Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Infectious Diseases 1/2013

Open Access 01-12-2013 | Research article

Less and less–influence of volume on hand coverage and bactericidal efficacy in hand disinfection

Authors: Günter Kampf, Sigunde Ruselack, Sven Eggerstedt, Nicolas Nowak, Muhammad Bashir

Published in: BMC Infectious Diseases | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Some manufacturers recommend using 1.1 mL per application of alcohol-based handrubs for effective hand disinfection. However, whether this volume is sufficient to cover both hands, as recommended by the World Health Organization, and fulfills current efficacy standards is unknown. This study aimed to determine hand coverage for three handrubs (two gels based on 70% v/v and 85% w/w ethanol and a foam based on 70% v/v ethanol) applied at various volumes.

Methods

Products were tested at product volumes of 1.1 mL, 2 mL, 2.4 mL as well as 1 and 2 pump dispenser pushes; the foam product was tested in addition at foam volumes of 1.1 mL, 2 mL, and 2.4 mL. Products were supplemented with a fluorescent dye and 15 participants applied products using responsible application techniques without any specific steps but the aim of completely covering both hands. Coverage quality was determined under ultraviolet light by two blinded investigators. Efficacy of the three handrubs was determined according to ASTM E 1174-06 and ASTM E 2755-10. For each experiment, the hands of 12 participants were contaminated with Serratia marcescens and the products applied as recommended (1.1 mL for 70% v/v ethanol products; 2 mL for the 85% w/w ethanol product). Log10-reduction was calculated.

Results

Volumes < 2 mL yielded high rates of incomplete coverage (67%–87%) whereas volumes ≥ 2 mL gave lower rates (13%–53%). Differences in coverage were significant between the five volumes tested for all handrubs (p < 0.001; two-way ANOVA) but not between the three handrubs themselves (p = 0.796). Application of 1.1 mL of 70% v/v ethanol rubs reduced contamination by 1.85 log10 or 1.60 log10 (ASTM E 1174-06); this failed the US FDA efficacy requirement of at least 2 log10. Application of 2 mL of the 85% w/w ethanol rub reduced contamination by 2.06 log10 (ASTM E 1174-06), fulfilling the US FDA efficacy requirement. Similar results were obtained according to ASTM E 2755-10.

Conclusions

Our data indicated that handrubs based on 70% ethanol (v/v) with a recommended volume of 1.1 mL per application do not ensure complete coverage of both hands and do not achieve current ASTM efficacy standards.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Anonym: WHO guidelines on hand hygiene in health care. First global patient safety challenge clean care is safer care. 2009, Geneva: WHO Anonym: WHO guidelines on hand hygiene in health care. First global patient safety challenge clean care is safer care. 2009, Geneva: WHO
2.
go back to reference Rotter M, Skopec M: Entwicklung der Händehygiene und die Bedeutung der Erkenntnisse von Ignaz Ph. Semmelweis. Hände-hygiene im gesundheitswesen. Edited by: Kampf G. 2003, Berlin: Springer, 1-27.CrossRef Rotter M, Skopec M: Entwicklung der Händehygiene und die Bedeutung der Erkenntnisse von Ignaz Ph. Semmelweis. Hände-hygiene im gesundheitswesen. Edited by: Kampf G. 2003, Berlin: Springer, 1-27.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Dharan S, Hugonnet S, Sax H, Pittet D: Comparison of waterless hand antisepsis agents at short application times: raising the flag of concern. Infect Contr Hosp Epidemiol. 2003, 24 (3): 160-164. 10.1086/502182.CrossRef Dharan S, Hugonnet S, Sax H, Pittet D: Comparison of waterless hand antisepsis agents at short application times: raising the flag of concern. Infect Contr Hosp Epidemiol. 2003, 24 (3): 160-164. 10.1086/502182.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference EN 1500:1997: Chemical disinfectants and antiseptics. Hygienic hand disinfection. Test method and requirement (phase 2, step 2). 1997, Brussels: CEN–Comité Européen de Normalisation EN 1500:1997: Chemical disinfectants and antiseptics. Hygienic hand disinfection. Test method and requirement (phase 2, step 2). 1997, Brussels: CEN–Comité Européen de Normalisation
5.
go back to reference Kampf G, Reichel M, Feil Y, Eggerstedt S, Kaulfers P-M: Influence of rub-in technique on required application time and hand coverage in hygienic hand disinfection. BMC Infect Dis. 2008, 8: 149-10.1186/1471-2334-8-149.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kampf G, Reichel M, Feil Y, Eggerstedt S, Kaulfers P-M: Influence of rub-in technique on required application time and hand coverage in hygienic hand disinfection. BMC Infect Dis. 2008, 8: 149-10.1186/1471-2334-8-149.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Kramer A, Rudolph P, Kampf G, Pittet D: Limited efficacy of alcohol-based hand gels. Lancet. 2002, 359: 1489-1490. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08426-X.CrossRefPubMed Kramer A, Rudolph P, Kampf G, Pittet D: Limited efficacy of alcohol-based hand gels. Lancet. 2002, 359: 1489-1490. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08426-X.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Kampf G, Marschall S, Eggerstedt S, Ostermeyer C: Efficacy of ethanol-based hand foams using clinically relevant amounts: a cross-over controlled study among healthy volunteers. BMC Infect Dis. 2010, 10: 78-10.1186/1471-2334-10-78.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kampf G, Marschall S, Eggerstedt S, Ostermeyer C: Efficacy of ethanol-based hand foams using clinically relevant amounts: a cross-over controlled study among healthy volunteers. BMC Infect Dis. 2010, 10: 78-10.1186/1471-2334-10-78.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Edmonds SL, Macinga DR, Mays-Suko P, Duley C, Rutter J, Jarvis WR, Arbogast JW: Comparative efficacy of commercially available alcohol-based hand rubs and world health organization-recommended hand rubs: formulation matters. Am J Infect Contr. 2012, 40 (6): 521-525. 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.08.016.CrossRef Edmonds SL, Macinga DR, Mays-Suko P, Duley C, Rutter J, Jarvis WR, Arbogast JW: Comparative efficacy of commercially available alcohol-based hand rubs and world health organization-recommended hand rubs: formulation matters. Am J Infect Contr. 2012, 40 (6): 521-525. 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.08.016.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Anonymous: Tentative final monograph for health care antiseptic products; proposed rule. Federal Reg. 1994, 59 (116): 31401-31452. Anonymous: Tentative final monograph for health care antiseptic products; proposed rule. Federal Reg. 1994, 59 (116): 31401-31452.
10.
go back to reference Kampf G: How effective are hand antiseptics for the post-contamination treatment of hands when used as recommended?. Am J Infect Contr. 2008, 36 (5): 356-360. 10.1016/j.ajic.2007.07.017.CrossRef Kampf G: How effective are hand antiseptics for the post-contamination treatment of hands when used as recommended?. Am J Infect Contr. 2008, 36 (5): 356-360. 10.1016/j.ajic.2007.07.017.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Edmonds S, Macinga DR, Paulson D: The influence of ABHR product format on in vivo efficacy: a meta-analysis. Am J Infect Contr. 2012, 40 (5): e43-CrossRef Edmonds S, Macinga DR, Paulson D: The influence of ABHR product format on in vivo efficacy: a meta-analysis. Am J Infect Contr. 2012, 40 (5): e43-CrossRef
12.
go back to reference American Society for Testing and Materials International: ASTM E 1174-06: Standard test method for evaluation of the effectiveness of healthcare personnel handwash formulations. 2006, West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials American Society for Testing and Materials International: ASTM E 1174-06: Standard test method for evaluation of the effectiveness of healthcare personnel handwash formulations. 2006, West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials
13.
go back to reference American Society for Testing and Materials International: ASTM E 1054-08: standard test methods for evaluation of inactivators of antimicrobial agents. 2008, West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials American Society for Testing and Materials International: ASTM E 1054-08: standard test methods for evaluation of inactivators of antimicrobial agents. 2008, West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials
14.
go back to reference American Society for Testing and Materials International: ASTM E 2755-10: standard test method for determining the bacteria-eliminating effectiveness of hand sanitizer formulations using hands of adults. 2010, West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials American Society for Testing and Materials International: ASTM E 2755-10: standard test method for determining the bacteria-eliminating effectiveness of hand sanitizer formulations using hands of adults. 2010, West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials
15.
go back to reference Kampf G, Shaffer M, Hunte C: Insufficient neutralization in testing a chlorhexidin-containing ethanol-based hand rub can result in a false positive efficacy assessment. BMC Infect Dis. 2005, 5: 48-10.1186/1471-2334-5-48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kampf G, Shaffer M, Hunte C: Insufficient neutralization in testing a chlorhexidin-containing ethanol-based hand rub can result in a false positive efficacy assessment. BMC Infect Dis. 2005, 5: 48-10.1186/1471-2334-5-48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Eggerstedt S: Comparative efficacy of commercially available alcohol-based hand rubs and world health organization-recommended hand rubs. Am J Infect Contr. 2013, 41 (5): 472-474. 10.1016/j.ajic.2013.01.021.CrossRef Eggerstedt S: Comparative efficacy of commercially available alcohol-based hand rubs and world health organization-recommended hand rubs. Am J Infect Contr. 2013, 41 (5): 472-474. 10.1016/j.ajic.2013.01.021.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Goroncy-Bermes P, Koburger T, Meyer B: Impact of the amount of hand rub applied in hygienic hand disinfection on the reduction of microbial counts on hands. J Hosp Infect. 2010, 74 (3): 212-218. 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.09.018.CrossRefPubMed Goroncy-Bermes P, Koburger T, Meyer B: Impact of the amount of hand rub applied in hygienic hand disinfection on the reduction of microbial counts on hands. J Hosp Infect. 2010, 74 (3): 212-218. 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.09.018.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Kampf G, Kramer A: Epidemiologic background of hand hygiene and evaluation of the most important agents for scrubs and rubs. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004, 17 (4): 863-893. 10.1128/CMR.17.4.863-893.2004.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kampf G, Kramer A: Epidemiologic background of hand hygiene and evaluation of the most important agents for scrubs and rubs. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004, 17 (4): 863-893. 10.1128/CMR.17.4.863-893.2004.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Cheeseman KE, Denyer SP, Hosein IK, Williams GJ, Maillard JY: Evaluation of the bactericidal efficacy of three different alcohol hand rubs against 57 clinical isolates of S. aureus. J Hosp Infect. 2009, 72 (4): 319-325. 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.04.018.CrossRefPubMed Cheeseman KE, Denyer SP, Hosein IK, Williams GJ, Maillard JY: Evaluation of the bactericidal efficacy of three different alcohol hand rubs against 57 clinical isolates of S. aureus. J Hosp Infect. 2009, 72 (4): 319-325. 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.04.018.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Less and less–influence of volume on hand coverage and bactericidal efficacy in hand disinfection
Authors
Günter Kampf
Sigunde Ruselack
Sven Eggerstedt
Nicolas Nowak
Muhammad Bashir
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases / Issue 1/2013
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2334
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-13-472

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

BMC Infectious Diseases 1/2013 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine