Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Amniocentesis | Research

The risk factors of procedure-related complications after amniocentesis in twin pregnancies: a retrospective analysis

Authors: Xijing Liu, Jiamin Wang, Wanying Luo, Qiyi Wang, Zhushu Liu, He Wang, Shanling Liu, Ting Hu

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There is an increasing demand for prenatal diagnostic testing in twin pregnancies, however, anecdotally there is a higher incidence of procedure-related complications after amniocentesis than that in singleton pregnancies. There is a paucity of data regarding risk factors of amniocentesis in twin pregnancies.

Methods

Women with twin pregnancies who underwent amniocentesis between January 2016 and December 2020 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Procedure-related complications including spontaneous miscarriage, intrauterine fetal death, spontaneous preterm delivery, preterm premature rupture of membranes, and placental abruption in one or both fetuses after amniocentesis were assessed. Meanwhile, potential risk factors related to amniocentesis including chorionicity, gestational age, conception, number of needle insertions, parity, history of miscarriage, indications, and pregnancy-related complications (pregnancy-induced hypertension and gestational diabetes) were also recorded.

Results

A total of 811 women with twin pregnancies underwent amniocentesis were included, with a procedure-related complications rate of 3.83%. Risk factors associated with increased risk of procedure-related complications after amniocentesis in twin pregnancies were chorionicity (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 4.06), gestational age at the procedure (aOR: 2.76), and numbers of needle insertions (aOR: 3.26). In the monochorionic twin pregnancy, hemorrhage during this pregnancy (aOR: 12.01), polyhydramnios (aOR: 5.03), and numbers of needle insertions (aOR: 3.15) were risk factors after amniocentesis. In the dichorionic twin pregnancy, gestational age at the procedure (OR:4.47) affected the risk of procedure-related complications after amniocentesis. In the subgroup of gestational age at the procedure ≤ 24+ 0 weeks, risk factors associated with increased risk of procedure-related complications after amniocentesis in twin pregnancies were chorionicity (aOR: 5.14), and numbers of needle insertions (aOR: 3.76).

Conclusion

The procedure-related complications rate is 3.83% in our institution during the study period. The present study has emphasized the significance of certain risk factors for adverse outcome and will be useful in counseling patients with twin pregnancies.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Audibert F, Gagnon A. Prenatal screening for and diagnosis of aneuploidy in twin pregnancies. Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada: JOGC = Journal d’obstetrique. et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC. 2011;33(7):754–67.CrossRef Audibert F, Gagnon A. Prenatal screening for and diagnosis of aneuploidy in twin pregnancies. Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada: JOGC = Journal d’obstetrique. et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC. 2011;33(7):754–67.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Wapner RJ, Johnson A, Davis G, Urban A, Morgan P, Jackson L. Prenatal diagnosis in twin gestations: a comparison between second-trimester amniocentesis and first-trimester chorionic villus sampling. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;82(1):49–56.PubMed Wapner RJ, Johnson A, Davis G, Urban A, Morgan P, Jackson L. Prenatal diagnosis in twin gestations: a comparison between second-trimester amniocentesis and first-trimester chorionic villus sampling. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;82(1):49–56.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Schinzel AA, Smith DW, Miller JR. Monozygotic twinning and structural defects. J Pediatr. 1979;95(6):921–30.CrossRefPubMed Schinzel AA, Smith DW, Miller JR. Monozygotic twinning and structural defects. J Pediatr. 1979;95(6):921–30.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Geffen KT, Ben-Zvi O, Weitzner O, Peleg A, Biron-Shental T, Sukenik-Halevy R. The yield and complications of amniocentesis performed after 24 weeks of gestation. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;296(1):69–75.CrossRefPubMed Geffen KT, Ben-Zvi O, Weitzner O, Peleg A, Biron-Shental T, Sukenik-Halevy R. The yield and complications of amniocentesis performed after 24 weeks of gestation. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;296(1):69–75.CrossRefPubMed
5.
6.
go back to reference Spencer K, Salonen R, Muller F. Down’s syndrome screening in multiple pregnancies using alpha-fetoprotein and free beta hCG. Prenat Diagn. 1994;14(7):537–42.CrossRefPubMed Spencer K, Salonen R, Muller F. Down’s syndrome screening in multiple pregnancies using alpha-fetoprotein and free beta hCG. Prenat Diagn. 1994;14(7):537–42.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Taylor-Phillips S, Freeman K, Geppert J, Agbebiyi A, Uthman OA, Madan J, et al. Accuracy of non-invasive prenatal testing using cell-free DNA for detection of Down, Edwards and Patau syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ open. 2016;6(1):e010002.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Taylor-Phillips S, Freeman K, Geppert J, Agbebiyi A, Uthman OA, Madan J, et al. Accuracy of non-invasive prenatal testing using cell-free DNA for detection of Down, Edwards and Patau syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ open. 2016;6(1):e010002.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 88., December 2007. Invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2007;110(6):1459-67. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 88., December 2007. Invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2007;110(6):1459-67.
9.
go back to reference Randomised trial to assess safety and fetal outcome of early and midtrimester amniocentesis. The Canadian Early and Mid-trimester Amniocentesis Trial (CEMAT) Group. Lancet (London, England). 1998;351(9098):242-7. Randomised trial to assess safety and fetal outcome of early and midtrimester amniocentesis. The Canadian Early and Mid-trimester Amniocentesis Trial (CEMAT) Group. Lancet (London, England). 1998;351(9098):242-7.
10.
go back to reference Odibo AO, Gray DL, Dicke JM, Stamilio DM, Macones GA, Crane JP. Revisiting the fetal loss rate after second-trimester genetic amniocentesis: a single center’s 16-year experience. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(3):589–95.CrossRefPubMed Odibo AO, Gray DL, Dicke JM, Stamilio DM, Macones GA, Crane JP. Revisiting the fetal loss rate after second-trimester genetic amniocentesis: a single center’s 16-year experience. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(3):589–95.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Tabor A, Vestergaard CH, Lidegaard Ø. Fetal loss rate after chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis: an 11-year national registry study. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology: the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2009;34(1):19–24.CrossRef Tabor A, Vestergaard CH, Lidegaard Ø. Fetal loss rate after chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis: an 11-year national registry study. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology: the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2009;34(1):19–24.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Theodora M, Antsaklis A, Antsaklis P, Blanas K, Daskalakis G, Sindos M et al. Fetal loss following second trimester amniocentesis. Who is at greater risk? How to counsel pregnant women? The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine: the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstet. 2016;29(4):590–5. Theodora M, Antsaklis A, Antsaklis P, Blanas K, Daskalakis G, Sindos M et al. Fetal loss following second trimester amniocentesis. Who is at greater risk? How to counsel pregnant women? The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine: the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstet. 2016;29(4):590–5.
13.
go back to reference Corrado F, Cannata ML, La Galia T, Magliarditi M, Imbruglia L, D’Anna R, et al. Pregnancy outcome following mid-trimester amniocentesis. J Obstet gynaecology: J Inst Obstet Gynecol. 2012;32(2):117–9.CrossRef Corrado F, Cannata ML, La Galia T, Magliarditi M, Imbruglia L, D’Anna R, et al. Pregnancy outcome following mid-trimester amniocentesis. J Obstet gynaecology: J Inst Obstet Gynecol. 2012;32(2):117–9.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Akolekar R, Beta J, Picciarelli G, Ogilvie C, D’Antonio F. Procedure-related risk of miscarriage following amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology: the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2015;45(1):16–26.CrossRef Akolekar R, Beta J, Picciarelli G, Ogilvie C, D’Antonio F. Procedure-related risk of miscarriage following amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology: the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2015;45(1):16–26.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Vink J, Fuchs K, D’Alton ME. Amniocentesis in twin pregnancies: a systematic review of the literature. Prenat Diagn. 2012;32(5):409–16.CrossRefPubMed Vink J, Fuchs K, D’Alton ME. Amniocentesis in twin pregnancies: a systematic review of the literature. Prenat Diagn. 2012;32(5):409–16.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Agarwal K, Alfirevic Z. Pregnancy loss after chorionic villus sampling and genetic amniocentesis in twin pregnancies: a systematic review. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology: the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2012;40(2):128–34.CrossRef Agarwal K, Alfirevic Z. Pregnancy loss after chorionic villus sampling and genetic amniocentesis in twin pregnancies: a systematic review. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology: the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2012;40(2):128–34.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Chen J, Liu L, Xia D, He F, Wang Q, Li T, et al. Comparison of spontaneous fetal loss rates between women with singleton and twin pregnancies after mid-trimester amniocentesis - A historical cohort study. Prenat Diagn. 2020;40(10):1315–20.CrossRefPubMed Chen J, Liu L, Xia D, He F, Wang Q, Li T, et al. Comparison of spontaneous fetal loss rates between women with singleton and twin pregnancies after mid-trimester amniocentesis - A historical cohort study. Prenat Diagn. 2020;40(10):1315–20.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Yukobowich E, Anteby EY, Cohen SM, Lavy Y, Granat M, Yagel S. Risk of fetal loss in twin pregnancies undergoing second trimester amniocentesis(1). Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98(2):231–4.PubMed Yukobowich E, Anteby EY, Cohen SM, Lavy Y, Granat M, Yagel S. Risk of fetal loss in twin pregnancies undergoing second trimester amniocentesis(1). Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98(2):231–4.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Millaire M, Bujold E, Morency AM, Gauthier RJ. Mid-trimester genetic amniocentesis in twin pregnancy and the risk of fetal loss. J Obstet Gynecol Canada: JOGC = Journal d’obstetrique et gynecologie du Can : JOGC. 2006;28(6):512–8. Millaire M, Bujold E, Morency AM, Gauthier RJ. Mid-trimester genetic amniocentesis in twin pregnancy and the risk of fetal loss. J Obstet Gynecol Canada: JOGC = Journal d’obstetrique et gynecologie du Can : JOGC. 2006;28(6):512–8.
20.
go back to reference Cahill AG, Macones GA, Stamilio DM, Dicke JM, Crane JP, Odibo AO. Pregnancy loss rate after mid-trimester amniocentesis in twin pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200(3):257e1–6.CrossRef Cahill AG, Macones GA, Stamilio DM, Dicke JM, Crane JP, Odibo AO. Pregnancy loss rate after mid-trimester amniocentesis in twin pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200(3):257e1–6.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Di Mascio D, Khalil A, Rizzo G, Buca D, Liberati M, Martellucci CA, et al. Risk of fetal loss following amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling in twin pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology: the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2020;56(5):647–55.CrossRef Di Mascio D, Khalil A, Rizzo G, Buca D, Liberati M, Martellucci CA, et al. Risk of fetal loss following amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling in twin pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology: the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2020;56(5):647–55.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Sperling JD, Zlatnik MG, Norton ME, Currier RJ. Pregnancy loss after amniocentesis in monochorionic and dichorionic twin pregnancies: results from a large population-based dataset. Prenat Diagn. 2019;39(10):896–900.CrossRefPubMed Sperling JD, Zlatnik MG, Norton ME, Currier RJ. Pregnancy loss after amniocentesis in monochorionic and dichorionic twin pregnancies: results from a large population-based dataset. Prenat Diagn. 2019;39(10):896–900.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Glinianaia SV, Obeysekera MA, Sturgiss S, Bell R. Stillbirth and neonatal mortality in monochorionic and dichorionic twins: a population-based study. Hum Reprod (Oxford England). 2011;26(9):2549–57.CrossRef Glinianaia SV, Obeysekera MA, Sturgiss S, Bell R. Stillbirth and neonatal mortality in monochorionic and dichorionic twins: a population-based study. Hum Reprod (Oxford England). 2011;26(9):2549–57.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Weisz B, Rodeck CH. Invasive diagnostic procedures in twin pregnancies. Prenat Diagn. 2005;25(9):751–8.CrossRefPubMed Weisz B, Rodeck CH. Invasive diagnostic procedures in twin pregnancies. Prenat Diagn. 2005;25(9):751–8.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Shi X, Li L, Huang X, Chen B, Zhou Y, Fang Q. Fetal aneuploidy: a comparison of Dichorionic Twins and Monochorionic twins. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2018;44(2):124–8.CrossRefPubMed Shi X, Li L, Huang X, Chen B, Zhou Y, Fang Q. Fetal aneuploidy: a comparison of Dichorionic Twins and Monochorionic twins. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2018;44(2):124–8.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Tachon G, Lefort G, Puechberty J, Schneider A, Jeandel C, Boulot P, et al. Discordant sex in monozygotic XXY/XX twins: a case report. Hum Reprod (Oxford England). 2014;29(12):2814–20.CrossRef Tachon G, Lefort G, Puechberty J, Schneider A, Jeandel C, Boulot P, et al. Discordant sex in monozygotic XXY/XX twins: a case report. Hum Reprod (Oxford England). 2014;29(12):2814–20.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Zech NH, Wisser J, Natalucci G, Riegel M, Baumer A, Schinzel A. Monochorionic-diamniotic twins discordant in gender from a naturally conceived pregnancy through postzygotic sex chromosome loss in a 47,XXY zygote. Prenat Diagn. 2008;28(8):759–63.CrossRefPubMed Zech NH, Wisser J, Natalucci G, Riegel M, Baumer A, Schinzel A. Monochorionic-diamniotic twins discordant in gender from a naturally conceived pregnancy through postzygotic sex chromosome loss in a 47,XXY zygote. Prenat Diagn. 2008;28(8):759–63.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Pri-Paz S, Khalek N, Fuchs KM, Simpson LL. Maximal amniotic fluid index as a prognostic factor in pregnancies complicated by polyhydramnios. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology: the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2012;39(6):648–53.CrossRef Pri-Paz S, Khalek N, Fuchs KM, Simpson LL. Maximal amniotic fluid index as a prognostic factor in pregnancies complicated by polyhydramnios. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology: the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2012;39(6):648–53.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Dashe JS, Pressman EK, Hibbard JU. SMFM consult Series #46: evaluation and management of polyhydramnios. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;219(4):B2–B8.CrossRefPubMed Dashe JS, Pressman EK, Hibbard JU. SMFM consult Series #46: evaluation and management of polyhydramnios. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;219(4):B2–B8.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Daniel Y, Ochshorn Y, Fait G, Geva E, Bar-Am A, Lessing JB. Analysis of 104 twin pregnancies conceived with assisted reproductive technologies and 193 spontaneously conceived twin pregnancies. Fertil Steril. 2000;74(4):683–9.CrossRefPubMed Daniel Y, Ochshorn Y, Fait G, Geva E, Bar-Am A, Lessing JB. Analysis of 104 twin pregnancies conceived with assisted reproductive technologies and 193 spontaneously conceived twin pregnancies. Fertil Steril. 2000;74(4):683–9.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Schieve LA, Meikle SF, Ferre C, Peterson HB, Jeng G, Wilcox LS. Low and very low birth weight in infants conceived with use of assisted reproductive technology. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(10):731–7.CrossRefPubMed Schieve LA, Meikle SF, Ferre C, Peterson HB, Jeng G, Wilcox LS. Low and very low birth weight in infants conceived with use of assisted reproductive technology. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(10):731–7.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Jackson RA, Gibson KA, Wu YW, Croughan MS. Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103(3):551–63.CrossRefPubMed Jackson RA, Gibson KA, Wu YW, Croughan MS. Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103(3):551–63.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Daskalakis G, Anastasakis E, Papantoniou N, Mesogitis S, Antsaklis A. Second trimester amniocentesis in assisted conception versus spontaneously conceived twins. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(6):2572–7.CrossRefPubMed Daskalakis G, Anastasakis E, Papantoniou N, Mesogitis S, Antsaklis A. Second trimester amniocentesis in assisted conception versus spontaneously conceived twins. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(6):2572–7.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Gordon MC, Narula K, O’Shaughnessy R, Barth WH. Jr. Complications of third-trimester amniocentesis using continuous ultrasound guidance. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99(2):255–9.PubMed Gordon MC, Narula K, O’Shaughnessy R, Barth WH. Jr. Complications of third-trimester amniocentesis using continuous ultrasound guidance. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99(2):255–9.PubMed
Metadata
Title
The risk factors of procedure-related complications after amniocentesis in twin pregnancies: a retrospective analysis
Authors
Xijing Liu
Jiamin Wang
Wanying Luo
Qiyi Wang
Zhushu Liu
He Wang
Shanling Liu
Ting Hu
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05884-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2023 Go to the issue