Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 1/2024

01-12-2024 | Transurethral Prostate Resection | Original Article

Rezŭm water vaporization therapy versus transurethral resection of the prostate in the management of refractory urine retention: matched pair comparative multicenter experience

Authors: Waseem Tayeb, Raed A. Azhar, Mohnna Subahi, Sameer Munshi, Abdulrahman Qarni, Abdulaziz Bakhsh, Majid Sejiny, Turkey Almohaisen, Adel Alammari, Mohamed A. Elkoushy

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the efficacy of Rezūm with a matched cohort of patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for catheter-dependent urine retention secondary to benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH).

Methods

A retrospective review was performed for consecutive catheter-dependent patients who underwent Rezūm for BPH. Patients were matched and compared with a similar cohort undergoing TURP, using non-inferiority analysis on propensity score-matched patient pairs. Patients were followed up at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months by international prostate symptoms score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL) index, peak flow rate (Qmax) and postvoid residual urine (PVR).

Results

Eighty-one patients undergoing Rezūm were compared with equal number of matched patients who undergoing TURP. Patients undergoing Rezūm experienced significantly shorter operation time (25.5 ± 8.7 vs. 103.4 ± 12.6 min; p < 0.001), lower intraoperative bleeding (2.4% vs. 20.7%, p < 0.001), shorter hospital stay (1.2 ± 0.9 vs. 2.4 ± 1.3 d, p < 0.001) and longer catheter time (12.6 ± 6.0 vs. 2.3 ± 1.2 d, p < 0.001), with no need for transfusion. Successful postoperative voiding was comparable between both arms (90.2% vs. 92.7%, p = 0.78), respectively. Despite patients undergoing TURP had significantly better voiding outcomes after 1 and 3 months, both groups were comparable after six and 12 months in terms of mean IPSS (11.1 ± 6.4 vs. 10.8 ± 3.4, p = 0.71), QoL indices (2.4 ± 1.6 vs. 2.1 ± 2.3, p = 0.33) and Qmax (22.0 ± 7.7 v. 19.8 ± 6.9 ml/sec, p = 0.06).

Conclusion

This study supports the safety and efficacy of Rezūm in the management of catheter-dependent patients secondary to BPH, with comparable functional outcomes to TURP. Until a randomized clinical comparison is available, long-term data are crucially recommended to compare the recurrence and reoperation rates.
Literature
Metadata
Title
Rezŭm water vaporization therapy versus transurethral resection of the prostate in the management of refractory urine retention: matched pair comparative multicenter experience
Authors
Waseem Tayeb
Raed A. Azhar
Mohnna Subahi
Sameer Munshi
Abdulrahman Qarni
Abdulaziz Bakhsh
Majid Sejiny
Turkey Almohaisen
Adel Alammari
Mohamed A. Elkoushy
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 1/2024
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04739-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

World Journal of Urology 1/2024 Go to the issue