Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Systematic Reviews 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Laryngoscopy | Research

Video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in achieving successful emergency endotracheal intubations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Authors: Mohammed Alsabri, Omar Ahmed Abdelwahab, Ahmed Bostamy Elsnhory, Rehab Adel Diab, Vaishnavi Sabesan, Muhammad Ayyan, Christopher McClean, Ayman Alhadheri

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Intubating a patient in an emergent setting presents significant challenges compared to planned intubation in an operating room. This study aims to compare video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in achieving successful endotracheal intubation on the first attempt in emergency intubations, irrespective of the clinical setting.

Methods

We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception until 27 February 2023. We included only randomized controlled trials that included patients who had undergone emergent endotracheal intubation for any indication, regardless of the clinical setting. We used the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool 2 (ROB2) to assess the included studies. We used the mean difference (MD) and risk ratio (RR), with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI), to pool the continuous and dichotomous variables, respectively.

Results

Fourteen studies were included with a total of 2470 patients. The overall analysis favored video laryngoscopy over direct laryngoscopy in first-attempt success rate (RR = 1.09, 95% CI [1.02, 1.18], P = 0.02), first-attempt intubation time (MD =  − 6.92, 95% CI [− 12.86, − 0.99], P = 0.02), intubation difficulty score (MD =  − 0.62, 95% CI [− 0.86, − 0.37], P < 0.001), peri-intubation percentage of glottis opening (MD = 24.91, 95% CI [11.18, 38.64], P < 0.001), upper airway injuries (RR = 0.15, 95% CI [0.04, 0.56], P = 0.005), and esophageal intubation (RR = 0.37, 95% CI [0.15, 0.94], P = 0.04). However, no difference between the two groups was found regarding the overall intubation success rate (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

In emergency intubations, video laryngoscopy is preferred to direct laryngoscopy in achieving successful intubation on the first attempt and was associated with a lower incidence of complications.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lee JH, Turner DA, Kamat P, Nett S, Shults J, Rehder KJ. The number of tracheal intubation attempts matters! A prospective multi-institutional pediatric observational study. BMC Pediatr. 2016;16:58. Lee JH, Turner DA, Kamat P, Nett S, Shults J, Rehder KJ. The number of tracheal intubation attempts matters! A prospective multi-institutional pediatric observational study. BMC Pediatr. 2016;16:58.
3.
go back to reference Choi HJ, Je SM, Kim JH, et al. The factors associated with successful paediatric endotracheal intubation on the first attempt in emergency departments: a 13-emergency-department registry study. Resuscitation. 2012;83:1363–8.PubMedCrossRef Choi HJ, Je SM, Kim JH, et al. The factors associated with successful paediatric endotracheal intubation on the first attempt in emergency departments: a 13-emergency-department registry study. Resuscitation. 2012;83:1363–8.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Long E, Sabato S, Babl FE. Endotracheal intubation in the pediatric emergency department. Paediatr Anaesth. 2014;24:1204–11.PubMedCrossRef Long E, Sabato S, Babl FE. Endotracheal intubation in the pediatric emergency department. Paediatr Anaesth. 2014;24:1204–11.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kerrey BT, Rinderknecht AS, Geis GL, et al. Rapid sequence intubation for pediatric emergency patients: higher frequency of failed attempts and adverse effects found by video review. Ann Emerg Med. 2012;60:251–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Kerrey BT, Rinderknecht AS, Geis GL, et al. Rapid sequence intubation for pediatric emergency patients: higher frequency of failed attempts and adverse effects found by video review. Ann Emerg Med. 2012;60:251–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Soares WE 3rd, Knowles KJ 2nd, Friedmann PD. A thousand cuts: racial and ethnic disparities in emergency medicine. Med Care. 2019;57(12):921–3. Soares WE 3rd, Knowles KJ 2nd, Friedmann PD. A thousand cuts: racial and ethnic disparities in emergency medicine. Med Care. 2019;57(12):921–3.
7.
go back to reference Sakles JC, Chiu S, Mosier J, Walker C, Stolz U. The importance of first pass success when performing orotracheal intubation in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2013;20(1):71–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Sakles JC, Chiu S, Mosier J, Walker C, Stolz U. The importance of first pass success when performing orotracheal intubation in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2013;20(1):71–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hasegawa K, Shigemitsu K, Hagiwara Y, Chiba T, Watase H, Brown CA 3rd, et al. Association between repeated intubation attempts and adverse events in emergency departments: an analysis of a multicenter prospective observational study. Ann Emerg Med. 2012;60(6):749–754.e2.PubMedCrossRef Hasegawa K, Shigemitsu K, Hagiwara Y, Chiba T, Watase H, Brown CA 3rd, et al. Association between repeated intubation attempts and adverse events in emergency departments: an analysis of a multicenter prospective observational study. Ann Emerg Med. 2012;60(6):749–754.e2.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Nalubola S, Jin E, Drugge ED, Weber G, Abramowicz AE. Video versus direct laryngoscopy in novice intubators: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cureus. 2022;14(9):e29578. Nalubola S, Jin E, Drugge ED, Weber G, Abramowicz AE. Video versus direct laryngoscopy in novice intubators: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cureus. 2022;14(9):e29578.
10.
go back to reference Ba X. A meta-analysis on the effectiveness of video laryngoscopy versus laryngoscopy for emergency orotracheal intubation. J Healthc Eng. 2022;2022:1474298. Ba X. A meta-analysis on the effectiveness of video laryngoscopy versus laryngoscopy for emergency orotracheal intubation. J Healthc Eng. 2022;2022:1474298.
11.
go back to reference Pourmand A, Terrebonne E, Gerber S, Shipley J, Tran QK. Efficacy of video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in the prehospital setting: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2023;38(1):111–21.CrossRef Pourmand A, Terrebonne E, Gerber S, Shipley J, Tran QK. Efficacy of video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in the prehospital setting: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2023;38(1):111–21.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kim JG, Ahn C, Kim W, Lim T-H, Jang B-H, Cho Y, et al. Comparison of video laryngoscopy with direct laryngoscopy for intubation success in critically ill patients: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis. Front Med. 2023;10:1193514. Kim JG, Ahn C, Kim W, Lim T-H, Jang B-H, Cho Y, et al. Comparison of video laryngoscopy with direct laryngoscopy for intubation success in critically ill patients: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis. Front Med. 2023;10:1193514.
13.
go back to reference Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;88:105906. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;88:105906.
14.
go back to reference Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.2 (updated February 2021). Cochrane Handbook Syst Rev Interventions. 2021. Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.2 (updated February 2021). Cochrane Handbook Syst Rev Interventions. 2021.
15.
go back to reference Miller SA, Forrest JL. Enhancing your practice through evidence-based decision making: PICO, learning how to ask good questions. J Evidence-Based Dent Prac. 2001;1:136.CrossRef Miller SA, Forrest JL. Enhancing your practice through evidence-based decision making: PICO, learning how to ask good questions. J Evidence-Based Dent Prac. 2001;1:136.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;28:366. Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;28:366.
17.
go back to reference Brown CA, Kaji AH, Fantegrossi A, et al. Video laryngoscopy compared to augmented direct laryngoscopy in adult emergency department tracheal intubations: a National Emergency Airway Registry (NEAR) study. Acad Emerg Med. 2020;27:100.PubMedCrossRef Brown CA, Kaji AH, Fantegrossi A, et al. Video laryngoscopy compared to augmented direct laryngoscopy in adult emergency department tracheal intubations: a National Emergency Airway Registry (NEAR) study. Acad Emerg Med. 2020;27:100.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Ahmadi K, Ebrahimi M, Hashemian AM, Sarshar S, Rahimi-Movaghar V. Glidescope video laryngoscope for difficult intubation in emergency patients: a quasi-randomized controlled trial. Acta Med Iran. 2015;53:738.PubMed Ahmadi K, Ebrahimi M, Hashemian AM, Sarshar S, Rahimi-Movaghar V. Glidescope video laryngoscope for difficult intubation in emergency patients: a quasi-randomized controlled trial. Acta Med Iran. 2015;53:738.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Ajith P, Bandyopadhyay A, Meena SC, Jain K, Aggarwal S, Gupta SK. Direct laryngoscope versus McGRATH video-laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in trauma emergency: a randomised control trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2022;56:353–5.PubMedCrossRef Ajith P, Bandyopadhyay A, Meena SC, Jain K, Aggarwal S, Gupta SK. Direct laryngoscope versus McGRATH video-laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in trauma emergency: a randomised control trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2022;56:353–5.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Arima T, Nagata O, Miura T, et al. Comparative analysis of airway scope and Macintosh laryngoscope for intubation primarily for cardiac arrest in prehospital setting. Am J Emerg Med. 2014;32:40.PubMedCrossRef Arima T, Nagata O, Miura T, et al. Comparative analysis of airway scope and Macintosh laryngoscope for intubation primarily for cardiac arrest in prehospital setting. Am J Emerg Med. 2014;32:40.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Driver BE, Prekker ME, Moore JC, Schick AL, Reardon RF, Miner JR. Direct versus video laryngoscopy using the C-MAC for tracheal intubation in the emergency department, a randomized controlled trial. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2016;23:433.PubMedCrossRef Driver BE, Prekker ME, Moore JC, Schick AL, Reardon RF, Miner JR. Direct versus video laryngoscopy using the C-MAC for tracheal intubation in the emergency department, a randomized controlled trial. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2016;23:433.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Goksu E, Kilic T, Yildiz G, Unal A, Kartal M. Comparison of the C-MAC video laryngoscope to the Macintosh laryngoscope for intubation of blunt trauma patients in the ED. Turk J Emerg Med. 2016;16:53.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Goksu E, Kilic T, Yildiz G, Unal A, Kartal M. Comparison of the C-MAC video laryngoscope to the Macintosh laryngoscope for intubation of blunt trauma patients in the ED. Turk J Emerg Med. 2016;16:53.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Ilbagi M, Nasr-Esfahani M. The efficacy of using video laryngoscopy on tracheal intubation by novice physicians. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2021;33:37.PubMedPubMedCentral Ilbagi M, Nasr-Esfahani M. The efficacy of using video laryngoscopy on tracheal intubation by novice physicians. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2021;33:37.PubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Kim JW, Park SO, Lee KR, et al. Video laryngoscopy vs. direct laryngoscopy: which should be chosen for endotracheal intubation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation? A prospective randomized controlled study of experienced intubators. Resuscitation. 2016;105:196.PubMedCrossRef Kim JW, Park SO, Lee KR, et al. Video laryngoscopy vs. direct laryngoscopy: which should be chosen for endotracheal intubation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation? A prospective randomized controlled study of experienced intubators. Resuscitation. 2016;105:196.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Loughnan A, Deng C, Dominick F, Pencheva L, Campbell D. A single-centre, randomised controlled feasibility pilot trial comparing performance of direct laryngoscopy versus videolaryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation in surgical patients. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019;5:50.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Loughnan A, Deng C, Dominick F, Pencheva L, Campbell D. A single-centre, randomised controlled feasibility pilot trial comparing performance of direct laryngoscopy versus videolaryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation in surgical patients. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019;5:50.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Macke C, Gralla F, Winkelmann M, et al. Increased first pass success with c-mac videolaryngoscopy in prehospital endotracheal intubation—a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Med. 2020;9:2719.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Macke C, Gralla F, Winkelmann M, et al. Increased first pass success with c-mac videolaryngoscopy in prehospital endotracheal intubation—a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Med. 2020;9:2719.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Noppens RR, Geimer S, Eisel N, David M, Piepho T. Endotracheal intubation using the C-MAC ®video laryngoscope or the Macintosh laryngoscope: a prospective, comparative study in the ICU. Crit Care. 2012;16:R103.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Noppens RR, Geimer S, Eisel N, David M, Piepho T. Endotracheal intubation using the C-MAC ®video laryngoscope or the Macintosh laryngoscope: a prospective, comparative study in the ICU. Crit Care. 2012;16:R103.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Sanguanwit P, Yuksen C, Laowattana N. Direct versus video laryngoscopy in emergency intubation: a randomized control trial study. Bull Emerg Trauma. 2021;9:118.PubMedPubMedCentral Sanguanwit P, Yuksen C, Laowattana N. Direct versus video laryngoscopy in emergency intubation: a randomized control trial study. Bull Emerg Trauma. 2021;9:118.PubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Sulser S, Ubmann D, Schlaepfer M, et al. C-MAC videolaryngoscope compared with direct laryngoscopy for rapid sequence intubation in an emergency department: a randomised clinical trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016;33:943.PubMedCrossRef Sulser S, Ubmann D, Schlaepfer M, et al. C-MAC videolaryngoscope compared with direct laryngoscopy for rapid sequence intubation in an emergency department: a randomised clinical trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016;33:943.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Sun Y, Zhang S, Lin B. A comparison of the video laryngoscope to the direct laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation in emergency department patients. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2020;13:9151–8 Cited 2023 Jul 22. Sun Y, Zhang S, Lin B. A comparison of the video laryngoscope to the direct laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation in emergency department patients. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2020;13:9151–8 Cited 2023 Jul 22.
31.
go back to reference Yeatts DJ, Dutton RP, Hu PF, Chang YW, Brown CH, Chen H, et al. Effect of video laryngoscopy on trauma patient survival: a randomized controlled trial. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;75(2):212–9.PubMedCrossRef Yeatts DJ, Dutton RP, Hu PF, Chang YW, Brown CH, Chen H, et al. Effect of video laryngoscopy on trauma patient survival: a randomized controlled trial. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;75(2):212–9.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Okamoto H, Goto T, Wong ZSY, Hagiwara Y, Watase H, Hasegawa K. Comparison of video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for intubation in emergency department patients with cardiac arrest: a multicentre study. Resuscitation. 2019;136:70.PubMedCrossRef Okamoto H, Goto T, Wong ZSY, Hagiwara Y, Watase H, Hasegawa K. Comparison of video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for intubation in emergency department patients with cardiac arrest: a multicentre study. Resuscitation. 2019;136:70.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Sakles JC, Mosier JM, Chiu S, Keim SM. Tracheal intubation in the emergency department: a comparison of GlideScope® video laryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy in 822 intubations. J Emerg Med. 2012;42:400.PubMedCrossRef Sakles JC, Mosier JM, Chiu S, Keim SM. Tracheal intubation in the emergency department: a comparison of GlideScope® video laryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy in 822 intubations. J Emerg Med. 2012;42:400.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Michailidou M, O’Keeffe T, Mosier JM, et al. A comparison of video laryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy for the emergency intubation of trauma patients. World J Surg. 2015;39:782.PubMedCrossRef Michailidou M, O’Keeffe T, Mosier JM, et al. A comparison of video laryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy for the emergency intubation of trauma patients. World J Surg. 2015;39:782.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Trent SA, Kaji AH, Carlson JN, McCormick T, Haukoos JS, Brown CA. Video laryngoscopy is associated with first-pass success in emergency department intubations for trauma patients: a propensity score matched analysis of the National Emergency Airway Registry. Ann Emerg Med. 2021;78:708.PubMedCrossRef Trent SA, Kaji AH, Carlson JN, McCormick T, Haukoos JS, Brown CA. Video laryngoscopy is associated with first-pass success in emergency department intubations for trauma patients: a propensity score matched analysis of the National Emergency Airway Registry. Ann Emerg Med. 2021;78:708.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Vaishnavi B, Syal R, Vyas R, Bihani P. Awake intubation with C-MAC videolaryngoscope in a patient with difficult airway. Indian J Anaesth. 2021;65:253.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Vaishnavi B, Syal R, Vyas R, Bihani P. Awake intubation with C-MAC videolaryngoscope in a patient with difficult airway. Indian J Anaesth. 2021;65:253.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Aziz MF, Dillman D, Fu R, Brambrink Angasar M. Comparative effectiveness of the C-MAC video laryngoscope versus direct laryngoscopy in the setting of the predicted difficult airway. Anesthesiology. 2012;116:629.PubMedCrossRef Aziz MF, Dillman D, Fu R, Brambrink Angasar M. Comparative effectiveness of the C-MAC video laryngoscope versus direct laryngoscopy in the setting of the predicted difficult airway. Anesthesiology. 2012;116:629.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Ray A, Sen IM, Bhardwaj N, Yaddanapudi S, Mathews P. Videolaryngoscopic versus direct laryngoscopic paraglossal intubation for cleft lip/palate reconstructive surgeries: a randomised controlled trial. Indian J Anaesth. 2021;65:593.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Ray A, Sen IM, Bhardwaj N, Yaddanapudi S, Mathews P. Videolaryngoscopic versus direct laryngoscopic paraglossal intubation for cleft lip/palate reconstructive surgeries: a randomised controlled trial. Indian J Anaesth. 2021;65:593.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Park R, Peyton JM, Fiadjoe JE, et al. The efficacy of GlideScope ® videolaryngoscopy compared with direct laryngoscopy in children who are difficult to intubate: an analysis from the Paediatric Difficult Intubation Registry. Br J Anaesth. 2017;119:984.PubMedCrossRef Park R, Peyton JM, Fiadjoe JE, et al. The efficacy of GlideScope ® videolaryngoscopy compared with direct laryngoscopy in children who are difficult to intubate: an analysis from the Paediatric Difficult Intubation Registry. Br J Anaesth. 2017;119:984.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Jagannathan N, Hajduk J, Sohn L, et al. Randomized equivalence trial of the King Vision aBlade videolaryngoscope with the Miller direct laryngoscope for routine tracheal intubation in children <2 yr of age. Br J Anaesth. 2017;118:932.PubMedCrossRef Jagannathan N, Hajduk J, Sohn L, et al. Randomized equivalence trial of the King Vision aBlade videolaryngoscope with the Miller direct laryngoscope for routine tracheal intubation in children <2 yr of age. Br J Anaesth. 2017;118:932.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Vlatten A, Aucoin S, Litz S, MacManus B, Soder C. A comparison of the STORZ video laryngoscope and standard direct laryngoscopy for intubation in the pediatric airway - a randomized clinical trial. Paediatr Anaesth. 2009;19:1102.PubMedCrossRef Vlatten A, Aucoin S, Litz S, MacManus B, Soder C. A comparison of the STORZ video laryngoscope and standard direct laryngoscopy for intubation in the pediatric airway - a randomized clinical trial. Paediatr Anaesth. 2009;19:1102.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Kim JT, Na HS, Bae JY, et al. GlideScope® video laryngoscope: a randomized clinical trial in 203 paediatric patients. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101:531.PubMedCrossRef Kim JT, Na HS, Bae JY, et al. GlideScope® video laryngoscope: a randomized clinical trial in 203 paediatric patients. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101:531.PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Fiadjoe JE, Gurnaney H, Dalesio N, et al. A prospective randomized equivalence trial of the GlideScope Cobalt® video laryngoscope to traditional direct laryngoscopy in neonates and infants. Anesthesiology. 2012;116:622.PubMedCrossRef Fiadjoe JE, Gurnaney H, Dalesio N, et al. A prospective randomized equivalence trial of the GlideScope Cobalt® video laryngoscope to traditional direct laryngoscopy in neonates and infants. Anesthesiology. 2012;116:622.PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Sakles JC, Javedani PP, Chase E, Garst-Orozco J, Guillen-Rodriguez JM, Stolz U. The use of a video laryngoscope by emergency medicine residents is associated with a reduction in esophageal intubations in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2015;22:700.PubMedCrossRef Sakles JC, Javedani PP, Chase E, Garst-Orozco J, Guillen-Rodriguez JM, Stolz U. The use of a video laryngoscope by emergency medicine residents is associated with a reduction in esophageal intubations in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2015;22:700.PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Lee DH, Han M, An JY, et al. Video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation during in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2015;89:195.PubMedCrossRef Lee DH, Han M, An JY, et al. Video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation during in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2015;89:195.PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Downey AW, Duggan LV, Adam Law J. A systematic review of meta-analyses comparing direct laryngoscopy with videolaryngoscopy. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia. 2021;68:706.PubMedCrossRef Downey AW, Duggan LV, Adam Law J. A systematic review of meta-analyses comparing direct laryngoscopy with videolaryngoscopy. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia. 2021;68:706.PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Hansel J, Rogers AM, Lewis SR, Cook TM, Smith AF. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022;4(4):CD011136. Hansel J, Rogers AM, Lewis SR, Cook TM, Smith AF. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022;4(4):CD011136.
48.
go back to reference Bhattacharjee S, Maitra S, Baidya DK. A comparison between video laryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation in the emergency department: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Anesth. 2018;47:21.PubMedCrossRef Bhattacharjee S, Maitra S, Baidya DK. A comparison between video laryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation in the emergency department: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Anesth. 2018;47:21.PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Huang HB, Peng JM, Xu B, Liu GY, Du B. Video laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation of critically ill adults: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Chest. 2017;152:510.PubMedCrossRef Huang HB, Peng JM, Xu B, Liu GY, Du B. Video laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation of critically ill adults: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Chest. 2017;152:510.PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Arulkumaran N, Lowe J, Ions R, Mendoza M, Bennett V, Dunser MW. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for emergency orotracheal intubation outside the operating room: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2018;12:712.CrossRef Arulkumaran N, Lowe J, Ions R, Mendoza M, Bennett V, Dunser MW. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for emergency orotracheal intubation outside the operating room: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2018;12:712.CrossRef
51.
go back to reference De Jong A, Molinari N, Conseil M, et al. Video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for orotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40:629.PubMed De Jong A, Molinari N, Conseil M, et al. Video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for orotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40:629.PubMed
52.
go back to reference Griesdale DEG, Liu D, McKinney J, Choi PT. Glidescope ® video-laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anesth. 2012;59:41.PubMedCrossRef Griesdale DEG, Liu D, McKinney J, Choi PT. Glidescope ® video-laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anesth. 2012;59:41.PubMedCrossRef
53.
go back to reference Healy DW, Maties O, Hovord D, Kheterpal S. A systematic review of the role of videolaryngoscopy in successful orotracheal intubation. BMC Anesthesiol. 2012;12:32.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Healy DW, Maties O, Hovord D, Kheterpal S. A systematic review of the role of videolaryngoscopy in successful orotracheal intubation. BMC Anesthesiol. 2012;12:32.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Hoshijima H, Kuratani N, Hirabayashi Y, Takeuchi R, Shiga T, Masaki E. Pentax Airway Scope® vs Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in adult patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anaesthesia. 2014;69:911.PubMedCrossRef Hoshijima H, Kuratani N, Hirabayashi Y, Takeuchi R, Shiga T, Masaki E. Pentax Airway Scope® vs Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in adult patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anaesthesia. 2014;69:911.PubMedCrossRef
55.
go back to reference Hoshijima H, Denawa Y, Tominaga A, Nakamura C, Shiga T, Nagasaka H. Videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in adults with obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth J Clin Anesth. 2018;44:69–75. Cited 2023 Jul 22.PubMedCrossRef Hoshijima H, Denawa Y, Tominaga A, Nakamura C, Shiga T, Nagasaka H. Videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in adults with obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth J Clin Anesth. 2018;44:69–75. Cited 2023 Jul 22.PubMedCrossRef
56.
go back to reference Thim T, Krarup NHV, Grove EL, Rohde CV, Lofgren B. Initial assessment and treatment with the Airway, Breathing, Circulation, Disability, Exposure (ABCDE) approach. Int J Gen Med. 2012;5:117.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Thim T, Krarup NHV, Grove EL, Rohde CV, Lofgren B. Initial assessment and treatment with the Airway, Breathing, Circulation, Disability, Exposure (ABCDE) approach. Int J Gen Med. 2012;5:117.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in achieving successful emergency endotracheal intubations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Authors
Mohammed Alsabri
Omar Ahmed Abdelwahab
Ahmed Bostamy Elsnhory
Rehab Adel Diab
Vaishnavi Sabesan
Muhammad Ayyan
Christopher McClean
Ayman Alhadheri
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02500-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Systematic Reviews 1/2024 Go to the issue