Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research

Learning from OCTET – exploring the acceptability of clinical trials management methods

Authors: Catherine Arundel, Judith Gellatly

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Conducting research can be time consuming, difficult and challenging. Guidance and pragmatic advice focussing on randomised controlled trial conduct are available but do not necessarily constitute comprehensive guidance. A successful trial is one that recruits to time and target and collects high-quality data within the originally agreed budget. Standardised trial management tools have outlined key project management elements for a successful trial as a method of ensuring good practice in research trials: initiation, planning, execution, monitoring and closure. Lessons are also frequently learnt during the development and conduct of trials but rarely shared for the benefit of others.
For the wider research team, the key focus will always be on the execution and delivery of a study. The aim of this study was to evaluate the acceptability of clinical trials management methods, focussing on study execution and monitoring, as implemented in the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme-funded Obsessive Compulsive Treatment Efficacy Trial (OCTET).

Methods

Workshops, questionnaires and semi-structured interviews were used to explore acceptability of trial management methods with members of the OCTET Trial research team. Nine members participated in the focus group, 10 completed a questionnaire and 20 were interviewed as part of qualitative work for the main OCTET study. Data was collected and analysed using thematic analysis.

Results

Six key themes were identified: support; communication; processes; resources; training and ethos. Clear and open communication, enthusiasm and accessibility of the trial managers and chief investigator were consistently noted as an important facet of the successful running of the trial. Clear resources and training materials were also found to be crucial in helping staff to work within the trial setting. Constructive suggestions were also made for improvement of these resources; for example, including both checklists and flowcharts within trial processes.

Conclusion

Organisation, openness and positivity are crucial for executing a trial successfully, whilst clear and focussed processes and resources are essential in monitoring and controlling the trial progress. Although derived from a single study, these findings are likely to be applicable to the successful conduct of all trials. Trial managers should consider developing these elements when setting up a study.

Trial registration

Clinical Trial Registry, ID: ISRCTN73535163. Registered prospectively on 5 April 2011.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference McGovern DPB. Randomized controlled trials. In: McGovern DPB, Valori RM, Summerskill WSM, editors. Key topics in evidence based medicine. Oxford: BIOS Scientific Publishers; 2001. McGovern DPB. Randomized controlled trials. In: McGovern DPB, Valori RM, Summerskill WSM, editors. Key topics in evidence based medicine. Oxford: BIOS Scientific Publishers; 2001.
3.
go back to reference Prescott RJ Counsell CE, Gillespie WJ, Grant AM, Russell IT, Kiauka S, et al. Factors that limit the quality, number and progress of randomised controlled trials. Health Technol Assess. 1999;3(20):1–153.PubMed Prescott RJ Counsell CE, Gillespie WJ, Grant AM, Russell IT, Kiauka S, et al. Factors that limit the quality, number and progress of randomised controlled trials. Health Technol Assess. 1999;3(20):1–153.PubMed
4.
go back to reference UK Trial Managers Network. In: McDonald A, Farrell B, Booth G, Buckland S, Foster K, Harper L, et al., editors. The guide to efficient trial management; 2016. UK Trial Managers Network. In: McDonald A, Farrell B, Booth G, Buckland S, Foster K, Harper L, et al., editors. The guide to efficient trial management; 2016.
5.
go back to reference Campbell MK, Snowdon C, Francis D, Elbourne D, McDonald AM, Knight R, et al. Recruitment to randomised trials: strategies for trial enrolment and participation study: the STEPS study. Health Technol Assess. 2007;11:48.CrossRef Campbell MK, Snowdon C, Francis D, Elbourne D, McDonald AM, Knight R, et al. Recruitment to randomised trials: strategies for trial enrolment and participation study: the STEPS study. Health Technol Assess. 2007;11:48.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Project Managmenent Institute. A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK Guide). Newtown Square: Project Managmenent Institute; 2000. Project Managmenent Institute. A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK Guide). Newtown Square: Project Managmenent Institute; 2000.
9.
go back to reference Richardson B and Newman RW. Clinical trial management—an integrated process. Drug development. 2006. Richardson B and Newman RW. Clinical trial management—an integrated process. Drug development. 2006.
10.
go back to reference Goodarzynejad H, Babamahmoodi A. Project management of randomized controlled trials: a narrative review. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2015;17:8.CrossRef Goodarzynejad H, Babamahmoodi A. Project management of randomized controlled trials: a narrative review. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2015;17:8.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Chan YH. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs)—essentials. Singap Med J. 2003;44(2):60–3. Chan YH. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs)—essentials. Singap Med J. 2003;44(2):60–3.
12.
go back to reference Department of Health, editor. Research governance framework for health and social care. In: Department of Health, editor. 2nd ed. London: Department of Health; 2005. Department of Health, editor. Research governance framework for health and social care. In: Department of Health, editor. 2nd ed. London: Department of Health; 2005.
13.
go back to reference Martin P, Tate K. Not everything is a project. PM Netw. 2001;15(5):25. Martin P, Tate K. Not everything is a project. PM Netw. 2001;15(5):25.
15.
go back to reference Irving SY, Curley MA. Challenges to conducting multi centre clinical research: ten points to consider. AACN Adv Critic Care. 2008;19(2):164–9. Irving SY, Curley MA. Challenges to conducting multi centre clinical research: ten points to consider. AACN Adv Critic Care. 2008;19(2):164–9.
16.
go back to reference Smyth RMD Jacoby A, Altman DG, Gamble C, Williamson PR. The natural history of conducting and reporting clinical trials: interviews with trialists. Trials. 2015;16:16.CrossRef Smyth RMD Jacoby A, Altman DG, Gamble C, Williamson PR. The natural history of conducting and reporting clinical trials: interviews with trialists. Trials. 2015;16:16.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Gardiner PD, Stewart K. Revisiting the golden triangle of cost, time and quality: the role of NPV in project control, success and failure. Int J Proj Manag. 2000;18:4.CrossRef Gardiner PD, Stewart K. Revisiting the golden triangle of cost, time and quality: the role of NPV in project control, success and failure. Int J Proj Manag. 2000;18:4.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Payne JM France KE, Henley N, D’Aintoine HA, Bartu AE, Elliott EJ, Bower C. Researchers’ experience with project management in health and medical research: results from a post-project review. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:424.CrossRefPubMed Payne JM France KE, Henley N, D’Aintoine HA, Bartu AE, Elliott EJ, Bower C. Researchers’ experience with project management in health and medical research: results from a post-project review. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:424.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Obsessive-compulsive disorder and body dysmorphic disorder: treatment. In: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, editor. 2005. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Obsessive-compulsive disorder and body dysmorphic disorder: treatment. In: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, editor. 2005.
20.
go back to reference Gellatly J, Bower P, McMillan D, Roberts C, Byford S, Bee P, et al. Obsessive Compulsive Treatment Efficacy Trial (OCTET) comparing the clinical and cost effectiveness of self-managed therapies: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2014;15:278.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gellatly J, Bower P, McMillan D, Roberts C, Byford S, Bee P, et al. Obsessive Compulsive Treatment Efficacy Trial (OCTET) comparing the clinical and cost effectiveness of self-managed therapies: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2014;15:278.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Lovell K, Bower P, Gellatly J, Byford S, Bee P, McMillan D, et al. Clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and acceptability of low-intensity interventions in the management of obsessive compulsive disorder: the Obsessive Compulsive Treatment Efficacy randomised controlled Trial (OCTET). Health Technol Assess. 2017;21:37.CrossRef Lovell K, Bower P, Gellatly J, Byford S, Bee P, McMillan D, et al. Clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and acceptability of low-intensity interventions in the management of obsessive compulsive disorder: the Obsessive Compulsive Treatment Efficacy randomised controlled Trial (OCTET). Health Technol Assess. 2017;21:37.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Goodman WK Price LH, Rasmussen SA, Mazure C, Fleischmann RL, Hill CL, et al. The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale: development, use and reliability. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1989;46:1006–11.CrossRefPubMed Goodman WK Price LH, Rasmussen SA, Mazure C, Fleischmann RL, Hill CL, et al. The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale: development, use and reliability. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1989;46:1006–11.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Learning from OCTET – exploring the acceptability of clinical trials management methods
Authors
Catherine Arundel
Judith Gellatly
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2765-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Trials 1/2018 Go to the issue