Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology 4/2023

21-06-2023 | Levofloxacin | Clinical Investigation

Effects of the pharmaceutical formulation of topical medications on corneal epithelial healing after phototherapeutic keratectomy

Authors: Nao Takanashi, Tomoko Haruki, Dai Miyazaki, Yoshitsugu Inoue

Published in: Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology | Issue 4/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the effect of the formulation of topical medications on the healing of corneal epithelial cells after phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK).

Study design

Retrospective cohort study.

Methods

We studied 271 eyes of 189 consecutive patients (aged 67.6 ± 11.8 years) who had undergone PTK for granular corneal dystrophy (n = 140), band keratopathy (n = 47), or lattice corneal dystrophy (n = 2). Postoperatively, generic or brand-named levofloxacin, 0.1% betamethasone, or 0.1% bromfenac sodium hydrate was applied topically. Patients were examined on postoperative days 1, 2, and 5 and weekly thereafter. The time to re-epithelialization was assessed by use of Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses.

Results

The time to re-epithelialization was significantly longer with generic 0.5% levofloxacin, at 8.2 ± 3.5 days, than with 0.5% Cravit (levofloxacin), at 6.7 ± 3.5 days (P = 0.018), or with 1.5% Cravit, at 6.3 ± 2.6 days (P = 0.000). In addition, the time to re-epithelialization was significantly longer with generic 0.1% betamethasone (Sanbetason), at 7.3 ± 3.4 days, than with brand-name 0.1% betamethasone (Rinderon), at 6.1 ± 2.5 days (P = 0.0002). The Cox proportional hazards model indicated that the use of generic formulations for levofloxacin eye drops and 0.1% betamethasone was a significant factor that delayed corneal re-epithelialization (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.72, P = 0.002 and HR = 0.77, P = 0.006, after adjustment for age). Re-epithelialization was significantly shorter in band keratopathy than in corneal dystrophy (HR = 1.56, P = 0.004). No other factors, including age, bandage contact lens, and diabetes mellitus, were significantly associated with time to re-epithelialization.

Conclusion

Corneal epithelial healing can be significantly affected by different antibacterial or steroid eye drops. Clinicians need to be aware that a generic formulation may affect corneal epithelial healing.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fukuda M. Characteristic of genetic versions of ocular hypotensive eyedrops. Rinsho Ganka. 2014;68:7–12 ((in Japanese)). Fukuda M. Characteristic of genetic versions of ocular hypotensive eyedrops. Rinsho Ganka. 2014;68:7–12 ((in Japanese)).
2.
go back to reference Sun HY, Liao HW, Sheng MH, Tai HM, Kuo CH, Sheng WH. Bioequivalence and in vitro antimicrobial activity between generic and brand-name levofloxacin. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016;85:347–51.CrossRefPubMed Sun HY, Liao HW, Sheng MH, Tai HM, Kuo CH, Sheng WH. Bioequivalence and in vitro antimicrobial activity between generic and brand-name levofloxacin. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016;85:347–51.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Zore M, Harris A, Tobe LA, Siesky B, Januleviciene I, Behzadi J, et al. Generic medications in ophthalmology. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013;97:253–7.CrossRefPubMed Zore M, Harris A, Tobe LA, Siesky B, Januleviciene I, Behzadi J, et al. Generic medications in ophthalmology. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013;97:253–7.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Diagourtas A, Kagelaris K, Oikonomakis K, Droulias A, Kokolakis N, Papaconstantinou D. Prospective study comparing Xalatan(®) eye drops and two similar generics as to the efficacy and safety profile. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2018;28:378–84.CrossRefPubMed Diagourtas A, Kagelaris K, Oikonomakis K, Droulias A, Kokolakis N, Papaconstantinou D. Prospective study comparing Xalatan(®) eye drops and two similar generics as to the efficacy and safety profile. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2018;28:378–84.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Egan P, Harris A, Siesky B, Abrams-Tobe L, Gerber AL, Park J, et al. Comparison of intraocular pressure in glaucoma subjects treated with Xalatan versus generic latanoprost. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014;92:e415–6.CrossRefPubMed Egan P, Harris A, Siesky B, Abrams-Tobe L, Gerber AL, Park J, et al. Comparison of intraocular pressure in glaucoma subjects treated with Xalatan versus generic latanoprost. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014;92:e415–6.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Narayanaswamy A, Neog A, Baskaran M, George R, Lingam V, Desai C, et al. A randomized, crossover, open label pilot study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Xalatan in comparison with generic Latanoprost (Latoprost) in subjects with primary open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2007;55:127–31.CrossRefPubMed Narayanaswamy A, Neog A, Baskaran M, George R, Lingam V, Desai C, et al. A randomized, crossover, open label pilot study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Xalatan in comparison with generic Latanoprost (Latoprost) in subjects with primary open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2007;55:127–31.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Stewart WC, Sharpe ED, Stewart JA, Hott CE. The safety and efficacy of timolol 0.5% in xanthan gum versus timolol gel forming solution 0.5%. Curr Eye Res. 2002;24:387–91. Stewart WC, Sharpe ED, Stewart JA, Hott CE. The safety and efficacy of timolol 0.5% in xanthan gum versus timolol gel forming solution 0.5%. Curr Eye Res. 2002;24:387–91.
8.
go back to reference Fukuda M, Inagaki S, Hagihara K, Yaguchi H, Sasaki H. Generic versions of latanoprost ophthalmic solution evaluated for safety to corneal epithelial cells. J Eye. 2011;28:849–54 ((in Japanese)). Fukuda M, Inagaki S, Hagihara K, Yaguchi H, Sasaki H. Generic versions of latanoprost ophthalmic solution evaluated for safety to corneal epithelial cells. J Eye. 2011;28:849–54 ((in Japanese)).
9.
go back to reference Fukuda M, Sasaki H. Effects of fluoroquinolone-based antibacterial ophthalmic solutions on corneal wound healing. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2015;31:536–40.CrossRefPubMed Fukuda M, Sasaki H. Effects of fluoroquinolone-based antibacterial ophthalmic solutions on corneal wound healing. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2015;31:536–40.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Toyama A. Antimicrobial agent J Pract Pharm. 2018;69:3535–43 ((in Japanese)). Toyama A. Antimicrobial agent J Pract Pharm. 2018;69:3535–43 ((in Japanese)).
11.
go back to reference Kobayashi T, Watanabe N, Shiraishi A, Ohashi Y. Effect of fluoroquinolone ophthalmic solutions on cultured human corneal epithelial cells. Jpn J Med Pharm Sci. 2013;70:61–6 ((in Japanese)). Kobayashi T, Watanabe N, Shiraishi A, Ohashi Y. Effect of fluoroquinolone ophthalmic solutions on cultured human corneal epithelial cells. Jpn J Med Pharm Sci. 2013;70:61–6 ((in Japanese)).
12.
go back to reference Fukuda M, Yaguchi H, Fujita N, Inagaki S, Osada H, Shibata N, et al. Effect of sodium hyaluronate eyedrops on corneal cells. J Eye. 2011;28:549–52 ((in Japanese)). Fukuda M, Yaguchi H, Fujita N, Inagaki S, Osada H, Shibata N, et al. Effect of sodium hyaluronate eyedrops on corneal cells. J Eye. 2011;28:549–52 ((in Japanese)).
13.
go back to reference Dvorscak L, Marfurt CF. Age-related changes in rat corneal epithelial nerve density. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:910–6.CrossRefPubMed Dvorscak L, Marfurt CF. Age-related changes in rat corneal epithelial nerve density. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:910–6.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Cai D, Zhu M, Petroll WM, Koppaka V, Robertson DM. The impact of type 1 diabetes mellitus on corneal epithelial nerve morphology and the corneal epithelium. Am J Pathol. 2014;184:2662–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cai D, Zhu M, Petroll WM, Koppaka V, Robertson DM. The impact of type 1 diabetes mellitus on corneal epithelial nerve morphology and the corneal epithelium. Am J Pathol. 2014;184:2662–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Effects of the pharmaceutical formulation of topical medications on corneal epithelial healing after phototherapeutic keratectomy
Authors
Nao Takanashi
Tomoko Haruki
Dai Miyazaki
Yoshitsugu Inoue
Publication date
21-06-2023
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology / Issue 4/2023
Print ISSN: 0021-5155
Electronic ISSN: 1613-2246
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-023-01004-8

Other articles of this Issue 4/2023

Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology 4/2023 Go to the issue