Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Skeletal Radiology 11/2015

01-11-2015 | Scientific Article

Limited role of gadolinium to detect active sacroiliitis on MRI in juvenile spondyloarthritis

Authors: N. Herregods, J. L. Jaremko, X. Baraliakos, J. Dehoorne, A. Leus, K. Verstraete, L. Jans

Published in: Skeletal Radiology | Issue 11/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study is to determine the added diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced (CE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared to routine non contrast-enhanced MRI to detect active sacroiliitis in clinically juvenile spondyloarthritis (JSpA).

Materials and methods

A total of 80 children clinically suspected for sacroiliitis prospectively underwent MRI of the sacroiliac (SI) joints. Axial and coronal T1-weighted (T1), Short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) and fat-saturated T1-weighted gadolinium-DTPA (Gd) contrast-enhanced (T1/Gd) sequences were obtained. The presence of bone marrow edema (BME), capsulitis, enthesitis, high intra-articular STIR signal, synovial enhancement and a global diagnostic impression of the MRI for diagnosis of sacroiliitis was recorded.

Results

STIR and T1/Gd sequences had 100 % agreement for depiction of BME, capsulitis and enthesitis. High intra-articular STIR signal was seen in 18/80 (22.5 %) patients, 15 (83 %) of whom also showed synovial enhancement in the T1/Gd sequence. Sensitivity (SN) and specificity (SP) for a clinical diagnosis of JSpA were similar for high STIR signal (SN = 33 %, SP = 85 %) and T1/Gd synovial enhancement (SN = 36 %, SP = 92 %). Positive likelihood ratio (LR+) for JSpA was twice as high for synovial enhancement than high STIR signal (4.5 compared to 2.2). Global diagnostic impression was similar (STIR: SN = 55 %, SP = 87 %, LR + =4 .2; T1/Gd: SN = 55 %, SP = 92 %, LR + = 6.9).

Conclusion

MRI without contrast administration is sufficient to identify bone marrow edema, capsulitis and retroarticular enthesitis as features of active sacroiliitis in juvenile spondyloarthritis. In selected cases when high STIR signal in the joint is the only finding, gadolinium-enhanced images may help to confirm the presence of synovitis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Burgos-Vargas R. The juvenile-onset spondylarthritides. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2002;28(3):531–60.CrossRefPubMed Burgos-Vargas R. The juvenile-onset spondylarthritides. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2002;28(3):531–60.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Petty RE, Southwood TR, Manners P, et al. International League of Association for Rheumatology Classification of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: second revision. Edmonton 2001. J Rheumatol. 2004;31(2):390–2.PubMed Petty RE, Southwood TR, Manners P, et al. International League of Association for Rheumatology Classification of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: second revision. Edmonton 2001. J Rheumatol. 2004;31(2):390–2.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Lambert RG, Salonen D, Rahman P, et al. Adalimumab significantly reduces both spinal and sacroiliac joint inflammation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56(12):4005–14.CrossRefPubMed Lambert RG, Salonen D, Rahman P, et al. Adalimumab significantly reduces both spinal and sacroiliac joint inflammation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56(12):4005–14.CrossRefPubMed
5.
6.
go back to reference Baraliakos X, Haibel H, Listing J, Sieper J, Braun J. Continuous long-term anti-TNF therapy does not lead to an increase in the rate of new bone formation over 8 years in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(4):710–5.CrossRefPubMed Baraliakos X, Haibel H, Listing J, Sieper J, Braun J. Continuous long-term anti-TNF therapy does not lead to an increase in the rate of new bone formation over 8 years in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(4):710–5.CrossRefPubMed
7.
8.
go back to reference Sieper J, Rudwaleit M, Baraliakos X, et al. The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) handbook: a guide to assess spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68 suppl 2:ii1–44.CrossRefPubMed Sieper J, Rudwaleit M, Baraliakos X, et al. The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) handbook: a guide to assess spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68 suppl 2:ii1–44.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Jaremko JL, Liu L, Winn NJ, Ellsworth JE, Lambert RGW. Diagnostic utility of magnetic resonance imaging and radiography in juvenile spondyloarthritis: evaluation of the sacroiliac joints in controls and affected subjects. J Rheumatol. 2014;41(5):963–70.CrossRefPubMed Jaremko JL, Liu L, Winn NJ, Ellsworth JE, Lambert RGW. Diagnostic utility of magnetic resonance imaging and radiography in juvenile spondyloarthritis: evaluation of the sacroiliac joints in controls and affected subjects. J Rheumatol. 2014;41(5):963–70.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Bollow M, Biedermann T, Kannenberg J, et al. Use of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging to detect sacroiliitis in HLA-B27 positive and negative children with juvenile arthritides. J Rheumatol. 1998;25(3):556–64.PubMed Bollow M, Biedermann T, Kannenberg J, et al. Use of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging to detect sacroiliitis in HLA-B27 positive and negative children with juvenile arthritides. J Rheumatol. 1998;25(3):556–64.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Lin C, MacKenzie JD, Courtier JL, Gu JT, Milojevic D. Magnetic resonance imaging findings in juvenile spondyloarthropathy and effects of treatment observed on subsequent imaging. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2014;12:25.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Lin C, MacKenzie JD, Courtier JL, Gu JT, Milojevic D. Magnetic resonance imaging findings in juvenile spondyloarthropathy and effects of treatment observed on subsequent imaging. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2014;12:25.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Bollow M, Braun J, Biedermann T, et al. Use of contrast-enhanced MR imaging to detect sacroiliitis in children. Skeletal Radiol. 1998;27(11):606–16.CrossRefPubMed Bollow M, Braun J, Biedermann T, et al. Use of contrast-enhanced MR imaging to detect sacroiliitis in children. Skeletal Radiol. 1998;27(11):606–16.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Pagnini I, Savelli S, Matucci-Cerinic M, Fonda C, Cimaz R, Simonini G. Early predictors of juvenile sacroiliitis in enthesitis-related arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2010;37(11):2395–401.CrossRefPubMed Pagnini I, Savelli S, Matucci-Cerinic M, Fonda C, Cimaz R, Simonini G. Early predictors of juvenile sacroiliitis in enthesitis-related arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2010;37(11):2395–401.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Althoff CE, Feist E, Burova E, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of active sacroiliitis: do we really need gadolinium? Eur J Radiol. 2009;71(2):232–6.CrossRefPubMed Althoff CE, Feist E, Burova E, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of active sacroiliitis: do we really need gadolinium? Eur J Radiol. 2009;71(2):232–6.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference De Hooge M, Van Den Berg R, Navarro-Compan V, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the sacro-iliac joints in the early detection of spondyloarthritis: no added value of gadolinium compared with short tau inversion recovery sequence. Rheumatology. 2013;52:1220–4.CrossRefPubMed De Hooge M, Van Den Berg R, Navarro-Compan V, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the sacro-iliac joints in the early detection of spondyloarthritis: no added value of gadolinium compared with short tau inversion recovery sequence. Rheumatology. 2013;52:1220–4.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Madsen KB, Egund N, Jurik AG. Grading of inflammatory disease activity in the sacroiliac joints with magnetic resonance imaging: comparison between short-tau inversion recovery and gadolinium contrast-enhanced sequences. J Rheumatol. 2010;37(2):393–400.CrossRefPubMed Madsen KB, Egund N, Jurik AG. Grading of inflammatory disease activity in the sacroiliac joints with magnetic resonance imaging: comparison between short-tau inversion recovery and gadolinium contrast-enhanced sequences. J Rheumatol. 2010;37(2):393–400.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Hermann KG, Landewe RB, Braun J, van der Heijde D. Magnetic resonance imaging of inflammatory lesions in the spine in ankylosing spondylitis clinical trials: is paramagnetic contrast medium necessary? J Rheumatol. 2005;32(10):2056–60.PubMed Hermann KG, Landewe RB, Braun J, van der Heijde D. Magnetic resonance imaging of inflammatory lesions in the spine in ankylosing spondylitis clinical trials: is paramagnetic contrast medium necessary? J Rheumatol. 2005;32(10):2056–60.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Baraliakos X, Hermann KG, Landewe R, et al. Assessment of acute spinal inflammation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis by magnetic resonance imaging: a comparison between contrast enhanced T1 and short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64(8):1141–4.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Baraliakos X, Hermann KG, Landewe R, et al. Assessment of acute spinal inflammation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis by magnetic resonance imaging: a comparison between contrast enhanced T1 and short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64(8):1141–4.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Maksymowicz H, Kowalewski K, Lubkowska K, Zołud W, Sąsiadek M. Diagnostic value of gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging of active sacroiliitis in seronegative spondyloarthropathy. Pol J Radiol. 2010;75(2):58–65.PubMedCentralPubMed Maksymowicz H, Kowalewski K, Lubkowska K, Zołud W, Sąsiadek M. Diagnostic value of gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging of active sacroiliitis in seronegative spondyloarthropathy. Pol J Radiol. 2010;75(2):58–65.PubMedCentralPubMed
20.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–74.CrossRefPubMed Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–74.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Jones KM, Unger EC, Granstrom P, Seeger JF, Carmody RF, Yoshino M. Bone marrow imaging using STIR at 0.5 and 1.5 T. Magn Reson Imaging. 1992;10(2):169–76.CrossRefPubMed Jones KM, Unger EC, Granstrom P, Seeger JF, Carmody RF, Yoshino M. Bone marrow imaging using STIR at 0.5 and 1.5 T. Magn Reson Imaging. 1992;10(2):169–76.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Maksymowych WP, Weber U. Diagnostic utility of MRI in early spondyloarthritis. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2011;13(5):402–8.CrossRefPubMed Maksymowych WP, Weber U. Diagnostic utility of MRI in early spondyloarthritis. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2011;13(5):402–8.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Puhakka KB, Melsen F, Jurik AG, Boel LW, Vesterby A, Egund N. MR imaging of the normal sacroiliac joint with correlation to histology. Skeletal Radiol. 2004;33(1):15–28.CrossRefPubMed Puhakka KB, Melsen F, Jurik AG, Boel LW, Vesterby A, Egund N. MR imaging of the normal sacroiliac joint with correlation to histology. Skeletal Radiol. 2004;33(1):15–28.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Burdiles A, Babyn PS. Pediatric bone marrow MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2009;17(3):391–409.CrossRefPubMed Burdiles A, Babyn PS. Pediatric bone marrow MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2009;17(3):391–409.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Jans L, Coeman L, Van Praet L, et al. How sensitive and specific are MRI features of sacroiliitis for diagnosis of spondylarthritis in patients with inflammatory back pain? JBR-BTR. 2014;97:202–5.PubMed Jans L, Coeman L, Van Praet L, et al. How sensitive and specific are MRI features of sacroiliitis for diagnosis of spondylarthritis in patients with inflammatory back pain? JBR-BTR. 2014;97:202–5.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Limited role of gadolinium to detect active sacroiliitis on MRI in juvenile spondyloarthritis
Authors
N. Herregods
J. L. Jaremko
X. Baraliakos
J. Dehoorne
A. Leus
K. Verstraete
L. Jans
Publication date
01-11-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Skeletal Radiology / Issue 11/2015
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-015-2211-8

Other articles of this Issue 11/2015

Skeletal Radiology 11/2015 Go to the issue