Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 9/2009

01-09-2009 | Research Article

LapBand System® in Super-Superobese Patients (>60 kg/m2): 4-Year Results

Authors: Fiore Torchia, Vincenza Mancuso, Simona Civitelli, Antonio Di Maro, Pasquale Cariello, Pasquale Tricarico Rosano, Giuseppe Ciriaco Sionne, Michele Lorenzo, Antonio J. Cascardo

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 9/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Bariatric surgery in superobese (BMI > 50 kg/m2) and super-superobese (BMI > 60 kg/m2) patients can be a formidable technical and therapeutic challenge because these patients often present multiple medical, surgical, and anesthetic risks. Only a few dedicated reports on different surgical options in this kind of patient population are available. The aim of this study is the evaluation of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) results in an unselected populations of super-superobese patients operated during the last 4 years.

Methods

Super-superobese (BMI > 60 kg/m2) patients who underwent LAGB were recruited from the prospective database of our institution. LapBand® System (Allergan, Irvine, CA, USA) was positioned in all cases via pars flaccida, 1–2 cm below the gastroesophageal junction and fixed anteriorly with three non-absorbable stitches. The band was not filled at the time of surgery. Operative time, co-morbidities, laparotomic conversion, intra- and postoperative complications, mortality, and weight-loss-related parameters were considered. Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation, except as otherwise indicated.

Results

From January 2003 to December 2006, 823 patients underwent a bariatric surgical procedure, 95 of whom (11.5%) were BMI > 60 kg/m2 (59 F/ 36 M; mean BMI, 62.5 ± 4.2; range, 60.1–77 kg/m2; mean age 38.5 ± 13.5, range 18–61 years old). Mortality, intraoperative, and 30-day major complications were absent. One or more preoperative co-morbidities were diagnosed in 90 of 95 (94.7%) patients. After 1 year, co-morbidity-free patients increased from five of 95 (5.3%) to 27 of 95 (28%; p < 0.001). Patients with three or more co-morbidities decreased from 62 of 95 (65.3%) to 0 (p < 0.001). Mean BMI was 43.6 in 95 of 95, 37.9 in 55 of 55, 29.1 in 11 of 11, and 28.9 in five of five patients at 12, 24, 36, and 48 months, respectively. At the same time, %EWL was 53.6, 69.7, 81.3, and 82.1 and %EBL was 50, 66, 90, and 91.

Conclusions

LAGB can be considered an appropriate bariatric surgical option in super-superobese patients both for low morbidity rate and weight loss. The end-point of BMI < 30 can be achieved with a multidisciplinary follow-up. Additional studies with more patients and longer follow-up are needed to confirm these observations.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fielding GA. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for massive superobesity (>60 body mass index kg/m2). Surg Endosc. 2003;17:1541–5.CrossRef Fielding GA. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for massive superobesity (>60 body mass index kg/m2). Surg Endosc. 2003;17:1541–5.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Capella JF, Capella RF. The weight reduction operation of choice: vertical banded gastroplasty or gastric bypass. Am J Surg. 1969;171:74–9.CrossRef Capella JF, Capella RF. The weight reduction operation of choice: vertical banded gastroplasty or gastric bypass. Am J Surg. 1969;171:74–9.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Brolin R, LaMarca L, Kenler H, et al. Malapsorptive gastric bypass in patients with superobesity. J Gastrointestinal Surg. 2002;6:195–205.CrossRef Brolin R, LaMarca L, Kenler H, et al. Malapsorptive gastric bypass in patients with superobesity. J Gastrointestinal Surg. 2002;6:195–205.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Sarr MC, Felty CC, Hilmer DM, et al. Technical and practical considerations involved in operations on patients weighing more than 270 Kg. Arch Surg. 1995;1309:102–5.CrossRef Sarr MC, Felty CC, Hilmer DM, et al. Technical and practical considerations involved in operations on patients weighing more than 270 Kg. Arch Surg. 1995;1309:102–5.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Marceau P, Hold PS, Simmond S, et al. Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. World J Surg. 1998;122:947–54.CrossRef Marceau P, Hold PS, Simmond S, et al. Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. World J Surg. 1998;122:947–54.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Angrisani L, Furbetta F, Doldi SB, et al. Results of the Italian multicentric study on 239 superobese patients treated by adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2002;12:846–50.CrossRef Angrisani L, Furbetta F, Doldi SB, et al. Results of the Italian multicentric study on 239 superobese patients treated by adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2002;12:846–50.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Myers JA, Sarker S, Shayani V. Treatment of massive superobesity with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. SOARD 2006;2:37–40. Myers JA, Sarker S, Shayani V. Treatment of massive superobesity with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. SOARD 2006;2:37–40.
8.
go back to reference Fazylov RM, Savel RH, Horovitz JH, et al. Association of super-super-obesity and male gender with elevated mortality in patients undergoing the duodenal switch procedure. Obes Surg. 2005;15:618–23.CrossRef Fazylov RM, Savel RH, Horovitz JH, et al. Association of super-super-obesity and male gender with elevated mortality in patients undergoing the duodenal switch procedure. Obes Surg. 2005;15:618–23.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Regan JP, Inabnet WB, Gagner M, et al. Early experience with two stage laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass as an alternative in the Super-superobese patient. Obes Surg. 2003;13:861–4.CrossRef Regan JP, Inabnet WB, Gagner M, et al. Early experience with two stage laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass as an alternative in the Super-superobese patient. Obes Surg. 2003;13:861–4.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Mongol P, Chosidow D, Marmuse JP. Laparoscopic gastric bypass versus laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in the superobese: a comparative study of 290 patients. Obes Surg. 2005;15:76–81.CrossRef Mongol P, Chosidow D, Marmuse JP. Laparoscopic gastric bypass versus laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in the superobese: a comparative study of 290 patients. Obes Surg. 2005;15:76–81.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Artuso D, Wayne M, Kaul A, et al. Extremely high body mass index is not a contraindication to laparoscopic gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2004;14:750–4.CrossRef Artuso D, Wayne M, Kaul A, et al. Extremely high body mass index is not a contraindication to laparoscopic gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2004;14:750–4.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Farkas DT, Vemulapalli P, Haider A, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is safe and effective in patients with a BMI > 60. Obes Surg. 2005;15:486–93.CrossRef Farkas DT, Vemulapalli P, Haider A, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is safe and effective in patients with a BMI > 60. Obes Surg. 2005;15:486–93.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Helling TS. Operative experience and follow up in a cohort of patients with a BMI >70 Kg/m2. Obes Surg. 2005;15:482–95.CrossRef Helling TS. Operative experience and follow up in a cohort of patients with a BMI >70 Kg/m2. Obes Surg. 2005;15:482–95.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Parikh MS, Shen R, Weiner M, et al. Laparoscopic bariatric surgery in superobese patients (BMI > 50) is safe and effective: a review of 332 patients. Obes Surg. 2005;15:858–63.CrossRef Parikh MS, Shen R, Weiner M, et al. Laparoscopic bariatric surgery in superobese patients (BMI > 50) is safe and effective: a review of 332 patients. Obes Surg. 2005;15:858–63.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Dolan K, Hatzifotis M, Newbury L, et al. A comparison of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding and iliopancreatic diversion in superobesity. Obes Surg. 2004;14:165–9.CrossRef Dolan K, Hatzifotis M, Newbury L, et al. A comparison of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding and iliopancreatic diversion in superobesity. Obes Surg. 2004;14:165–9.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Murr MM, Balsiger BM, Kennedy FP, et al. Malabsorptive procedures for severe obesity: comparison of pancreaticobiliary bypass and very, very long limb Roux-n-Y gastric bypass. J Gastrointest Surg. 1999;3:607–12.CrossRef Murr MM, Balsiger BM, Kennedy FP, et al. Malabsorptive procedures for severe obesity: comparison of pancreaticobiliary bypass and very, very long limb Roux-n-Y gastric bypass. J Gastrointest Surg. 1999;3:607–12.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Oliak D, Ballantyne GH, Davies RJ, et al. Short-term results of laparoscopic gastric bypass in patients with BMI > or = 60. Obes Surg. 2002;12:643–7.CrossRef Oliak D, Ballantyne GH, Davies RJ, et al. Short-term results of laparoscopic gastric bypass in patients with BMI > or = 60. Obes Surg. 2002;12:643–7.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
LapBand System® in Super-Superobese Patients (>60 kg/m2): 4-Year Results
Authors
Fiore Torchia
Vincenza Mancuso
Simona Civitelli
Antonio Di Maro
Pasquale Cariello
Pasquale Tricarico Rosano
Giuseppe Ciriaco Sionne
Michele Lorenzo
Antonio J. Cascardo
Publication date
01-09-2009
Publisher
Springer New York
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 9/2009
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-008-9760-z

Other articles of this Issue 9/2009

Obesity Surgery 9/2009 Go to the issue