Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Primary Care
Published in: BMC Primary Care 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Learning to use electronic health records: can we stay patient-centered? A pre-post intervention study with family medicine residents

Authors: Cédric Lanier, Melissa Dominicé Dao, Patricia Hudelson, Bernard Cerutti, Noëlle Junod Perron

Published in: BMC Primary Care | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The Electronic Health Record (EHR) is now widely used in clinical encounters. Because its use can negatively impact the physician-patient relationship, several recommendations on the “patient-centered” use of the EHR have been published. However, the impact of training to improve EHR use during clinical encounters is not well known. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of training on residents’ EHR-related communication skills and explore whether they varied according to the content of the consultation.

Methods

We conducted a pre-post intervention study at the Primary Care Division of the Geneva University Hospitals, Switzerland. Residents were invited to attend a 3-month training course that included 2 large group sessions and 2–4 individualized coaching sessions based on videotaped encounters. Outcomes were: 1) residents’ perceptions regarding the use of EHR, measured through a self-administered questionnaire and 2) objective use of the EHR during the first 10 min of patient encounters. Changes in practice were measured pre and post intervention using the Roter interaction analysis system (RIAS) and EHR specific items.

Results

Seventeen out of 27 residents took part in the study. Participants used EHR in about 30% of consultations. After training, they were less likely to consider EHR to be a barrier to the physician-patient relationship, and felt more comfortable using the EHR. After training, participants increased the use of signposting when using the EHR (pre: 0.77, SD 1.69; post: 1.80, SD3.35; p 0.035) and decreased EHR use when psychosocial issues appeared (pre: 24.5% and post: 9.76%, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

This study suggests that training can improve residents’ EHR-related communication skills, especially in situations where patients bring up sensitive psychosocial issues. Future research should focus on patients’ perceptions of the relevance and usefulness of such skills.
Literature
1.
Als AB. The desk-top computer as a magic box: patterns of behaviour connected with the desk-top computer; GPs’ and patients’ perceptions. Fam Pract. 1997;14:17–23.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Schoen C, Osborn R, Squires D, Doty M, Rasmussen P, Pierson R, Applebaum S. A survey of primary care doctors in ten countries shows progress in use of health information technology, less in other areas. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012;31:2805–16.CrossRef
3.
Xierali IM, Phillips Jr RL, Green LA, Bazemore AW, Puffer JC. Factors influencing family physician adoption of electronic health records (EHRs). J Am Board Fam Med. 2013;26:388–93.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Blumenthal D. Stimulating the Adoption of Health Information Technology. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1477–9.CrossRefPubMed
5.
McConnell H. International efforts in implementing national health information infrastructure and electronic health records. World Hosp Health Serv. 2004;40:33–7. 39–40, 50–52.PubMed
6.
Lippert S, Kverneland A. The Danish National Health Informatics Strategy. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2003;95:845–50.PubMed
7.
8.
Hippisley-Cox J, Pringle M, Cater R, Wynn A, Hammersley V, Coupland C, Hapgood R, Horsfield P, Teasdale S, Johnson C. The electronic patient record in primary care--regression or progression? A cross sectional study. Brit Med J. 2003;326:1439–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Kazmi Z. Effects of exam room EHR use on doctor-patient communication: a systematic literature review. Inform Prim Care. 2013;21:30–9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Sullivan F, Mitchell E. Has general practitioner computing made a difference to patient care? A systematic review of published reports. Brit Med J. 1995;311:848–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Burke HB, Sessums LL, Hoang A, Becher DA, Fontelo P, Liu F, Stephens M, Pangaro LN, O’Malley PG, Baxi NS, et al. Electronic health records improve clinical note quality. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015;22:199–205.PubMed
12.
Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, Maglione M, Mojica W, Roth E, Morton SC, Shekelle PG. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:742–52.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Crampton NH, Reis S, Shachak A. Computers in the clinical encounter: a scoping review and thematic analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016;23:654–65.CrossRefPubMed
14.
15.
Hersh WR. Medical informatics: improving health care through information. J Am Med Assoc. 2002;288:1955–8.CrossRef
16.
Arar NH, Wen L, McGrath J, Steinbach R, Pugh JA. Communicating about medications during primary care outpatient visits: the role of electronic medical records. Inform Prim Care. 2005;13:13–22.PubMed
17.
18.
Garcia-Sanchez R. The patient’s perspective of computerised records: a questionnaire survey in primary care. Inform Prim Care. 2008;16:93–9.PubMed
19.
Garrison GM, Bernard ME, Rasmussen NH. 21st-century health care: the effect of computer use by physicians on patient satisfaction at a family medicine clinic. Fam Med. 2002;34:362–8.PubMed
20.
Hsu J, Huang J, Fung V, Robertson N, Jimison H, Frankel R. Health information technology and physician-patient interactions: impact of computers on communication during outpatient primary care visits. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005;12:474–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Irani JS, Middleton JL, Marfatia R, Omana ET, D’Amico F. The use of electronic health records in the exam room and patient satisfaction: a systematic review. J Am Board Fam Med. 2009;22:553–62.CrossRefPubMed
22.
23.
Doyle RJ, Wang N, Anthony D, Borkan J, Shield RR, Goldman RE. Computers in the examination room and the electronic health record: physicians’ perceived impact on clinical encounters before and after full installation and implementation. Fam Pract. 2012;29:601–8.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Morton ME, Wiedenbeck S. EHR acceptance factors in ambulatory care: a survey of physician perceptions. Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2010;7:1c.PubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Shield RR, Goldman RE, Anthony DA, Wang N, Doyle RJ, Borkan J. Gradual electronic health record implementation: new insights on physician and patient adaptation. Ann Fam Med. 2010;8:316–26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Pearce C, Trumble S, Arnold M, Dwan K, Phillips C. Computers in the new consultation: within the first minute. Fam Pract. 2008;25:202–8.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Alkureishi MA, Lee WW, Lyons M, Press VG, Imam S, Nkansah-Amankra A, Werner D, Arora VM. Impact of Electronic Medical Record Use on the Patient-Doctor Relationship and Communication: A Systematic Review. J Gen Intern Med. 2016;31:548–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Booth N, Robinson P, Kohannejad J. Identification of high-quality consultation practice in primary care: the effects of computer use on doctor-patient rapport. Inform Prim Care. 2004;12:75–83.PubMed
29.
Greatbatch D, Heath C, Campion P, Luff P. How do desk-top computers affect the doctor-patient interaction? Fam Pract. 1995;12:32–6.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Margalit RS, Roter D, Dunevant MA, Larson S, Reis S. Electronic medical record use and physician-patient communication: an observational study of Israeli primary care encounters. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;61:134–41.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Warshawsky SS, Pliskin JS, Urkin J, Cohen N, Sharon A, Binztok M, Margolis CZ. Physician Use of a Computerized Medical Record System during the Patient Encounter - a Descriptive Study. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1994;43:269–73.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Sinsky CA, Beasley JW. Texting while doctoring: a patient safety hazard. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159:782–3.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Duke P, Frankel RM, Reis S. How to Integrate the Electronic Health Record and Patient-Centered Communication Into the Medical Visit: A Skills-Based Approach. Teach Learn Med. 2013;25:358–65.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Ventres W, Kooienga S, Marlin R. EHRs in the exam room: tips on patient-centered care. Fam Pract Manag. 2006;13:45–7.PubMed
35.
Silverman J, Kurtz S, Draper J. Skills for Communicating With Patients. 3 Revisedth ed. Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing Ltd; 2013.
36.
Stewart M, Brown JB, Donner A, McWhinney IR, Oates J, Weston WW, Jordan J. The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes. J Fam Pract. 2000;49:796–804.PubMed
37.
Nemeth LS, Feifer C, Stuart GW, Ornstein SM. Implementing change in primary care practices using electronic medical records: a conceptual framework. Implement Sci. 2008;3:3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
Shachak A, Hadas-Dayagi M, Ziv A, Reis S. Primary care physicians’ use of an electronic medical record system: a cognitive task analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24:341–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
Ventres W, Kooienga S, Marlin R, Vuckovic N, Stewart V. Clinician style and examination room computers: a video ethnography. Fam Med. 2005;37:276–81.PubMed
40.
Montague E, Asan O. Physician Interactions with Electronic Health Records in Primary Care. Health Syst (Basingstoke). 2012;1:96–103.CrossRef
41.
Triola MM, Friedman E, Cimino C, Geyer EM, Wiederhorn J, Mainiero C. Health information technology and the medical school curriculum. Am J Manag Care. 2010;16:54–6.
42.
Lown BA, Rodriguez D. Commentary: Lost in translation? How electronic health records structure communication, relationships, and meaning. Acad Med. 2012;87:392–4.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Tierney MJ, Pageler NM, Kahana M, Pantaleoni JL, Longhurst CA. Medical education in the electronic medical record (EMR) era: benefits, challenges, and future directions. Acad Med. 2013;88:748–52.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Wald HS, George P, Reis SP, Taylor JS. Electronic health record training in undergraduate medical education: bridging theory to practice with curricula for empowering patient- and relationship-centered care in the computerized setting. Acad Med. 2014;89:380–6.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Morrow JB, Dobbie AE, Jenkins C, Long R, Mihalic A, Wagner J. First-year medical students can demonstrate EHR-specific communication skills: a control-group study. Fam Med. 2009;41:28–33.PubMed
46.
Reis S, Sagi D, Eisenberg O, Kuchnir Y, Azuri J, Shalev V, Ziv A. The impact of residents’ training in Electronic Medical Record (EMR) use on their competence: Report of a pragmatic trial. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;93:515–21.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Han H, Waters T, Lopp L. Preserving Patient Relationship-centered Care while Utilizing EHRs. MedEdPORTAL Publications. 2014;10:9729.
48.
Silverman H, Ho Y-X, Kaib S, Ellis WD, Moffitt MP, Chen Q, Nian H, Gadd CS. A novel approach to supporting relationship-centered care through electronic health record ergonomic training in preclerkship medical education. Acad Med. 2014;89:1230–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
49.
Häyrinen K, Saranto K, Nykänen P. Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: a review of the research literature. Int J Med Inform. 2008;77:291–304.CrossRefPubMed
50.
51.
Rouf E, Whittle J, Lu N, Schwartz MD. Computers in the exam room: differences in physician-patient interaction may be due to physician experience. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:43–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
52.
Hackl WO, Hoerbst A, Ammenwerth E. “Why the hell do we need electronic health records?”. EHR acceptance among physicians in private practice in Austria: a qualitative study. Methods Inf Med. 2011;50:53–61.CrossRefPubMed
53.
King J, Patel V, Jamoom EW, Furukawa MF. Clinical benefits of electronic health record use: national findings. Health Serv Res. 2014;49:392–404.CrossRefPubMed
54.
El-Kareh R, Gandhi TK, Poon EG, Newmark LP, Ungar J, Lipsitz S, Sequist TD. Trends in Primary Care Clinician Perceptions of a New Electronic Health Record. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24:464–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
55.
Roter D, Larson S. The Roter interaction analysis system (RIAS): utility and flexibility for analysis of medical interactions. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;46:243–51.CrossRefPubMed
56.
57.
58.
Ventres W, Kooienga S, Vuckovic N, Marlin R, Nygren P, Stewart V. Physicians, patients, and the electronic health record: an ethnographic analysis. Ann Fam Med. 2006;4:124–31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
59.
Newman W, Button G, Cairns P. Pauses in doctor–patient conversation during computer use: The design significance of their durations and accompanying topic changes. Int J Hum Comput Stud. 2010;68:398–409.CrossRef
60.
Ong LM, Visser MR, Kruyver IP, Bensing JM, van den Brink-Muinen A, Stouthard JM, Lammes FB, de Haes JC. The Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS) in oncological consultations: psychometric properties. Psychooncology. 1998;7:387–401.CrossRefPubMed
61.
Asan O, Kushner K, Montague E. Exploring Residents’ Interactions With Electronic Health Records in Primary Care Encounters. Fam Med. 2015;47:722–6.PubMed
62.
63.
Floyd M, Lang F, Beine KL, McCord E. Evaluating interviewing techniques for the sexual practices history. Use of video trigger tapes to assess patient comfort. Arch Fam Med. 1999;8:218–23.CrossRefPubMed
64.
Levinson W, Roter DL, Mullooly JP, Dull VT, Frankel RM. Physician-patient communication. The relationship with malpractice claims among primary care physicians and surgeons. JAMA. 1997;277:553–9.CrossRefPubMed
65.
Cole SA, Bird J. The Medical Interview: The Three Function Approach. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2013.
66.
Roter DL, Larson S. The Relationship Between Residents’ and Attending Physicians’ Communication During Primary Care Visits: An Illustrative Use of the Roter Interaction Analysis System. Health Commun. 2001;13:33–48.CrossRefPubMed
67.
Asan O, Young HN, Chewning B, Montague E. How physician electronic health record screen sharing affects patient and doctor non-verbal communication in primary care. Patient Educ Couns. 2015;98:310–6.CrossRefPubMed
68.
Farber NJ, Liu L, Chen Y, Calvitti A, Street RL, Zuest D, Bell K, Gabuzda M, Gray B, Ashfaq S, et al. EHR use and patient satisfaction: What we learned. J Fam Pract. 2015;64:687–96.PubMed
69.
Zoppi K, Epstein RM. Is communication a skill? Communication behaviors and being in relation. Fam Med. 2002;34:319–24.PubMed
70.
Ruusuvuori J. Looking means listening: coordinating displays of engagement in doctor-patient interaction. Soc Sci Med. 2001;52:1093–108.
71.
Legler JD, Oates R. Patients’ reactions to physician use of a computerized medical record system during clinical encounters. J Fam Pract. 1993;37:241–4.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Learning to use electronic health records: can we stay patient-centered? A pre-post intervention study with family medicine residents
Authors
Cédric Lanier
Melissa Dominicé Dao
Patricia Hudelson
Bernard Cerutti
Noëlle Junod Perron
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Primary Care / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 2731-4553
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-017-0640-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Primary Care 1/2017 Go to the issue

Research article

The effectiveness of a primary care nursing-led dietary intervention for prediabetes: a mixed methods pilot study

Research article

Promoting independence, health and well-being for older people: a feasibility study of computer-aided health and social risk appraisal system in primary care

Research article

Recognition of depression by primary care clinicians in rural Ethiopia

Research article

“Was that a success or not a success?”: a qualitative study of health professionals’ perspectives on support for people with long-term conditions

Research article

Multimorbidity, clinical decision making and health care delivery in New Zealand Primary care: a qualitative study

Research article

Developing a community-based psycho-social intervention with older people and third sector workers for anxiety and depression: a qualitative study