Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 12/2020

01-12-2020 | Laser | Review Article

Photobiomodulation in oral mucositis in patients with head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis followed by a cost-effectiveness analysis

Authors: Thalita Molinos Campos, Carolina Antunes do Prado Tavares Silva, Ana Paula Taboada Sobral, Sergio Sousa Sobral, Maria Fernanda Setúbal Destro Rodrigues, Sandra Kalil Bussadori, Kristianne Porta Santos Fernandes, Raquel Angnelli Mesquita-Ferrari, Anna Carolina Ratto Tempestini Horliana, Lara Jansiski Motta

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 12/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Oral mucositis (OM) is an oral toxicity caused by cancer treatment, found often in patients with head and neck cancer. Low-intensity laser therapy for OM has anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and tissue reparative properties.

Objective

The objective of this work is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the randomized clinical trials of OM laser therapy in patients undergoing treatment for head and neck cancers, followed by a cost-effectiveness analysis of the therapy.

Method

The search terms, mucositis and phototherapy, laser therapy and mucositis, photobiomodulation and mucositis, and low-level laser therapy and mucositis, were used to search the databases of PubMed, Web of Science, and MEDLINE. Randomized clinical trials were divided into two groups: one treated with laser therapy and the other given a placebo. Only 13 studies were included in the systematic review, and 6 studies in the meta-analysis.

Results

The results of the systematic review and meta-analysis show that the laser therapy presented good results in clinical improvement and pain reduction, decreasing the patients’ likelihood of developing OM, with degrees of debilitating lesions, to 64% (RR = 0.36 [95% CI = 0.29–0.44]). The cost-effectiveness analysis revealed an incremental cost of R$ 3687.53 for the laser group, with an incremental effectiveness of 132.2. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was 27.89, for the severe OM cases that were avoided.

Conclusion

It was concluded, therefore, that photobiomodulation for OM in patients receiving head and neck cancer treatment was clinically effective and cost-effective.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
14.
go back to reference Husereau D, Drummond M, Petrou S, Carswell C, Moher D, Greenberg D, Augustovski F, Briggs AH, Mauskopf J, Loder E, ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines-CHEERS Good Reporting Practices Task Force (2013) Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards (CHEERS) explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR health economic evaluations publication guidelines good reporting practices task force. Value Health 16(2):231–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2013.02.002CrossRefPubMed Husereau D, Drummond M, Petrou S, Carswell C, Moher D, Greenberg D, Augustovski F, Briggs AH, Mauskopf J, Loder E, ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines-CHEERS Good Reporting Practices Task Force (2013) Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards (CHEERS) explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR health economic evaluations publication guidelines good reporting practices task force. Value Health 16(2):231–250. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jval.​2013.​02.​002CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Claxton K et al (2015) Methods for the economic evaluation of health care Programmes. Oxford University Press Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Claxton K et al (2015) Methods for the economic evaluation of health care Programmes. Oxford University Press
16.
go back to reference Brazil Ministry of Health (2012) Executive secretary. Economic Area of Health and Development Brazil Ministry of Health (2012) Executive secretary. Economic Area of Health and Development
20.
go back to reference Gautam AP, Fernandes DJ, Vidyasagar MS, Maiya AG, Nigudgi S (2013) Effect of low-level laser therapy on patient reported measures of oral mucositis and quality of life in head and neck cancer patients receiving chemoradiotherapy—a randomized controlled trial. Support Care Cancer 21:1421–1428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1684-4CrossRefPubMed Gautam AP, Fernandes DJ, Vidyasagar MS, Maiya AG, Nigudgi S (2013) Effect of low-level laser therapy on patient reported measures of oral mucositis and quality of life in head and neck cancer patients receiving chemoradiotherapy—a randomized controlled trial. Support Care Cancer 21:1421–1428. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00520-012-1684-4CrossRefPubMed
25.
32.
go back to reference Genot-Klastersky MT, Klastersky J, Awada F et al The use of low-energy laser (LEL) for the prevention of chemotherapy- and/or radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis in cancer patients: results from two prospective studies. Support Care Cancer 16(12):1381–1387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-008-0439-8 Genot-Klastersky MT, Klastersky J, Awada F et al The use of low-energy laser (LEL) for the prevention of chemotherapy- and/or radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis in cancer patients: results from two prospective studies. Support Care Cancer 16(12):1381–1387. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00520-008-0439-8
33.
go back to reference Simões A, Eduardo FP, Luiz AC, Campos L, Sá PHRN, Cristófaro M, Marques MM, Eduardo CP (2009) Laser phototherapy as topical prophylaxis against head and neck cancer radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis: comparison between low and high/low power lasers. Lasers Surg Med 41(4):264–270. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.20758CrossRefPubMed Simões A, Eduardo FP, Luiz AC, Campos L, Sá PHRN, Cristófaro M, Marques MM, Eduardo CP (2009) Laser phototherapy as topical prophylaxis against head and neck cancer radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis: comparison between low and high/low power lasers. Lasers Surg Med 41(4):264–270. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​lsm.​20758CrossRefPubMed
43.
Metadata
Title
Photobiomodulation in oral mucositis in patients with head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis followed by a cost-effectiveness analysis
Authors
Thalita Molinos Campos
Carolina Antunes do Prado Tavares Silva
Ana Paula Taboada Sobral
Sergio Sousa Sobral
Maria Fernanda Setúbal Destro Rodrigues
Sandra Kalil Bussadori
Kristianne Porta Santos Fernandes
Raquel Angnelli Mesquita-Ferrari
Anna Carolina Ratto Tempestini Horliana
Lara Jansiski Motta
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Keyword
Laser
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 12/2020
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05613-8

Other articles of this Issue 12/2020

Supportive Care in Cancer 12/2020 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine