Top

European Spine Journal

Published in:

Open Access 01-07-2020 | Leg Pain | Review Article

Clinical course of pain and disability following primary lumbar discectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors: A. Rushton, N. R. Heneghan, M. W. Heymans, J. B. Staal, P. Goodwin

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 7/2020

Abstract

Purpose

To conduct a meta-analysis to describe clinical course of pain and disability in adult patients post-lumbar discectomy (PROSPERO: CRD42015020806).

Methods

Sensitive topic-based search strategy designed for individual databases was conducted. Patients (> 16 years) following first-time lumbar discectomy for sciatica/radiculopathy with no complications, investigated in inception (point of surgery) prospective cohort studies, were included. Studies including revision surgery or not published in English were excluded. Two reviewers independently searched information sources, assessed eligibility at title/abstract and full-text stages, extracted data, assessed risk of bias (modified QUIPs) and assessed GRADE. Authors were contacted to request raw data where data/variance data were missing. Meta-analyses evaluated outcomes at all available time points using the variance-weighted mean in random-effect meta-analyses. Means and 95% CIs were plotted over time for measurements reported on outcomes of leg pain, back pain and disability.

Results

A total of 87 studies (n = 31,034) at risk of bias (49 moderate, 38 high) were included. Clinically relevant improvements immediately following surgery (> MCID) for leg pain (0–10, mean before surgery 7.04, 50 studies, n = 14,910 participants) and disability were identified (0–100, mean before surgery 53.33, 48 studies, n = 15,037). Back pain also improved (0–10, mean before surgery 4.72, 53 studies, n = 14,877). Improvement in all outcomes was maintained (to 7 years). Meta-regression analyses to assess the relationship between outcome data and a priori potential covariates found preoperative back pain and disability predictive for outcome.

Conclusion

Moderate-level evidence supports clinically relevant immediate improvement in leg pain and disability following lumbar discectomy with accompanying improvements in back pain.

Graphic abstract

These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Available only for authorised users

NICE (2016) Low back pain and sciatica in over 16s: assessment and management, NICE guideline [NG59]. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London

Foster NE, Anema JR, Cherkin D, Chou R, Cohen SP, Gross DP, Ferreira PH, Fritz JM, Koes BW, Peul W, Turner JA, Maher CG, Buchbinder R, Hartvigsen J, Cherkin D, Foster NE, Maher CG, Underwood M, van Tulder M, Anema JR, Chou R, Cohen SP, Menezes Costa L, Croft P, Ferreira M, Ferreira PH, Fritz JM, Genevay S, Gross DP, Hancock MJ, Hoy D, Karppinen J, Koes BW, Kongsted A, Louw Q, Öberg B, Peul WC, Pransky G, Schoene M, Sieper J, Smeets RJ, Turner JA, Woolf A (2018) Prevention and treatment of low back pain: evidence, challenges, and promising directions. The Lancet 391(10137):2368–2383. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30489-6 CrossRef

Oosterhuis T, Costa LOP, Maher CG, de Vet HCW, van Tulder MW, Ostelo RWJG (2014) Rehabilitation after lumbar disc surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003007.pub3 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ostelo RWGM, de Vet HC et al (2004) Economic evaluation of a behavioral-graded activity program compared to physical therapy for patients following lumbar disc surgery. Spine 29:615–622CrossRef

Orgaan CB (2008) The lumbosacral radicular syndrome. Centraal Begeleidings Orgaan Report. Dutch Institute for Healthcare Improvement

Online HES (2014) All procedures and interventions 2013/2014. 3 Character. All procedures [V33]. https://www.hscic.gov.uk/hes. Accessed 20 Jan 2016

McGregor AH, Burton AK, Sell P, Waddell G (2007) The development of an evidence-based patient booklet for patients undergoing lumbar discectomy and un-instrumented decompression. Eur Spine J 16(3):339–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0141-9 CrossRefPubMed

Williamson E, White L, Rushton A (2007) A survey of post-operative management for patients following first time lumbar discectomy. Eur Spine J 16(6):795–802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0207-8 CrossRefPubMed

Oosterhuis T, Ostelo RW, van Dongen JM, Peul WC, de Boer MR, Bosmans JE, Vleggeert-Lankamp CL, Arts MP, van Tulder MW (2017) Early rehabilitation after lumbar disc surgery is not effective or cost-effective compared to no referral: a randomised trial and economic evaluation. J Physiother 63(3):144–153CrossRef

10.

Sherman RE, Anderson SA, Dal Pan GJ, Gray GW, Gross T, Hunter NL, LaVange L, Marinac-Dabic D, Marks PW, Robb MA, Shuren J (2016) Real-world evidence—what is it and what can it tell us. N Engl J Med 375(23):2293–2297CrossRef

11.

World Health Organisation (2003) The burden of musculoskeletal conditions at the start of the new millennium. WHO Technical Report Series. WHO, Geneva

12.

Maniadakis N, Gray A (2000) The economic burden of back pain in the UK. Pain 84(1):95–103CrossRef

13.

Kongsted A, Kent P, Jensen TS, Albert H, Manniche C (2013) Prognostic implications of the Quebec Task Force classification of back-related leg pain: an analysis of longitudinal routine clinical data. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 14(1):171. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-171 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Outcomes by 3 Laminectomy, excision intervertebral disc (2012) https://hcupnet.ahrq/HCUPnet.jsp. Accessed 30 Apr 2015

15.

van Beek ELK, van Schooten G et al (2010) Reduceren van praktijkvariatie: budgettaire effecten van scherpere indicatiestelling. Reduceren van praktijkvariatie: budgettaire effecten van scherpere indicatiestelling. Plexus, Breukelen

16.

Sherman J, Cauthen J, Schoenberg D, Burns M, Reaven NL, Griffith SL (2010) Economic impact of improving outcomes of lumbar discectomy. Spine J 10(2):108–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2009.08.453 CrossRefPubMed

17.

Parker SL, Mendenhall SK, Godil SS, Sivasubramanian P, Cahill K, Ziewacz J, McGirt MJ (2015) Incidence of low back pain after lumbar discectomy for herniated disc and its effect on patient-reported outcomes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(6):1988–1999. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-015-4193-1 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Machado GC, Witzleb AJ, Fritsch C, Maher CG, Ferreira PH, Ferreira ML (2016) Patients with sciatica still experience pain and disability 5 years after surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis of cohort studies. Eur J Pain 20(10):1700–1709. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.893 CrossRefPubMed

19.

World Health Organisation (2001) International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. WHO, Geneva

20.

Rushton A, Heneghan N, Heijmans MW, Staal JB, Goodwin P (2016) Natural course of pain and disability following primary lumbar discectomy: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010571 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, Shekelle P, Stewart LA, Group P-P (2015) Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ 350:g7647. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7647 CrossRefPubMed

22.

Furlan APV, Bombardier C, from the Editorial Board of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group et al (2009) Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration back review group. Spine 34:1929–1941CrossRef

23.

Higgins JP, Green S (eds) (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of intervention. Version 5.1.0. Wiley, Hoboken

24.

Jonsson B, Stromqvist B (1994) Lumbar spine surgery in the elderly. Complications and surgical results. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19(13):1431–1435CrossRef

25.

van Tulder M, Furlan A, Bombardier C, Bouter L, Editorial Board of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review G (2003) Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the cochrane collaboration back review group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28(12):1290–1299. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000065484.95996.AF CrossRef

26.

Dissemination CFRA (2009) Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in healthcare, 3rd edn. University of York NHS Centre for Reviews & Dissemination, York

27.

Hayden JA, van der Windt DA, Cartwright JL, Cote P, Bombardier C (2013) Assessing bias in studies of prognostic factors. Ann Intern Med 158(4):280–286. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-158-4-201302190-00009 CrossRefPubMed

28.

Pengel LH, Herbert RD, Maher CG, Refshauge KM (2003) Acute low back pain: systematic review of its prognosis. BMJ 327(7410):323. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7410.323 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

29.

Iorio ASF, Falavigna M et al (2015) Use of GRADE for assessment of evidence about prognosis: rating confidence in estimates of event rates in broad categories of patients. BMJ 350:870CrossRef

30.

Huguet A, Hayden JA, Stinson J, McGrath PJ, Chambers CT, Tougas ME, Wozney L (2013) Judging the quality of evidence in reviews of prognostic factor research: adapting the GRADE framework. Syst Rev 2(1):71. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-71 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

den Boer JJ, Oostendorp RA, Beems T, Munneke M, Oerlemans M, Evers AW (2006) A systematic review of bio-psychosocial risk factors for an unfavourable outcome after lumbar disc surgery. Eur Spine J 15(5):527–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-005-0910-x CrossRef

32.

Rushton A, Zoulas K, Powell A, Bart Staal J (2018) Physical prognostic factors predicting outcome following lumbar discectomy surgery: systematic review and narrative synthesis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 19(1):326. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2240-2 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

33.

LA Moher D, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151(4):264–269CrossRef

34.

Peul WC, van Houwelingen HC, van den Hout WB, Brand R, Eekhof JA, Tans JT, Thomeer RT, Koes BW, Leiden-The Hague Spine Intervention Prognostic Study G (2007) Surgery versus prolonged conservative treatment for sciatica. N Engl J Med 356(22):2245–2256. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa064039 CrossRefPubMed

35.

Shamji MF, Shcharinsky A (2016) Use of neuropathic pain questionnaires in predicting persistent postoperative neuropathic pain following lumbar discectomy for radiculopathy. J Neurosurg Spine 24:256–262CrossRef

36.

Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, Thuku M, Hamel C, Moran J, Moher D, Tugwell P, Welch V, Kristjansson E, Henry DA (2017) AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ 358:j4008CrossRef

Title: Clinical course of pain and disability following primary lumbar discectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors: A. Rushton
N. R. Heneghan
M. W. Heymans
J. B. Staal
P. Goodwin
Publication date: 01-07-2020
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Keywords: Leg Pain
Leg Pain
Back Pain
Back Pain
Back Pain
Sciatica
Published in: European Spine Journal / Issue 7/2020
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06272-y

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Clinical course of pain and disability following primary lumbar discectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Graphic abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Graphic abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 7/2020

Correction to: Analysis of skull bone thickness during growth: an anatomical guide for safe pin placement in halo fixation

Percutaneous vertebroplasty as treatment of malignant vertebral lesions: a systematic review and GRADE evaluation resulting in a Danish national clinical guideline

Total disc replacement for lumbar degenerative disc disease: single centre 20 years experience

Spontaneous regression of calcified thoracic herniations: Can Hounsfield-units radiodensity have a predictive value?

Immuno-stimulatory capacity of decorin in the rat tail intervertebral disc and the mechanical consequence of resultant inflammation

Computed tomography imaging characteristics help to differentiate pyogenic spondylitis from brucellar spondylitis