Specialists Pediatr Nurs. 2021;26(3):e12316. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​jspn.​12316.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The puppet interview to measure illness perceptions in paediatric oncology: development and psychometric properties in acute treatment and follow-up care
Authors
Kristina Herzog
Florian Schepper
Jessy Herrmann
Julia Martini
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pediatrics / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2431
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-024-04586-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

BMC Pediatrics 1/2024 Go to the issue