Skip to main content
Top
Published in: PharmacoEconomics 9/2005

01-09-2005 | Adis Drug Evaluation

Linezolid

A pharmacoeconomic review of its use in serious gram-positive infections

Authors: Greg L. Plosker, David P. Figgitt

Published in: PharmacoEconomics | Issue 9/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Linezolid (Zyvox®), the first available oxazolidinone antibacterial agent, has good activity against Gram-positive pathogens, including multidrug-resistant organisms such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. Randomised multicentre trials in patients with various types of serious Gram-positive infections showed that clinical cure rates with linezolid were similar to those with vancomycin or teicoplanin. In some subgroup analyses, which must be interpreted with a degree of caution, clinical advantages were noted for linezolid (e.g. versus vancomycin in confirmed MRSA nosocomial pneumonia and MRSA-complicated skin and soft tissue infections). Although generally well tolerated, gastrointestinal adverse effects are relatively common with linezolid and it has been associated with thrombocytopenia and myelosuppression.
The oral bioavailability of linezolid is ≈100%, thus allowing sequential intravenous-to-oral administration without changing the drug or dosage regimen. Healthcare resource use data from various countries indicate that this practical advantage translates into at least a trend towards reduced length of hospital stay compared with vancomycin, which may offset its several-fold higher acquisition cost. Modelled analyses from the US, despite some limitations, indicate that, compared with vancomycin, linezolid is associated with lower total hospitalisation costs for the treatment of patients with cellulitis and has a favourable incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of ≈$US30 000 per QALY gained (2001 value) for patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia. Broadly similar results have also been reported in modelled analyses from other countries.
In conclusion, for patients with serious Gram-positive infections, including those caused by suspected or proven multidrug-resistant pathogens such as MRSA, linezolid is an effective and generally well tolerated therapeutic option. Linezolid is currently the only antibacterial agent with good activity against MRSA that can be administered orally (as well as intravenously). It may be particularly useful as an alternative to vancomycin in patients who have impaired renal function, poor or no intravenous access, require outpatient therapy, or who have been unable to tolerate glycopeptides. Healthcare resource use studies and pharmacoeconomic analyses generally support the use of linezolid in some subgroups of patients, although results should be interpreted with due consideration of the study limitations.
Footnotes
1
The use of trade names is for product identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pfizer. Zyvox® prescribing information: linezolid injection, linezolid tablets, linezolid for oral suspension. New York; May 2005: 1-33. 2005 Pfizer. Zyvox® prescribing information: linezolid injection, linezolid tablets, linezolid for oral suspension. New York; May 2005: 1-33. 2005
2.
go back to reference Perry CM, Jarvis B. Linezolid: a review of its use in the management of serious gram-positive infections. Drugs 2001; 61 (4): 525–51PubMedCrossRef Perry CM, Jarvis B. Linezolid: a review of its use in the management of serious gram-positive infections. Drugs 2001; 61 (4): 525–51PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Fung HB, Chang JY, Kuczynski S. A practical guide to the treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections. Drugs 2003; 63 (14): 1459–80PubMedCrossRef Fung HB, Chang JY, Kuczynski S. A practical guide to the treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections. Drugs 2003; 63 (14): 1459–80PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Solomkin JS, Bjornson HS, Cainzos M, et al. A consensus statement on empiric therapy for suspected gram-positive infections in surgical patients. Am J Surg 2004 Jan; 187 (1): 134–45PubMedCrossRef Solomkin JS, Bjornson HS, Cainzos M, et al. A consensus statement on empiric therapy for suspected gram-positive infections in surgical patients. Am J Surg 2004 Jan; 187 (1): 134–45PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Craven DE, Palladino R, McQuillen DP. Healthcare-associated pneumonia in adults: management principles to improve outcomes. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2004 Dec; 18 (4): 939–62PubMedCrossRef Craven DE, Palladino R, McQuillen DP. Healthcare-associated pneumonia in adults: management principles to improve outcomes. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2004 Dec; 18 (4): 939–62PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Haddadin AS, Fappiano SA, Lipsett PA. Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in the intensive care unit. Postgrad Med J 2002 Jul; 78 (921): 385–92PubMedCrossRef Haddadin AS, Fappiano SA, Lipsett PA. Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in the intensive care unit. Postgrad Med J 2002 Jul; 78 (921): 385–92PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Fluit AC, Wielders CL, Verhoef J, et al. Epidemiology and susceptibility of 3,051 Staphylococcus aureus isolates from 25 university hospitals participating in the European SENTRY study. J Clin Microbiol 2001 Oct; 39 (10): 3727–32PubMedCrossRef Fluit AC, Wielders CL, Verhoef J, et al. Epidemiology and susceptibility of 3,051 Staphylococcus aureus isolates from 25 university hospitals participating in the European SENTRY study. J Clin Microbiol 2001 Oct; 39 (10): 3727–32PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hardy KJ, Hawkey PM, Gao F, et al. Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the critically ill. Br J Anaesth 2004 Jan; 92 (1): 121–30PubMedCrossRef Hardy KJ, Hawkey PM, Gao F, et al. Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the critically ill. Br J Anaesth 2004 Jan; 92 (1): 121–30PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Rennie RP, Jones RN, Mutnick AH. Occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of pathogens isolated from skin and soft tissue infections: report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (United States and Canada, 2000). Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2003 Apr; 45 (4): 287–93PubMedCrossRef Rennie RP, Jones RN, Mutnick AH. Occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of pathogens isolated from skin and soft tissue infections: report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (United States and Canada, 2000). Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2003 Apr; 45 (4): 287–93PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Wunderink RG, Rello J, Cammarata SK, et al. Linezolid vs vancomycin: analysis of two double-blind studies of patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nosocomial pneumonia. Chest 2003 Nov; 124 (5): 1789–97PubMedCrossRef Wunderink RG, Rello J, Cammarata SK, et al. Linezolid vs vancomycin: analysis of two double-blind studies of patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nosocomial pneumonia. Chest 2003 Nov; 124 (5): 1789–97PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Smith TL, Pearson ML, Wilcox KR, et al. Emergence of vancomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. N Engl J Med 1999 Feb 18; 340: 493–501 Smith TL, Pearson ML, Wilcox KR, et al. Emergence of vancomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. N Engl J Med 1999 Feb 18; 340: 493–501
12.
go back to reference Staphylococcus aureus resistant to vancomycin: United States, 2002. MMWR Moth Mortal Wkly Rep 2002 Jul 5; 51 (26: 565–7 Staphylococcus aureus resistant to vancomycin: United States, 2002. MMWR Moth Mortal Wkly Rep 2002 Jul 5; 51 (26: 565–7
13.
go back to reference Tsiodras S, Gold HS, Sakoulas G, et al. Linezolid resistance in a clinical isolate of Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet 2001; 358: 207–8PubMedCrossRef Tsiodras S, Gold HS, Sakoulas G, et al. Linezolid resistance in a clinical isolate of Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet 2001; 358: 207–8PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Meka VG, Gold HS, Cooke A, et al. Reversion to susceptibility in a linezolid-resistant clinical isolate of Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother 2004 Oct; 54 (4): 818–20PubMedCrossRef Meka VG, Gold HS, Cooke A, et al. Reversion to susceptibility in a linezolid-resistant clinical isolate of Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother 2004 Oct; 54 (4): 818–20PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Dietrich ES, Demmler M, Schulgen G, et al. Nosocomial pneumonia: a cost-of-illness analysis. Infection 2002 Apr; 30 (2): 61–7PubMedCrossRef Dietrich ES, Demmler M, Schulgen G, et al. Nosocomial pneumonia: a cost-of-illness analysis. Infection 2002 Apr; 30 (2): 61–7PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Rello J, Ollendorf DA, Oster G, et al. Epidemiology and outcomes of ventilator-associated pneumonia in a large US database. Chest 2002; 122: 2115–21PubMedCrossRef Rello J, Ollendorf DA, Oster G, et al. Epidemiology and outcomes of ventilator-associated pneumonia in a large US database. Chest 2002; 122: 2115–21PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Warren DK, Shukla SJ, Olsen MA, et al. Outcome and attributable cost of ventilator-associated pneumonia among intensive care unit patients in a suburban medical center. Crit Care Med 2003; 31: 1312–7PubMedCrossRef Warren DK, Shukla SJ, Olsen MA, et al. Outcome and attributable cost of ventilator-associated pneumonia among intensive care unit patients in a suburban medical center. Crit Care Med 2003; 31: 1312–7PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Patel N, Goldfarb N, Hartmann CW, et al. Impact of complicated skin and soft tissue infections on inpatient costs for an academic medical center [abstract no. PIN15]. Value Health 2005; 8: 309CrossRef Patel N, Goldfarb N, Hartmann CW, et al. Impact of complicated skin and soft tissue infections on inpatient costs for an academic medical center [abstract no. PIN15]. Value Health 2005; 8: 309CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Abramson MA, Sexton DJ. Nosocomial methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus primary bacteremia: at what costs? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999 Jun; 20 (6: 408–11PubMedCrossRef Abramson MA, Sexton DJ. Nosocomial methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus primary bacteremia: at what costs? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999 Jun; 20 (6: 408–11PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Rubin RJ, Harrington CA, Poon A, et al. The economic impact of Staphylococcus aureus infection in New York City hospitals. Emerg Infect Dis 1999; 5 (1): 9–17PubMedCrossRef Rubin RJ, Harrington CA, Poon A, et al. The economic impact of Staphylococcus aureus infection in New York City hospitals. Emerg Infect Dis 1999; 5 (1): 9–17PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Paladino JA. Linezolid: an oxazolidinone antimicrobial agent. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2002 Dec 15; 59 (24): 2413–25PubMed Paladino JA. Linezolid: an oxazolidinone antimicrobial agent. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2002 Dec 15; 59 (24): 2413–25PubMed
22.
go back to reference Moellering Jr RC. Linezolid: the first oxazolidinone antimicrobial. Ann Intern Med 2003 Jan 21; 138 (2): 135–42PubMed Moellering Jr RC. Linezolid: the first oxazolidinone antimicrobial. Ann Intern Med 2003 Jan 21; 138 (2): 135–42PubMed
23.
go back to reference Lyseng-Williamson KA, Goa KL. Linezolid: in infants and children with severe Gram-positive infections. Pediatr Drugs 2003; 5 (6): 419–29 Lyseng-Williamson KA, Goa KL. Linezolid: in infants and children with severe Gram-positive infections. Pediatr Drugs 2003; 5 (6): 419–29
24.
go back to reference Mutnick AH, Biedenbach DJ, Turnidge JD, et al. Spectrum and potency evaluation of a new oxazolidinone, linezolid: report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 1998-2000. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2002 May; 43 (1): 65–73PubMedCrossRef Mutnick AH, Biedenbach DJ, Turnidge JD, et al. Spectrum and potency evaluation of a new oxazolidinone, linezolid: report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 1998-2000. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2002 May; 43 (1): 65–73PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Kollef MH, Rello J, Cammarata SK, et al. Clinical cure and survival in Gram-positive ventilator-associated pneumonia: retrospective analysis of two double-blind studies comparing linezolid with vancomycin. Intensive Care Med 2004 Mar; 30 (3): 388–94PubMedCrossRef Kollef MH, Rello J, Cammarata SK, et al. Clinical cure and survival in Gram-positive ventilator-associated pneumonia: retrospective analysis of two double-blind studies comparing linezolid with vancomycin. Intensive Care Med 2004 Mar; 30 (3): 388–94PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Rubinstein E, Cammarata SK, Oliphant TH, et al. Linezolid (PNU-100766) versus vancomycin in the treatment of hospitalized patients with nosocomial pneumonia: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study. Clin Infect Dis 2001 Feb 1; 32: 402–12 Rubinstein E, Cammarata SK, Oliphant TH, et al. Linezolid (PNU-100766) versus vancomycin in the treatment of hospitalized patients with nosocomial pneumonia: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study. Clin Infect Dis 2001 Feb 1; 32: 402–12
27.
go back to reference Wunderink RG, Cammarata SK, Oliphant TH, et al. Continuation of a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of linezolid versus vancomycin in the treatment of patients with nosocomial pneumonia. Clin Ther 2003 Mar; 25: 980–92 Wunderink RG, Cammarata SK, Oliphant TH, et al. Continuation of a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of linezolid versus vancomycin in the treatment of patients with nosocomial pneumonia. Clin Ther 2003 Mar; 25: 980–92
28.
go back to reference Stevens DL, Herr D, Lampiris H, et al. Linezolid versus vancomycin for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Clin Infect Dis 2002 Jun 1; 34: 1481–90 Stevens DL, Herr D, Lampiris H, et al. Linezolid versus vancomycin for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Clin Infect Dis 2002 Jun 1; 34: 1481–90
29.
go back to reference Weigelt J, Itani K, Stevens D, et al. Linezolid versus vancomycin in treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005 Jun; 49 (6: 2260–6PubMedCrossRef Weigelt J, Itani K, Stevens D, et al. Linezolid versus vancomycin in treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005 Jun; 49 (6: 2260–6PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Stevens DL, Smith LG, Bruss JB, et al. Randomized comparison of linezolid (PNU-100766 versus oxacillin-dicloxacillin for treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2000 Dec; 44: 3408–13 Stevens DL, Smith LG, Bruss JB, et al. Randomized comparison of linezolid (PNU-100766 versus oxacillin-dicloxacillin for treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2000 Dec; 44: 3408–13
31.
go back to reference Wilcox M, Nathwani D, Dryden M. Linezolid compared with teicoplanin for the treatment of suspected or proven Grampositive infections. J Antimicrob Chemother 2004 Feb; 53 (2): 335–44PubMedCrossRef Wilcox M, Nathwani D, Dryden M. Linezolid compared with teicoplanin for the treatment of suspected or proven Grampositive infections. J Antimicrob Chemother 2004 Feb; 53 (2): 335–44PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Powers JH, Ross DB, Lin D, et al. Linezolid and vancomycin for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nosocomial pneumonia: the subtleties of subgroup analyses [letter]. Chest 2004 Jul; 126 (1): 314–5; author reply 315-6PubMedCrossRef Powers JH, Ross DB, Lin D, et al. Linezolid and vancomycin for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nosocomial pneumonia: the subtleties of subgroup analyses [letter]. Chest 2004 Jul; 126 (1): 314–5; author reply 315-6PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Kalil AC, Puumala SE, Stoner J. Unresolved questions with the use of linezolid vs vancomycin for nosocomial pneumonia [letter]. Chest 2004 Jun; 125 (6: 2370–1PubMedCrossRef Kalil AC, Puumala SE, Stoner J. Unresolved questions with the use of linezolid vs vancomycin for nosocomial pneumonia [letter]. Chest 2004 Jun; 125 (6: 2370–1PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Cepeda JA, Whitehouse T, Cooper B, et al. Linezolid versus teicoplanin in the treatment of gram-postive infections in the critically ill: a randomized, double-blind, multicentre study. J Antimicrob Chemother 2004 Feb; 53 (2): 345–55PubMedCrossRef Cepeda JA, Whitehouse T, Cooper B, et al. Linezolid versus teicoplanin in the treatment of gram-postive infections in the critically ill: a randomized, double-blind, multicentre study. J Antimicrob Chemother 2004 Feb; 53 (2): 345–55PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Lipsky BA, Itani K, Norden C, et al. Treating foot infections in diabetic patients: a randomized, multicenter, open-label trial of linezolid versus ampicillin-sulbactam/amoxicillin-clavulanate. Clin Infect Dis 2004 Jan 1; 38 (1): 17–24PubMedCrossRef Lipsky BA, Itani K, Norden C, et al. Treating foot infections in diabetic patients: a randomized, multicenter, open-label trial of linezolid versus ampicillin-sulbactam/amoxicillin-clavulanate. Clin Infect Dis 2004 Jan 1; 38 (1): 17–24PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Rubinstein E, Isturiz R, Standiford HC, et al. Worldwide assessment of linezolid’s clinical safety and tolerability: comparatorcontrolled phase III studies. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2003; 47 (6: 1824–31PubMedCrossRef Rubinstein E, Isturiz R, Standiford HC, et al. Worldwide assessment of linezolid’s clinical safety and tolerability: comparatorcontrolled phase III studies. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2003; 47 (6: 1824–31PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Li JZ, Willke RJ, Pinto LA, et al. Comparison of length of hospital stay for patients with known or suspected methicillinresistant Staphylococcus species infections treated with linezolid or vancomycin: a randomized, multicenter trial. Pharmacotherapy 2001 Mar; 21: 263–74 Li JZ, Willke RJ, Pinto LA, et al. Comparison of length of hospital stay for patients with known or suspected methicillinresistant Staphylococcus species infections treated with linezolid or vancomycin: a randomized, multicenter trial. Pharmacotherapy 2001 Mar; 21: 263–74
38.
go back to reference Sharpe JN, Shively EH, Polk Jr HC. Clinical and economic outcomes of oral linezolid versus intravenous vancomycin in the treatment of MRSA-complicated, lower-extremity skin and soft-tissue infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Am J Surg 2005 Apr; 189 (4): 425–8PubMedCrossRef Sharpe JN, Shively EH, Polk Jr HC. Clinical and economic outcomes of oral linezolid versus intravenous vancomycin in the treatment of MRSA-complicated, lower-extremity skin and soft-tissue infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Am J Surg 2005 Apr; 189 (4): 425–8PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Li JZ, Willke RJ, Rittenhouse BE, et al. Approaches to analysis of length of hospital stay related to antibiotic therapy in a randomized clinical trial: linezolid versus vancomycin for treatment of known or suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus species infections. Pharmacotherapy 2002 Feb; 22 (2 Pt 2): 45S–54SPubMedCrossRef Li JZ, Willke RJ, Rittenhouse BE, et al. Approaches to analysis of length of hospital stay related to antibiotic therapy in a randomized clinical trial: linezolid versus vancomycin for treatment of known or suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus species infections. Pharmacotherapy 2002 Feb; 22 (2 Pt 2): 45S–54SPubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Li JZ, Willke RJ, Rittenhouse BE, et al. Effect of linezolid versus vancomycin on length of hospital stay in patients with complicated skin and soft tissue infections caused by known or suspected methicillin-resistant staphylococci: results from a randomized clinical trial. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2003 Spring; 4 (1): 57–70CrossRef Li JZ, Willke RJ, Rittenhouse BE, et al. Effect of linezolid versus vancomycin on length of hospital stay in patients with complicated skin and soft tissue infections caused by known or suspected methicillin-resistant staphylococci: results from a randomized clinical trial. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2003 Spring; 4 (1): 57–70CrossRef
41.
go back to reference López H, Li JZ, Balan DA, et al. Hospital resource use and cost of treatment with linezolid versus teicoplanin for treatment of serious Gram-positive bacterial infections among hospitalized patients from South America and Mexico: results from a multicenter trial. Clin Ther 2003 Jun; 25 (6: 1846–71PubMedCrossRef López H, Li JZ, Balan DA, et al. Hospital resource use and cost of treatment with linezolid versus teicoplanin for treatment of serious Gram-positive bacterial infections among hospitalized patients from South America and Mexico: results from a multicenter trial. Clin Ther 2003 Jun; 25 (6: 1846–71PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Nathwani D, Li JZ, Balan DA, et al. An economic evaluation of a European cohort from a multinational trial of linezolid versus teicoplanin in serious gram-positive bacterial infections: the importance of treatment setting in evaluating treatment effects. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2004 Apr; 23 (4): 315–24PubMedCrossRef Nathwani D, Li JZ, Balan DA, et al. An economic evaluation of a European cohort from a multinational trial of linezolid versus teicoplanin in serious gram-positive bacterial infections: the importance of treatment setting in evaluating treatment effects. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2004 Apr; 23 (4): 315–24PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Willke RJ, Glick HA, Li JZ, et al. Effects of linezolid on hospital length of stay compared with vancomycin in treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus infections: an application of multivariate survival analysis. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2002; 18 (3): 540–54PubMed Willke RJ, Glick HA, Li JZ, et al. Effects of linezolid on hospital length of stay compared with vancomycin in treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus infections: an application of multivariate survival analysis. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2002; 18 (3): 540–54PubMed
44.
go back to reference Weigelt JA, Itani KM, Li JZ. Linezolid reduces LOS when compared to vancomycin (Vanco) for complicated skin and soft tissue infections due to suspected or proven MRSA: results from a randomized trial [abstract no. 315]. 41st Annual Meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society of America; 2003 Oct 9-12; San Diego, 87 Weigelt JA, Itani KM, Li JZ. Linezolid reduces LOS when compared to vancomycin (Vanco) for complicated skin and soft tissue infections due to suspected or proven MRSA: results from a randomized trial [abstract no. 315]. 41st Annual Meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society of America; 2003 Oct 9-12; San Diego, 87
45.
go back to reference Vinken AG, Li JZ, Balan DA, et al. Comparison of linezolid with oxacillin or vancomycin in the empiric treatment of cellulitis in US hospitals. Am J Ther 2003; 10 (4): 264–74PubMedCrossRef Vinken AG, Li JZ, Balan DA, et al. Comparison of linezolid with oxacillin or vancomycin in the empiric treatment of cellulitis in US hospitals. Am J Ther 2003; 10 (4): 264–74PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Vinken A, Li Z, Balan D, et al. Economic evaluation of linezolid, flucloxacillin and vancomycin in the empirical treatment of cellulitis in UK hospitals: a decision analytical model. J Hosp Infect 2001 Dec; 49 Suppl A: S13–24PubMedCrossRef Vinken A, Li Z, Balan D, et al. Economic evaluation of linezolid, flucloxacillin and vancomycin in the empirical treatment of cellulitis in UK hospitals: a decision analytical model. J Hosp Infect 2001 Dec; 49 Suppl A: S13–24PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference McCollum M, Rhew DC, Parodi S. Cost analysis of switching from i.v. vancomycin to p.o. linezolid for the management of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus species. Clin Ther 2003 Dec; 25 (12): 3173–89PubMedCrossRef McCollum M, Rhew DC, Parodi S. Cost analysis of switching from i.v. vancomycin to p.o. linezolid for the management of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus species. Clin Ther 2003 Dec; 25 (12): 3173–89PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Nathwani D, Barlow GD, Ajdukiewicz K, et al. Cost-minimization analysis and audit of antibiotic management of bone and joint infections with ambulatory teicoplanin, in-patient care or outpatient oral linezolid therapy. J Antimicrob Chemother 2003 Feb; 51: 391–6 Nathwani D, Barlow GD, Ajdukiewicz K, et al. Cost-minimization analysis and audit of antibiotic management of bone and joint infections with ambulatory teicoplanin, in-patient care or outpatient oral linezolid therapy. J Antimicrob Chemother 2003 Feb; 51: 391–6
49.
go back to reference Parodi S, Rhew DC, Bidwell Goetz M. Early switch and early discharge opportunities in intravenous vancomycin treatment of suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcal species infections. J Manage Care Pharm 2003; 9 (4): 317–26 Parodi S, Rhew DC, Bidwell Goetz M. Early switch and early discharge opportunities in intravenous vancomycin treatment of suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcal species infections. J Manage Care Pharm 2003; 9 (4): 317–26
50.
go back to reference Stein GE, Schooley S, Kak V, et al. Oral linezolid as alternative therapy in patients with cellulitis who have been referred to an infusion center. PT 2004; 29 (8): 510–1 Stein GE, Schooley S, Kak V, et al. Oral linezolid as alternative therapy in patients with cellulitis who have been referred to an infusion center. PT 2004; 29 (8): 510–1
51.
go back to reference Davis S, Shieh M, Levine D, et al. A case-control study to evaluate the conomic outcome of early PO linezolid in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Clin Microbiol Infect 2005 Apr; 11 (Suppl. 2): 262–3 Davis S, Shieh M, Levine D, et al. A case-control study to evaluate the conomic outcome of early PO linezolid in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Clin Microbiol Infect 2005 Apr; 11 (Suppl. 2): 262–3
52.
go back to reference Clincea R, Panza J, Abernathy K, et al. Pharmacoeconomic comparison of vancomycin and linezolid within the home health care setting of a veterans administration population [abstract no. 451]. 42nd Annual Meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society of America; 2004 Sept 30-Oct 3; Boston, 125 Clincea R, Panza J, Abernathy K, et al. Pharmacoeconomic comparison of vancomycin and linezolid within the home health care setting of a veterans administration population [abstract no. 451]. 42nd Annual Meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society of America; 2004 Sept 30-Oct 3; Boston, 125
53.
go back to reference Shorr AF, Susla GM, Kollef MH. Linezolid for treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a cost-effective alternative to vancomycin. Crit Care Med 2004 Jan; 32 (1): 137–43PubMedCrossRef Shorr AF, Susla GM, Kollef MH. Linezolid for treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a cost-effective alternative to vancomycin. Crit Care Med 2004 Jan; 32 (1): 137–43PubMedCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Grau S, Alvarez-Lerma F, del Castillo A, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia with linezolid or vancomycin in Spain. J Chemother 2005; 17 (2): 203–11PubMed Grau S, Alvarez-Lerma F, del Castillo A, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia with linezolid or vancomycin in Spain. J Chemother 2005; 17 (2): 203–11PubMed
55.
go back to reference Kuznik A, Mullins CD, Levine AR, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of linezolid vs vancomycin for the treatment of MRSA nosocomial pneumonia [abstract no. C86]. Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society; 2005 May 20-25; San Diego, A797 Kuznik A, Mullins CD, Levine AR, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of linezolid vs vancomycin for the treatment of MRSA nosocomial pneumonia [abstract no. C86]. Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society; 2005 May 20-25; San Diego, A797
56.
go back to reference Grunewald T, De Cock E, Sorensen SV, et al. Cost-effectiveness of linezolid versus vancomycin in suspected methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus in nosocomial pneumonia in Germany [abstract no. PIN2] Plus poster presented at the 7th Annual European Congress of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research; Hamburg; 2004 Oct 24-26. Value Health 2004; 7 (6): 758CrossRef Grunewald T, De Cock E, Sorensen SV, et al. Cost-effectiveness of linezolid versus vancomycin in suspected methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus in nosocomial pneumonia in Germany [abstract no. PIN2] Plus poster presented at the 7th Annual European Congress of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research; Hamburg; 2004 Oct 24-26. Value Health 2004; 7 (6): 758CrossRef
57.
go back to reference Schurmann D, De Cock E, Sorensen S, et al. Cost-effectiveness of linezolid versus vancomycin in complicated skin and softtissue infection due to suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in Germany [abstract no. P873]. Clin Microbiol Infect 2005 Apr; 11 Suppl. 2: 263 Schurmann D, De Cock E, Sorensen S, et al. Cost-effectiveness of linezolid versus vancomycin in complicated skin and softtissue infection due to suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in Germany [abstract no. P873]. Clin Microbiol Infect 2005 Apr; 11 Suppl. 2: 263
58.
go back to reference Sorensen SV, Hollenbeak CS, Baker TM, et al. Linezolid for the treatment of skin and soft-tissue MRSA infections - a costeffective alternative to vancomycin: evidence from a multinational clinical trial [abstract no. PIN3] Plus poster presented at the 7th Annual European Congress of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research; Hamburg; 2004 Oct 24-26. Value Health 2004; 7 (6): 758–9CrossRef Sorensen SV, Hollenbeak CS, Baker TM, et al. Linezolid for the treatment of skin and soft-tissue MRSA infections - a costeffective alternative to vancomycin: evidence from a multinational clinical trial [abstract no. PIN3] Plus poster presented at the 7th Annual European Congress of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research; Hamburg; 2004 Oct 24-26. Value Health 2004; 7 (6): 758–9CrossRef
59.
go back to reference Sorensen SV, Hollenbeak CS, Liu LZ, et al. Cost-effectiveness of linezolid versus vancomycin in the treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infection due to proven or suspected MRSA [abstract no. 503]. 42nd Annual Meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society of America; 2004 Sept 30 to Oct 3; Boston, 136-7 Sorensen SV, Hollenbeak CS, Liu LZ, et al. Cost-effectiveness of linezolid versus vancomycin in the treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infection due to proven or suspected MRSA [abstract no. 503]. 42nd Annual Meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society of America; 2004 Sept 30 to Oct 3; Boston, 136-7
60.
go back to reference FXConverter - 164 Currency Converter [online]. Available from URL: http://www.oanda.com/convert/classic [Accessed 2005 Jul 12] FXConverter - 164 Currency Converter [online]. Available from URL: http://​www.​oanda.​com/​convert/​classic [Accessed 2005 Jul 12]
61.
go back to reference American Thoracic Society. Guidelines for the management of adults with hospital-acquired, ventilator-associated, and healthcare-associated pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005; 171: 388–416CrossRef American Thoracic Society. Guidelines for the management of adults with hospital-acquired, ventilator-associated, and healthcare-associated pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005; 171: 388–416CrossRef
62.
go back to reference Carpenter CF, Chambers HF. Daptomycin: another novel agent for treating infections due to drug-resistant gram-positive pathogens. Clin Infect Dis 2004 Apr 1; 38 (7): 994–1000PubMedCrossRef Carpenter CF, Chambers HF. Daptomycin: another novel agent for treating infections due to drug-resistant gram-positive pathogens. Clin Infect Dis 2004 Apr 1; 38 (7): 994–1000PubMedCrossRef
63.
64.
go back to reference Linden PK, Moellering RC, Wood CA, et al. Treatment of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium infections with quinupristin/dalfopristin. Clin Infect Dis 2001; 33: 1816–23PubMedCrossRef Linden PK, Moellering RC, Wood CA, et al. Treatment of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium infections with quinupristin/dalfopristin. Clin Infect Dis 2001; 33: 1816–23PubMedCrossRef
65.
go back to reference Wood MJ. The comparative efficacy and safety of teicoplanin and vancomycin. J Antimicrob Chemother 1996; 37: 209–22PubMedCrossRef Wood MJ. The comparative efficacy and safety of teicoplanin and vancomycin. J Antimicrob Chemother 1996; 37: 209–22PubMedCrossRef
66.
go back to reference British Medical Association and Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain. British National Formulary, 49th edition [online]. Available from URL: http://www.bnf.org [Accessed 2005 Jul 29] British Medical Association and Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain. British National Formulary, 49th edition [online]. Available from URL: http://​www.​bnf.​org [Accessed 2005 Jul 29]
67.
go back to reference Fakih MG, Saravolatz L. Treatment of Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia. Curr Treat Options Infect Dis 2003; 5: 137–42 Fakih MG, Saravolatz L. Treatment of Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia. Curr Treat Options Infect Dis 2003; 5: 137–42
68.
go back to reference Murray L. Red book: pharmacy’s fundamental reference. 2004 ed. Montvale (NJ): Thomson PDR, 2004 Murray L. Red book: pharmacy’s fundamental reference. 2004 ed. Montvale (NJ): Thomson PDR, 2004
69.
go back to reference Norton EC, Van Homven CH, Lindrooth RC, et al. Does prospective payment reduce inpatient length of stay? Health Econ 2002 Jul; 11 (5): 377–87PubMedCrossRef Norton EC, Van Homven CH, Lindrooth RC, et al. Does prospective payment reduce inpatient length of stay? Health Econ 2002 Jul; 11 (5): 377–87PubMedCrossRef
70.
go back to reference Gilman BH. Hospital response to DRG refinements: the impact of multiple reimbursement incentives on inpatient length of stay. Health Econ 2000 Jun; 9 (4): 277–94PubMedCrossRef Gilman BH. Hospital response to DRG refinements: the impact of multiple reimbursement incentives on inpatient length of stay. Health Econ 2000 Jun; 9 (4): 277–94PubMedCrossRef
71.
go back to reference Nathwani D. Economic impact and formulary positioning of linezolid: a new anti-Gram-positive antimicrobial. J Hosp Infect 2001 Dec; 49 Suppl A: S33–41PubMedCrossRef Nathwani D. Economic impact and formulary positioning of linezolid: a new anti-Gram-positive antimicrobial. J Hosp Infect 2001 Dec; 49 Suppl A: S33–41PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Linezolid
A pharmacoeconomic review of its use in serious gram-positive infections
Authors
Greg L. Plosker
David P. Figgitt
Publication date
01-09-2005
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
PharmacoEconomics / Issue 9/2005
Print ISSN: 1170-7690
Electronic ISSN: 1179-2027
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200523090-00006

Other articles of this Issue 9/2005

PharmacoEconomics 9/2005 Go to the issue